Tiny Yet Indispensable Plant MicroRNAs Are Worth to Explore as Key Components for Combating Genotoxic Stresses

Overlapping of copper-nanoparticles with microRNA reveals crippling of heat stress pathway in Solanum lycopersicum: Tomato case study

Despite the tangible benefits of copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) for plants, the increasing use of CuNPs poses a threat to plants and the environment. Although miRNAs have been shown to mediate heat shock and CuNPs by altering gene expression, no study has investigated how CuNPs in combination with heat shock (HS) affect the miRNA expression profile. Here, we exposed tomato plants to 0.01 CuONPs at 42 °C for 1 h after exposure. It was found that the expression levels of miR156a, miR159a and miR172a and their targets SPL3, MYB33 and AP2a were altered under CuNPs and HS + CuNPs. This alteration accelerated the change of vegetative phase and the process of leaf senescence. The overexpression of miR393 under CuNPs and HS + CuNPs could also be an indicator of the attenuation of leaf morphology. Interestingly, the down-regulation of Cu/ZnSOD1 and Cu/ZnSOD2 as target genes of miR398a, which showed strong abnormal expression, was replaced by FeSOD (FSD1), indicating the influence of CuNPs. In addition, CuNPs triggered the expression of some important genes of heat shock response, including HsFA2, HSP70-9 and HSP90-3, which showed lower expression compared to HS. Thus, CuNPs play an important role in altering the gene expression pathway during heat stress.

MicroRNAs potentially targeting DDR-related genes are differentially expressed upon exposure to γ-rays during seed germination in wheat

DNA damage response (DDR), a complex network of cellular pathways that cooperate to sense and repair DNA lesions, is regulated by several mechanisms, including microRNAs. As small, single-stranded RNA molecules, miRNAs post-transcriptionally regulate their target genes by mRNA cleavage or translation inhibition. Knowledge regarding miRNAs influence on DDR-associated genes is still scanty in plants. In this work, an in silico analysis was performed to identify putative miRNAs that could target DDR sensors, signal transducers and effector genes in wheat. Selected putative miRNA-gene pairs were tested in an experimental system where seeds from two wheat mutant lines were irradiated with 50 Gy and 300 Gy gamma(γ)-rays. To evaluate the effect of the treatments on wheat germination, phenotypic and molecular (DNA damage, ROS accumulation, gene/miRNA expression profile) analyses have been carried out. The results showed that in dry seeds ROS accumulated immediately after irradiation and decayed soon after while the negative impact on seedling growth was supported by enhanced accumulation of DNA damage. When a qRT-PCR analysis was performed, the selected miRNAs and DDR-related genes were differentially modulated by the γ-rays treatments in a dose-, time- and genotype-dependent manner. A significant negative correlation was observed between the expression of tae-miR5086 and the RAD50 gene, involved in double-strand break sensing and homologous recombination repair, one of the main processes that repairs DNA breaks induced by γ-rays. The results hereby reported can be relevant for wheat breeding programs and screening of the radiation response and tolerance of novel wheat varieties.

Deciphering miRNA-lncRNA-mRNA interaction through experimental validation of miRNAs, lncRNAs, and miRNA targets on mRNAs in Cajanus cajan

Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) is widely cultivated for its nutritional and medicinal value yet remains an orphan crop as productivity has not been improved because of a lack of genome and non-coding genome information. Non-coding RNAs, like miRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), are involved in regulation of growth, metabolism, development, and stress response, and have a critical role in post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR). We attempted to elucidate the roles of miRNAs and lncRNAs in pigeon pea through experimental validation of computationally predicted miRNAs and lncRNAs and targets of miRNAs on mRNAs. We experimentally validated 20 miRNAs and 11 lncRNAs. We predicted cleavage sites of three miRNA targets: serine/threonine-protein kinase, polygalacturonase, beta-galactosidase. We identified 469 targets of 265 miRNAs and their functional annotations using computational methods. We built a miRNA-mRNA-lncRNA network model, with the miRNAs targeting both mRNAs and lncRNAs, to obtain information on the interplay of these three molecules. A confirmed interaction through experimental validation was established between miRNA, namely cca-miR1535a targeting the mRNA for beta-galactosidase, as well as the lncRNA cca-lnc-020033. Our findings increase knowledge of the non-coding genome of pigeon pea and their roles in PTGR and in improving agronomic traits of this pulse crop.

Exploring microRNA Signatures of DNA Damage Response Using an Innovative System of Genotoxic Stress in Medicago truncatula Seedlings

One of the challenges that living organisms face is to promptly respond to genotoxic stress to avoid DNA damage. To this purpose, all organisms, including plants, developed complex DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms. These mechanisms are highly conserved among organisms and need to be finely regulated. In this scenario, microRNAs (miRNAs) are emerging as active players, thus attracting the attention of the research community. The involvement of miRNAs in DDR has been investigated prominently in human cells whereas studies in plants are still scarce. To experimentally investigate the involvement of plant miRNAs in the regulation of DDR-associated pathways, an ad hoc system was developed, using the model legume Medicago truncatula. Specific treatments with camptothecin (CPT) and/or NSC120686 (NSC), targeting distinct components of DDR, namely topoisomerase I (TopI) and tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), were used. Phenotypic (germination percentage and speed, seedling growth) and molecular (cell death, DNA damage, and gene expression profiles) analyses demonstrated that the imposed treatments impact DDR. Our results show that these treatments do not influence the germination process but rather inhibit seedling development, causing an increase in cell death and accumulation of DNA damage. Moreover, treatment-specific changes in the expression of suppressor of gamma response 1 (SOG1), master-regulator of plant DDR, were observed. Additionally, the expression of multiple genes playing important roles in different DNA repair pathways and cell cycle regulation were differentially expressed in a treatment-specific manner. Subsequently, specific miRNAs identified from our previous bioinformatics approaches as putatively targeting genes involved in DDR processes were investigated alongside their targets. The obtained results indicate that under most conditions when a miRNA is upregulated the corresponding candidate target gene is downregulated, providing an indirect evidence of miRNAs action over these targets. Hence, the present study extends the present knowledge on the information available regarding the roles played by miRNAs in the post-transcriptional regulation of DDR in plants.