Strategic modulation of response inhibition in task-switching

Execution-based and verbal code-based stimulus-response associations: proportion manipulations reveal conflict adaptation processes in item-specific priming

Stimulus-response (S-R) associations consist of two independent components: Stimulus-classification (S-C) and stimulus-action (S-A) associations. Here, we examined whether these S-C and S-A associations were modulated by cognitive control operations. In two item-specific priming experiments, we systematically manipulated the proportion of trials in which item-specific S-C and/or S-A mappings repeated or switched between the single encoding (prime) and single retrieval (probe) instance of each stimulus (i.e., each stimulus appeared only twice). Thus, we assessed the influence of a list-level proportion switch manipulation on the strength of item-specific S-C and S-A associations. Participants responded slower and committed more errors when item-specific S-C or S-A mappings switched rather than repeated between prime and probe (i.e., S-C/S-A switch effects). S-C switch effects were larger when S-C repetitions rather than switches were frequent on the list-level. Similarly, S-A switch effects were modulated by S-A switch proportion. Most importantly, our findings rule out contingency learning and temporal learning as explanations of the observed results and point towards a conflict adaptation mechanism that selectively adapts the encoding and/or retrieval for each S-R component. Finally, we outline how cognitive control over S-R associations operates in the context of item-specific priming.

Cognitive dysfunction associated with falls in progressive supranuclear palsy

BACKGROUND

Attentional and executive dysfunctions are associated with falls in community-dwelling elderly individuals and patients with PD. Frontal cognitive dysfunction and falls are frequent symptoms of PSP. We studied to identify the cognitive domains associated with recurrent falls in patients with PSP.

METHODS

We performed a battery of neuropsychological tests in 59 individuals with probable PSP. We categorized patients into infrequent fall (≤one fall during the last 12 months, n=29) or recurrent fall (≥two falls during the last 12 months, n=30) groups.

RESULTS

UPDRS subscores for axial deficits were significantly higher in the recurrent fall group than the infrequent fall group, but there were no significant differences in UPDRS total motor scores or subscores for bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. There was no difference between groups in MMSE scores. ANCOVA with adjustment for confounding factors showed that, recurrent falls were associated with abnormalities in alternating hand movement, alternating square and triangle, RCFT copying task, and ideomotor apraxia. Group difference of abnormalities in Stroop test was marginal (p=0.054). However, there were no group differences in the frequency of abnormalities in forward or backward digit span, motor impersistence, fist-edge-palm, contrast programming, go-no-go, Luria loop drawing, or Controlled Oral Word Association Tests. Recurrent falls were not associated with memory or language dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent falls in patients with PSP were associated mainly with executive and visuospatial dysfunctions, including (1) impaired coordinated alternating uni- and bimanual motor programming and execution, (2) deficit of attention and decision making in the presence of interference, (3) visuospatial misperception and (4) ideomotor apraxia.

Response Inhibition Modulates Response Conflict in Task Switching

Although response repetition (RR) effects vary considerably between conditions and studies, little is known about the causes. Recently, RR costs on task-switch trials have been found to be larger for incongruent stimuli that activate both alternative responses than for neutral ones. Here, we investigated if this modulation can be explained by an amplification of response conflict account (ARC). It assumes that a response-shift bias that is responsible for the basic RR costs amplifies the response conflict induced by incongruent stimuli specifically on trials where the response repeats. Consequently, RR costs are increased for incongruent stimuli. Because supporting evidence for this account was restricted to task-shift trials, we tested if the ARC account holds also more generally, that is, on task-repetition trials. To this end, we applied a rather common alternating-runs paradigm and presented neutral and incongruent stimuli. Results show that the congruency effect was larger on RR trials than on RS trials. Because this relation was independent of task transition, it is consistent with the idea that, in order to promote behavioral flexibility in task-switching contexts, a general response-shift bias is induced by inhibiting the previous response.