2
|
Wertheim J, Ragni M. The Neural Correlates of Relational Reasoning: A Meta-analysis of 47 Functional Magnetic Resonance Studies. J Cogn Neurosci 2018; 30:1734-1748. [DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
It is a core cognitive ability of humans to represent and reason about relational information, such as “the train station is north of the hotel” or “Charles is richer than Jim.” However, the neural processes underlying the ability to draw conclusions about relations are still not sufficiently understood. Central open questions are as follows: (1) What are the neural correlates of relational reasoning? (2) Where can deductive and inductive reasoning be localized? (3) What is the impact of different informational types on cerebral activity? For that, we conducted a meta-analysis of 47 neuroimaging studies. We found activation of the frontoparietal network during both deductive and inductive reasoning, with additional activation in an extended network during inductive reasoning in the basal ganglia and the inferior parietal cortex. Analyses revealed a double dissociation concerning the lateral and medial Brodmann's area 6 during deductive and inductive reasoning, indicating differences in terms of processing verbal information in deductive and spatial information in inductive tasks. During semantic and symbolic tasks, the frontoparietal network was found active, whereas geometric tasks only elicited prefrontal activation, which can be explained by the reduced demand for the construction of a mental representation in geometric tasks. Our study provides new insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying relational reasoning and clarifies previous controversies concerning involved brain areas.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hobeika L, Diard-Detoeuf C, Garcin B, Levy R, Volle E. General and specialized brain correlates for analogical reasoning: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 2016; 37:1953-69. [PMID: 27012301 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Reasoning by analogy allows us to link distinct domains of knowledge and to transfer solutions from one domain to another. Analogical reasoning has been studied using various tasks that have generally required the consideration of the relationships between objects and their integration to infer an analogy schema. However, these tasks varied in terms of the level and the nature of the relationships to consider (e.g., semantic, visuospatial). The aim of this study was to identify the cerebral network involved in analogical reasoning and its specialization based on the domains of information and task specificity. We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 27 experiments that used analogical reasoning tasks. The left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex was one of the regions most consistently activated across the studies. A comparison between semantic and visuospatial analogy tasks showed both domain-oriented regions in the inferior and middle frontal gyri and a domain-general region, the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, which was specialized for analogy tasks. A comparison of visuospatial analogy to matrix problem tasks revealed that these two relational reasoning tasks engage, at least in part, distinct right and left cerebral networks, particularly separate areas within the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex. These findings highlight several cognitive and cerebral differences between relational reasoning tasks that can allow us to make predictions about the respective roles of distinct brain regions or networks. These results also provide new, testable anatomical hypotheses about reasoning disorders that are induced by brain damage. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1953-1969, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Hobeika
- Inserm, U 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, 75013, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,ICM, Frontlab, Paris, 75013, France.,AP-HP, Hôpital De La Salpêtrière, Behavioural Neuropsychiatry Unit, Paris, 75013, France
| | - Capucine Diard-Detoeuf
- Inserm, U 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, 75013, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,ICM, Frontlab, Paris, 75013, France
| | - Béatrice Garcin
- Inserm, U 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, 75013, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,ICM, Frontlab, Paris, 75013, France
| | - Richard Levy
- Inserm, U 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, 75013, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,ICM, Frontlab, Paris, 75013, France.,AP-HP, Hôpital De La Salpêtrière, Behavioural Neuropsychiatry Unit, Paris, 75013, France
| | - Emmanuelle Volle
- Inserm, U 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, 75013, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, 75013, France.,ICM, Frontlab, Paris, 75013, France
| |
Collapse
|