1
|
Rawlings BS, Flynn EG, Kendal RL. Personality predicts innovation and social learning in children: Implications for cultural evolution. Dev Sci 2021; 25:e13153. [PMID: 34251078 DOI: 10.1111/desc.13153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Innovation and social learning are the pillars of cultural evolution, allowing cultural behaviours to cumulatively advance over generations. Yet, little is known about individual differences in the use of social and asocial information. We examined whether personality influenced 7-11-year-old children's (N = 282) propensity to elect to observe others first or independently generate solutions to novel problems. Conscientiousness was associated with electing for no demonstrations, while agreeableness was associated with opting for demonstrations. For children receiving demonstrations, openness to experience consistently predicted deviation from observed methods. Children who opted for no demonstrations were also more likely than those opting for demonstrations to exhibit tool manufacture on an innovation challenge and displayed higher creativity, as measured by an alternate uses task. These results highlight how new cultural traditions emerge, establish and advance by identifying which individuals generate new cultural variants in populations and which are influential in the diffusion of these variants, and help reduce the apparent tension within the 'ratchet' of cumulative culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce S Rawlings
- Department of Anthropology, Durham Cultural Evolution Research Centre, Durham University, UK.,Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Emma G Flynn
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Rachel L Kendal
- Department of Anthropology, Durham Cultural Evolution Research Centre, Durham University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A cognitive developmental approach is essential to understanding cumulative technological culture. Behav Brain Sci 2020; 43:e159. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x20000175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Osiurak and Reynaud argue that children are not a good methodological choice to examine cumulative technological culture (CTC). However, the paper ignores other current work that suggests that young children do display some aspects of creative problem-solving. We argue that using multiple methodologies and examining how technical-reasoning develops in children will provide crucial support for a cognitive approach to CTC.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cutting N, Apperly IA, Chappell J, Beck SR. Is tool modification more difficult than innovation? COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
4
|
Ebel SJ, Schmelz M, Herrmann E, Call J. Innovative problem solving in great apes: the role of visual feedback in the floating peanut task. Anim Cogn 2019; 22:791-805. [PMID: 31278621 PMCID: PMC6687703 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-019-01275-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Nonhuman great apes show remarkable behavioural flexibility. Some individuals are even able to use water as a tool: They spit water into a vertical tube to make a peanut float upwards until it comes into reach (floating peanut task; FPT). In the current study, we used the FPT to investigate how visual feedback, an end-state demonstration and a social demonstration affect task performance in nonhuman great apes in three experiments. Our results indicate that apes who had acquired the solution with a clear tube maintained it with an opaque one. However, apes starting with an opaque tube failed to solve the task. Additionally, facing the peanut floating on a water-filled tube (i.e., an end-state demonstration) promoted success independent on the availability of visual feedback. Moreover, experiencing how water was poured into the tube either by a human demonstrator or by a water tap that had been opened either by the ape or a human did not seem to be of further assistance. First, this study suggests that great apes require visual feedback for solving the FPT, which is no longer required after the initial acquisition. Second, some subjects benefit from encountering the end-state, a finding corroborating previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja J Ebel
- Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. .,School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South Street, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.
| | - Martin Schmelz
- Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14 (UZA1), 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Esther Herrmann
- Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Josep Call
- Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South Street, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gönül G, Hohenberger A, Corballis M, Henderson AME. Joint and individual tool making in preschoolers: From social to cognitive processes. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/sode.12373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gökhan Gönül
- Department of Cognitive Science, Graduate School of Informatics Middle East Technical University Ankara Turkey
| | - Annette Hohenberger
- Department of Cognitive Science, Graduate School of Informatics Middle East Technical University Ankara Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neldner K, Mushin I, Nielsen M. Young children’s tool innovation across culture: Affordance visibility matters. Cognition 2017; 168:335-343. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
7
|
Whalley CL, Cutting N, Beck SR. The effect of prior experience on children’s tool innovation. J Exp Child Psychol 2017; 161:81-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
8
|
Beck SR, Williams C, Cutting N, Apperly IA, Chappell J. Individual differences in children's innovative problem-solving are not predicted by divergent thinking or executive functions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016; 371:rstb.2015.0190. [PMID: 26926280 PMCID: PMC4780532 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies of children's tool innovation have revealed that there is variation in children's success in middle-childhood. In two individual differences studies, we sought to identify personal characteristics that might predict success on an innovation task. In Study 1, we found that although measures of divergent thinking were related to each other they did not predict innovation success. In Study 2, we measured executive functioning including: inhibition, working memory, attentional flexibility and ill-structured problem-solving. None of these measures predicted innovation, but, innovation was predicted by children's performance on a receptive vocabulary scale that may function as a proxy for general intelligence. We did not find evidence that children's innovation was predicted by specific personal characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Beck
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Clare Williams
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Nicola Cutting
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Ian A Apperly
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Jackie Chappell
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Remigereau C, Roy A, Costini O, Osiurak F, Jarry C, Le Gall D. Involvement of Technical Reasoning More Than Functional Knowledge in Development of Tool Use in Childhood. Front Psychol 2016; 7:1625. [PMID: 27877141 PMCID: PMC5099152 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well-known that even toddlers are able to manipulate tools in an appropriate manner according to their physical properties. The ability of children to make novel tools in order to solve problems is, however, surprisingly limited. In adults, mechanical problem solving (MPS) has been proposed to be supported by "technical reasoning skills," which are thought to be involved in every situation requiring the use of a tool (whether conventional or unusual). The aim of this study was to investigate the typical development of real tool use (RTU) skills and its link with technical reasoning abilities in healthy children. Three experimental tasks were adapted from those used with adults: MPS (three different apparatus), RTU (10 familiar tool-object pairs), and functional knowledge (FK; 10 functional picture matching with familiar tools previously used). The tasks were administered to 85 healthy children divided into six age groups (from 6 to 14 years of age). The results revealed that RTU (p = 0.01) and MPS skills improve with age, even if this improvement differs according to the apparatus for the latter (p < 0.01 for the Hook task and p < 0.05 for the Sloping task). Results also showed that MPS is a better predictor of RTU than FK, with a significant and greater weight (importance weight: 0.65; Estimate ± Standard Error: 0.27 ± 0.08). Ours findings suggest that RTU and technical reasoning develop jointly in children, independently from development of FK. In addition, technical reasoning appears partially operative from the age of six onward, even though the outcome of these skills depends of the context in which they are applied (i.e., the type of apparatus).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrystelle Remigereau
- Department of Psychology, Psychology Laboratory, LUNAM, University of AngersAngers, France; Reference Center for Learning Disabilities, Nantes University HospitalNantes, France
| | - Arnaud Roy
- Department of Psychology, Psychology Laboratory, LUNAM, University of AngersAngers, France; Reference Center for Learning Disabilities, Nantes University HospitalNantes, France; Neurofibromatosis Clinic, Nantes University HospitalNantes, France
| | - Orianne Costini
- CNRS UMR 8158, Psychology Laboratory of PerceptionParis, France; Neurology Service, Rothschild Ophthalmological FoundationParis, France
| | - François Osiurak
- Laboratory for the Study of Cognitive Mechanisms, University of LyonLyon, France; University Institute of FranceParis, France
| | - Christophe Jarry
- Department of Psychology, Psychology Laboratory, LUNAM, University of Angers Angers, France
| | - Didier Le Gall
- Department of Psychology, Psychology Laboratory, LUNAM, University of AngersAngers, France; Department of Neurology, Angers University HospitalAngers, France
| |
Collapse
|