Psychological effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. A review of study methods

Strength of clinical indication and therapeutic impact of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD) has revolutionized the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the identification of ideal candidates remains challenging. We aimed to describe the long-term impact of the ICD for primary prevention in patients with HCM based on stringent (high SCD risk) vs lenient indications (need for pacing/personal choice).

METHODS

Data from two Italian HCM Cardiomyopathy Units were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients >1 follow-up visits were divided into two groups according to ICD candidacy:stringent (high SCD risk) and lenient (need for pacing, patients' choice, physician advice despite lack of high SCD risk). Major cardiac events (composite of appropriate shock/intervention and SCD) was the primary endpoint. A safety endpoint was defined as a composite of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

RESULTS

Of 2009 patients, 252(12.5%) received an ICD, including 27(1.3%) in secondary prevention and 225(11.2%) in primary prevention (age at implantation 49 ± 16 years; men 65.3%). Among those in primary prevention, 167(74.2%) had stringent, while 58(25.8%) had lenient indications. At 5 ± 4 years, only stringent ICD patients experienced major cardiac events (2.84%/year, 5-year cumulative incidence: 8.1%, 95%CI [3.5-14.1%]). ICD-related complications were similar across stringent and lenient subgroups. However, patients implanted >60 years had a significantly higher risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

One third of ICD recipients with HCM in primary prevention received a lenient implantation and had no appropriate intervention. ICD implantation due to systematic upgrade in patients requiring pacing and increased risk perception may offer little advantage and increase complication rates.

Let It Beat: How Lifestyle and Psychosocial Factors Affect the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death-A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the lifestyle and occurrence of psychosocial factors in patients with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and to explore their effect on the occurrence of the adequate therapy of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD). (2) Methods: In this retro-prospective single-centre study, a group of patients aged 18-65 years old, who underwent the first ICD implantation for primary (PP) or secondary (SP) prevention between 2010-2014, was studied. The control group consisted of pair-matched (age ± 5 years, gender) respondents without a high risk of SCD. Information was obtained using a self-reported questionnaire and hospital electronic health records. The adequacy of ICD therapy was evaluated regularly until 31 January 2020. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to assess the risk of SCD. (3) Results: A family history of SCD, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus and depression significantly aggravated the odds of being at a high risk of SCD. The occurrence of an appropriate ICD therapy was significantly associated with being in the SP group, BMI, education level and TV/PC screen time. (4) Conclusions: Lifestyle and psychosocial factors have been confirmed to affect the risk of SCD. Early identification and treatment of coronary artery disease and its risk factors remain the cornerstones of preventive effort. Further research is needed to evaluate the complex nature of psychosocial determinants of cardiac health.

Device nurse intervention facilitates the patients' adaptation to cardiac shock devices in the remote monitoring era

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of patients with shock devices (implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICDs] or ICDs with resynchronization [CRTDs]) experience psychological distress.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the device nurse telephone intervention's effect on improving the patient's adaptation to shock devices, quality of life (QOL), and anxiety in the remote monitoring era.

METHODS

The patient's adaptation to the device, health-related QOL, and anxiety were investigated by the modified Implanted Devices Adjustment-Japan score (IDAS), Short Form-36, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and 1-year after the device nurse telephone intervention, performed every 3 months. A total of 95 patients (median age 69 years and 25 females) participated. Sixty patients had ICDs and 35 CRTDs. Structural heart disease was observed in 72 patients, and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in the others. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46% ± 15%. The median duration since the device implantation was 5.2 years.

RESULTS

The total IDAS score significantly improved from 28.42 ± 7.11 at baseline to 26.77 ± 7.68 (p = 0.0076) at 1 year. Both the state and trait anxiety significantly improved (from 38.9 ± 9.6 to 35.3 ± 9.0 [<0.0001] and 38.8 ± 10.3 to 36.2±9.8 [p = 0.0044], respectively). The prevalence of patients with a state and trait anxiety of more than 40 decreased from 44 (46%) and 38 (40%) patients before the study to 27 (28 %) and 32 (34 %) at 1 year. The SF-36 mental component summary score significantly increased (50.8 ± 8.3 at baseline to 53.1 ± 7.7 at 1 year, p = 0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS

The device nurse intervention facilitated the patient's adaptation to the shock device, increased the health-related QOL, and reduced the patient's anxiety.

The impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation on health-related quality of life in the DANISH trial

AIM

The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICD) in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure (HF) on Mortality (DANISH) found no overall effect on all-cause mortality. The effect of ICD implantation on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains to be established as previous trials have demonstrated conflicting results. We investigated the impact of ICD implantation on HRQoL in patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF, a prespecified secondary endpoint in DANISH.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In DANISH, a total of 1116 patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF were randomly assigned (1:1) to ICD implantation or usual clinical care (control). Patients completed disease-specific HRQoL as assessed by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ; 0-105, high indicating worse). Changes in HRQoL 8 months after randomization were assessed with a mixed-effects model. At randomization, MLHFQ was completed by 935 (84%) patients (n = 472 in the ICD group and n = 463 in the control group) and was reassessed in 274 (58%) and 292 (63%) patients, respectively after 8 months for the primary analysis. Patients in the ICD group vs. the control group had similar improvements in MLHFQ after 8 months [least square mean -7.0 vs. -4.2 (P = 0.13)]. A clinically relevant improvement (decrease ≥5) in the MLHFQ overall score at 8 months was observed in 151 patients in the ICD group and 148 patients in the control group [55% vs. 51%, respectively (P = 0.25)].

CONCLUSION

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF did not significantly alter HRQoL compared with patients randomized to usual clinical care.

[Quality of life in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator from a salutogenic perspective : A qualitative study in cardiologic health service research]

BACKGROUND

Evidence on disease-related quality of life (DRQoL) of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been described heterogeneously. Disease-specific measures of DRQoL in ICD patients are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to gain a broader understanding of long-term DRQoL in ICD patients. Special focus was placed on stressors and cognitive management strategies in everyday life.

METHODS

Data assessment was performed via semistructured, guideline-based interviews. The monocentric qualitative study included 10 ICD patients with primary and secondary prophylactic indication and 3 cardiologists. The qualitative analysis used the salutogenesis model (Antonovsky) as a framework.

RESULTS

The interviews show that most patients do not experience a prominent limitation in their quality of life through the ICD. We found that patients focus on their individual coping strategies to handle the ICD indication with a sense of coherence, aiming at understanding their situation and giving it meaning. Whether the DRQoL is modified positively or negatively after ICD implantation depends on individual factors of resilience and factors of coherence.

CONCLUSIONS

We established a salutogenic model for the assessment of DRQoL in patients with ICDs. A stable DRQoL on ICD implantation and follow-up could be achieved if patients at high risk (small sense of coherence and reduced resilience) are identified and their individual lifestyles are taken into account.

Preventive Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: Meta-analysis of Randomised Trials

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) aims to treat the underlying arrhythmia substrate to prevent ICD therapies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of VT ablation prior to or at the time of secondary prevention ICD implantation in patients with coronary artery disease, as compared with deferred VT ablation. Based on a systematic literature search, three randomised trials were considered eligible for inclusion in this analysis, and data on the number of patients with appropriate ICD shocks, appropriate ICD therapy, arrhythmic storm, death and major complications were extracted from each study. On pooled analysis, there was a significant reduction of appropriate ICD shocks (OR 2.58; 95% CI [1.54–4.34]; p<0.001) and appropriate ICD therapies (OR 2.04; 95% CI [1.15–3.61]; p=0.015) in patients undergoing VT ablation at the time of ICD implantation without significant differences with respect to complications (OR 1.39; 95% CI [0.43–4.51]; p=0.581). Mortality did not differ between both groups (OR 1.30; 95% CI [0.60–2.45]; p=0.422). Preventive catheter ablation of VT in patients with coronary heart disease at the time of secondary prevention ICD implantation results in a significant reduction of appropriate ICD shocks and any appropriate ICD therapy compared with patients without or with deferred VT ablation. No significant difference with respect to complications or mortality was observed between both treatment strategies.

Psychological distress in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and their partners

OBJECTIVES

Adjustment to life with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) may be challenging for some patients and their partners, with disease and individual characteristics likely influencing the process. We examined whether perceived social support and clinical patient characteristics are associated with change in couples' symptoms of anxiety and depression in the first year after ICD implantation, and explored whether the associations differ between patients and partners.

METHOD

A cohort of consecutively implanted patients (n = 286; 21% women) and their partners completed questionnaires on social support and symptoms of anxiety and depression prior to ICD implantation and 12 months later. Information on demographic and clinical characteristics were captured from patients' medical records or purpose-designed questions. Data were analyzed using multilevel models accounting for the interdependency of scores within couples with adjustment for possible confounders.

RESULTS

Higher ratings of perceived social support prior to ICD implantation were associated with greater reductions in couples' symptoms of anxiety and depression, whereas having received an ICD shock was associated with less improvement. Secondary prevention indication for ICD implantation and symptomatic heart failure were associated with less improvement in anxiety symptoms. These associations applied to both patients' and partners' levels of distress.

CONCLUSION

The patient's heart disease affects both patients' and partners' psychological adjustment in the first year after ICD implantation. Interventions are warranted that address this issue not only in patients but also in partners. Targeting social support as a resource for both could be one avenue to pursue.

Posttraumatic stress disorder and mortality in VA patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

The association between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mortality in patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement has not been evaluated in US veterans.

HYPOTHESIS

PTSD in veterans with ICD is associated with increased mortality.

METHODS

We studied a retrospective cohort of 25 678 veterans who underwent ICD implantation between September 30, 2002, and December 31, 2011. Of these subjects, 3280 carried the diagnosis of PTSD prior to ICD implantation. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality between date of ICD implantation and end of follow-up (September 30, 2013). We used Cox proportional hazard models to compute multivariable adjusted hazard ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the relation between PTSD diagnosis and death following ICD placement.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 4.21 ± 2.62 years, 11 015 deaths were reported. The crude incidence rate of death was 87.8 and 103.9/1000 person-years for people with and without PTSD, respectively. We did not find an association between presence of PTSD before or after ICD implantation and incident death when adjusted for multiple risk factors (hazard ratio: 1.003, 95% confidence interval: 0.948-1.061). In secondary analysis, no statistically significant association was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study among more than 25 000 veterans undergoing ICD implantation, almost 13% had a diagnosis of PTSD. Subjects with PTSD were significantly younger, yet they had a higher incidence of coronary heart disease, major cardiac comorbidities, cancer, and mental health conditions. We found no association between presence of PTSD before or after ICD implantation and incident death when adjusting for all covariates.

Depressive symptoms in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Does treatment expectations play a role?

OBJECTIVE

Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and co-morbid depression are at greater risk of poor quality of life and premature death. We examined if treatment expectations predict depressive symptoms 12months post implant.

METHODS

First-time implant patients from the WEBCARE study (n=177; 83.1% men) completed the EXPECTations towards ICD therapy questionnaire and the Type D Scale at baseline, and the Patient Health Questionnaire at baseline and 12months.

RESULTS

Using hierarchical linear regression with 3 models, we identified the following independent predictors of 12-months depressive symptoms: Model 1: Negative treatment expectations (β=0.202; p=0.020) and baseline depression (β=0.376; p<0.0001). Model 2: Baseline depression (β=0.350; p<0.0001) and Type D personality (β=0.162; p=0.042); negative treatment expectations was borderline significant (β=0.169; p=0.051). Model 3: Baseline depression (β=0.353; p<0.0001) and negative treatment expectations (β=0.180; p=0.043); Type D personality was not significant (β=0.150; p=0.067), adjusting for positive treatment expectations, heart failure, sex, and shocks during follow-up. The models accounted for 22.2%, 24.1%, and 23.3% of the variance in 12-months depressive symptoms, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Further research is warranted to explore the role of treatment expectations at the time of implant and its overlap with personality as a determinant of depression in patients with an ICD.

Embodying a New Meaning of Being At Risk: Living With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia (ARVC/D) is a genetic condition that can cause fatal arrhythmias. The implantable cardioverter defibrillation (ICD) is a primary treatment for ARVC/D. Using a grounded theory approach, this study examines the experiences of 15 individuals living with an ICD. The ability to cope with and adjust to having an ICD is influenced by the acceptance of the ICD as something needed to survive, an understanding of the ICD's function, existing support networks, and ones' ability to manage everyday challenges. Coping well requires reshaping ideas about the meaning of being at risk and understanding how the ICD fits into that changing personal risk narrative. A thorough understanding of the unique needs of individuals with ARVC/D and of the specific factors contributing to the psychosocial distress related to having an ICD (vs. having the disease itself) is needed. Nurses must be prepared to provide ongoing support and education to this population.

Time-Dependent Changes in Psychosocial Distress in Japanese Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

This prospective study clarified changes in the mood states of Japanese patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators as well as factors related to the mood states. Using a longitudinal repeated-measure design, 29 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators completed the Profile of Mood States-Short Form Japanese Version questionnaire before discharge and 1, 4, 7, and 13 months after implantation. One month after discharge, the mood states of the patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators improved. From 7 to 13 months after discharge, moods deteriorated; 13 months after discharge, moods were equivalent to those at the time of discharge. No relationship with defibrillation experience was detected in this study, but employment, age, sex, and lack of experience of syncopal attack were factors related to poor mood states for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Therefore, Japanese patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators with any factor deteriorating their mood state should be monitored so that their mood state does not deteriorate again between six months and one year after implantation.

Therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease: a multifaceted challenge

The unpredictable nature and potentially catastrophic consequences of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) have obligated physicians to search for therapies to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD). At present, a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been used as a risk factor to predict SCD in patients with structural heart disease and has been consistently adopted as the predominant, and sometimes sole, indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Although the ICD remains the mainstay life-saving therapy for SCD, it does not modify the underlying arrhythmic substrate and may be associated with adverse effects from perioperative and long-term complications. Preventative pharmacological therapy has been associated with limited benefits, but anti-arrhythmic medications have significant side effects profiles. Catheter ablation of VAs has greatly evolved over the last few decades. Substrate mapping in sinus rhythm has allowed haemodynamically unstable VAs to be successfully treated. Both LVEF as an indication for ICD therapy and electro-anatomical mapping for substrate modification identify static components of underlying myocardial arrhythmogenicity. They do not take into account dynamic factors, such as the mechanisms of arrhythmia initiation and development of new anatomical or functional lines of block, leading to the initiation and maintenance of VAs. Dynamic factors are difficult to evaluate and consequently are not routinely used in clinical practice to guide treatment. However, progress in the treatment of VAs should consider and integrate dynamic factors with static components to fully characterize the myocardial arrhythmic substrate.