Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer

Comparative analysis of breast and lung cancer survival rates and clinical trial enrollments among rural and urban patients in Georgia

Objectives

Rural patients have poor cancer outcomes and clinical trial (CT) enrollment compared to urban patients due to attitudinal, awareness, and healthcare access differential. Knowledge of cancer survival disparities and CT enrollment is important for designing interventions and innovative approaches to address the stated barriers. The study explores the potential disparities in cancer survival rates and clinical trial enrollments in rural and urban breast and lung cancer patients. Our hypotheses are that for both cancer types, urban cancer patients will have longer 5-year survival rates and higher enrollment rates in clinical trials than those in rural counties.

Methods

We compared breast and lung cancer patients' survival rates and enrollment ratios in clinical trials between rural (RUCC 4-9) and urban counties in Georgia at a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). To assess these differences, we carried out a series of independent samples t-tests and Chi-Square tests.

Results

The outcomes indicate comparable 5-year survival rates across rural and urban counties for breast and lung cancer patients, failing to substantiate our hypothesis. While clinical trial enrollment rates demonstrated a significant difference between breast and lung cancer patients at CCC, no significant variation was observed based on rural or urban classification.

Conclusion

These findings underscore the need for further research into the representation of rural patients with diverse cancer types at CCC and other cancer centers. Further, the findings have considerable implications for the initiation of positive social change to improve CT participation and reduce cancer survival disparities.

Demand analysis of health care services for community-dwelling breast cancer survivors based on the Kano model: A cross-sectional study

Objectives

Providing satisfactory healthcare services for breast cancer survivors can effectively reduce their burden and the pressure on medical resources. The aim of this study was to explore health care service demands for community-dwelling breast cancer survivors using the Kano model.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to March 2023 among breast cancer survivors discharged from a tertiary cancer hospital. Participants were asked to fill out a self-designed questionnaire involving the Kano model, which helped to categorize and prioritize the attributes of healthcare services. The questionnaire included 30 health care services. Additionally, their social demographic characteristics were collected during the survey.

Results

A total of 296 valid questionnaires were collected, and demand attributes of the 30 health care services were evaluated. The findings revealed that one of 30 services was classified as "must-be attributes" (body image management), 13 as "one-dimensional attributes" (focused on medical security support, health management, and health counseling), 3 as "attractive attributes" (focused on communication needs and telehealth services), and 11 as "indifferent attributes" (mainly in the area of psycho-social services).

Conclusions

Breast cancer survivors in the community have different levels of need for various health care services. It's crucial for healthcare providers to identify these needs and devise effective strategies to deliver the appropriate services. Services with must-be and one-dimensional attributes should be given priority, and efforts should be made to provide services with attractive attributes, hence improving the quality of life of breast cancer survivors.

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Breast Cancer Stigma Assessment Scale for Women with Breast Cancer and Its Survivors

BACKGROUND

The increase in breast cancer cases and breast cancer survival makes it advisable to quantify the impact of the health-related stigma of this disease.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a breast cancer stigma scale in Spanish.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with, or survivors of, breast cancer were included. The development of the Breast Cancer Stigma Assessment Scale (BCSAS) involved both a literature review and personal interviews. Content validity was assessed using a Delphi study and a pilot test; construct validity was evaluated using an exploratory factor analysis; and convergent validity was assessed using six scales. Cronbach's α internal consistency and test-retest reliability were used to determine the reliability of the scales.

RESULTS

231 women responded to the 28-item scale. The BCSAS showed good reliability, with α = 0.897. Seven factors emerged: concealment (α = 0.765), disturbance (α = 0.772), internalized stigma (α = 0.750), aesthetics (α = 0.779), course (α = 0.599), danger (α = 0.502), and origin (α = 0.350). The test-retest reliability was 0.830 (p < 0.001). Significant correlation was observed with event centrality (r = 0.701), anxiety-depression (r = 0.668), shame (r = 0.645), guilt (r = 0.524), and quality of life (r = -0.545).

CONCLUSIONS

The BCSAS is a reliable and valid measure of stigma in women with breast cancer and its survivors. It could be useful for detecting stigma risk and establishing psychotherapeutic and care priorities.

Assessment tools for stigma in breast cancer patients based on COSMIN guidelines: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the measurement properties and methodological quality of stigma assessment tools designed for breast cancer patients. The aim was to provide clinical medical staff with a foundation for selecting high-quality assessment tools.

METHODS

A comprehensive computer search was carried out across various databases, including SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP), Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus, which were searched from the inception of the databases until March 20, 2023. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers, adhering to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The assessment tools were evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic evaluation guidelines.

RESULTS

In the final analysis, a total of 9 assessment tools were included. However, none of these tools addressed measurement error, cross-cultural validity, criterion validity, and responsiveness. Following the COSMIN guidelines, BCSS and CSPDS were assigned to Class A recommendations, while the remaining tools received Class B recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The BCSS and CSPDS scales demonstrated comprehensive assessment in terms of their measurement characteristics, exhibiting good methodological quality, measurement attribute quality, and supporting evidence. Therefore, it is recommended to utilize these scales for evaluating breast cancer stigma. However, further validation is required for the remaining assessment tools.

Association between stigma and sleep quality in patients with breast cancer: A latent profile and mediation analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to identify the heterogeneity in the stigma experienced by patients with breast cancer and examine the mediation effect of resilience on the relation between stigma and sleep quality.

METHOD

A total of 396 patients with breast cancer were enrolled from Be Resilient to Breast Cancer (BRBC) program between January and April 2023. Participants completed the Social Impact Scale, the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale. Latent profile analysis (LPA) and mediation analysis were conducted to analyze the data.

RESULTS

LPA categorized stigma into three subgroups, namely low-stigma (21.9%), moderate-stigma (64.9%), and high-stigma (13.2%). Mediation analysis revealed a fully mediated effect in the comparison between low-stigma and moderate-stigma groups (standard error [SE] = 0.13, 95%CI = 0.06,0.56), whereas a partially mediated effect was observed in the comparison between low-stigma and high-stigma groups (SE = 0.18, 95%CI = 0.39,1.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Stigma is a significant factor to sleep quality in breast cancer and resilience could act as a robust buffer against stigma resulting in improved sleep quality. Resilience-based interventions might be helpful in this population.

The stigma in patients with breast cancer: A concept analysis

Objective

Stigma is a common problem among patients having breast cancer. However, the concept of stigma is vague and not specifically described or clearly defined in the literature. The lack of description or definition has further limited stigma research among patients having breast cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify and analyze the concept of stigma in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

Walker and Avant's concept analysis method was applied to analyze the connotation of stigma in patients with breast cancer. PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed databases were searched from inception until May 31, 2023.

Results

Five stigma-related attributes of patients having breast cancer were identified: (1) impaired body image and physiological function; (2) negative stereotypes; (3) mixed negative feelings about developing breast cancer; (4) a feeling of avoidance; (5) experienced discrimination. Antecedents included the implementation of breast surgery and postoperative time, negative psychological factors, lack of social support, and cultural beliefs. This stigma among patients having breast cancer had significant negative effects on their quality of individual life and marriage, postoperative rehabilitation, and healthcare-seeking behavior.

Conclusions

The concept analysis results clarified the concept of stigma in patients with breast cancer and provided theoretical guidance for the development of the conceptual model of stigma in these patients. What is more, it offered a theoretical basis for future studies related to the development of stigma assessment tools for breast cancer patients and for devising nursing intervention strategies.

Culturally-informed adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cataldo Cancer Stigma Scale in Northern Tanzania

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related stigma impacts patients' emotional health, care engagement, and cancer outcomes, but few measures of cancer stigma exist. We culturally adapted and assessed psychometric properties of the Cataldo Cancer Stigma Scale (CCSS) in Tanzania.

METHODS

We administered the CCSS short version (21 items), plus 12 locally-derived items, to 146 adult cancer patients. We conducted exploratory factor analysis, examined internal consistency/reliability, and assessed convergent validity with relevant measures.

RESULTS

We identified a 17-item cancer stigma scale with strong psychometric properties and four subscales: enacted stigma, shame and blame, internalized stigma, and disclosure concerns. Stigma was rare except for disclosure concerns. Stigma was positively associated with depression and anxiety and negatively associated with social support, quality of life, and illness acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale provides valid, culturally-informed measurement of cancer stigma in Tanzania. Future studies should assess associations with care engagement, which will inform interventions to reduce stigma and improve outcomes.