Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Guan T, Cook P, Xu S, Ranzinger LH, Conklin JL, Alfahad AAS, Ping Y, Shieh K, Barroso S, Villegas N, Song L. Family-based psychosocial interventions for adult Latino patients with cancer and their caregivers: A systematic review. Front Psychol 2023;14:1052229. [PMID: 37063545 PMCID: PMC10097880 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open

For:	Guan T, Cook P, Xu S, Ranzinger LH, Conklin JL, Alfahad AAS, Ping Y, Shieh K, Barroso S, Villegas N, Song L. Family-based psychosocial interventions for adult Latino patients with cancer and their caregivers: A systematic review. Front Psychol 2023;14:1052229. [PMID: 37063545 PMCID: PMC10097880 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Torres-Blasco N, Rosario-Ramos L, Arguelles C, Marrero ST, Rivera T, Vicente Z, Navedo ME, Burgos R, Garriga M, del Carmen Pacheco M, Lopez B. Development of a Community-Based Communication Intervention among Latin Caregivers of Patients Coping with Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2024;12:841. [PMID: 38667603 PMCID: PMC11050426 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12080841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open

Affiliation(s)

Normarie Torres-Blasco School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.) Ponce Research Institute, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico
Lianel Rosario-Ramos School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Carled Arguelles School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Stephanie Torres Marrero School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Tiffany Rivera School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Zulay Vicente School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Maria Elena Navedo Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA;
Rosael Burgos School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Mayra Garriga School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Maria del Carmen Pacheco School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)
Betsy Lopez School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico; (L.R.-R.); (C.A.); (S.T.M.); (T.R.); (Z.V.); (R.B.); (M.G.); (M.d.C.P.); (B.L.)

Collapse

Sun Q, Wang K, Chen Y, Peng X, Jiang X, Peng J. Effectiveness of dyadic interventions among cancer dyads: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Clin Nurs 2024;33:497-530. [PMID: 37876319 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To summarize evidence from systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) regarding the impact of dyadic interventions delivered to both members of a cancer dyad, including a cancer patient and caregiver (e.g. family caregiver, intimate partner).

DESIGN

This overview of SRs was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for overviews of reviews statement.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wan Fang. The methodological and reporting quality of SRs and MAs was assessed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2. The quality of the included SRs/MAs was evaluated using the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Eighteen SRs/MAs undertook quantitative synthesis to assess the impact of dyadic interventions on cancer dyads. Both the credibility of the SRs/MAs and the evidence quality of the outcome measures were below satisfactory standards. Prior SRs/MAs revealed several limitations such as lack of pre-published protocols or research objectives, failure to report excluded studies and insufficient details on funding sources for individual studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Dyadic interventions may prove advantageous for the physical health and dyadic adjustment of cancer dyads. Nevertheless, the reported results of dyadic interventions on the psychological health of patient-caregiver dyads affected by cancer are inconsistent. Thus, rigorous and comprehensive studies are requisite to establish reliable evidence for conclusive determinations.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The findings of this overview can guide healthcare practitioners when considering the use of dyadic interventions for cancer dyads. Moreover, these findings have the potential to enhance the integration of these approaches into clinical practice.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Our paper presents an overview of systematic reviews, and therefore, such specific details may not be relevant to our study.

Collapse