1
|
Marrocu A, Kettner H, Weiss B, Zeifman RJ, Erritzoe D, Carhart-Harris RL. Psychiatric risks for worsened mental health after psychedelic use. J Psychopharmacol 2024; 38:225-235. [PMID: 38491857 PMCID: PMC10944581 DOI: 10.1177/02698811241232548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resurgent psychedelic research has largely supported the safety and efficacy of psychedelic therapy for the treatment of various psychiatric disorders. As psychedelic use and therapy increase in prevalence, so does the importance of understanding associated risks. Cases of prolonged negative psychological responses to psychedelic therapy seem to be rare; however, studies are limited by biases and small sample sizes. The current analytical approach was motivated by the question of whether rare but significant adverse effects have been under-sampled in psychedelic research studies. METHODS A "bottom margin analysis" approach was taken to focus on negative responders to psychedelic use in a pool of naturalistic, observational prospective studies (N = 807). We define "negative response" by a clinically meaningful decline in a generic index of mental health, that is, one standard error from the mean decrease in psychological well-being 4 weeks post-psychedelic use (vs pre-use baseline). We then assessed whether a history of diagnosed mental illness can predict negative responses. RESULTS We find that 16% of the cohort falls into the "negative responder" subset. Parsing the sample by self-reported history of psychiatric diagnoses, results revealed a disproportionate prevalence of negative responses among those reporting a prior personality disorder diagnosis (31%). One multivariate regression model indicated a greater than four-fold elevated risk of adverse psychological responses to psychedelics in the personality disorder subsample (b = 1.425, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION We infer that the presence of a personality disorder may represent an elevated risk for psychedelic use and hypothesize that the importance of psychological support and good therapeutic alliance may be increased in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Marrocu
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hannes Kettner
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Brandon Weiss
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Richard J Zeifman
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NYU Langone Center for Psychedelic Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Erritzoe
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Robin L Carhart-Harris
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Carhart-Harris Lab, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
In recent years, psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies have reentered the realm of rigorous scientific inquiry, garnering much attention from both the psychiatric community and the broader public. Headlines on major media platforms frequently tout the psychedelic future of psychiatry, and patients increasingly ask about the prospect of using psychedelics during their sessions. Despite this enthusiasm, psychedelics remain in an investigational stage, and more research and regulatory work are required before psychedelics can be deemed appropriate for general clinical use. In this climate, psychiatrists are increasingly curious about the prospects of psychedelic treatments. This review's goal was to help psychiatrists better understand the complexities of the burgeoning field of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. The discussion encompasses issues surrounding psychedelics in their current investigational stage and issues for psychiatrists to consider should psychedelics become available for broad clinical use. This review discusses research equipoise in the context of the current enthusiasm for psychedelics, informed consent, patient vulnerability, equity and access, differences between clinical and nonclinical psychedelic uses, and psychedelic self-enhancement. As psychedelics move closer toward regulatory approval beyond research settings, it is vital that these promising treatments be used ethically. The unique features of psychedelic therapies, including the altered states of consciousness they produce and the vulnerability that such states entail for patients, require careful consideration to minimize potential ethical pitfalls. This review seeks to ensure that psychiatrists are equipped to use psychedelic psychotherapy both ethically and effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory S Barber
- Private practice, Bethesda (Barber); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Dike)
| | - Charles C Dike
- Private practice, Bethesda (Barber); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Dike)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Breeksema JJ, Kuin BW, Kamphuis J, van den Brink W, Vermetten E, Schoevers RA. Adverse events in clinical treatments with serotonergic psychedelics and MDMA: A mixed-methods systematic review. J Psychopharmacol 2022; 36:1100-1117. [PMID: 36017784 PMCID: PMC9548934 DOI: 10.1177/02698811221116926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Small-scale clinical studies with psychedelic drugs have shown promising results for the treatment of several mental disorders. Before psychedelics become registered medicines, it is important to know the full range of adverse events (AEs) for making balanced treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the presence of AEs during and after administration of serotonergic psychedelics and 3,4-methyenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in clinical studies. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical trials with psychedelics since 2000 describing the results of quantitative and qualitative studies. RESULTS We included 44 articles (34 quantitative + 10 qualitative), describing treatments with MDMA and serotonergic psychedelics (psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, and ayahuasca) in 598 unique patients. In many studies, AEs were not systematically assessed. Despite this limitation, treatments seemed to be overall well tolerated. Nausea, headaches, and anxiety were commonly reported acute AEs across diagnoses and compounds. Late AEs included headaches (psilocybin, MDMA), fatigue, low mood, and anxiety (MDMA). One serious AE occurred during MDMA administration (increase in premature ventricular contractions requiring brief hospitalization); no other AEs required medical intervention. Qualitative studies suggested that psychologically challenging experiences may also be therapeutically beneficial. Except for ayahuasca, a large proportion of patients had prior experience with psychedelic drugs before entering studies. CONCLUSIONS AEs are poorly defined in the context of psychedelic treatments and are probably underreported in the literature due to study design (lack of systematic assessment of AEs) and sample selection. Acute challenging experiences may be therapeutically meaningful, but a better understanding of AEs in the context of psychedelic treatments requires systematic and detailed reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost J Breeksema
- Department of Psychiatry, University of
Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,Department of Psychiatry, Leiden
University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands,OPEN Foundation, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands,Joost J Breeksema, University Center of
Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9700
RB, The Netherlands.
| | - Bouwe W Kuin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of
Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanine Kamphuis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of
Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim van den Brink
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Vermetten
- Department of Psychiatry, Leiden
University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Schoevers
- Department of Psychiatry, University of
Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cavarra M, Falzone A, Ramaekers JG, Kuypers KPC, Mento C. Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy-A Systematic Review of Associated Psychological Interventions. Front Psychol 2022; 13:887255. [PMID: 35756295 PMCID: PMC9226617 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Modern clinical research on psychedelics is generating interesting outcomes in a wide array of clinical conditions when psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy is delivered to appropriately screened participants and in controlled settings. Still, a number of patients relapse or are less responsive to such treatments. Individual and contextual factors (i.e., set and setting) seem to play a role in shaping the psychedelic experience and in determining clinical outcomes. These findings, coupled with data from literature on the effectiveness of psychotherapy, frame the therapeutic context as a potential moderator of clinical efficacy, highlighting the need to investigate how to functionally employ environmental and relational factors. In this review, we performed a structured search through two databases (i.e., PubMed/Medline and Scopus) to identify records of clinical studies on psychedelics which used and described a structured associated psychotherapeutic intervention. The aim is to construct a picture of what models of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy are currently adopted in clinical research and to report on their clinical outcomes. Ad-hoc and adapted therapeutic methods were identified. Common principles, points of divergence and future directions are highlighted and discussed with special attention toward therapeutic stance, degree of directiveness and the potential suggestive effects of information provided to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Cavarra
- Department of Cognitive, Psychological Science and Cultural Studies, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.,Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Alessandra Falzone
- Department of Cognitive, Psychological Science and Cultural Studies, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Johannes G Ramaekers
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Kim P C Kuypers
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Carmela Mento
- Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Classic psychedelics, including psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), dimethyltryptamine, and mescaline, and entactogens/empathogens, especially 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, have received renewed attention in psychiatric research and may be developed into medications for such indications as anxiety, depression, cluster headache, and posttraumatic stress disorder, among others. However, identifying proper doses is crucial. Controlled study data on dosing using well-characterized pharmaceutical formulations of the substances are scarce. The dose equivalence of different substances, dose-response effects, and subjective effects of different doses are of great interest and practically important for their clinical use in psychotherapy. Furthermore, the so-called microdosing of psychedelics has recently gained popularity, and the first placebo-controlled studies of LSD have been published. This chapter discusses different aspects of psychedelic dosing, including pharmaceutical aspects, definitions and characteristics of different doses, including microdoses, aspects of personalized dosing, and non-pharmacological factors, that can influence the response to psychedelics.
Collapse
|