Impaired DNA Repair Fidelity in a Breast Cancer Patient With Adverse Reactions to Radiotherapy

Copy number alterations: a catastrophic orchestration of the breast cancer genome

Breast cancer (BCa) is a prevalent malignancy that predominantly affects women around the world. Somatic copy number alterations (CNAs) are tumor-specific amplifications or deletions of DNA segments that often drive BCa development and therapy resistance. Hence, the complex patterns of CNAs complement BCa classification systems. In addition, understanding the precise contributions of CNAs is essential for tailoring personalized treatment approaches. This review highlights how tumor evolution drives the acquisition of CNAs, which in turn shape the genomic landscapes of BCas. It also discusses advanced methodologies for identifying recurrent CNAs, studying CNAs in BCa and their clinical impact.

Research progress on factors affecting the sensitivity of breast cancer to radiotherapy: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the important components of comprehensive treatment for breast cancer and has important value in improving the control rate of local areas, reducing the chance of recurrence and metastasis after breast cancer surgery, delaying disease progression, and improving the survival of breast cancer patients. The factors that affect the RT sensitivity of breast cancer are important. The above potential predictors of radiation efficacy can provide patients with a predictive method and therefore have significant value in clinical therapy. In this paper, we have summarised the predictive factors of radiotherapy sensitivity by reviewing recent research on breast cancer and focused on the following areas: tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), cancer stem cells, noncoding RNAs, signal transduction pathways, genes, etc. This review aims to provide theoretical basis and reference for improving the efficacy of radiotherapy and experimental individualized treatment of breast cancer.

Methods

We searched the Web of Science database to identify clinical studies published between 2010 and January 2024 that investigated radiotherapy sensitivity. The main findings of the validated studies were summarised.

Key Content and Findings

Improving the radiosensitivity of breast cancer is essential in the treatment of breast cancer. The radiosensitivity can be improved by modulating immune cells or immunomodulatory factors in the TIME, modulating signal transduction pathways, and other innovative combination therapy strategies. And we also summarized the predictive markers of breast cancer radiosensitivity.

Conclusions

In this paper, we reviewed the literature and summarized the newest research advances on the radiosensitivity of breast cancer patients. This review paper includes the following six aspects: the immune microenvironment, tumor stem cells, signaling pathways, regulation of gene/protein expression, small molecule drugs, and predictive markers for radiosensitivity.

Comparative Analysis of miRNA Expression after Whole-Body Irradiation Across Three Strains of Mice

Whole- or partial-body exposure to ionizing radiation damages major organ systems, leading to dysfunction on both acute and chronic timescales. Radiation medical countermeasures can mitigate acute damages and may delay chronic effects when delivered within days after exposure. However, in the event of widespread radiation exposure, there will inevitably be scarce resources with limited countermeasures to distribute among the affected population. Radiation biodosimetry is necessary to separate exposed from unexposed victims and determine those who requires the most urgent care. Blood-based, microRNA signatures have great potential for biodosimetry, but the affected population in such a situation will be genetically heterogeneous and have varying miRNA responses to radiation. Thus, there is a need to understand differences in radiation-induced miRNA expression across different genetic backgrounds to develop a robust signature. We used inbred mouse strains C3H/HeJ and BALB/c mice to determine how accurate miRNA in blood would be in developing markers for radiation vs. no radiation, low dose (1 Gy, 2 Gy) vs. high dose (4 Gy, 8 Gy), and high risk (8 Gy) vs. low risk (1 Gy, 2 Gy, 4 Gy). Mice were exposed to whole-body doses of 0 Gy, 1 Gy, 2 Gy, 4 Gy, or 8 Gy of X rays. MiRNA expression changes were identified using NanoString nCounter panels on blood RNA collected 1, 2, 3 or 7 days postirradiation. Overall, C3H/HeJ mice had more differentially expressed miRNAs across all doses and timepoints than BALB/c mice. The highest amount of differential expression occurred at days 2 and 3 postirradiation for both strains. Comparison of C3H/HeJ and BALB/c expression profiles to those previously identified in C57BL/6 mice revealed 12 miRNAs that were commonly expressed across all three strains, only one of which, miR-340-5p, displayed a consistent regulation pattern in all three miRNA data. Notably multiple Let-7 family members predicted high-dose and high-risk radiation exposure (Let-7a, Let-7f, Let-7e, Let-7g, and Let-7d). KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated involvement of these predicted miRNAs in pathways related to: Fatty acid metabolism, Lysine degradation and FoxO signaling. These findings indicate differences in the miRNA response to radiation across various genetic backgrounds, and highlights key similarities, which we exploited to discover miRNAs that predict radiation exposure. Our study demonstrates the need and the utility of including multiple animal strains in developing and validating biodosimetry diagnostic signatures. From this data, we developed highly accurate miRNA signatures capable of predicting exposed and unexposed subjects within a genetically heterogeneous population as quickly as 24 h of exposure to radiation.

Influence of Gender on Radiosensitivity during Radiochemotherapy of Advanced Rectal Cancer

Simple Summary

In radiotherapy for rectal cancer, the treatment is identical for women and men. In recent years, the question has arisen whether there are gender differences in radiochemotherapy. We have investigated, in detail, differences between men and women, especially with regard to radiation sensitivity. We found no evidence for a difference in radiosensitivity between the sexes. Nevertheless, during radiochemotherapy, women experienced increased impairments in the quality of life, which, however, are restored in the subsequent period. One possibility is an increased sensitivity of women to chemotherapy.

Abstract

Gender is increasingly recognized as an important factor in medicine, although it has long been neglected in medical research in many areas. We have studied the influence of gender in advanced rectal cancer with a special focus on radiosensitivity. For this purpose, we studied a cohort of 495 men (84.1% ≥ T3, 63.6% N1, 17.6%, M1) and 215 women (84.2% ≥ T3, 56.7% N1, 22.8%, M1) who all suffered from advanced rectal cancer and were treated with radiochemotherapy. The energy deposited, DNA double-strand break (dsb) repair, occurrence of chromosomal aberrations, duration of therapy, tumor regression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, laboratory parameters, quality of life and survival were assessed. The residual DNA dsb damage 24 h after irradiation in lymphocytes was identical in both sexes. Furthermore, chromosomal aberrations accurately reflecting radiosensitivity, were similar in both sexes. There were no gender-dependent differences in tumor regression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and outcome indicating no differences in the radiosensitivity of cancer cells. The irradiated tumor volume in women was slightly lower than in men, related to body weight, no difference was observed. However, when the total energy deposited was calculated and related to the body weight, women were exposed to higher amounts of ionizing radiation. During radiochemotherapy, decreases in blood lymphocyte counts and albumin and several quality-of-life parameters such as nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite, and diarrhea were significantly worse in women. There is no difference in radiation sensitivity between men and women in both normal tissue and tumors. During radiochemotherapy, the quality of life deteriorates more in women than in men. However, women also recover quickly and there are no long-term differences in quality of life.