Social Support and Diabetes Management Among Older American Indians

Variations in health literacy and influential factors affecting the categories of social support among rural patients with diabetes mellitus

Objective

The aim of this study is to explore the inherent classification of social support among individuals residing in rural areas of China. Additionally, we aim to examine the attributes and variations in health literacy scores among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) within diverse social support categories.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Employing the multi-stage stratified sampling technique, we enrolled 2,178 patients diagnosed with DM residing in the rural regions of Guangxi Province. We utilized the General Information Questionnaire, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Instrument.

Results

The rural patients with DM were categorized into four distinct groups based on the types and levels of their underlying social support. These groups included a low-level social support utilization group (43%), a low-level objective social support group (17%), a moderate-level social support group (20%), and a high-level social support and high-level utilization group (20%). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the four groups in terms of age, disease duration, and blood sugar control level (p < 0.05). Furthermore, health literacy scores and scores across various dimensions for rural patients with DM demonstrated variability in accordance with latent profiles of social support, with statistically significant differences observed (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was identified between the level of social support and all dimensions of health literacy among rural patients with DM (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The social support available to individuals with DM in rural settings can be categorized into four distinct types, and its manifestation is influenced by demographic factors. The health literacy of rural patients with DM is intricately linked to the extent of social support they receive. For enhanced outcomes, interventions targeted at enhancing health literacy and quality of life among rural patients with DM should be tailored to address the heterogeneity observed in latent profiles of social support.

The dyadic effects of family resilience and social support on quality of life among older adults with chronic illness and their primary caregivers in multigenerational families in China: A cross-sectional study

Older adults with chronic illness, as well as their primary caregivers in multigenerational families, may experience a complex interplay of factors that affect their quality of life (QOL). However, this interplay is not yet well-characterized for Chinese multigenerational families in particular. In this study, we analyzed how family resilience and social support affect the QOL of both older adults and caregivers in multigenerational Chinese families specifically. We enrolled 258 pairs of older adults with chronic illness and their primary caregivers in a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in southern China in December 2021. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM), we then examined the correlation between family resilience, social support, and QOL in dyadic analysis and found that QOL, family resilience, and social support for primary caregivers were better than those of older adults with chronic illness (t = 3.66-16.3, p＜0.01). These factors were found to be positively correlated (r = 0.22-0.60, p＜0.05), except for the family resilience of primary caregivers and the QOL of older adults with chronic illness (r = -0.14, p = 0.04). Additionally, actor effect results showed that when a dyadic member has high family resilience and objective social support, they tend to have a better QOL (β = 0.5-1.48, P < 0.01). However, partner effect results showed that when the primary caregiver has high family resilience, this is associated with a worse QOL for the older adult (β = -1.06, P < 0.01). Furthermore, we found that objective social support of dyads does not significantly influence their partner's QOL (β = 0.88/0.31, P＞0.05) for any pair. This suggests that medical staff should pay attention to the impact of family resilience on the QOL of older adult and caregiver dyads and explore health management plans that focus on binary coping in multigenerational families.

Wiidookaage'Win: A Community-Based Qualitative Approach to Developing a Facebook Group Intervention for Native Women to Support Recovery From Opioid Use

PURPOSE

To develop a culturally-tailored American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women's Facebook group supporting opioid recovery as an adjunct to medication.

DESIGN

Community-based, qualitative approach.

SETTING

Minnesota, U.S.

PARTICIPANTS

AI/AN women in opioid recovery, interested parties, and a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) of AI/AN women with lived experience, health care providers, and community members.

INTERVENTION

We developed evidence-based content focusing on stress/trauma and substance use, mindfulness, responding to triggers, and supportive community resources. Additional content centered on AI/AN culture was also selected.

METHOD

Interviews were conducted by two women, then transcribed and coded using content analysis with NVivo software. Results were presented to CAC for further content refinement.

RESULTS

CAC members (n = 10) guided study methods, intervention development, and dissemination activities. 14 AI/AN women (mean age 36.4 years; mean 6.7 months opioid abstinence) and 12 interested parties (7 men, 5 women) were receptive to an AI/AN gender-specific Facebook group, preferring content with AI/AN people and/or text resonating with AI/AN culture (e.g., Native traditions, family, personal stories, historical trauma). Recommendations included (1) protect confidentiality, (2) retain positivity, (3) incorporate resources and exercises to build coping skills, and (4) moderators should be authentic and relatable to build trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach provides a model for developing culturally tailored, appealing and effective social media interventions to support AI/AN women in recovery from opioid use disorder.

The role of family in supporting adherence to diabetes self-care management practices: An umbrella review

AIMS

Synthesize a review of reviews of the family's role in supporting adherence to diabetes self-care management practices (DSMP) for adults with type 2 diabetes (DM2).

DESIGN

An umbrella review.

DATA SOURCES

Scopus, Web of Science including MEDLINE, CINAHL via EBSCO, PubMed and Science Direct were searched for systematic reviews from their year of establishment until June 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for umbrella reviews. The JBI data extraction form for systematic reviews and research syntheses was used for data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic reviews and Research Syntheses.

RESULTS

Nineteen reviews met the inclusion criteria. The key findings were summarized using a narrative and thematic analysis methods. Four main themes were identified: family interactions and diabetes self-management, family support as informal social support, factors affecting families' roles, and tailoring culturally sensitive family-based interventions.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be a consensus regarding the impact of family on adults' self-management of DM2. Additional research is needed to comprehend the role of the family in underrepresented populations and examine what constitutes a family and the diverse family functions in different groups.

IMPACT

Enhancing adherence to self-care management practices is crucial for the well-being of adults with DM2. Family support is a key to successful self-care management at home. However, understanding the unique needs of adults with DM2 and their families can help healthcare professionals plan appropriate support strategies and sustainable family-based interventions.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This review did not incorporate direct patients or public input as it summarizes evidence from previously published systematic reviews.