1
|
Oudjedi A, Allali A, Bekli A, Lounis M, Ben Saad H, Boukoufa M. Reported COVID-19 vaccines side effects among Algerian athletes: a comparison between inactivated virus, adenoviral vector, and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED 2024; 52:134-146. [PMID: 36876437 DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2023.2186691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many types of COVID19 vaccines are administered globally, yet there is not much evidence regarding their side effects among athletes. This study evaluated the selfreported postvaccination side effects of inactivated virus, adenoviral vector, and mRNA COVID19 vaccines among Algerian athletes. METHODS A cross-sectional survey-based study was carried out in Algeria between March 01 and 4 April 2022. The study used a validated questionnaire with twenty-five multiple-choice items covering the participants' anamnestic characteristics, post-vaccination side effects (their onset and duration), post-vaccination medical care, and risk factors. RESULTS A total of 273 athletes completed the survey. Overall, (54.6%) of the athletes reported at least one local side effect, while (46.9%) reported at least one systemic side effect. These side effects were more prevalent among the adenoviral vector group compared to the inactivated virus and mRNA groups. The most common local side effect was injection site pain (29.9%), while Fever (30.8%) was the most prevalent systemic side effect. The age group of 31-40 years, allergy, previous infection with COVID-19, and the first dose of vaccines were associated with an increased risk of side effects for all groups of COVID-19 vaccines. Logistic regression analysis further revealed that compared to males, the incidence of reported side effects was significantly higher in females (odd ratio (OR) = 1.16; P = 0.015*) only for the adenoviral vector vaccine group. In addition, a significantly higher percentage of athletes group of high dynamic/moderate static or high dynamic /high static components suffered from post-vaccination side effects compared to the group of athletes with high dynamic/low static components (OR = 14.68 and 14.71; P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The adenoviral vector vaccines have the highest rate of side effects, followed by the inactivated virus and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. COVID‑19 vaccines were well-tolerated among Algerian athletes and there were no reports of serious side effects. Nevertheless, further long-term follow-up study with a larger sample size of athletes (from different types and sports categories) is warranted to establish the long-term safety of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adda Oudjedi
- Institute of Science and Techniques of Physical and Sports Activities, Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Oum El Bouaghi, Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria
| | - Abdelghani Allali
- Institute of Science and Techniques of Physical and Sports Activities, Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Oum El Bouaghi, Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria
| | - Aissa Bekli
- Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Hassiba Ben Bouali University, Chlef, Algeria
| | - Mohamed Lounis
- Department of Agro-Veterinary Science, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Ziane Achour, Djelfa, Algeria
| | - Helmi Ben Saad
- University of Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Hospital Farhat HACHED of Sousse, Research Laboratory, Heart Failure, LR12SP09, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Boukoufa
- Institute of physical education and sports, Ibrahim Sultan Cheibout University of Algiers 3, Algiers, Algeria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karuppannan M, Ming LC, Abdul Wahab MS, Mohd Noordin Z, Yee S, Hermansyah A. Self-reported side effects of COVID-19 vaccines among the public. J Pharm Policy Pract 2024; 17:2308617. [PMID: 38420042 PMCID: PMC10901186 DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2308617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The safety, side effects and efficacy profile of COVID-19 vaccines remain subjects of ongoing concern among the public in Malaysia. The aim of this study was to determine the types of adverse effects following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines and the differences based on various types of COVID-19 vaccines to raise public awareness and reduce vaccine hesitancy among the public. Methods A total of 901 Malaysian adults (≥18 years) who received various COVID-19 vaccines were selected to participate in our cross-sectional study through an online survey between December 2021 and January 2022. Results A total of 814 (90.3%) of the participants reported ≥1 side effect following COVID-19 immunisation. Of these, the predominant symptoms were swelling at the injection site (n = 752, 83.5%), headache (n = 638, 70.8%), pain or soreness at the injection site (n = 628, 69.7%), fatigue or tiredness (n = 544, 60.4%), muscle weakness (n = 529, 58.7%) and diarrhea (n = 451, 50.1%). Recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech (Comirnaty ®) vaccine reported the highest number of adverse effects (n = 355, 43.6%), followed by mixed COVID-19 vaccines (n = 254, 31.2%), the Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1-®[recombinant]) vaccine (n = 113, 13.9%) and the Sinovac (CoronaVac®) vaccine (n = 90, 11.1%). The study showed that individuals who reported significantly more side effects were of elderly age, female gender and high educational level [P value < 0.05]. Mixed COVID-19 vaccine recipients also reported significantly more local and systemic symptoms after the first dose and third dose when compared with other single vaccine recipients. Conclusion This study demonstrated the types of self-reported adverse effects following immunisation with single and mixed COVID-19 vaccines. These findings may provide the side effects of different COVID-19 vaccines with the hope of educating the public on the safety profiles of these vaccines and reducing vaccine hesitancy among the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmathi Karuppannan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia
- Cardiology Therapeutics Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia
| | - Long Chiau Ming
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
- School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei
| | - Mohd Shahezwan Abdul Wahab
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia
- Cardiology Therapeutics Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia
| | - Zakiah Mohd Noordin
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia
- Cardiology Therapeutics Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia
| | - Shermaine Yee
- Faculty of Medicine, Quest International University, Ipoh, Malaysia
| | - Andi Hermansyah
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mohebbi A, Eterafi M, Fouladi N, Golizadeh M, Panahizadeh R, Habibzadeh S, Karimi K, Safarzadeh E. Adverse Effects Reported and Insights Following Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccination. Curr Microbiol 2023; 80:377. [PMID: 37861721 DOI: 10.1007/s00284-023-03432-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Vaccines are promising strategies for controlling COVID-19; however, COVID-19 vaccine side effects play a central role in public confidence in the vaccine and its uptake process. This study aimed to provide evidence on the post-vaccination early side effects of the BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine. This cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted between November 2021 and January 2022 among recipients of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine, using a questionnaire-based survey. Our final sample consisted of 657 participants, including 392 women. Among the study cases, only 103 (15.7%) participants received one dose of vaccine, and the rest received both doses (N = 554, 84.3%). Systemic symptoms (first dose: N = 187, both doses: N = 128) were the most commonly reported events after vaccination, and among them, injection site pain (first dose: 19.3%, both doses: 12.9%) was the most prevalent adverse effect. All reporting events were mild and resolved in less than 3 days without hospitalization. Among the participants, females and young people aged 35-65 were more prone to manifest side effects (N = 169, 53.3%) after the vaccine injection. Furthermore, our results revealed that the recipients who were suffering from underlying diseases, including diabetes, renal disorder, and respiratory illness, reported fewer adverse responses after vaccination in comparison with healthy individuals. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 may lead to some adverse reactions in recipients. However, the frequency of post-vaccination early side effects differed in people, but all responses were slight and temporary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Mohebbi
- Students Research Committee, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Majid Eterafi
- Students Research Committee, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Nasrin Fouladi
- School of Medicine and Allied Medical Sciences, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Majid Golizadeh
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Reza Panahizadeh
- Students Research Committee, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Shahram Habibzadeh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Emam Khomeini Hospital, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Kimia Karimi
- Students Research Committee, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Elham Safarzadeh
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
- Department of Microbiology, Parasitology, and Immunology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moll MEC, Martínez AMS, Cisneros BT, Onofre JIG, Floriano GN, de León MB. Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnant and Lactating Mexican Women and Breastfed Infants: A Survey-Based Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1280. [PMID: 37631848 PMCID: PMC10459654 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11081280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines' safety has been extensively studied; however, further analysis is required in pregnant women, nursing mothers, and breastfed infants. Our aim was to compare the extension and severity of self-reported COVID-19 vaccine side effects in pregnant and breastfeeding women, and breastfed infants. In this cross-sectional study, COVID-19-vaccinated subjects were enrolled using an online survey in Mexico. Women were classified by pregnancy and breastfeeding status at the time of vaccination (n = 3167). After the first or only dose, there was a trend toward fewer systemic effects in pregnant women (p = 0.06). BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) had a higher frequency of local symptoms in pregnancy. Lactating women experienced fewer local symptoms after the first or single dose (p = 0.04) and the opposite occurred after the second dose (p = 0.001). ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca) increased the chances of developing both local and systemic symptoms after the first dose but decreased them after the second dose. The severity was similar across groups, although the result of lack of association in pregnancy requires studies with a larger sample size. Irritability was the most reported symptom in breastfed infants. This study contributes to the knowledge about the side effects in pregnant and lactating women, and breastfed babies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Elena Camacho Moll
- Department of Molecular Biology, Northeast Biomedical Research Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Monterrey 64720, N.L., Mexico;
- Center for Molecular Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine, Health Sciences Division, Universidad de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García 66238, N.L., Mexico
| | - Ana María Salinas Martínez
- Epidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Monterrey 64360, N.L., Mexico
- School of Public Health and Nutrition, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey 64460, N.L., Mexico
| | - Benjamín Tovar Cisneros
- School of Biological Sciences, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey 66455, N.L., Mexico;
| | - Juan Ignacio García Onofre
- Family Medicine Unit No. 64, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Santa Catarina 66358, N.L., Mexico; (J.I.G.O.); (G.N.F.)
| | - Gloria Navarrete Floriano
- Family Medicine Unit No. 64, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Santa Catarina 66358, N.L., Mexico; (J.I.G.O.); (G.N.F.)
| | - Mario Bermúdez de León
- Department of Molecular Biology, Northeast Biomedical Research Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Monterrey 64720, N.L., Mexico;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Camacho Moll ME, Mata Tijerina VL, Silva Ramírez B, Peñuelas Urquides K, González Escalante LA, Escobedo Guajardo BL, Cruz Luna JE, Corrales Pérez R, Gómez García S, Bermúdez de León M. Sex, Age, and Comorbidities Are Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID-19 Severity, and Fatal Outcome in a Mexican Population: A Retrospective Multi-Hospital Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072676. [PMID: 37048758 PMCID: PMC10095205 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
People with comorbidities and the male sex are at a higher risk of developing severe COVID-19. In the present study, we aim to investigate the associated factors for infection, severity, and death due to COVID-19 in a population from Nuevo León, México. Epidemiological COVID-19 data were collected from 65 hospitals from December 2020 to May 2022. A total of 75,232 cases were compiled from which 25,722 cases were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Male sex, older age, diabetes, obesity, and hypertension were associated with infection. In addition to the above-mentioned factors, renal disease, cardiovascular disease, and immunosuppression were found to be associated with increased COVID-19 severity. These factors, as well as neurological diseases, are also associated with death due to COVID-19. When comparing the different variants of SARs-CoV-2, the variant B1.1.519 increased the probability of death by 2.23 times compared to the AY.20 variant. Male sex, older age, diabetes, obesity, and hypertension are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, severity, and death. Along with the aforementioned comorbidities, renal disease, cardiovascular disease, and immunosuppression are also associated with severity and death. Another factor associated with death is the presence of neurological disease. The SARS-CoV-2 B1.1.519 variant increases the odds of death compared to the SARS-CoV-2 AY.20 variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Elena Camacho Moll
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Northeast Biomedical Research Centre, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64720, Mexico
| | - Viviana Leticia Mata Tijerina
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Northeast Biomedical Research Centre, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64720, Mexico
| | - Beatriz Silva Ramírez
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Northeast Biomedical Research Centre, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64720, Mexico
| | - Katia Peñuelas Urquides
- Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Northeast Biomedical Research Centre, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64720, Mexico
| | - Laura Adiene González Escalante
- Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Northeast Biomedical Research Centre, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64720, Mexico
| | - Brenda Leticia Escobedo Guajardo
- Laboratory of Molecular Research of Diseases, Northeast Biomedical Research Centre, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64720, Mexico
| | - Jorge Eleazar Cruz Luna
- Medical Epidemiological Assistance Coordination of the State of Nuevo León, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64000, Mexico
| | - Roberto Corrales Pérez
- Medical Epidemiological Assistance Coordination of the State of Nuevo León, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64000, Mexico
| | - Salvador Gómez García
- Medical Epidemiological Assistance Coordination of the State of Nuevo León, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64000, Mexico
| | - Mario Bermúdez de León
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Northeast Biomedical Research Centre, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey 64720, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Najjar M, Albuaini S, Fadel M, Aljbawi A, AlAwad Y, Mohsen F. Impact of comorbidities on hospitalised Syrian patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068849. [PMID: 36940947 PMCID: PMC10030286 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to compare the clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, outcomes and overall survival time of patients with COVID-19 with and without comorbidities. DESIGN Retrospective design. SETTING This study was undertaken at two hospitals in Damascus. PARTICIPANTS A total of 515 Syrian patients met the inclusion criterion, laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Exclusion criteria were suspected and probable cases that were not confirmed with a positive reverse transcription-PCR assay, and patients who self-discharged from the hospital against medical advice. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES First, assess the impacts of comorbidities on COVID-19 infection in four areas (clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, severity and outcomes). Second, calculate the overall survival time for patients with COVID-19 with comorbidities. RESULTS Of 515 patients included, 316 (61.4%) were male and 347 (67.4%) had at least one coexisting chronic disease. Patients with comorbidities compared with no comorbidities were more vulnerable to poor outcomes such as severe infection (32.0% vs 9.5%, p<0.001), severe complications (34.6% vs 9.5%, p<0.001), the need for mechanical ventilation (28.8% vs 7.7%, p<0.001) and death (32.0% vs 8.3%, p<0.001). Multiple logistic regression showed that age ≥65 years old, positive smoking history, having ≥2 comorbidities and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were risk factors linked to severe COVID-19 infection in patients with comorbidities. Overall survival time was lower among patients with comorbidities (vs no comorbidities), patients with ≥2 comorbidities (vs one comorbidity), and patients with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy or obesity (vs other comorbidities) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION This study revealed that COVID-19 infection had poor outcomes among those with comorbidities. Severe complications, mechanical ventilation usage and death were more prevalent among patients with comorbidities compared with those with no comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Najjar
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Sara Albuaini
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Mohammad Fadel
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Ahmad Aljbawi
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Yara AlAwad
- Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Fatema Mohsen
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Najjar M, Albuaini S, Fadel M, Mohsen F. Covid-19 vaccination reported side effects and hesitancy among the Syrian population: a cross-sectional study. Ann Med 2023; 55:2241351. [PMID: 37544017 PMCID: PMC10405764 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2241351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studying post-vaccination side effects and identifying the reasons behind low vaccine uptake are pivotal for overcoming the pandemic. METHODS This cross-sectional study was distributed through social media platforms and face-to-face interviews. Data from vaccinated and unvaccinated participants were collected and analyzed using the chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression to detect factors associated with side effects and severe side effects. RESULTS Of the 3509 participants included, 1672(47.6%) were vaccinated. The most common reason for not taking the vaccine was concerns about the vaccine's side effects 815(44.4). The majority of symptoms were mild 788(47.1%), followed by moderate 374(22.3%), and severe 144(8.6%). The most common symptoms were tiredness 1028(61.5%), pain at the injection site 933(55.8%), and low-grade fever 684(40.9%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that <40 years (vs. ≥40; OR: 2.113, p-value = 0.008), females (vs. males; OR: 2.245, p-value< .001), did not receive influenza shot last year (vs. did receive Influenza shot last year OR: 1.697, p-value = 0.041), AstraZeneca (vs. other vaccine brands; OR: 2.799, p-value< .001), co-morbidities (vs. no co-morbidities; OR: 1.993, p-value = 0.008), and diabetes mellitus (vs. no diabetes mellitus; OR: 2.788, p-value = 0.007) were associated with severe post-vaccine side effects. Serious side effects reported were blood clots 5(0.3%), thrombocytopenia 2(0.1%), anaphylaxis 1(0.1%), seizures 1(0.1%), and cardiac infarction 1(0.1%). CONCLUSION Our study revealed that most side effects reported were mild in severity and self-limiting. Increasing the public's awareness of the nature of the vaccine's side effects would reduce the misinformation and improve the public's trust in vaccines. Larger studies to evaluate rare and serious adverse events and long-term side effects are needed, so people can have sufficient information and understanding before making an informed consent which is essential for vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Najjar
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syria
| | - Sara Albuaini
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syria
| | - Mohammad Fadel
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syria
| | - Fatema Mohsen
- Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syria
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu D, Hu Y, Jiang Z, Yang T, Chu K, Zhang H, Hu J, Meng X, Tan Z, Wu J, Lian X, Li C, Pan H. Lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity, and safety of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults: A randomized, double-blind, phase IV trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2135929. [PMID: 36441137 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2135929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous phase I to III clinical trials have shown that the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine namely CoronaVac has good efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. This phase IV trial aims to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity, and safety on a commercial scale in healthy adults, which could provide data to support stable manufacturing. In this single-center, randomized, double-blind study, 1,080 healthy adults aged 26-45 years were randomly assigned into three groups to receive one of three lots of vaccines. All subjects received two doses of CoronaVac with an interval of 28 days. Serum samples were collected before the first dose and 28 days after the second dose to assess the immunogenicity. Solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) within 7 days and unsolicited AEs within 28 days after each dose of vaccination were recorded. A total of 1,039 participants completed the study and were included in the per-protocol set (PPS). The GMTs were 75.2 (68.5,82.6), 65.0 (59.0,71.7), and 65.3 (59.4,71.8), respectively, and the seroconversion rates of neutralizing antibody were all higher than 98%. The GMT ratios of each pair of lots were 1.16 (1.01,1.32), 1.15 (1.01, 1.32), and 0.99 (0.87, 1.14), respectively, meeting the immunological equivalence criteria. The incidence rates of adverse reactions (ARs) were 19.17%, 13.89%, and 18.33%, with no statistical difference. The ARs were all in grade 1 and grade 2, with incidences of 15.46% and 2.50%. Non-vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. These results showed robust lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity, and safety. The stable production indicated that CoronaVac is suitable for large-scale use.Trial registration number: NCT04894227 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandan Zhu
- Huaiyin District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai'an, China
| | - Yuansheng Hu
- Clinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiwei Jiang
- Beijing Key-Tech Statistical Consulting Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Tuantuan Yang
- Clinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Chu
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institution of Vaccine Clinical Trials, Nanjing, China
| | - Hengming Zhang
- Clinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China
| | - Jialei Hu
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institution of Vaccine Clinical Trials, Nanjing, China
| | - Xing Meng
- Clinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China
| | - Zhijun Tan
- Beijing Key-Tech Statistical Consulting Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Jingliang Wu
- Huaiyin District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai'an, China
| | | | - Changgui Li
- National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Control of Biological Products, Beijing, China
| | - Hongxing Pan
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institution of Vaccine Clinical Trials, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chekol Abebe E, Mengie Ayele T, Tilahun Muche Z, Behaile T/Mariam A, Dagnaw Baye N, Mekonnen Agidew M, Asmamaw Dejenie T. Evaluation and comparison of post-vaccination adverse effects among Janssen and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccinated adult individuals in Debre Tabor Town: A cross- sectional survey in Northwest Ethiopia. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2104059. [PMID: 35960924 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2104059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID 19 vaccination has recently been launched globally to halt the pandemic. But COVID 19 vaccines have some adverse effects that raise concerns in the global community. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the adverse effects of Janssen and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccinated adults. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 15 to 30, 2022 among 421 (211 Janssen and 210 Astra Zeneca vaccinated) adults recruited by a convenience sampling technique in Debre Tabor Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews and by reviewing the immunization card. Chi-square test, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare the adverse symptoms and related parameters between the two vaccines. A linear regression model was also used to identify predictors of the number of post-vaccination symptoms. The majority (75.8%) of participants reported at least one side effect after vaccination. Adverse symptoms had a significantly greater occurrence (p < .05) among recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine (84.8%) than receivers of the Janssen vaccine (66.8%). The main adverse symptoms were injection site pain, fever, fatigue, arthralgia, and myalgia in both vaccines. Significant variations (p < .05) between the receipts of the two vaccines were shown in injection site pain, fever, and arthralgia. The total number of symptoms was significantly higher (p < .05) in participants with female sex, younger age, BMI <25 kg/m2, no prior COVID 19, and those who had received AstraZeneca vaccine. Thus, the authors advise that they should receive vaccines with no hesitation, while continuous tracking of vaccine safety is kept in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Endeshaw Chekol Abebe
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Teklie Mengie Ayele
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Zelalem Tilahun Muche
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Awgichew Behaile T/Mariam
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Nega Dagnaw Baye
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Melaku Mekonnen Agidew
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Chania HA, Sajid S, Hotwani S, Sarwar HU, Nawaz S, Abid S. Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With a History of COVID-19 Infection: A Survey Conducted in Pakistan. Cureus 2022; 14:e31359. [PMID: 36514568 PMCID: PMC9741751 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunizations become more common, concerns about their safety and reactogenicity have grown. It is important to assess and analyze the post-vaccination side effects of several COVID-19 vaccines that have been licensed in Pakistan. Methods and results A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2021 and January 2022 to collect data on the side effects produced by different COVID-19 vaccines. An online survey was conducted to gather data on participants' demographics, clinical profiles, COVID-19 profiles as well as the intensity and side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to analyze the data collected. Out of 421 participants, 63.2% were males, 36.8% of participants received messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, 33.2% received viral vector vaccine, 29.9% received inactivated vaccine, and further 71.7% of the total subjects were completely immunized. The majority of the symptoms were mild to moderate in degree. Approximately, 0.7% of the individuals reported experiencing serious adverse effects. Injection site pain (35.9%) was noted to be the most remarkable post-vaccination side effect followed by fever (33.2%) and fatigue (23.1%). Prior COVID-19 infection was not associated with the severity of any COVID-19 vaccine-related side effect (p > 0.05), except dyspnea. Younger participants and the female gender were substantially linked to post-vaccination adverse effects. Conclusion In comparison to viral vector and inactivated vaccines, our data suggest that the mRNA-based vaccination causes more severe adverse effects, and the majority of them were mild to moderate in severity. Participants who had previously contracted COVID-19 were not at a higher risk of developing additional vaccine-related side effects.
Collapse
|
11
|
Melanson SEF, Zhao Z, Kumanovics A, Love T, Meng QH, Wu AHB, Apple F, Ondracek CR, Schulz KM, Wiencek JR, Koch D, Christenson R, Zhang YV. Tolerance for three commonly administered COVID-19 vaccines by healthcare professionals. Front Public Health 2022; 10:975781. [PMID: 36238255 PMCID: PMC9553122 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.975781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Most healthcare institutions require employees to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and many also require at least one booster. Objective We determine the impact of vaccine type, demographics, and health conditions on COVID-19 vaccine side effects in healthcare professionals. Design A COVID-19 immunity study was performed at the 2021 American Association for Clinical Chemistry Annual Scientific meeting. As part of this study, a REDCap survey with cascading questions was administered from September 9, 2021 to October 20, 2021. General questions included participant demographics, past and present health conditions, smoking, exercise, and medications. COVID-19 specific questions asked about SARS-CoV-2 vaccine status and type, vaccine-associated side effects after each dose including any boosters, previous infection with COVID-19, diagnostic testing performed, and type and severity symptoms of COVID-19. Results There were 975 participants (47.1% male, median age of 50 years) who completed the survey. Pfizer was the most commonly administered vaccine (56.4%) followed by Moderna (32.0%) and Johnson & Johnson (7.1%). There were no significant differences in vaccine type received by age, health conditions, smoking, exercise, or type or number of prescription medications. Side effects were reported more frequently after second dose (e.g., Moderna or Pfizer) (54.1%) or single/only dose of Johnson & Johnson (47.8%). Males were significantly more likely to report no side effects (p < 0.001), while females were significantly more likely to report injection site reactions (p < 0.001), fatigue (p < 0.001), headache (p < 0.001), muscle pain (p < 0.001), chills (p = 0.001), fever (p = 0.007), and nausea (p < 0.001). There was a significant upward trend in participants reporting no side effects with increasing age (p < 0.001). There were no significant trends in side effects among different races, ethnicities, health conditions, medications, smoking status or exercise. In multivariate logistic regressions analyses, the second dose of Moderna was associated with a significantly higher risk of side effects than both the second dose of Pfizer and the single dose of Johnson & Johnson. Conclusions and relevance Younger people, females, and those receiving the second dose of Moderna had more COVID-19 vaccine side effects that per self-report led to moderate to severe limitations. As reported in other studies, the increase in side effects from Moderna may be explained by higher viral mRNA concentrations but be associated with additional protective immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy E. F. Melanson
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Zhen Zhao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Attila Kumanovics
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Tanzy Love
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Qing H. Meng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alan H. B. Wu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Fred Apple
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin Healthcare/Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Karen M. Schulz
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Joseph R. Wiencek
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - David Koch
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Robert Christenson
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Y. Victoria Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mendez-Lizarraga CA, Chacon-Cruz E, Carrillo-Meza R, Hernández-Milán NS, Inustroza-Sánchez LC, Ovalle-Marroquín DF, Machado-Contreras JR, Ceballos Zuñiga O, Bejarano-Ramírez V, Aguilar-Aguayo C, Medina-Amarillas A, Ceballos-Liceaga SE, Zazueta OE. Report of Adverse Effects Following Population-Wide COVID-19 Vaccination: A Comparative Study between Six Different Vaccines in Baja-California, Mexico. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10081196. [PMID: 36016083 PMCID: PMC9414877 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
After emergency authorization, different COVID-19 vaccines were administered across Mexico in 2021, including mRNA, viral vector, and inactivated platform vaccines. In the state of Baja-California, 3,516,394 doses were administered, and 2285 adverse events (AE) were registered in the epidemiological surveillance system in 2021. Incidence rates per 100,000 doses were calculated for total, mild (local and systemic), and severe AE for each vaccine. Symptoms were compared between mRNA and viral vector/inactivated virus vaccines. The overall incidence rate for all AE was 64.98 per 100,000 administered doses; 79.05 AE per 100,000 doses for mRNA vaccines; and 56.9 AE per 100,000 doses for viral vector/inactivated virus vaccine platforms. AE were at least five times higher in recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine from the Serum Institute of India (AZ from SII). Local injection site symptoms were more common in mRNA vaccines while systemic were more prevalent in viral vector/inactivated virus vaccines. Severe AE rates were similar across all administered vaccines (0.72–1.61 AE per 100,000 doses), except for AZ from SII, which documented 12.6 AE per 100,000 doses. Among 32 hospitalized severe cases, 28 (87.5%) were discharged. Guillain–Barré Syndrome was the most common serious AE reported (n = 7). Adverse events rates differed among vaccine manufacturers but were consistent with clinical trials and population-based reports in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesar A. Mendez-Lizarraga
- Departamento de Epidemiología, Secretaría de Salud de Baja California, Mexicali 21000, Mexico;
- Correspondence: (C.A.M.-L.); (O.E.Z.)
| | - Enrique Chacon-Cruz
- Departamento de Infectología Pediátrica, Hospital General de Tijuana, Tijuana 22000, Mexico;
| | - Ricardo Carrillo-Meza
- Unidad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21376, Mexico;
| | - Néstor Saúl Hernández-Milán
- Dirección General de Servicios de Salud del Estado de Baja California, Secretaría de Salud de Baja California, Mexicali 21000, Mexico; (N.S.H.-M.); (C.A.-A.); (A.M.-A.)
| | | | - Diego F. Ovalle-Marroquín
- Dirección de Enseñanza e Investigación, Secretaría de Salud de Baja California, Mexicali 21000, Mexico;
| | | | - Omar Ceballos Zuñiga
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital General de Mexicali, Mexicali 21000, Mexico;
| | - Verónica Bejarano-Ramírez
- Laboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Secretaría de Salud de Baja California, Mexicali 21010, Mexico;
| | - Cipriano Aguilar-Aguayo
- Dirección General de Servicios de Salud del Estado de Baja California, Secretaría de Salud de Baja California, Mexicali 21000, Mexico; (N.S.H.-M.); (C.A.-A.); (A.M.-A.)
| | - Adrián Medina-Amarillas
- Dirección General de Servicios de Salud del Estado de Baja California, Secretaría de Salud de Baja California, Mexicali 21000, Mexico; (N.S.H.-M.); (C.A.-A.); (A.M.-A.)
| | | | - Oscar E. Zazueta
- Departamento de Epidemiología, Secretaría de Salud de Baja California, Mexicali 21000, Mexico;
- Correspondence: (C.A.M.-L.); (O.E.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|