The Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination on the Social Participation of Immunocompromised Persons - Results of a Multicenter Observational Study

Association of long COVID with health-related Quality of Life and Social Participation in Germany: Finding from an online-based cross-sectional survey

Purpose

This study aims to examine the health-related Quality of Life (hrQoL) and social participation in participants with Long COVID compared to participants without symptoms after COVID-19 and participants with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Germany. The non-random sample consists of participants 18 years or older. Participants were divided in three groups: Lg COVID with a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and new or persistent symptoms 28 days after infection, ExCOVID with a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and without new or persistent symptoms after 28 days, and NoCOVID when participants had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. EQ-5D-3L was used as hrQoL measure and the Index for the Assessment of Health Impairments (IMET) to reflect social participation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed.

Results

A total of 3188 participants were included in the analysis (1421 Lg COVID, 260 ExCOVID, 1507 NoCOVID). Lg COVID was associated with the lowest EQ-5D-3L index values (p < 0.001), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores (p < 0.001), and IMET (p < 0.001) scores followed by NoCOVID and ExCOVID. After adjusting for sociodemographic and medical conditions in a multivariable model Long COVID was still associated with lower hrQoL compared to NoCOVID (p < 0.001). About 10% of Lg COVID participants showed no health impairments in all EQ-5D dimensions while 51.1% of NoCOVID and 60% of ExCOVID participants showed no health impairments.

Conclusion

This study highlights the impairments of persons with Long COVID on hrQoL and social participation compared to individuals without Long COVID in Germany.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trial Registry, DRKS00026007.

Smartphone sensors for evaluating COVID-19 fear in patients with cancer: a prospective study

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the association between the behavior of cancer patients, measured using passively and continuously generated data streams from smartphone sensors (as in digital phenotyping), and perceived fear of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination status.

Methods

A total of 202 patients with different cancer types and undergoing various treatments completed the COVID-19 Fears Questionnaire for Chronic Medical Conditions, and their vaccination status was evaluated. Patients' behaviors were monitored using a smartphone application that passively and continuously captures high-resolution data from personal smartphone sensors. In all, 107 patients were monitored for at least 2 weeks. The study was conducted between August 2022 and August 2023. Distributions of clinical and demographical parameters between fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated patients were compared using the Chi-squared test. The fear of COVID-19 among the groups was compared using the Mann-Whitney and the Kruskal-Wallis criteria. Trajectories of passively generated data were compared as a function of fear of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination status using local polynomial regression.

Results

In total, 202 patients were included in the study. Most patients were fully (71%) or partially (13%) vaccinated and 16% of the patients were unvaccinated for COVID-19. Fully vaccinated or unvaccinated patients reported greater fear of COVID-19 than partially vaccinated patients. Fear of COVID-19 was higher in patients being treated with biological therapy. Patients who reported a higher fear of COVID-19 spent more time at home, visited places at shorter distances from home, and visited fewer places of interest (POI). Fully or partially vaccinated patients visited more POI than unvaccinated patients. Local polynomial regression using passively generated smartphone sensor data showed that, although at the beginning of the study, all patients had a similar number of POI, after 1 week, partially vaccinated patients had an increased number of POI, which later remained, on average, around four POI per day. Meanwhile, fully vaccinated or unvaccinated patients had a similar trend of POI and it did not exceed three visits per day during the entire treatment period.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have an impact on the behavior of cancer patients even after the termination of the global pandemic. A higher perceived fear of COVID-19 was associated with less movement, more time spent at home, less time spent outside of home, and a lower number of visited places. Unvaccinated patients visited fewer places and were moving less overall during a 14-week follow-up as compared to vaccinated patients.

Conceptualization, Measurement, and Factors Associated with Participation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to examine the conceptualization and measurement of participation among people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and the factors, such as facilitators and barriers, linked to participation in this population.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to July 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were screened using primary inclusion criteria of peer-reviewed articles that measure participation in adults with PD.

DATA EXTRACTION

The reviewers independently assessed quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extracted data regarding sample characteristics, study design, country, properties of assessments, and factors examined in relation to participation.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Out of 64,427 records, we included 36 articles. Among them, less than half explicitly defined participation, and those articles used four different participation-related terms. Eighteen different assessments have been used to measure participation, and 56% of them were originally developed to measure constructs other than participation. Among aspects of participation assessed by the evaluation tools, participation problem was the most frequently measured, followed by participation accomplishment and satisfaction with participation. Many impairment-level factors, including disease severity, depression, and cognition, were found to be associated with participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation is a central concept and important outcome in the field of rehabilitation. This systematic review provides a summary and synthesis of the existing quantitative studies on participation among people with PD. It identified inconsistencies in the conceptualization and measurement of participation across studies. Additionally, the aspect of satisfaction with participation and the association of environmental (or social) factors with participation have received relatively little attention. Future research should investigate satisfaction with participation, examine the impact of environmental factors on participation, and include longitudinal studies to better understand participation in individuals with PD.

[Social participation and melanoma during the COVID-19 pandemic]

BACKGROUND

Measures used to contain the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have impaired the social participation of many people. Especially people with chronic or oncologic conditions were affected. In this observational study, we aimed to assess social participation in melanoma patients with immune checkpoint therapy. Therefore, we investigated social participation in a very specific group and consider this a basis for further studies in a growing collective of long-term survivors in an era of infectious diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional assessment via the index to measure social participation and health associated quality of life ("Index zur Messung von Einschränkungen der Teilhabe", IMET). Results are compared with published norm data.

RESULTS

In all, 47 melanoma patients (mean age 58.5 years, standard deviation 13.2) were included: 18 patients had advanced melanoma stage III and received adjuvant Immunotherapy, while 29 patients were treated because of metastatic melanoma (stage IV). Results of the IMET showed no significant impairments in social participation when regarding the total score and when being compared to prepandemic norm data. Female patients did have significantly impaired participation.

CONCLUSION

The endpoints health-related quality of life and social participation are important in long-term survivors with melanoma. During the pandemic, women of our collective were especially at risk for impairment of social participation. Differences between pandemic and disease-specific influences on social participation cannot be derived from our data. Nevertheless, this study will be part of growing and necessary research on long-term cancer survivors diseases.