Exploring the threshold for the start of respiratory syncytial virus infection epidemic season using sentinel surveillance data in Japan

Efficacy and safety of bivalent RSVpreF maternal vaccination to prevent RSV illness in Japanese infants: Subset analysis from the pivotal randomized phase 3 MATISSE trial

BACKGROUND

Maternal vaccination with respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F vaccine (RSVpreF) is effective at preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) in newborns/infants.

METHODS

This subgroup analysis from the global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled MATISSE (Maternal Immunization Study for Safety and Efficacy) trial evaluated participants enrolled in Japan. Pregnant women 24-36 weeks' gestation were randomized 1:1 to receive RSVpreF or placebo. Maternal safety endpoints included local reactions/systemic events within 7 days, adverse events (AEs) through 1 month, and serious AEs (SAEs) through 6 months after vaccination. In infants born to maternal participants, safety endpoints included specific birth outcomes, AEs through 1 month after birth, and SAEs and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions through 12 or 24 months after birth. Vaccine efficacy in infants was assessed against RSV-positive, medically attended LRTI (RSV-MA-LRTI) and severe RSV-MA-LRTI through 180 days after birth.

RESULTS

In Japan, 230 maternal participants received RSVpreF and 232 received placebo; 218 and 216 infants born to these mothers, respectively, were analyzed. Observed vaccine efficacy (95 % CIs) against infant RSV-MA-LRTI within 90 and 180 days after birth was 100.0 % (30.9, 100.0; RSVpreF, 0 cases; placebo, 7 cases) and 87.6 % (7.2, 99.7; RSVpreF, 1 case; placebo, 8 cases), respectively. Vaccine efficacy (95 % CIs) against severe RSV-MA-LRTI within 90 and 180 days was 100.0 % (-140.9, 100.0; RSVpreF, 0 cases; placebo, 3 cases) and 75.1 % (-151.5, 99.5; RSVpreF, 1 case; placebo, 4 cases), respectively. No safety concerns were identified. AE rates ≤1 month after vaccination/birth were similar in the RSVpreF (maternal, 16.1 %; infant, 48.6 %) and placebo (19.8 %; 50.5 %) groups. Preterm birth rates were also similar (RSVpreF, 3.2 %; placebo, 6.0 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Safety and efficacy data in Japanese participants were consistent with overall MATISSE results, supporting the efficacy of maternal RSVpreF vaccination against severe MA-RSV-LRTI/MA-RSV-LRTI in infants, with no safety concerns. NCT04424316.

New Insights on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prevention

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a well-known infant pathogen transmitted mainly by droplets. It is a leading cause of upper respiratory tract infections in children, usually with a mild course of illness. RSV has also been a threat to older people, especially those with underlying medical conditions. For a long time, prevention was limited to passive immunoprophylaxis with palivizumab for high-risk infants. There was a strong need to find other treatment or prevention methods against RSV infections. In addition, after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, some significant changes in RSV epidemiology have been observed. Researchers noticed the shift in RSV seasonality and age distribution and the increased number of cases in older infants and adults. All of these made the need to find other medical options even stronger. Fortunately, two protein-based vaccines against RSV have successfully passed all phases of clinical trials and have been approved for use by adults and older people. One of them is also approved for infants from birth to 6 months of age (after maternal immunisation during pregnancy) and for pregnant women between 24 and 36 weeks of pregnancy. Also, a new passive immunisation option named nirsevimab (a highly potent monoclonal antibody with a long half-life) is now available for the paediatric group. In this review, we will discuss the previous and current RSV prevention methods in the light of structural discoveries of RSV antigens.

Impact of meteorological and demographic factors on the influenza epidemic in Japan: a large observational database study

Factors affecting the start date of the influenza epidemic season and total number of infected persons per 1,000,000 population in 47 prefectures of Japan were evaluated. This retrospective observational study (September 2014-August 2019; N = 472,740-883,804) evaluated data from a Japanese health insurance claims database. Single and multiple regression analyses evaluated the time to start of the epidemic or total infected persons per 1,000,000 population with time to absolute humidity (AH) or number of days with AH (≤ 5.5, ≤ 6.0, ≤ 6.5, and ≤ 7.0), total visitors (first epidemic month or per day), and total population. For the 2014/15, 2015/16, and 2016/17 seasons, a weak-to-moderate positive correlation (R2: 0.042-0.417) was observed between time to start of the epidemic and time to first day with AH below the cutoff values. Except in the 2016/17 season (R2: 0.089), a moderate correlation was reported between time to start of the epidemic and the total population (R2: 0.212-0.401). For all seasons, multiple regression analysis showed negative R2 for time to start of the epidemic and total visitors and population density (positive for time to AH ≤ 7.0). The earlier the climate becomes suitable for virus transmission and the higher the human mobility (more visitors and higher population density), the earlier the epidemic season tends to begin.