1
|
Van Biesen D, Van Damme T, Morgulec-Adamowicz N, Buchholz A, Anjum M, Healy S. A Systematic Review of Digital Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in People With Intellectual Disabilities and/or Autism. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2024; 41:330-350. [PMID: 37793654 DOI: 10.1123/apaq.2023-0061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This systematic review synthesized the literature on digital health interventions for the promotion of physical activity (PA) among people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism. From an initial screening of 553 records, 10 studies underwent full-text review. Data were extracted relating to study, intervention, and sample characteristics and PA-related findings. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. There were mixed findings pertaining to the effectiveness of digital health interventions for promoting PA among these populations. Positive results were reported for three of five active-video-game interventions, two of three social-media-based interventions, and one of two e-learning/multicomponent interventions. Digital health interventions can potentially be effective for promoting PA among people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism. However, the large variation in the samples and intervention types and a reliance on pre- and quasi-experimental research designs suggest that inferences should be made with caution and additional research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tine Van Damme
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Momna Anjum
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séan Healy
- Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kreis A, Gomes A, Tsiouris A, Beutel ME, Ruckes C, Dahn I, Schiller A, Loy G, Zajac H, Kosmuetzky G, Ziser P, Sträßner E, Schneider V, Wilde T, Leber M, Schäfer H, Kilian R, Zwerenz R. Development and evaluation of an internet- and mobile-based intervention for individualized return to work planning after inpatient rehabilitation - Study protocol for a randomized-controlled-trial. Internet Interv 2024; 35:100721. [PMID: 38370287 PMCID: PMC10869915 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Following discharge, it is crucial for patients to transfer intentions and action plans from inpatient rehabilitation into everyday life. This ensures their reintegration into social and working life and prevents economic costs due to sick leave or reduced earning capacity pension. However, most established aftercare programs do not specifically address occupational problems or challenges during occupational measures such as graded return to work. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the low-threshold online self-help intervention marena (Meine Arbeitsbezogene Reha-Nachsorge - My Work-related Rehabilitation Aftercare) to support return to work. Methods A two-arm randomized-controlled-trial (RCT) will be conducted. A total of N = 400 rehabilitation inpatients across different indication areas (psychosomatic, orthopedic, or cardiologic) aged 18 to 65 years with a planned return to work after medical rehabilitation, have a heightened social-medical risk and private internet access and are insured with the German Pension insurance or statutory health insurance, will be recruited in four medical and psychosomatic clinics in Germany. Participants will be allocated to either the intervention (IG) or the control group (CG). In a stepped-care model, participants of the IG will receive access to the non-guided internet- and mobile-based intervention marena (IG subgroup 1) or marena in combination with GSA-Online plus (IG subgroup 2), a guided psychodynamic internet-based intervention that has proven effective in two trials regarding occupational and health objectives. Based on a priori defined indication criteria, clinic staff will recommend either IG subgroup 1 or IG subgroup 2. The CG will receive optimized treatment as usual with access to a survey feature within marena. The primary outcome will be work status after 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T4). The endpoint at 12 months (T4) after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation will be considered as secondary endpoint. Work status is defined as positive if the participant is working and has ≤ 6 weeks of sick leave at T2 and ≤ 12 weeks of sick leave at T4. Secondary outcomes include successful completion of graded return to work, successful application for benefits for participation in working life, current work ability, social-medical risk, subjective prognosis of future employment, quality of life, somatic symptoms, coping, social support, depression, anxiety, and psychosocial stress. Discussion This study will contribute to the evidence concerning efficacy of online aftercare interventions. If proven efficacious, marena could provide an individualized and adaptable self-help approach to promote return to work following inpatient rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adina Kreis
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Anna Gomes
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Angeliki Tsiouris
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Manfred E. Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Ingo Dahn
- Virtual Campus Rhineland-Palatinate, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Annika Schiller
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Guido Loy
- Psychosomatic Clinic, Campus Bad Neustadt, Kurhausstraße 31, 97616 Bad Neustadt, Germany
| | - Hiltrud Zajac
- Psychosomatic Clinic, Campus Bad Neustadt, Kurhausstraße 31, 97616 Bad Neustadt, Germany
| | - Gregor Kosmuetzky
- Rehabilitation Center Bad Driburg - Clinic Berlin, Brunnenstraße 11, 33014 Bad Driburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Ziser
- Rehabilitation Center Bad Driburg - Clinic Berlin, Brunnenstraße 11, 33014 Bad Driburg, Germany
| | - Eckard Sträßner
- Rehabilitation Center Schömberg - Clinic Black Forest, Römerweg 50, 75328 Schömberg, Germany
| | - Vera Schneider
- Rehabilitation Center Schömberg - Clinic Black Forest, Römerweg 50, 75328 Schömberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wilde
- St. Franziska Stift - Rehabilitation Clinic Bad Kreuznach, Franziska-Puricelli-Straße 3, 55543 Bad Kreuznach, Germany
| | - Martin Leber
- St. Franziska Stift - Rehabilitation Clinic Bad Kreuznach, Franziska-Puricelli-Straße 3, 55543 Bad Kreuznach, Germany
| | - Hannah Schäfer
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Rebecca Kilian
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Zwerenz
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vennik J, Geraghty AWA, Martinson K, Yardley L, Stuart B, Moore M, Francis N, Hay A, Verheij T, Bradbury K, Greenwell K, Dennison L, Williamson S, Denison-Day J, Ainsworth B, Raftery J, Zhu S, Butler C, Richards-Hall S, Little P. Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the 'Immune Defence' randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285693. [PMID: 37450460 PMCID: PMC10348543 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most adults in the UK experience at least one viral respiratory tract infection (RTI) per year. Individuals with comorbidities and those with recurrent RTIs are at higher risk of infections. This can lead to more severe illness, worse quality of life and more days off work. There is promising evidence that using common nasal sprays or improving immune function through increasing physical activity and managing stress, may reduce the incidence and severity of RTIs. METHODS AND DESIGN Immune Defence is an open, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Up to 15000 adults from UK general practices, with a comorbidity or risk factor for infection and/or recurrent infections (3 or more infections per year) will be randomly allocated to i) a gel-based nasal spray designed to inhibit viral respiratory infections; ii) a saline nasal spray, iii) a digital intervention promoting physical activity and stress management, or iv) usual care with brief advice for managing infections, for 12 months. Participants will complete monthly questionnaires online. The primary outcome is the total number of days of illness due to RTIs over 6 months. Key secondary outcomes include: days with symptoms moderately bad or worse; days where work/normal activities were impaired; incidence of RTI; incidence of COVID-19; health service contacts; antibiotic usage; beliefs about antibiotics; intention to consult; number of days of illness in total due to respiratory tract infections over 12 months. Economic evaluation from an NHS perspective will compare the interventions, expressed as incremental cost effectiveness ratios. A nested mixed methods process evaluation will examine uptake and engagement with the interventions and trial procedures. TRIAL STATUS Recruitment commenced in December 2020 and the last participant is expected to complete the trial in April 2024. DISCUSSION Common nasal sprays and digital interventions to promote physical activity and stress management are low cost, accessible interventions applicable to primary care. If effective, they have the potential to reduce the individual and societal impact of RTIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospectively registered with ISRCTN registry (17936080) on 30/10/2020. SPONSOR This RCT is sponsored by University of Southampton. The sponsors had no role in the study design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Vennik
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W. A. Geraghty
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Martinson
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Yardley
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Theo Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Katherine Bradbury
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Greenwell
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Dennison
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Williamson
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - James Denison-Day
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Ainsworth
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - James Raftery
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Butler
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Samantha Richards-Hall
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tam HL, Chair SY, Leung ISH, Leung LYL, Chan ASW. US Adults Practicing Healthy Lifestyles Before and During COVID-19: Comparative Analysis of National Surveys. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023; 9:e45697. [PMID: 36940169 PMCID: PMC10131672 DOI: 10.2196/45697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practicing healthy lifestyles can reduce the risk to develop noncommunicable diseases and the related mortality. Studies showed that practicing healthy lifestyles could enhance disease-free life expectancy and preserve bodily functions. However, engagement in healthy lifestyle behavior was suboptimal. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to define individuals' lifestyle characteristics before and during COVID-19 and determine the factors associated with practicing a healthy lifestyle. This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2019 and 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. METHODS US individuals aged ≥18 years were interviewed via phone call. Healthy lifestyles were assessed through corresponding questions regarding the maintenance of optimal body weight, physical activity, daily consumption of at least five portions of fruits and vegetables, current smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Missing data were imputed using a package in the R statistical software. The effects of practicing a healthy lifestyle on cases without missing data and those with imputation were reported. RESULTS There were 550,607 respondents (272,543 and 278,064 from 2019 and 2021, respectively) included in this analysis. The rates of practicing a healthy lifestyle were 4% (10,955/272,543) and 3.6% (10,139/278,064) in 2019 and 2021, respectively. Although 36.6% (160,629/438,693) of all 2021 respondents had missing data, the results of the logistic regression analysis for cases without missing data and those with imputation were similar. Of the cases with imputation, women (odds ratio [OR] 1.87) residing in urban areas (OR 1.24) with high education levels (OR 1.73) and good or better health status (OR 1.59) were more likely to practice healthier lifestyles than young individuals (OR 0.51-0.67) with a low household income (OR 0.74-0.78) and chronic health conditions (OR 0.48-0.74). CONCLUSIONS A healthy lifestyle should be strongly promoted at the community level. In particular, factors associated with a low rate of practice of healthy lifestyles should be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hon Lon Tam
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Sek Ying Chair
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Isaac Sze Him Leung
- Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Leona Yuen Ling Leung
- The Ronin Institute, Montclair, NJ, United States
- Canadian Academy of Independent Scholars, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alex Siu Wing Chan
- Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grobler JS, Stavric V, Saywell NL. Participant perspectives of automated short messaging service interventions to promote physical activity: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221113705. [PMID: 35860614 PMCID: PMC9290169 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221113705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Short messaging service has the potential to improve participation in physical activity in individuals with long-term health conditions. However, successful implementation relies on participant engagement with such programmes. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review of qualitative literature exploring participant perspectives of short messaging service-based interventions designed to promote physical activity for people with long-term health conditions. Methods CINHAL, MEDLINE, SPORTSDiscus, Scopus and Web of Science were searched up to 15 February 2021 looking for participants’ perspectives on short messaging service programmes designed to promote physical activity in people with long-term health conditions. Included studies were analysed using thematic synthesis. Results Eight studies involving 533 participants were included and analysed using the principles of thematic analysis and 10 descriptive themes were identified. These descriptive themes were further refined to develop five final analytical themes: taking control of my own health, from information to action, relationship with the programme, perfection required for success and increased expectations. Discussion The findings agree with published work on the factors which influence behaviour. The findings from this synthesis demonstrate that automated short messaging service programmes to increase physical activity are generally acceptable. People report that these interventions support and encourage physical activity. The novel finding of this study was that having more regular and long-lasting contact has the potential to increase the expectations people have of healthcare services. This is a finding which needs to be considered and managed but should not discourage the use of automated short messaging service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Verna Stavric
- Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicola L Saywell
- Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|