Women Trust Their OBGYNs to Provide Preexposure Prophylaxis: An Opportunity for HIV Prevention

"PrEPping" women's healthcare providers: motivational interviewing to support ending the HIV epidemic

In 2018, cisgender women accounted for nearly 20% of new HIV infections, with women of color disproportionately affected. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake, adherence, and persistence are paramount to ending the HIV epidemic, but current strategies to promote it have not improved uptake among women. Alternatively, pre-exposure prophylaxis marketing and implementation have traditionally targeted men who have sex with men and transwomen. Women feel most comfortable turning to their primary care and reproductive health providers for HIV and pre-exposure prophylaxis counseling, but prescribing is the lowest among these providers. Thus, reframing pre-exposure prophylaxis counseling and education strategies is crucial to better engage providers and patients. Motivational interviewing is a person-centered counseling style for eliciting behavior change. Providers use 4 core skills-open-ended questions, affirmation, reflective listening, and summarizing-to empower individuals for behavior change, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis use. Motivational interviewing is brief, individualized, and effective in increasing pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake, regardless of patients' readiness to change. Primary care and reproductive health providers can employ motivational interviewing approaches with pre-exposure prophylaxis counseling to increase uptake among cisgender women and end the HIV epidemic.

Self-Perception of HIV Risk and Interest in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in a General Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic Population

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is underutilized, particularly among attendees of obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clinics. Lack of self-perception of HIV risk is a barrier to PrEP utilization, and a lack of understanding of community risk factors for HIV may contribute to that lack of self-perception of risk. Methods: Attendees of general Ob/Gyn clinics in New Orleans completed a survey assessing HIV knowledge, self-perception of HIV risk, and interest in PrEP. They reviewed a brief written educational intervention on demographic and behavioral risk factors for HIV and availability of PrEP. HIV knowledge, self-perception of HIV risk, and interest in PrEP were reassessed after the intervention. Results: One-hundred seventy individuals completed the survey. Eighty-five participants (50%) expressed initial interest in PrEP. Self-perception of risk of HIV acquisition was associated with interest in PrEP. Ten of 11 (90.9%) respondents who had high self-perceived risk of HIV were interested in PrEP, compared with 75 of 159 (47.2%) of those who had low self-perceived risk (p = 0.01). The association remained significant in a multivariate analysis. After the intervention, the number of those who perceived themselves to be at risk of HIV increased from 11 to 25 individuals (p < 0.01) and 20 of these (80%) were interested in PrEP. Knowledge of HIV risk factors increased (p < 0.01). The intervention did not significantly alter interest in PrEP. Conclusions: Self-perception of HIV risk was associated with interest in PrEP. A brief written educational intervention increased knowledge of HIV risk factors and increased self-perception of risk of HIV. The intervention did not translate to increased interest in PrEP.

Women's perspectives on barriers to potential PrEP uptake for HIV prevention: HIV risk assessment, relationship dynamics and stigma

HIV remains a significant health issue for women, and multiple overlapping factors shape women's HIV-related risk. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers critical advantages over other existing options, yet it remains significantly underused among women in the USA where limited work has explored women's opinions on barriers to potential PrEP use. Using open-ended text responses from a sample of women seeking care at a US urban family planning health centre, this study aimed to understand perceptions of factors affecting potential PrEP use. Three themes concerning key factors impacting potential PrEP use emerged: HIV risk assessment, relationship dynamics, and anticipated stigma. Women's assessment of HIV risk suggests that identifying women in clinical settings as having low self-perceived risk may overlook the complexity of how women determine HIV-related risk and prevention needs. Women frequently referenced relationship dynamics when considering PrEP and discussed anticipated partner reactions about use contributing to non-use. Fear or worry of stigma were expressed as motivations to not use PrEP. Study results highlight the importance of public health and health care professionals normalising PrEP as a strategy in women's HIV prevention and sexual health decision-making. Woman-centred PrEP education, screening and communication strategies reflective of their unique HIV-related risk context are needed.