The Effect of Prosthetic Alignment on Prosthetic and Total Leg Stiffness While Running With Simulated Running-Specific Prostheses

A review of evidence on mechanical properties of running specific prostheses and their relationship with running performance

Background

Although mechanical properties of running specific prostheses (RSPs) can affect running performance, manufacturers do not consistently report them. This study aimed to review existing literature on RSP mechanical and structural properties and their relationship with running performance.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted using keywords related to mechanical properties of RSPs and running performance. Search terms included stiffness and hysteresis, as well as performance outcomes including metabolic cost and running speed. Non-peer-reviewed and non-English publications were excluded.

Results

Twenty articles were included in the review. Sixteen studies used a material testing machine to measure RSP material properties, and four articles used other techniques including 2D/3D video capture and force platforms. Both measurement techniques and reporting of outcomes were inconsistent, which limits the ability to draw broad conclusions. Additionally, several studies did not report the numerical data for material properties despite measuring them. Relatively few articles measured both material properties and running performance and assessed correlations.

Conclusion

Several articles connected prosthesis properties to running performance. However, inconsistent measurement and reporting of mechanical properties, along with the multifactorial nature of the athlete-prosthesis system, limit the ability to draw broad conclusions regarding the relationship between material and structural properties and athlete performance. Current evidence may be useful for clinicians seeking ways to optimize RSP stiffness in a case-by-case basis; however, clinicians would benefit from more consistent and systematic comparisons of the attributes of different RSPs and their role in performance.

The accuracy of commercially available instrumented insoles (ARION) for measuring spatiotemporal running metrics

Spatiotemporal metrics such as step frequency have been associated with running injuries in some studies. Wearables can measure these metrics and provide real-time feedback in-field, but are often not validated. This study assessed the validity of commercially available wireless instrumented insoles (ARION) for quantifying spatiotemporal metrics during level running at different speeds (2.78-5.0 m s-1 ,) and slopes (3° and 6° up/downhill) to an instrumented treadmill. Mean raw, percentage and absolute percentage error, and limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. Agreement was statistically quantified using four thresholds: excellent, <5%; good, <10%; acceptable, <15%; and poor, >15% error. Excellent agreement (<5% error) was achieved for stride time across all conditions, and for step frequency across all but one condition with good agreement. Contact time and swing time generally showed at least good agreement. The mean difference across all conditions was -0.95% for contact time, 0.11% for stride time, 0.6% for swing time, -0.11% for step frequency, and -0.09% when averaged across all outcomes and conditions. The accuracy at an individual level was generally good to excellent, being <10% for all but two conditions, with these conditions being <15%. Additional experiments among four runners showed that step length could also be measured with an accuracy of 1.76% across different speeds with an updated version of the insoles. These findings suggests that the ARION wearable may not only be useful for large-scale in-field studies investigating group differences, but also to quantify spatiotemporal metrics with generally good to excellent accuracy for individual runners.

Biomechanical factors affecting individuals with lower limb amputations running using running-specific prostheses: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Running-specific prostheses (RSPs) are biomechanically designed to enable individuals with lower limb amputations to engage in high level sports.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the influence of RSP use on the running biomechanics of individuals with lower limb amputations?

METHODS

An article search was conducted in six databases since their inception to July 2021. Two independent reviewers assessed the title, abstract and full texts in the review process. The quality of the papers was appraised. The review included a total of 35 articles.

RESULTS

Main findings indicate force production is a limitation of RSPs. Individuals with lower limb absence employ a variety of compensatory strategies such as adjusting their step frequency, contact length and joint kinetics to improve their running performance. Leg stiffness modulation and external factors relating to the RSP design and fitting play important roles in RSP biomechanics. For individuals with unilateral amputations, the increased loading of the intact limb could increase the risk of acute injury or chronic joint degradation.

SIGNIFICANCE

To improve their running performance, runners with lower limb amputations employ various compensatory strategies, such as altering the spatiotemporal and kinetic parameters. Factors relating to RSP height, stiffness, shape, and alignment also play an important role in terms of running biomechanics and should be considered in RSP design and fitting. Future studies should focus on the use of RSPs for recreation, in pediatric populations, with certain amputation levels, as well as the impact of training and running techniques.

The Impact of Blade Technology on Paralympic Sprint Performance Between 1996 and 2016: Bilateral Amputees' Competitive Advantage

It is known that high-performance sprinters with unilateral and bilateral prosthetic lower limbs run at different speeds using different spatiotemporal strategies. Historically, these athletes still competed together in the same races, but 2018 classification rule revisions saw the separation of these two groups. This study sought to compare Paralympic sprint performance between all-comer (i.e., transfemoral and transtibial) unilateral and bilateral amputee sprinters using a large athlete sample. A retrospective analysis of race speed among Paralympic sprinters between 1996 and 2016 was conducted. In total, 584 published race results from 161 sprinters revealed that unilateral and bilateral lower-extremity amputee sprinters had significantly different race speeds in all three race finals (100 m, p value <.001; 200 m, <.001; 400 m, <.001). All-comer bilateral amputee runners ran faster than their unilateral counterparts; performance differences increased with race distance. These data support current classification criteria in amputee sprinting, which may create more equal competitive fields in the future.

Strategies for Gait Retraining in a Collegiate Runner with Transfemoral Amputation: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

More than fifty percent of people with limb amputations participate in sports or physical activity following amputation. Athletes with limb amputations may face additional challenges including phantom limb pain (PLP), psychological barriers, prosthetic complications, and gait abnormalities. Prevalence of PLP in the general amputee population is estimated to be as high as 85%. Despite the high prevalence of PLP, there is little research regarding the use of gait training as a treatment for PLP among both the general amputee population and athletes.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 20-year old female collegiate track and field athlete presented with phantom knee pain brought on with running. The athlete demonstrated deficits in core and hip strength as well as decreased single leg stability bilaterally. Running gait analysis revealed circumduction with the prosthesis for limb advancement and increased vaulting with push off on the sound (uninvolved) limb. Gait retraining strategies were implemented to address video analysis findings and create a more efficient running gait and address phantom limb pain symptoms.

OUTCOMES

Rehabilitation and gait retraining strategies were effective in improving several clinical and functional outcomes in this case. Significant improvements were noted in PLP, running gait mechanics, and the patient's psychological and functional status as measured with a standardized outcome tool, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®).

DISCUSSION

Running gait training following amputation could be a crucial component of rehabilitation for athletes in an attempt to lessen pain while running, especially in those experiencing phantom limb pain (PLP). Utilization of a multidisciplinary team in the gait retraining process is recommended. There is a need for further research to determine the effects of running gait retraining for management of PLP in athletes with amputation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Development of Instrumented Running Prosthetic Feet for the Collection of Track Loads on Elite Athletes

Knowledge of loads acting on running specific prostheses (RSP), and in particular on running prosthetic feet (RPF), is crucial for evaluating athletes' technique, designing safe feet, and biomechanical modelling. The aim of this work was to develop a J-shaped and a C-shaped wearable instrumented running prosthetic foot (iRPF) starting from commercial RPF, suitable for load data collection on the track. The sensing elements are strain gauge bridges mounted on the foot in a configuration that allows decoupling loads parallel and normal to the socket-foot clamp during the stance phase. The system records data on lightweight athlete-worn loggers and transmits them via Wi-Fi to a base station for real-time monitoring. iRPF calibration procedure and static and dynamic validation of predicted ground-reaction forces against those measured by a force platform embedded in the track are reported. The potential application of this wearable system in estimating determinants of sprint performance is presented.