Floor Substrate Preferences of Chickens: A Meta-Analysis

Effects of dustbathing environment on gut microbiota and expression of intestinal barrier and immune-related genes of adult laying hens housed individually in modified traditional cage

Litters, the composition of sand and peat rich in microbiota, are essential to trigger the dustbathing behavior of chickens. To investigate the effects of a dustbathing environment (DE) on the intestinal health, gut microbiota, and immune responses of laying hens, a total of 72 healthy Hy-Line Brown laying hens at 69 wk of age (WOA) were housed individually in modified traditional cages and randomly divided into 2 groups: one group had free access to litters (CT), while the other one was restricted from litters (CC). The experiment lasted for 42 d. At the end of the experiment, the intestinal histomorphology and immune status of laying hens were determined, and the 16S rRNA sequencing method was used to assess the composition of the intestinal microbial community of birds. Intestinal histomorphology changed, including villus height and villus-to-crypt ratio significantly increased in the CT group (P < 0.01). DE reshaped the microbial community and increased the microbial richness with the higher indicators of Chao1 and observed species and the comparatively abundant beta diversity (P < 0.05). Ten genera, including Faecalibacterium and Coprococcus, declined in laying hens from the CT group (P < 0.05), while Alistipes increased in CT hens (P < 0.05) compared to those hens from the CC group. The expression levels of intestinal barrier-related genes of claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin, ZO-1, and ZO-2 and immune-related genes of IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ, IgA, TLR-2, and TLR-4 were significantly upregulated in the intestine of laying hens in CT group (P < 0.05). DE also increased the serum levels of IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ, and IgA (P < 0.01). The alteration of the gut microbiota by DE is closely related to host immune responses, including Lactobacillus positively correlated with IL-4 and IgA. Thus, a dustbathing environment can improve the welfare of laying hens by changing the intestinal histomorphology, immune response, and the gut microbial community.

Welfare of broilers on farm

This Scientific Opinion considers the welfare of domestic fowl (Gallus gallus) related to the production of meat (broilers) and includes the keeping of day-old chicks, broiler breeders, and broiler chickens. Currently used husbandry systems in the EU are described. Overall, 19 highly relevant welfare consequences (WCs) were identified based on severity, duration and frequency of occurrence: 'bone lesions', 'cold stress', 'gastro-enteric disorders', 'group stress', 'handling stress', 'heat stress', 'isolation stress', 'inability to perform comfort behaviour', 'inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour', 'inability to avoid unwanted sexual behaviour', 'locomotory disorders', 'prolonged hunger', 'prolonged thirst', 'predation stress', 'restriction of movement', 'resting problems', 'sensory under- and overstimulation', 'soft tissue and integument damage' and 'umbilical disorders'. These WCs and their animal-based measures (ABMs) that can identify them are described in detail. A variety of hazards related to the different husbandry systems were identified as well as ABMs for assessing the different WCs. Measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate each of the WCs are listed. Recommendations are provided on quantitative or qualitative criteria to answer specific questions on the welfare of broilers and related to genetic selection, temperature, feed and water restriction, use of cages, light, air quality and mutilations in breeders such as beak trimming, de-toeing and comb dubbing. In addition, minimal requirements (e.g. stocking density, group size, nests, provision of litter, perches and platforms, drinkers and feeders, of covered veranda and outdoor range) for an enclosure for keeping broiler chickens (fast-growing, slower-growing and broiler breeders) are recommended. Finally, 'total mortality', 'wounds', 'carcass condemnation' and 'footpad dermatitis' are proposed as indicators for monitoring at slaughter the welfare of broilers on-farm.

Effect of alternative litter materials on the behaviour of male broilers

The welfare of broilers is strongly dependent on the litter material because they spend their life in contact with it. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of alternative litter materials on broiler behaviour. Two hundred eighty-eight 1-day old male broiler chicks were used. Chicks were placed in pens each having different litter material (Wood shavings (WS), paper waste sludge (PWS), sepiolite (S), the mix of 25% paper waste sludge & 75% sepiolite (25PWS+75 S), the mix of 50% paper waste sludge & 50% sepiolite (50PWS+50 S) and the mix of 75% paper waste sludge & 25% sepiolite (75PWS+25 S)). Broilers in the pens were recorded with a camera on the same day in a week during 6 weeks' trial. When total behaviour was assessed from 1 to 41 days of age, the percentage of sitting behaviour was the highest in the WS group and the percentage of resting behaviour was the lowest in the groups of S and WS. It can be suggested that PWS, which is a waste product, does not have a negative effect on natural behaviour and welfare of broilers and it can be used alone or mixed with S as a litter material.