1
|
Sung C, Park CG, Maienschein-Cline M, Chlipala G, Green S, Doorenbos A, Fink A, Bronas U, Lockwood M. Associations Between Gut Microbial Features and Sickness Symptoms in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Biol Res Nurs 2024; 26:368-379. [PMID: 38231673 DOI: 10.1177/10998004241227560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study investigated the relationship of gut microbiome features and sickness symptoms in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS Employing a prospective, longitudinal design, we collected data from 19 participants who had undergone living-donor kidney transplant at three timepoints (pre-transplant and 1 week and 3 months post-transplant). Sickness symptom data and fecal specimens were collected at each timepoint. Participants were grouped either as high or low sickness symptom severity at baseline. Shotgun metagenomics sequencing characterized gut microbial structure and functional gene content. Fecal microbial features, including alpha (evenness and richness within samples) and beta (dissimilarities between samples) diversity and relative abundances, were analyzed using R statistical packages. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses examined relationships between gut microbial features and sickness symptoms. RESULTS Although our exploratory findings revealed no significant differences in alpha and beta diversity between groups, the high-severity group showed lower microbial richness and evenness than the low-severity group. The high-severity group had enriched relative abundance of bacteria from the genera Citrobacter and Enterobacter and reduced relative abundance of bacteria from the genus Akkermansia across timepoints. No functional genes differed significantly between groups or timepoints. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplant recipients with high symptom burden displayed increased putative proinflammatory bacteria and decreased beneficial bacteria. This study provides an effect size that future large cohort studies can employ to confirm associations between gut microbial features and sickness symptom experiences in the kidney transplant population. The study findings also have implications for future interventional studies aiming to alleviate the sickness symptom burden in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Choa Sung
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chang Gi Park
- Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - George Chlipala
- Associate Director of Research Informatics Core, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stefan Green
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ardith Doorenbos
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anne Fink
- Biobehavioral Science in Nursing and Rehabilitation & Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ulf Bronas
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark Lockwood
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lockwood MB, Sung C, Alvernaz SA, Lee JR, Chin JL, Nayebpour M, Bernabé BP, Tussing-Humphreys LM, Li H, Spaggiari M, Martinino A, Park CG, Chlipala GE, Doorenbos AZ, Green SJ. The Gut Microbiome and Symptom Burden After Kidney Transplantation: An Overview and Research Opportunities. Biol Res Nurs 2024:10998004241256031. [PMID: 38836469 DOI: 10.1177/10998004241256031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Many kidney transplant recipients continue to experience high symptom burden despite restoration of kidney function. High symptom burden is a significant driver of quality of life. In the post-transplant setting, high symptom burden has been linked to negative outcomes including medication non-adherence, allograft rejection, graft loss, and even mortality. Symbiotic bacteria (microbiota) in the human gastrointestinal tract critically interact with the immune, endocrine, and neurological systems to maintain homeostasis of the host. The gut microbiome has been proposed as an underlying mechanism mediating symptoms in several chronic medical conditions including irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and psychoneurological disorders via the gut-brain-microbiota axis, a bidirectional signaling pathway between the enteric and central nervous system. Post-transplant exposure to antibiotics, antivirals, and immunosuppressant medications results in significant alterations in gut microbiota community composition and function, which in turn alter these commensal microorganisms' protective effects. This overview will discuss the current state of the science on the effects of the gut microbiome on symptom burden in kidney transplantation and future directions to guide this field of study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark B Lockwood
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Choa Sung
- Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Suzanne A Alvernaz
- Graduate Student, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois ChicagoColleges of Engineering and Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John R Lee
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L Chin
- Medical Student, Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Middletown, NY, USA
| | - Mehdi Nayebpour
- Virginia BioAnalytics LLC, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Beatriz Peñalver Bernabé
- Graduate Student, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois ChicagoColleges of Engineering and Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lisa M Tussing-Humphreys
- Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hongjin Li
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mario Spaggiari
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alessandro Martinino
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chang G Park
- Department of Population Health Nursing Science, Office of Research Facilitation, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - George E Chlipala
- Research Core Facility, Research Resources Center, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ardith Z Doorenbos
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois ChicagoCollege of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stefan J Green
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jia Y, Li Q, Zhang X, Yan Y, Yan S, Li S, Li W, Wu X, Rong H, Liu J. Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Adult Tumor Clinical Trials in China: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e45719. [PMID: 38718388 PMCID: PMC11112474 DOI: 10.2196/45719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND International health policies and researchers have emphasized the value of evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical studies. However, the characteristics of PROs in adult tumor clinical trials in China remain insufficiently elucidated. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the application and characteristics of PRO instruments as primary or secondary outcomes in adult randomized clinical trials related to tumors in China. METHODS This cross-sectional study identified tumor-focused randomized clinical trials conducted in China between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2022. The ClinicalTrials.gov database and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were selected as the databases. Trials were classified into four groups based on the use of PRO instruments: (1) trials listing PRO instruments as primary outcomes, (2) trials listing PRO instruments as secondary outcomes, (3) trials listing PRO instruments as coprimary outcomes, and (4) trials without any mention of PRO instruments. Pertinent data, including study phase, settings, geographic regions, centers, participant demographics (age and sex), funding sources, intervention types, target diseases, and the names of PRO instruments, were extracted from these trials. The target diseases involved in the trials were grouped according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition. RESULTS Among the 6445 trials examined, 2390 (37.08%) incorporated PRO instruments as part of their outcomes. Within this subset, 26.82% (641/2390) listed PRO instruments as primary outcomes, 52.72% (1260/2390) as secondary outcomes, and 20.46% (489/2390) as coprimary outcomes. Among the 2,155,306 participants included in these trials, PRO instruments were used to collect data from 613,648 (28.47%) patients as primary or secondary outcomes and from 74,287 (3.45%) patients as coprimary outcomes. The most common conditions explicitly using specified PRO instruments included thorax tumors (217/1280, 16.95%), breast tumors (176/1280, 13.75%), and lower gastrointestinal tract tumors (173/1280, 13.52%). Frequently used PRO instruments included the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire-30, the visual analog scale, the numeric rating scale, the Traditional Chinese Medicine Symptom Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. CONCLUSIONS Over recent years, the incorporation of PROs has demonstrated an upward trajectory in adult randomized clinical trials on tumors in China. Nonetheless, the infrequent measurement of the patient's voice remains noteworthy. Disease-specific PRO instruments should be more effectively incorporated into various tumor disease categories in clinical trials, and there is room for improvement in the inclusion of PRO instruments as clinical trial end points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Jia
- Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Li
- Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowen Zhang
- Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Yan
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shiyan Yan
- College of Acupuncture and Massage, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shunping Li
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, Shandong University, Shandong, China
| | - Wei Li
- International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowen Wu
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University, Beijng, China
| | - Hongguo Rong
- Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute for Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jianping Liu
- Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute for Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rimmer B, Jenkins R, Russell S, Craig D, Sharp L, Exley C. Assessing quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of the development, content, and quality of available condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100836. [PMID: 38359538 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to identify the condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) available to measure quality of life (QoL) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, examine their development and content, and critically appraise the quality of their measurement properties, to inform recommendations for clinical and research use. METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception to 27th January 2023. Search hits were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers; papers reporting the development and/or validation of condition- and transplant-specific PROMs measuring QoL in adult SOT recipients were considered eligible. We abstracted and synthesised data on PROM characteristics, development (item generation and/or reduction), and content (QoL dimensions). Quality appraisal and synthesis were informed by the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, and included methodological and quality assessment of measurement properties, GRADE levels of evidence, feasibility and interpretability. RESULTS We identified 33 papers reporting 26 QoL PROMs validated in SOT recipients (kidney n = 10 PROMs; liver n = 6; lung n = 3; heart n = 2; pancreas n = 1; multiple organs n = 4). Patient discussions (n = 17 PROMs) and factor analysis (n = 11) were the most common item generation and reduction techniques used, respectively. All PROMs measured ≥3 of nine QoL dimensions (all measured emotional functioning); KDQoL-SF and NIDDK-QA measured all nine. Methodological quality was variable; no PROM had low evidence or better for all measurement properties. All PROMs were COSMIN recommendation category 'B', primarily because none had sufficient content validity. CONCLUSIONS There are many condition- and transplant-specific QoL PROMs validated in SOT recipients, particularly kidney. These findings can help inform PROM selection for clinicians and researchers. However, caution is required when adopting measures, due to the substantial heterogeneity in development, content, and quality. Each PROM has potential but requires further research to be recommendable. Greater consideration of patient and professional involvement in PROM development in this setting is needed to ensure sufficient content validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Rimmer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - Rebeka Jenkins
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Siân Russell
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Craig
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Exley
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan S, Cazzolli R, Jaure A, Johnson DW, Hawley CM, Craig JC, Sautenet B, van Zwieten A, Cao C, Dobrijevic E, Wilson G, Scholes-Robertson N, Carter S, Vastani T, Cho Y, Blumberg E, Brennan DC, Huuskes BM, Knoll G, Kotton C, Mamode N, Muller E, Phan Ha HA, Tedesco-Silva H, White DM, Viecelli AK. Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-transplant Consensus Workshop on Establishing a Core Outcome Measure for Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2024; 108:588-592. [PMID: 38385339 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Chan
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network and the Medical School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Rosanna Cazzolli
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Allison Jaure
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network and the Medical School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Carmel M Hawley
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network and the Medical School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, SA, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Anita van Zwieten
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher Cao
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ellen Dobrijevic
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Greg Wilson
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network and the Medical School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, SA, Australia
| | - Simon Carter
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
| | - Tom Vastani
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Emily Blumberg
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Brooke M Huuskes
- Department of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Greg Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Camille Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, United Kingdom
| | - Elmi Muller
- Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Hai An Phan Ha
- Kidney Diseases and Dialysis Department, Viet Duc University Hospital, Vietnam
| | - Helio Tedesco-Silva
- Division of Nephrology, Hospital do Rim, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - David M White
- Centre for Health Action and Policy, The Rogosin Institute, New York, NY
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network and the Medical School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hughes A, Guha C, Sluiter A, Himmelfarb J, Jauré A. Patient-Centered Research and Innovation in Nephrology. ADVANCES IN KIDNEY DISEASE AND HEALTH 2024; 31:52-67. [PMID: 38403395 DOI: 10.1053/j.akdh.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Patient involvement in research can improve the relevance of research, consequently enhancing the recruitment, retention, and uptake of interventions and policies impacting patient outcomes. Despite this, patients are not often involved in the design and conduct of research. The research agenda and innovations are frequently determined by the interest of health and industry professionals rather than proactively aligning with the priorities of patients. It is now being encouraged and recommended to engage patients in research priority setting to ensure interventions and trials report outcomes valuable to patients, moving away from a history of overlooking the outcomes that reflect the feel and function of patients. Involving patients ensures constant innovative research in nephrology, as this broader depth of evidence fortifies reliability and validity through knowledge gained from lived experience. Findings from such research can enhance clinical practice and strengthen decision-making and policy to support better outcomes. We aim to outline principles and strategies for patient involvement in research, including setting research priorities, identifying and designing interventions, selecting outcomes, and disseminating and translating research. Principles and strategies including engagement, education and training, empowerment, and connection and community provide guidance in patient involvement. There are increasing efforts to involve patients across all stages of research including setting research priorities. Efforts are rising to involve patients across all stages of research including priority setting, identifying and designing interventions, selecting outcomes, and dissemination and translation. Patient involvement throughout the research cycle drives innovative investigations ensuring funding, efforts, and resources are directed toward priorities of patients, contributing to catalyst advancements in care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Hughes
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Chandana Guha
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amanda Sluiter
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan Himmelfarb
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Kidney Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Allison Jauré
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chiche L, Yang HK, Abbassi F, Robles-Campos R, Stain SC, Ko CY, Neumayer LA, Pawlik TM, Barkun JS, Clavien PA. Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 278:647-654. [PMID: 37555327 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This forum summarizes the proceedings of the joint European Surgical Association (ESA)/American Surgical Association (ASA) symposium on Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery that took place in Bordeaux, France, as part of the celebrations of the 30th anniversary of the ESA. Three presentations focused on a) the main messages from the Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference, which took place in Zurich, Switzerland, in June 2022, b) the patient perspective, and c) benchmarking were hold by ESA members and discussed by ASA members in a symposium attended by members of both associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Clifford Y Ko
- University of California at Los Angeles and the American College of Surgeons, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Leigh A Neumayer
- University of Florida, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Jeffrey S Barkun
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Naesens M. Embracing the Wisdom of Ancient Greece in the Era of Personalized Medicine-Uncertainty, Probabilistic Reasoning, and Democratic Consensus. Transpl Int 2023; 36:12178. [PMID: 37954528 PMCID: PMC10632184 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.12178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Further improvements of outcome after solid organ transplantation will depend on our ability to integrate personalized medicine in clinical routine. Not only better risk stratification or improved diagnostics, also targeted therapies and predictive markers of treatment success are needed, as there is a virtual standstill in the development and implementation of novel therapies for prevention and treatment of allograft rejection. The integration of clinical decision support algorithms and novel biomarkers in clinical practice will require a different reasoning, embracing concepts of uncertainty and probabilistic thinking as the ground truth is often unknown and the tools imperfect. This is important for communication between healthcare professionals, but patients and their caregivers also need to be informed and educated about the levels of uncertainty inherent to personalized medicine. In the translation of research findings and personalized medicine to routine clinical care, it remains crucial to maintain global consensus on major aspects of clinical routine, to avoid further divergence between centres and countries in the standard of care. Such consensus can only be reached when experts with divergent opinions are willing to transcend their own convictions, understand that there is not one single truth, and thus are able to embrace a level of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cazzolli R, Sluiter A, Guha C, Huuskes B, Wong G, Craig JC, Jaure A, Scholes-Robertson N. Partnering with patients and caregivers to enrich research and care in kidney disease: values and strategies. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:i57-i68. [PMID: 37711636 PMCID: PMC10497378 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient and caregiver involvement broadens the scope of new knowledge generated from research and can enhance the relevance, quality and impact of research on clinical practice and health outcomes. Incorporating the perspectives of people with lived experience of chronic kidney disease (CKD) affords new insights into the design of interventions, study methodology, data analysis and implementation and has value for patients, healthcare professionals and researchers alike. However, patient involvement in CKD research has been limited and data on which to inform best practice is scarce. A number of frameworks have been developed for involving patients and caregivers in research in CKD and in health research more broadly. These frameworks provide an overall conceptual structure to guide the planning and implementation of research partnerships and describe values that are essential and strategies considered best practice when working with diverse stakeholder groups. This article aims to provide a summary of the strategies most widely used to support multistakeholder partnerships, the different ways patients and caregivers can be involved in research and the methods used to amalgamate diverse and at times conflicting points of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Cazzolli
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda Sluiter
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Chandana Guha
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Brooke Huuskes
- Centre for Cardiovascular Biology and Disease Research, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Allison Jaure
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F, Košťálová B, De Geest S. Psychometric Properties of the BAASIS: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. Transplantation 2023; 107:1795-1809. [PMID: 36949037 PMCID: PMC10358438 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonadherence to immunosuppressives, a risk factor for poor posttransplant outcomes, can be assessed by self-report using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS). Available in written and interview versions, and previously validated on content, the BAASIS is widely used in research and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate its psychometric properties. METHODS Using a literature search and our BAASIS database, this meta-analysis identified completed studies in adult transplant recipients whose data were usable to examine the BAASIS' reliability and 3 validity aspects: (1) relationships with other variables (electronic monitoring, other self-report scales, tacrolimus blood-level variability, collateral report, depressive symptoms, psycho-behavioral constructs, and interventions); (2) response processes; and (3) internal structure. Testing used random-effects logistic regressions. RESULTS Our sample included 12 109 graft recipients from 26 studies. Of these 26, a total of 20 provided individual participant data. Evidence of the BAASIS' stability over time supports its reliability. Validity testing of relationships with other variables showed that BAASIS-assessed nonadherence was significantly associated with the selected variables: electronically monitored nonadherence ( P < 0.03), other self- and collaterally-reported nonadherence ( P < 0.001), higher variability in tacrolimus concentrations ( P = 0.02), higher barriers ( P < 0.001), lower self-efficacy ( P < 0.001), lower intention ( P < 0.001), and higher worries ( P = 0.02). Nonadherence also decreased after regimen change interventions ( P = 0.03). Response process evaluation indicated good readability and slightly higher nonadherence with the written version. Structurally, items on taking and timing shared variability. CONCLUSIONS The BAASIS shows good validity and reliability as a self-report instrument to assess medication nonadherence in transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Denhaerynck
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fabienne Dobbels
- Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Barbora Košťálová
- Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
- Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Swift SL, Leyva Y, Wang S, Chang CCH, Dew MA, Shapiro R, Unruh M, Kendall K, Croswell E, Peipert JD, Myaskovsky L. Are cultural or psychosocial factors associated with patient-reported outcomes at the conclusion of kidney transplant evaluation? Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14796. [PMID: 35988025 PMCID: PMC9772103 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplant evaluation (KTE) is a period marked by many stressors for patients, which may lead to poorer patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Research on the association of cultural and psychosocial factors with PROs during KTE is lacking, even though cultural and psychosocial variables may mitigate the relationship between acceptance status and PROs. METHODS Using a prospective cohort study of 955 adults referred for KTE, we examined whether cultural factors and psychosocial characteristics, assessed at the initiation of KTE, are associated with PROs at KTE completion, controlling for demographics and medical factors. Also, we analyzed whether these factors moderate the relationship between transplant acceptance status and PROs. RESULTS In multivariable regression models, a stronger sense of mastery was associated with higher physical and mental QOL. A stronger sense of self-esteem was associated with higher kidney-specific QOL. Depression was associated with a lower mental QOL, but only in those who were accepted for transplant. Having low levels of external locus of control was associated with better mental QOL in those who were not accepted for transplant. Higher anxiety was associated with poorer kidney-specific QOL among those who were not accepted for KT, but trust in physician was only associated with greater satisfaction in transplant clinic service for those who were accepted for KT. CONCLUSIONS Targeting interventions to increase patient mastery and external locus of control, and reduce depression and anxiety in patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation may be useful approaches to improve their experience during this stressful period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel L. Swift
- Center for Healthcare Equity in Kidney Disease (CHEK-D), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
- SS now at New Mexico Department of Health, Epidemiology
| | - Yuri Leyva
- Center for Healthcare Equity in Kidney Disease (CHEK-D), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
| | - Shu Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida
| | - Chung-Chou H. Chang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine
| | - Mary Amanda Dew
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine
| | - Ron Shapiro
- Mount Sinai Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine
| | - Mark Unruh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, School of Medicine
| | | | - Emilee Croswell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaboration (NUTORC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
| | - Larissa Myaskovsky
- Center for Healthcare Equity in Kidney Disease (CHEK-D), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bellini MI, Amabile MI, Saullo P, Zorzetti N, Testini M, Caronna R, D’Andrea V. A Woman's Place Is in Theatre, but Are Theatres Designed with Women in Mind? A Systematic Review of Ergonomics for Women in Surgery. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123496. [PMID: 35743578 PMCID: PMC9225169 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Literature regarding ergonomic protocols for surgery is lacking, and there is a paucity of information on how this impacts on gender differences with regards to the barriers faced by women in surgery. Methods: This article reviews current literature addressing women in surgery and ergonomics through a systematic search including the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Results: Searches retrieved 425 items, and after a thorough evaluation for inclusion, 15 studies were examined—predominantly surveys (n = 9) and originating from the USA (n = 9). Identified ergonomic challenges included the general shorter height and smaller glove size of women. Furthermore, women experienced more musculoskeletal pain than men, potentially because the size and design of theatre tools are designed for male and tall individuals, highlighting an unconscious gender bias still pervading the surgical field. Conclusions: As more women enter medicine and pursue surgical careers, it is essential to foster a culture of diversity and inclusion in theatre to develop more ergonomic environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Irene Bellini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (P.S.); (N.Z.); (M.T.); (R.C.); (V.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0649970385
| | - Maria Ida Amabile
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (P.S.); (N.Z.); (M.T.); (R.C.); (V.D.)
| | - Paolina Saullo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (P.S.); (N.Z.); (M.T.); (R.C.); (V.D.)
| | - Noemi Zorzetti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (P.S.); (N.Z.); (M.T.); (R.C.); (V.D.)
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (P.S.); (N.Z.); (M.T.); (R.C.); (V.D.)
- Academic Unit of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, School of Medical, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70120 Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Caronna
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (P.S.); (N.Z.); (M.T.); (R.C.); (V.D.)
| | - Vito D’Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.A.); (P.S.); (N.Z.); (M.T.); (R.C.); (V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Naesens M, Loupy A, Hilbrands L, Oberbauer R, Bellini MI, Glotz D, Grinyó J, Heemann U, Jochmans I, Pengel L, Reinders M, Schneeberger S, Budde K. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10137. [PMID: 35669977 PMCID: PMC9163307 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Conditional marketing authorization (CMA) facilitates timely access to new drugs for illnesses with unmet clinical needs, such as late graft failure after kidney transplantation. Late graft failure remains a serious, burdensome, and life-threatening condition for recipients. This article has been developed from content prepared by members of a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) for a Broad Scientific Advice request, submitted by ESOT to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and reviewed by the EMA in 2020. The article presents the rationale for using surrogate endpoints in clinical trials aiming at improving late graft failure rates, to enable novel kidney transplantation therapies to be considered for CMA and improve access to medicines. The paper also provides background data to illustrate the relationship between primary and surrogate endpoints. Developing surrogate endpoints and a CMA strategy could be particularly beneficial for studies where the use of primary endpoints would yield insufficient statistical power or insufficient indication of long-term benefit following transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Maarten Naesens,
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ina Jochmans
- Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marlies Reinders
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|