Normothermic Machine Perfusion—Improving the Supply of Transplantable Livers for High-Risk Recipients

Impact of donor transaminases on liver transplant utilisation and unnecessary organ discard: national registry cohort study

Background

Donor liver transaminases (ALT and AST) have been used to decline livers for transplant, despite evidence that they do not influence transplant outcomes. This study assesses the effect that raised donor transaminases have on the unnecessary decline of livers.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used the National Health Service registry on adult liver transplantation (2016-2019). Logistic regression models were built to assess the impact of donor transaminases on the utilisation of organs donated following brain stem death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD). A further model was used to simulate the impact on liver decline if raised donor ALT was not used to make utilisation decisions.

Results

5,424 adult livers were offered for transplant, of which 3,605 were utilised (2,841 DBD, 764 DCD). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for key factors, increasing peak donor ALT independently increased the odds of liver decline (DBD aOR = 1.396, 1.305-1.494, p < 0.001, DCD aOR = 1.162, 1.084-1.246, p < 0.001). AST was also a significant predictor of liver decline. 18.5% of livers from DBD donors with ALT > 40 U/L (n = 1,683) were declined for transplantation. In this group, our model predicted a 48% (38%-58%) decrease in decline if raised donor ALT was excluded from these decisions. This represents an additional 37 (30-45) liver transplants every year in the UK.

Conclusions

Raised donor ALT increased the likelihood of liver decline. As it does not influence transplant outcome, avoiding donor ALT-based organ decline is an immediate and effective way to expand the donor pool.

The Rationale for Combining Normothermic Liver Machine Perfusion with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy to Maintain Physiological Perfusate during Ex Vivo Organ Perfusion

Background: The possibility of keeping liver grafts viable and functioning until transplantation has been explored since the 1950s. However, the current modalities of Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) have shown several limitations, such as the inability to correct electrolytes and pH derangements efficiently. Combining NMP with continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) might provide a promising new model to overcome these issues. Methods: An NMP that covers the organ perfusion, oxygenation, carbon dioxide removal, and thermal balance was connected to a CKRT circuit to ensure physiological hydro-electrolytes, acid-base balance, and catabolite removal from the perfusate. Results: The integration of NMP and CKRT maintains a neoplastic liver in a perfusion system with physiological perfusate for 100 h. CKRT re-established and maintained the hydro-electrolyte and acid-base status throughout the 100 h of perfusion. Significant limitations were the need for frequent monitoring of electrolytes and acid-base disorders and the loss of low molecular weight nutrients, which have to be replenished by manual infusion into the system. Conclusions: This novel CKRT-NMP integrated system may represent a practical and versatile model to support organs' perfusion and extend preservation times. Further experiments are needed to fix monitoring and adjusting processes.

Liver regeneration after injury: Mechanisms, cellular interactions and therapeutic innovations

The liver possesses a distinctive capacity for regeneration within the human body. Under normal circumstances, liver cells replicate themselves to maintain liver function. Compensatory replication of healthy hepatocytes is sufficient for the regeneration after acute liver injuries. In the late stage of chronic liver damage, a large number of hepatocytes die and hepatocyte replication is blocked. Liver regeneration has more complex mechanisms, such as the transdifferentiation between cell types or hepatic progenitor cells mediated. Dysregulation of liver regeneration causes severe chronic liver disease. Gaining a more comprehensive understanding of liver regeneration mechanisms would facilitate the advancement of efficient therapeutic approaches. This review provides an overview of the signalling pathways linked to different aspects of liver regeneration in various liver diseases. Moreover, new knowledge on cellular interactions during the regenerative process is also presented. Finally, this paper explores the potential applications of new technologies, such as nanotechnology, stem cell transplantation and organoids, in liver regeneration after injury, offering fresh perspectives on treating liver disease.

Liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: who, when and how

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Using transplant oncology principles, selected patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) may achieve long-term survival after liver transplantation. Strategies for identifying and managing these patients are discussed in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unlike initial reports, several modern series have reported positive outcomes after liver transplantation for iCCA. The main challenges are in identifying the appropriate candidates and graft scarcity. Tumor burden and response to neoadjuvant therapies have been successfully used to identify favorable biology in unresectable cases. New molecular biomarkers will probably predict this response in the future. Also, new technologies and better strategies have been used to increase graft availability for these patients without affecting the liver waitlist.

SUMMARY

Liver transplantation for the management of patients with unresectable iCCA is currently a reality under strict research protocols. Who is a candidate for transplantation, when to use neoadjuvant and locoregional therapies, and how to increase graft availability are the main topics of this review.

Donor Liver Blood Tests and Liver Transplant Outcomes: UK Registry Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Safely increasing organ utilization is a global priority. Donor serum transaminase levels are often used to decline livers, despite minimal evidence to support such decisions. This study aimed to investigate the impact of donor "liver blood tests" on transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the National Health Service registry on adult liver transplantation (2016-2019); adjusted regressions models were used to assess the effect of donor "liver blood tests" on outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 3299 adult liver transplant recipients were included (2530 following brain stem death, 769 following circulatory death). Peak alanine transaminase (ALT) ranged from 6 to 5927 U/L (median = 45). Donor cause of death significantly predicted donor ALT; 4.2-fold increase in peak ALT with hypoxic brain injury versus intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted P  < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, adjusting for a wide range of factors, transaminase level (ALT or aspartate aminotransferase) failed to predict graft survival, primary nonfunction, 90-d graft loss, or mortality. This held true in all examined subgroups, that is, steatotic grafts, donation following circulatory death, hypoxic brain injury donors, and donors, in which ALT was still rising at the time of retrieval. Even grafts from donors with extremely deranged ALT (>1000 U/L) displayed excellent posttransplant outcomes. In contrast, donor peak alkaline phosphatase was a significant predictor of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.808; 1.016-3.216; P  = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor transaminases do not predict posttransplant outcomes. When other factors are favorable, livers from donors with raised transaminases can be accepted and transplanted with confidence. Such knowledge should improve organ utilization decision-making and prevent future unnecessary organ discard. This provides a safe, simple, and immediate option to expand the donor pool.

The evolution of the liver transplant candidate

The first successful human liver transplant (LT) was done over 60 years ago; since the early pioneering days, this procedure has become a routine treatment with excellent outcomes for the great majority of recipients. Over the last six decades, indications have evolved. Use of LT for hepatic malignancy is becoming less common as factors that define a successful outcome are being increasingly defined, and alternative therapeutic options become available. Both Hepatitis B and C virus associated liver disease are becoming less common indications as medical treatments become more effective in preventing end-stage disease. Currently, the most common indications are alcohol-related liver disease and metabolic associated liver disease. The developing (and controversial) indications include acute on chronic liver failure, alcoholic hepatitis and some rarer malignancies such as non-resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases, neuroendocrine tumours and cholangiocarcinoma. Candidates are becoming older and with greater comorbidities, A relative shortage of donor organs remains the greatest cause for reducing access to LT; therefore, various countries have developed transparent approaches to allocation of this life saving and life enhancing resource. Reliance on prognostic models has gone some way to improve transparency and increase equity of access but these approaches have their limitations.

Machine perfusion and the prevention of ischemic type biliary lesions following liver transplant: What is the evidence?

The widespread uptake of different machine perfusion (MP) strategies for liver transplant has been driven by an effort to minimize graft injury. Damage to the cholangiocytes during the liver donation, preservation, or early posttransplant period may result in stricturing of the biliary tree and inadequate biliary drainage. This problem continues to trouble clinicians, and may have catastrophic consequences for the graft and patient. Ischemic injury, as a result of compromised hepatic artery flow, is a well-known cause of biliary strictures, sepsis, and graft failure. However, very similar lesions can appear with a patent hepatic artery and these are known as ischemic type biliary lesions (ITBL) that are attributed to microcirculatory dysfunction rather than main hepatic arterial compromise. Both the warm and cold ischemic period duration appear to influence the onset of ITBL. All of the commonly used MP techniques deliver oxygen to the graft cells, and therefore may minimize the cholangiocyte injury and subsequently reduce the incidence of ITBL. As clinical experience and published evidence grows for these modalities, the impact they have on ITBL rates is important to consider. In this review, the evidence for the three commonly used MP strategies (abdominal normothermic regional perfusion [A-NRP], hypothermic oxygenated perfusion [HOPE], and normothermic machine perfusion [NMP] for ITBL prevention has been critically reviewed. Inconsistencies with ITBL definitions used in trials, coupled with variations in techniques of MP, make interpretation challenging. Overall, the evidence suggests that both HOPE and A-NRP prevent ITBL in donated after circulatory death grafts compared to cold storage. The evidence for ITBL prevention in donor after brain death grafts with any MP technique is weak.

Normothermic Machine Perfusion for Declined Livers: A Strategy to Rescue Marginal Livers for Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Organ waste is a major cause of the donor liver shortage. Roughly 67% of recovered organ donors have liver utilization annually. A new technology called normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) offers a way to recover marginal and declined livers for transplant. We report interim results of the RESTORE trial (FDA investigational drug exemption trial NCT04483102) that aims to transplant NMP-treated livers that would otherwise be discarded.

STUDY DESIGN

Declined livers were screened for NMP eligibility (eg donation after circulatory death [DCD] grafts with warm ischemic time <40 minutes, donation after brain death [DBD] grafts with cold ischemic time <8 hours). Livers meeting pre-NMP eligibility criteria received NMP using the OrganOx metra device for a minimum of 4 hours. All NMP-treated livers meeting the viability criteria were transplanted to consented recipients.

RESULTS

Over 22 months, 60 declined livers from three organ procurement organizations (OPOs; 40 DCD and 20 DBD donor livers) were offered, and 22 livers (10 DCD and 12 DBD livers) met the pre-NMP eligibility. After NMP, 16 of 22 livers passed viability testing and were transplanted into needy recipients (median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score of 8, range 6 to 24), resulting in a 72.7% rescue rate (50% DCD, 91.7% DBD). The rate of early allograft dysfunction was 31.3%, but there were no graft-related deaths, primary nonfunction, or instances of nonanastomotic biliary strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

Interim results of the RESTORE trial suggest that a sizable number of declined livers can be reclaimed. They are safe for transplantation and can enable lower MELD patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality to receive lifesaving grafts while offering OPOs a way to allocate more livers and reduce organ waste.