1
|
Torres A, Kuraieva A, Stone GG, Cillóniz C. Systematic review of ceftaroline fosamil in the management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:230117. [PMID: 37852658 PMCID: PMC10582922 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0117-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an array of problematic community- and healthcare-acquired infections, including pneumonia, and is frequently associated with severe disease and high mortality rates. Standard recommended treatments for empiric and targeted coverage of suspected MRSA in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), are vancomycin and linezolid. However, adverse events such as acute kidney injury and Clostridium difficile infection have been associated with these antibiotics. Ceftaroline fosamil is a β-lactam/extended-spectrum cephalosporin approved for the treatment of adults and children with CAP and complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Ceftaroline has in vitro activity against a range of common Gram-positive bacteria and is distinct among the β-lactams in retaining activity against MRSA. Due to the design of the pivotal randomised controlled trials of ceftaroline fosamil, outcomes in patients with MRSA CAP were not evaluated. However, various reports of real-world outcomes with ceftaroline fosamil for pneumonia caused by MRSA, including CAP and HAP/VAP, been published since its approval. A systematic literature review and qualitative analysis of relevant publications was undertaken to collate and summarise relevant published data on the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil in patients with MRSA pneumonia. While relatively few real-world outcomes studies are available, the available data suggest that ceftaroline fosamil is a possible alternative to linezolid and vancomycin for MRSA pneumonia. Specific scenarios in which ceftaroline fosamil might be considered include bacteraemia and complicating factors such as empyema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoní Torres
- Dept of Pulmonology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, ICREA, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Catia Cillóniz
- Dept of Pulmonology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, ICREA, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Continental University, Huancayo, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Langford BJ, So M, Simeonova M, Leung V, Lo J, Kan T, Raybardhan S, Sapin ME, Mponponsuo K, Farrell A, Leung E, Soucy JPR, Cassini A, MacFadden D, Daneman N, Bertagnolio S. Antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2023; 4:e179-e191. [PMID: 36736332 PMCID: PMC9889096 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00355-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frequent use of antibiotics in patients with COVID-19 threatens to exacerbate antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to establish the prevalence and predictors of bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of bacterial co-infections (identified within ≤48 h of presentation) and secondary infections (>48 h after presentation) in outpatients or hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We searched the WHO COVID-19 Research Database to identify cohort studies, case series, case-control trials, and randomised controlled trials with populations of at least 50 patients published in any language between Jan 1, 2019, and Dec 1, 2021. Reviews, editorials, letters, pre-prints, and conference proceedings were excluded, as were studies in which bacterial infection was not microbiologically confirmed (or confirmed via nasopharyngeal swab only). We screened titles and abstracts of papers identified by our search, and then assessed the full text of potentially relevant articles. We reported the pooled prevalence of bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance by doing a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Our primary outcomes were the prevalence of bacterial co-infection and secondary infection, and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens among patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and bacterial infections. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021297344). FINDINGS We included 148 studies of 362 976 patients, which were done between December, 2019, and May, 2021. The prevalence of bacterial co-infection was 5·3% (95% CI 3·8-7·4), whereas the prevalence of secondary bacterial infection was 18·4% (14·0-23·7). 42 (28%) studies included comprehensive data for the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial infections. Among people with bacterial infections, the proportion of infections that were resistant to antimicrobials was 60·8% (95% CI 38·6-79·3), and the proportion of isolates that were resistant was 37·5% (26·9-49·5). Heterogeneity in the reported prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in organisms was substantial (I2=95%). INTERPRETATION Although infrequently assessed, antimicrobial resistance is highly prevalent in patients with COVID-19 and bacterial infections. Future research and surveillance assessing the effect of COVID-19 on antimicrobial resistance at the patient and population level are urgently needed. FUNDING WHO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Langford
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Miranda So
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Valerie Leung
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Lo
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tiffany Kan
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mia E Sapin
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kwadwo Mponponsuo
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Elizabeth Leung
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, UK
| | - Jean-Paul R Soucy
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Derek MacFadden
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nick Daneman
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Some patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop pulmonary bacterial coinfection or superinfection, that could unfavorably impact their prognosis. RECENT FINDINGS The exact burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) lung infection in peculiar populations such as patients with COVID-19 remains somewhat elusive, possibly because of wide heterogeneity in methods and endpoints across studies. SUMMARY There was important heterogeneity in the retrieved literature on the epidemiology of MRSA lung infection in patients with COVID-19, both when considering all other bacteria as the denominator (relative prevalence ranging from 2% to 29%) and when considering only S. aureus as the denominator (relative prevalence ranging from 11% to 65%). Overall, MRSA is among the most frequent causative agents of pulmonary infection in patients with COVID-19. Improving our ability to rapidly reach etiological diagnosis of bacterial lung infection in COVID-19 patients remains fundamental if we are to improve the rates of appropriate antibiotic therapy in patients with COVID-19 and concomitant/superimposed MRSA infection, at the same time avoiding antibiotic overuse in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles.
Collapse
|
5
|
Polemis M, Mandilara G, Pappa O, Argyropoulou A, Perivolioti E, Koudoumnakis N, Pournaras S, Vasilakopoulou A, Vourli S, Katsifa H, Karampatakis T, Papavasiliou A, Petinaki E, Xitsas S, Skoura L, Protonotariou E, Mantzana P, Gartzonika K, Priavali E, Kallinteri A, Giannopoulou P, Charalampaki N, Memezas M, Calina Oana Z, Papadogianni M, Panopoulou M, Koutsidou A, Vatopoulos A, Tryfinopoulou K. COVID-19 and Antimicrobial Resistance: Data from the Greek Electronic System for the Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance-WHONET-Greece (January 2018-March 2021). Life (Basel) 2021; 11:996. [PMID: 34685368 PMCID: PMC8538738 DOI: 10.3390/life11100996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Changes in hospitals' daily practice due to COVID-19 pandemic may have an impact on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We aimed to assess this possible impact as captured by the Greek Electronic System for the Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (WHONET-Greece). Routine susceptibility data of 17,837 Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial isolates from blood and respiratory specimens of hospitalized patients in nine COVID-19 tertiary hospitals were used in order to identify potential differences in AMR trends in the last three years, divided into two periods, January 2018-March 2020 and April 2020-March 2021. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate differences in the trends of non-susceptibility before and after the changes due to COVID-19. We found significant differences in the slope of non-susceptibility trends of Acinetobacter baumannii blood and respiratory isolates to amikacin, tigecycline and colistin; of Klebsiella pneumoniae blood and respiratory isolates to meropenem and tigecycline; and of Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory isolates to imipenem, meropenem and levofloxacin. Additionally, we found significant differences in the slope of non-susceptibility trends of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to oxacillin and of Enterococcus faecium isolates to glycopeptides. Assessing in this early stage, through surveillance of routine laboratory data, the way a new global threat like COVID-19 could affect an already ongoing pandemic like AMR provides useful information for prompt action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michalis Polemis
- Central Public Health Laboratory, National Public Health Organization, 16672 Vari, Greece; (O.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Georgia Mandilara
- School of Public Health, University of West Attica, 11521 Athens, Greece; (G.M.); (A.V.)
| | - Olga Pappa
- Central Public Health Laboratory, National Public Health Organization, 16672 Vari, Greece; (O.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Athina Argyropoulou
- “Evaggelismos” General Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece; (A.A.); (E.P.); (N.K.)
| | | | | | - Spyros Pournaras
- “Attikon” University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.P.); (A.V.); (S.V.)
| | | | - Sophia Vourli
- “Attikon” University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.P.); (A.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Helen Katsifa
- General Hospital “George Papanikolaou”, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (H.K.); (T.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Theodoros Karampatakis
- General Hospital “George Papanikolaou”, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (H.K.); (T.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Anastasia Papavasiliou
- General Hospital “George Papanikolaou”, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (H.K.); (T.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Efthymia Petinaki
- University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (E.P.); (S.X.)
| | - Stylianos Xitsas
- University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (E.P.); (S.X.)
| | - Lemonia Skoura
- “Axepa” University Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.S.); (E.P.); (P.M.)
| | | | - Paraskevi Mantzana
- “Axepa” University Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.S.); (E.P.); (P.M.)
| | | | - Efthalia Priavali
- University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece; (K.G.); (E.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Amalia Kallinteri
- University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece; (K.G.); (E.P.); (A.K.)
| | | | | | - Meletis Memezas
- “Thriasio” General Hospital of Elefsina, 19600 Athens, Greece; (P.G.); (N.C.); (M.M.)
| | - Zervaki Calina Oana
- “St. George” General Hospital, 73300 Crete (Chania), Greece; (Z.C.O.); (M.P.)
| | - Marina Papadogianni
- “St. George” General Hospital, 73300 Crete (Chania), Greece; (Z.C.O.); (M.P.)
| | - Maria Panopoulou
- University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupoli, Greece; (M.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Athanasia Koutsidou
- University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupoli, Greece; (M.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Alkiviadis Vatopoulos
- School of Public Health, University of West Attica, 11521 Athens, Greece; (G.M.); (A.V.)
| | - Kyriaki Tryfinopoulou
- Central Public Health Laboratory, National Public Health Organization, 16672 Vari, Greece; (O.P.); (K.T.)
| |
Collapse
|