Direct Testing for KPC-Mediated Carbapenem Resistance from Blood Samples Using a T2 Magnetic Resonance Based Assay

Prospective observational pilot study of the T2Resistance panel in the T2Dx system for detection of resistance genes in bacterial bloodstream infections

Early initiation of antimicrobial therapy targeting resistant bacterial pathogens causing sepsis and bloodstream infections (BSIs) is critical for a successful outcome. The T2Resistance Panel (T2R) detects the following resistance genes within organisms that commonly cause BSIs directly from patient blood samples: blaKPC, blaCTXM-14/15, blaNDM/bla/IMP/blaVIM, blaAmpC, blaOXA, vanA, vanB, and mecA/mecC. We conducted a prospective study in two major medical centers for the detection of circulating resistance genes by T2R in patients with BSIs. T2R reports were compared to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), phenotypic identification, and standard molecular detection assays. Among 59 enrolled patients, 25 resistance genes were identified: blaKPC (n = 10), blaNDM/bla/IMP/blaVIM (n = 5), blaCTXM-14/15 (n = 4), blaAmpC (n = 2), and mecA/mecC (n = 4). Median time-to-positive-T2R in both hospitals was 4.4 hours [interquartile range (IQR): 3.65-4.97 hours] in comparison to that for positive blood cultures with final reporting of AST of 58.34 h (IQR: 45.51-111.2 hours; P < 0.0001). The sensitivity of T2R to detect the following genes in comparison to AST was 100% for blaCTXM-14/15, blaNDM/bla/IMP/blaVIM, blaAmpC, mecA/mecC and 87.5% for blaKPC. When monitored for the impact of significant antimicrobial changes, there were 32 events of discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotics and 17 events of escalation of antibiotics, including initiation of ceftazidime/avibactam in six patients in response to positive T2R results for blaKPC. In summary, T2R markers were highly sensitive for the detection of drug resistance genes in patients with bacterial BSIs, when compared with standard molecular resistance detection systems and phenotypic identification assays while significantly reducing by approximately 90% the time to detection of resistance compared to standard methodology and impacting clinical decisions for antimicrobial therapy.

IMPORTANCE

This is the first reported study to our knowledge to identify key bacterial resistance genes directly from the bloodstream within 3 to 5 hours in patients with bloodstream infections and sepsis. The study further demonstrated a direct effect in modifying initial empirical antibacterial therapy in response to T2R signal to treat resistant bacteria causing bloodstream infections and sepsis.

Rapid, Ultrasensitive, and Visual Detection of Pathogens Based on Cation Dye-Triggered Gold Nanoparticle Electrokinetic Agglutination Analysis

Rapid prescribing of the right antibiotic is the key to treat infectious diseases and decelerate the challenge of bacterial antibiotic resistance. Herein, by targeting the 16S rRNA of bacteria, we developed a cation dye-triggered electrokinetic gold nanoparticle (AuNP) agglutination (CD-TEAA) method, which is rapid, visual, ultrasensitive, culture-independent, and low in cost. The limit of detection (LOD) is as low as 1 CFU mL-1 Escherichia coli. The infection identifications of aseptic fluid samples (n = 11) and urine samples with a clinically suspected urinary tract infection (UTI, n = 78) were accomplished within 50 and 30 min for each sample, respectively. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of UTI urine samples was achieved within 2.5 h. In ROC analysis of urine, the sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 96% for infection identification, and 100 and 98% for AST, respectively. Moreover, the overall cost of materials for each test is about US$0.69. Therefore, the CD-TEAA method is a superior approach to existing, time-consuming, and expensive methods, especially in less developed areas.

T2Bacteria and T2Resistance Assays in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Descriptive Experience

The use of rapid molecular tests may anticipate the identification of causative agents and resistance determinants in the blood of critically ill patients with sepsis. From April to December 2021, all intensive care unit patients with sepsis or septic shock who were tested with the T2Bacteria and T2Resistance assays were included in a retrospective, single center study. The primary descriptive endpoints were results of rapid molecular tests and concomitant blood cultures. Overall, 38 combinations of T2Bacteria and T2Resistance tests were performed. One or more causative agent(s) were identified by the T2Bacteria assay in 26% of episodes (10/38), whereas negative and invalid results were obtained in 66% (25/38) and 8% (3/38) of episodes, respectively. The same pathogen detected by the T2Bacteria test grew from blood cultures in 30% of cases (3/10). One or more determinant(s) of resistance were identified by the T2Resistance assay in 11% of episodes (4/38). Changes in therapy based on T2Bacteria and/or T2Resistance results occurred in 21% of episodes (8/38). In conclusion, T2Bacteria/T2Resistance results can influence early treatment decisions in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock in real-life practice. Large, controlled studies remain necessary to confirm a favorable impact on patients' outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

New Antimicrobial Options in the Clinical Practice of Infections Caused by Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens: A Global Opportunity for Public Health

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious cause of concern for public health [...]