1
|
Santerre Henriksen A, Jeannot K, Oliver A, Perry JD, Pletz MW, Stefani S, Morrissey I, Longshaw C. In vitro activity of cefiderocol against European Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including isolates resistant to meropenem and recent β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0383623. [PMID: 38483164 PMCID: PMC10986614 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03836-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. represent major threats and have few approved therapeutic options. Non-fermenting Gram-negative isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in 6 European countries between 01 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 and underwent susceptibility testing against cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L), cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-resistant isolates were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,451 (950 P. aeruginosa; 501 Acinetobacter spp.) isolates were collected, commonly from the respiratory tract (42.0% and 39.3%, respectively). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against P. aeruginosa (98.9% vs 83.3%-91.4%), and P. aeruginosa resistant to meropenem (n = 139; 97.8% vs 12.2%-59.7%), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (93.6%-98.1% vs 10.7%-71.8%), and both meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam (96.7% vs 5.0%-45.0%) or ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.4% vs 8.1%-54.8%), respectively. Cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibilities were high against Acinetobacter spp. (92.4% and 97.0%) and meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. (n = 227; 85.0% and 93.8%) but lower against sulbactam-durlobactam- (n = 15; 13.3%) and cefiderocol- (n = 38; 65.8%) resistant isolates, respectively. Among meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., the most common β-lactamase genes were metallo-β-lactamases [30/139; blaVIM-2 (15/139)] and oxacillinases [215/227; blaOXA-23 (194/227)], respectively. Acquired β-lactamase genes were identified in 1/10 and 32/38 of cefiderocol-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., and pirA-like or piuA mutations in 10/10 and 37/38, respectively. Conclusion: cefiderocol susceptibility was high against P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including meropenem-resistant isolates and those resistant to recent β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations common in first-line treatment of European non-fermenters. IMPORTANCE This was the first study in which the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and non-licensed β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates. A notably large number of European isolates were collected. Meropenem resistance was defined according to the MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem, ensuring that data reflect antibiotic activity against isolates that would remain meropenem resistant in the clinic. Cefiderocol susceptibility was high against non-fermenters, and there was no apparent cross resistance between cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, with the exception of sulbactam-durlobactam. These results provide insights into therapeutic options for infections due to resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. and indicate how early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow clinicians to choose the effective treatment(s) from all available options. This is particularly important as current treatment options against non-fermenters are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katy Jeannot
- Laboratory of Bacteriology, University Hospital of Besançon, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Antonio Oliver
- Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - John D. Perry
- Microbiology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Mathias W. Pletz
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Stefania Stefani
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Ian Morrissey
- Antimicrobial Focus Ltd., Sawbridgeworth, United Kingdom
| | | | - ARTEMIS Study InvestigatorsWillingerBirgitLeysseneDavidCattoenChristianAlauzetCorentineBoyerPierreDuboisVéroniqueJeannotKatyCorvecStephaneLavigneJean-PhilippeGuillardThomasGontierAudrey MerensNaasThierryRohdeHolgerZiesingStefanImirzaliogluCanHunfeldKlaus-PeterJungJetteGatermannSörenPletzMathiasBiancoGabrieleGiammancoAnnaCarcioneDavideRaponiGiammarcoMatinatoCaterinaDomenicoEnea Gino DiGaibaniPaoloMarcheseAnnaArenaFabioNiccolaiClaudiaStefaniStefaniaPitartCristinaBarriosJose LuisCercenadoEmiliaBouGermanLopezAlicia BetetaCantonRafaelHontangasJose LopezGracia-AhufingerIreneOliverAntonioLopez-CereroLorenaLarrosaNievesWarehamDavidPerryJohnCaseyAnnaNahlJasvirHughesDanielCoyneMichaelListerMichelleAttwoodMarie
- Medical Affairs, Shionogi B.V., London, United Kingdom
- Laboratory of Bacteriology, University Hospital of Besançon, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
- Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Microbiology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Antimicrobial Focus Ltd., Sawbridgeworth, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shi Q, Zeng S, Yu R, Li M, Shen C, Zhang X, Zhao C, Zeng J, Huang B, Pu J, Chen C. The small RNA PrrH aggravates Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced acute lung injury by regulating the type III secretion system activator ExsA. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0062623. [PMID: 38289930 PMCID: PMC10913731 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00626-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that causes acute and chronic infections in immunocompromised individuals. Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) regulate multiple bacterial adaptations to environmental changes, especially virulence. Our previous study showed that sRNA PrrH negatively regulates the expression of a number of virulence factors, such as pyocyanin, rhamnolipid, biofilm, and elastase in the P. aeruginosa strain PAO1. However, previous studies have shown that the prrH-deficient mutant attenuates virulence in an acute murine lung infection model. All ΔprrH-infected mice survived the entire 28-day course of the experiment, whereas all mice inoculated with the wild-type or the complemented mutant succumbed to lung infection within 4 days of injection, but the specific mechanism is unclear. Herein, we explored how PrrH mediates severe lung injury by regulating the expression of virulence factors. In vivo mouse and in vitro cellular assays demonstrated that PrrH enhanced the pathogenicity of PAO1, causing severe lung injury. Mechanistically, PrrH binds to the coding sequence region of the mRNA of exsA, which encodes the type III secretion system master regulatory protein. We further demonstrated that PrrH mediates a severe inflammatory response and exacerbates the apoptosis of A549 cells. Overall, our results revealed that PrrH positively regulates ExsA, enhances the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa, and causes severe lung injury. IMPORTANCE Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium and the leading cause of nosocomial pneumonia. The pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa is due to the secretion of many virulence factors. Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) regulate various bacterial adaptations, especially virulence. Therefore, understanding the mechanism by which sRNAs regulate virulence is necessary for understanding the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa and the treatment of the related disease. In this study, we demonstrated that PrrH enhances the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa by binding to the coding sequence regions of the ExsA, the master regulatory protein of type III secretion system, causing severe lung injury and exacerbating the inflammatory response and apoptosis. These findings revealed that PrrH is a crucial molecule that positively regulates ExsA. Type III-positive strains are often associated with a high mortality rate in P. aeruginosa infections in clinical practice. Therefore, this discovery may provide a new target for treating P. aeruginosa infections, especially type III-positive strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qixuan Shi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shenghe Zeng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruiqi Yu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mo Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cong Shen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuan Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chanjing Zhao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianming Zeng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jieying Pu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cha Chen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oweis AO, Zeyad HN, Alshelleh SA, Alzoubi KH. Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients with Multi-Drug Resistant Infection: A Study from Jordan. J Multidiscip Healthc 2022; 15:2759-2766. [PMID: 36504497 PMCID: PMC9733443 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s384386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-known complication for hospitalized patients. Sepsis and various infections play a significant role in increasing the incidence of AKI. The present study evaluated the risk for Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections and its effect on the incidence of AKI, hospitalization, need for dialysis, and mortality. Methods In a retrospective study design, data were collected from all adult patients with a positive multi-drug resistant culture who were admitted to King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH). Records of 436 patients were reviewed between January 2017 - December 2018 with at least one year of follow-up. Results The mean age was 57.3 years (SD± 23.1), and 58.5% were males. The most common source of positive cultures was sputum, with 50% positive cultures. The incidence of AKI was 59.2%. The most isolated microorganism was Acinetobacter baumannii (76.8%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.9%).On multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, P=0.001), HTN (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3, P=0.02), DM (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-1.9, P=0.69) and the use of Foley catheter on chronic bases (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.6-6.8, P<0.0001) were strong predictors of AKI. Among patients with AKI, 74.4% died compared to 44.4% among non-AKI patients (p<0.001). Conclusion In patients with MDR, AKI incidence, hospitalization, and mortality were high. Early detection and addressing the problem may decrease bad outcomes, and health education for reducing antibiotic abuse is needed to lower MDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashraf O Oweis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan,Correspondence: Ashraf O Oweis, Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology division, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, Tel +962791455505, Email
| | - Heba N Zeyad
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Sameeha A Alshelleh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Karem H Alzoubi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Due to Difficult-to-Treat Non-Fermenter Gram-Negative Bacteria in COVID-19 Patients: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11081007. [PMID: 35892396 PMCID: PMC9330655 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11081007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients with COVID-19 represents a very huge global threat due to a higher incidence rate compared to non-COVID-19 patients and almost 50% of the 30-day mortality rate. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the first pathogen involved but uncommon non-fermenter gram-negative organisms such as Burkholderia cepacea and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia have emerged as other potential etiological causes. Against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative microorganisms, Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is considered a first-line option, even more so in case of a ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance or shortage. The aim of this report was to describe our experience with CZA in a case series of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the ICU with VAP due to difficult-to-treat (DTT) P. aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacea, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and to compare it with data published in the literature. A total of 23 patients were treated from February 2020 to March 2022: 19/23 (82%) VAPs were caused by Pseudomonas spp. (16/19 DTT), 2 by Burkholderia cepacea, and 6 by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; 12/23 (52.1%) were polymicrobial. Septic shock was diagnosed in 65.2% of the patients and VAP occurred after a median of 29 days from ICU admission. CZA was prescribed as a combination regimen in 86% of the cases, with either fosfomycin or inhaled amikacin or cotrimoxazole. Microbiological eradication was achieved in 52.3% of the cases and the 30-day overall mortality rate was 14/23 (60.8%). Despite the high mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients, CZA, especially in combination therapy, could represent a valid treatment option for VAP due to DTT non-fermenter gram-negative bacteria, including uncommon pathogens such as Burkholderia cepacea and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Collapse
|