Interprofessional Collaboration between ICU Physicians, Staff Nurses, and Hospital Pharmacists Optimizes Antimicrobial Treatment and Improves Quality of Care and Economic Outcome

Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care from a multidisciplinary perspective: a case study approach

Systematic assessments of interprofessional collaboration barriers and enablers in long-term care settings are critical for delivering person-centered healthcare. However, research on factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care settings is limited. For this study, 65 healthcare professionals across multiple facilities experienced in long-term care in Japan participated in online focus group discussions and individual interviews to discuss cases. The qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Seven themes emerged: coordination, the need for care manager training, hierarchy among healthcare professionals, specialization but not the mind-set of overspecialization, casual conversations, electronic group communication tools, and excessive fear of personal information protection. These findings highlight the need to develop coordinator roles and for interprofessional education on the proper approach to personal information protection laws. Furthermore, daily casual conversations, the use of online platforms, and the prevention of patients being left behind due to overspecialization are required.

Cost-effectiveness in an interprofessional training ward within a university department for internal medicine: a monocentric open-label controlled study of the A-STAR Regensburg

Introduction

Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare involves diverse professionals working together to address complex patient needs. Interprofessional training wards offer workplace-based interprofessional education in real healthcare settings, fostering collaborative learning among students. While their educational value is widely recognized, debates persist regarding their cost-effectiveness due to limited research. This study assesses the cost efficiency of the interprofessional training ward Regensburg (A-STAR) within the Department of Internal Medicine I at the University Hospital Regensburg, compared to conventional wards.

Methods

From October 2019 to December 2022, 7,244 patient cases were assigned to A-STAR or conventional wards by case managers, with a comprehensive analysis of all associated revenues and costs.

Results

A-STAR treated 1,482 patients, whereas conventional wards treated 5,752 patients, with more males and younger patients at A-STAR. A-STAR achieved higher profit per case (€1,508.74) attributed to increased revenues and reduced material costs. It generated an average of €1,366.54 more Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) revenue per case annually than conventional wards, due to greater medical complexity reflected in a higher case-mix index (CMI: 2.4 vs. 2.2). The increased case complexity led to longer patient stays (9.0 vs. 8.1 days) and fewer cases treated annually at A-STAR (27.4 cases/year vs. 37.8 cases/year). The higher CMI did not result in a higher proportion of patients requiring isolation. A-STAR exhibited a higher capacity utilization rate (87.1% vs. 83.9%). Personnel costs per case at A-STAR were initially elevated due to enhanced observation by the senior physician but were gradually mitigated by expanding A-STAR's bed capacity. Material costs were consistently lower on a per-case basis at A-STAR (€1512.02 vs. €1577.12), particularly in terms of medication expenses, indicating more resource-efficient operations. From the A-STAR graduates, 18 individuals were recruited for permanent positions as doctors or nurses over 2 years.

Conclusion

A-STAR demonstrates economic efficiency and stability even during the COVID-19 pandemic. The substantial personnel acquisition is likely influenced by high levels of satisfaction with education and work and is economically relevant in medical staff shortages. These findings provide a compelling rationale for the broader implementation of interprofessional training wards, establishing them as vital platforms for nurturing future professionals.

Relationship between transformational leadership, adverse patient events, and nurse-assessed quality of care in emergency units: The mediating role of work satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Effective leadership plays a pivotal role in healthcare settings, particularly in the fast-paced and high-pressure environment of the emergency room, as it is closely linked to patient safety and the overall quality of care. This study assessed the mediating role of work satisfaction in the relationship between nurses' perceptions of their nurse managers' transformational leadership, reported adverse patient events, and the nurse-assessed quality of care in the emergency units.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey design was carried out involving 283 emergency room nurses from the Philippines, utilizing standardized scales. Mediation testing was performed using Hayes' PROCESS macro in SPSS (Model 4).

RESULTS

Emergency room nurses perceived their nurse managers as highly transformational. Nurses' perceptions of transformational leadership in their nurse managers were associated with a reduction in reported adverse patient events and an increase in nurse-assessed nursing care quality. Work satisfaction partially mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and nurse-assessed nursing care quality, but it did not serve as a mediator between transformational leadership and reported adverse patient events.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that enhancing transformational leadership behaviors among nurse leaders can foster work satisfaction in ER nurses, which, in effect, contributes to enhanced nursing quality of care provision in emergency settings.

Emergency room nurses' caring ability and its relationship with patient safety outcomes: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Nurse caring ability plays a crucial role in providing quality care and ensuring patient safety. However, further research is warranted to understand the specific impact of caring ability on patient safety in the emergency department.

AIM

This study has two-fold purposes: (a) to examine the association between nurses' demographic characteristics and their perceptions of their caring ability, and (b) to explore the relationship between nurses' caring ability and nursing care quality, as well as its impact on adverse patient events and missed care.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of emergency room nurses working in select hospitals in the Philippines. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 164 out of the 200 emergency nurses invited responded to the survey. The mean score for the caring ability inventory was 67.89 out of 80. Nurses' demographic characteristics, including job status (working part-time) and hospital size (working in small and medium-sized hospitals), were associated with higher levels of caring ability. Higher levels of nurses' caring ability were associated with better nursing care quality (β = 0.259, p <.001), a reduction in adverse events (β = -0.169, p <.05), and a decrease in instances of missed care (β = -0.158, p <.01).

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the significance of nurses' characteristics in influencing nurse caring abilities. Additionally, the results underscore the importance of nurse caring ability in the emergency department and its association with nursing care quality and patient safety outcomes. Organizational strategies directed toward promoting and enhancing nurse caring ability in the emergency department can have positive implications for nursing practice, including improved nursing care quality, reduced adverse events, and decreased instances of missed care.

Clinical Interprofessional Education in Inpatient Pharmacy: Findings From a Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Clinical interprofessional education (IPE) is defined as learning that occurs within clinical learning environments such as hospitals, primary care clinics, and long-term care facilities where learners collaborate to deliver care to real patients. The objective of this secondary analysis of a scoping review is to identify, characterize, and summarize evidence from the published literature regarding clinical IPE for pharmacy learners in the inpatient setting.

FINDINGS

PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched for clinical IPE articles that met the following inclusion criteria: ≥ 2 health professions, ≥ 2 learner groups, and involvement of real patients/patient care. For this secondary analysis, 12 articles involving pharmacy learners in an inpatient setting were included. The most common interprofessional partner was medicine (66%), and the median number of student participants involved in the activity was 19 (range, 10-525). Five studies conducted clinical IPE in the context of advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Clinical IPE activities were described primarily as inpatient rounding with the medical team, but were often outside the normal clinical workflow (66%). Incorporation of Interprofessional Education Collaborative competencies was limited, as was the use of validated IPE assessment tools to measure outcomes.

SUMMARY

Current literature is limited in reports of pharmacy learner involvement in inpatient clinical IPE. Expansion of pharmacy partnerships and alignment of team outcomes with the Interprofessional Education Collaborative competencies are needed to demonstrate the relationship between clinical IPE and patient care outcomes within established workflows.

Interprofessional Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Carbapenems Improves ICU Care and Guideline Adherence in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

(1) Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a severe, rapidly progressing disease in patients with liver cirrhosis. Meropenem is crucial for treating severe infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) offers an effective means to control drug dosages, especially vital for bactericidal antibiotics like meropenem. We aimed to assess the outcomes of implementing TDM for meropenem using an innovative interprofessional approach in ACLF patients on a medical intensive care unit (ICU). (2) Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on a medical ICU. The outcomes of an interprofessional approach comprising physicians, hospital pharmacists, and staff nurses to TDM for meropenem in critically ill patients with ACLF were examined in 25 patients. Meropenem was administered continuously via an infusion pump after the application of an initial loading dose. TDM was performed weekly using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Meropenem serum levels, implementation of the recommendations of the interprofessional team, and meropenem consumption were analyzed. (3) Results: Initial TDM for meropenem showed a mean meropenem serum concentration of 20.9 ± 9.6 mg/L in the 25 analyzed patients. Of note, in the initial TDM, only 16.0% of the patients had meropenem serum concentrations within the respective target range, while 84.0% exceeded this range. Follow-up TDM showed serum concentrations of 15.2 ± 5.7 mg/L (9.0-24.6) in Week 2 and 11.9 ± 2.3 mg/L (10.2-13.5) in Week 3. In Week 2, 41.7% of the patients had meropenem serum concentrations that were within the respective target range, while 58.3% of the patients were above this range. In Week 3, 50% of the analyzed serum concentrations of meropenem were within the targeted range, and 50% were above the range. In total, 100% of the advice given by the interprofessional team regarding meropenem dosing or a change in antibiotic therapy was implemented. During the intervention period, the meropenem application density was 37.9 recommended daily doses (RDD)/100 patient days (PD), compared to 42.1 RDD/100 PD in the control period, representing a 10.0% decrease. (4) Conclusions: Our interprofessional approach to TDM significantly reduced meropenem dosing, with all the team's recommendations being implemented. This method not only improved patient safety but also considerably decreased the application density of meropenem.

Challenges and opportunities of evaluating work based interprofessional learning: insights from a pediatric interprofessional training ward

Introduction

Interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals is fostered through interprofessional education (IPE). Work-based IPE has demonstrated effectiveness within interprofessional training wards. We developed the Interprofessional Training Ward in Pediatrics (IPAPED) and employ a combination of established assessment tools and a newly created IPAPED questionnaire, directed at to assess both students' learning experiences and program structure. This paper presents the development and analysis of the psychometric properties of the IPAPED questionnaire.

Methods

Nursing trainees and medical students participated in IPAPED. The IPAPED questionnaire was developed to complement established instruments, based on IPE frameworks. Interprofessional collaboration and communication were represented in subscales in part 1 of the questionnaire. Part 2 focused on the IPAPED program itself. Statistical analyses included calculation of internal consistency for part 1 and exploratory factor analyses for part 2.

Results

All IPAPED participants between November 2017 and November 2022 completed the questionnaire (n = 105). 94 of 105 questionnaires were analyzed. Internal consistency for part 1 was low (Cronbach's α <0.58). Exploratory factor analyses revealed three distinct factors: teaching and learning material, interprofessional learning facilitation and professional guidance by nurses on the ward.

Discussion

Our results illustrate the challenge of performing high quality, theory based evaluation in a work-based setting. However, exploratory factor analyses highlighted the opportunity of focusing on both learning facilitators and staff on the wards to ensure a maximum learning output for participants. Developing program-specific questionnaires to gain insight into local structures has the potential to improve work-based IPE formats.

Implementation of the standardized process of Pharmacotherapeutic evaluation in inpatients and outpatients

OBJECTIVES

The Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up program (PFU) carried out by the clinical pharmacist can be categorized within 3 fundamental activities; identification, resolution and prevention of adverse drug events. These must be adjusted to the requirements and resources of each institution, developing procedures to increase PFU efficiency and to guarantee patient safety. The clinical pharmacists of UC-CHRISTUS Healthcare Network developed a Standardized Pharmacotherapeutic Evaluation Process (SPEP). The main goal of our study is to evaluate the impact of this tool through the pharmacist evaluation number and pharmacist interventions number. Secondarily to determine the potential and direct cost savings associated with the pharmacist interventions in an Intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study evaluated the frequency and type of pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions performed by clinical pharmacists in adult patients units of UC-CHRISTUS Healthcare Network, before and after the implementation of SPEP. The distribution of variables was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test and the association between the use of SPEP and the pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number was performed using the Chi-square test. The cost evaluation associated with pharmacist interventions in the ICU was carried out using methodology proposed by Hammond et al. RESULTS: A total number of 1,781 patients was evaluated before and 2,129 after the SPEP. The pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number in the before-SPEP period were 5,209 and 2,246. In the after-SPEP period were 6,105 and 2,641, respectively. The increase in both the pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number was significant only in critical care patients. The potential cost saving in after-SPEP period in the ICU was USD 492,805. Major adverse drug events prevention was the intervention that generated the most savings with a reduction of 60.2%. The total direct savings for sequential therapy was USD 8,072 in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a clinical pharmacist developed tool called SPEP that increased the pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number in multiple clinical scenarios. These were significant only in critical care patients. Future investigations should make effort to evaluate the quality and clinical impact of these interventions.

[Translated article] Implementation of the standardized process of drug therapy evaluation in inpatients and outpatients

OBJECTIVES

The Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up program (PFU) carried out by the clinical pharmacist can be categorized within 3 fundamental activities; identification, resolution and prevention of adverse drug events. These must be adjusted to the requirements and resources of each institution, developing procedures to increase PFU efficiency and to guarantee patient safety. The clinical pharmacists of UC-CHRISTUS Healthcare Network developed a Standardized Pharmacotherapeutic Evaluation Process (SPEP). The main goal of our study is to evaluate the impact of this tool through the pharmacist evaluation number and pharmacist interventions number. Secondarily to determine the potential and direct cost savings associated with the pharmacist interventions in an Intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study evaluated the frequency and type of pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions performed by clinical pharmacists in adult patients units of UC-CHRISTUS Healthcare Network, before and after the implementation of SPEP. The distribution of variables was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test and the association between the use of SPEP and the pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number was performed using the Chi-square test. The cost evaluation associated with pharmacist interventions in the ICU was carried out using methodology proposed by Hammond et al. RESULTS: A total number of 1781 patients was evaluated before and 2129 after the SPEP. The pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number in the before-SPEP period were 5209 and 2246. In the after-SPEP period were 6105 and 2641, respectively. The increase in both the pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number was significant only in critical care patients. The potential cost saving in after-SPEP period in the ICU was USD 492,805. Major adverse drug events prevention was the intervention that generated the most savings with a reduction of 60.2%. The total direct savings for sequential therapy was USD 8072 in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a clinical pharmacist developed tool called SPEP that increased the pharmacist evaluation and pharmacist interventions number in multiple clinical scenarios. These were significant only in critical care patients. Future investigations should make effort to evaluate the quality and clinical impact of these interventions.

Pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship interventions in patients with COVID-19: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly infectious disease that can be treated with antivirals in addition to other antimicrobials in cases of secondary or concomitant infections. This creates potential for antimicrobials misuse, which increases antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Pharmacists are known to undertake prominent roles in combatting AMR.

AIM

The aim of this review was to characterize pharmacist-driven interventions that have been performed in patients with COVID-19 globally and describe their impact on antimicrobial use.

METHOD

We followed the Joanna Briggs Institutes manual framework for scoping reviews in our study. Studies that reported antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions performed by pharmacists in COVID-19 patients were included. Articles that did not report outcomes or did not mention pharmacists in the intervention were excluded. Restrictions included English-only articles from inception date until June 2022. Articles were searched from four databases.

RESULTS

Eleven publications were included in the review. The most common AMS intervention was pharmacist-driven interventions reported in 63.2% of all studies, followed by guideline development and application (26.3%), and medication supply coordination (10.5%), respectively. The outcomes of the interventions were difficult to compare but showed a reduction in antimicrobial use and prevention of adverse drug reactions with a relatively high acceptance rate from physicians.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists played an important role in performing AMS-related interventions in COVID-19 patients and helped in the fight against the worsening of AMR during the pandemic. The impact of pharmacist-driven AMS interventions in patients with COVID-19 seemed to be positive and improved outcomes related to antimicrobial use.

A pilot project of expert nurses for the follow-up of complex intravenous antimicrobial treatment

OBJECTIVE

To report a pilot project of expert nurses for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) follow-up.

METHODS

Three nurses with specific training on antibiotics started a state-funded programme including: i) consultations for OPAT follow-up; ii) hotline for satellite hospitals; iii) peer training. Patients' data were prospectively collected. A representative sample of patients and physicians was interviewed to learn about their opinion on the project.

RESULTS

From December 2020 to December 2021, 118 patients (median age 66.5 years [52-75], male-to-female ratio 2.5) were enrolled, for a total of 621 consultations. Patients were mostly on OPAT for bone and joint infections (n = 76, 64 %) and cardiovascular infections (n = 16, 14 %), for a median duration of 29 days [22-57]. Eleven patients (9 %) required unplanned hospital admissions, and three experienced treatment failure. Most patients (21/22) and physicians in charge (10/10) reported a high level of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses may be important actors for OPAT follow-up.

Readiness for Interprofessional Education Among Health Profession Students in a University in the United Arab Emirates

Introduction

Inter-Professional Education (IPE) is an educational engagement between students from two or more professions possibly leading to better collaboration among them in the future workplace. Several organizations have advocated, developed, and updated guidelines for IPE.

Objective

This study was aimed at assessing the medical, dental, and pharmacy students' readiness toward interprofessional education (IPE), and to identify the association between readiness and the demographic profile of students in a university in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Methods

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based exploratory study involving 215 medical, dental, and pharmacy students at Ajman University, UAE, using convenience sampling. The survey questionnaire (Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale, RIPLS) had a total of 19 statements. The first 9 items were related to "teamwork and collaboration", items 10-16 were related to "professional identity", and the remaining three (items 17-19) were related to "roles and responsibilities". The individual statements' median (IQR) scores were calculated and the total scores were compared with the demographic characteristics of the respondents with suitable non-parametric tests at alpha=0.05.

Results

Altogether, 215 undergraduate students (medical (n= 35)), pharmacy (n=105), and dental (n=75) responded to the survey. The median (IQR) score for the 19 individual statements was '5 (4-5)' for 12 of the statements. The total scores and domain-specific scores (teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and roles and responsibilities) according to respondents' demography showed significant differences only in the case of the educational stream with professional identity score (p=<0.001), and the total RIPLS score (p=0.024). Further, post hoc pairwise comparison showed a significant difference between medicine-pharmacy (p<0.001), and dentistry-medicine (p=0.009), for professional identity, and medicine-pharmacy (p=0.020) for the total RIPLS score.

Conclusion

A high readiness score among students offers the possibility of conducting IPE modules. A favorable attitude can be considered by curriculum planners while initiating IPE sessions.

Role of Pharmacists in Antimicrobial Stewardship During COVID-19 Outbreak: A Scoping Review

Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, pharmacists have been on the front lines of health care, offering vital services. Consequently, the need for pharmacists to support an effective antibiotic stewardship (AMS) program during the COVID-19 outbreak has become increasingly evident. This scoping review was performed to examine related articles in 2020-2022 published in the Scopus, SAGE, and Cochrane databases with the keywords "Pharmacist" and "Antibiotic Stewardship" and "COVID-19". The inclusion criteria were full-text articles written in English. A total of 15 articles were included in this review to describe the role of pharmacists in AMS during the COVID-19 outbreak. In general, pharmacists are responsible for identifying and treating patients during pandemics, ensuring the continued supply and accessibility of medications, promoting health policies, and monitoring antibiotic use for COVID-19 cases and co-infections. At the hospital, as the most significant element for pharmacists on the AMS team, the apparent change is demonstrated in educating patients on telehealth services, clarifying misconceptions about treatments and antibiotic consumption, as well as taking a leadership position to establish local guidelines for the COVID-19 treatment protocol. Pharmacists have an important role in the AMS program, and the COVID-19 pandemic was perceived as a highlight their importance. Therefore, their work with the AMS program needs to be improved as they learn to extend their role in telehealth services, educate and clarify the misconceptions about COVID-19 treatments and other antibiotic consumption in the community, inventory control the COVID-19 drug, antibiotics, and vaccine, as well as take the lead in establishing local guidelines on antibiotic consumption during the pandemic outbreak.

Therapeutic drug monitoring practices of anti-infectives: An Asia-wide cross-sectional survey

Objectives: The current practice of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in Asia is poorly documented. Our aim was to capture and describe TDM services delivered in hospitals across Asia, including aspects such as assay availability, interpretation of results and clinical decision-making. Methods: An online survey about anti-infective TDM practices, available in English and involving 50 questions, was promoted to people involved in TDM in Asia. The survey was open for responses from September to November 2021. Results: Of 207 responses from participants working in 14 Asian countries, 150 responses from 10 countries could be included. TDM services are available for many anti-infectives, providing assays based on chromatographic assays (100.0%) or immunoassays (39.3%). Clinicians (82.6%) and pharmacists (86.8%) were responsible for ordering and interpreting TDM. Most services provided reference targets and dose recommendations. Interpretative support was available to a varying degree. Assay results were available and clinical decision-making could be completed within 24 h in most hospitals (87.9% and 88.9% respectively). As the turnaround time of assay results decreased, the proportion of clinical decision-making completed within 8 h increased. Barriers to implementation of TDM included lack of funding or equipment (71.1%), lack of clinician interest or cooperation (47.0%), and lack of expertise (42.3%). Lack of expertise was the primary barrier for using precision dosing software (50.5%). Conclusion: There are significant differences and challenges in the development and practice of anti-infective TDM in Asian countries.

Instant Gratification and Overtreating to Be Safe: Perceptions of U.S. Intensive Care Unit Pharmacists and Residents on Antimicrobial Stewardship

Antimicrobial stewardship programs have been associated with numerous impacts on medical practice including reductions in costs, antimicrobial resistance, and adverse events. While antimicrobial stewardship is now considered an essential element of medical practice, the understandings of the value of antimicrobial stewardship among medical practitioners vary. Additionally, non-physician practitioners are regularly left out of antimicrobial stewardship interventions targeting antimicrobial decision-making. Here, we contribute the perspective from resident physicians and specialists in pharmacy regarding their involvement in antimicrobial prescribing. Notably, our semi-structured interviews with 10 residents and pharmacy specialists described their limited autonomy in the clinical setting. However, the participants regularly worked alongside primary antimicrobial decision-makers and described feeling pressure to overtreat to be safe. The clear rationales and motivations associated with antimicrobial prescribing have a noticeable impact on physicians in training and non-physician practitioners, and as such, we argue that antimicrobial stewardship interventions targeting primary antimicrobial decision-makers are missing an opportunity to address the breadth of antimicrobial prescribing culture. By looking at the perspectives and rationales of physicians in training and non-physician practitioners, we can see evidence that the act of antimicrobial prescribing is impacted by individuals on all levels of the hierarchies present in medical practice.