Cochlear Implantation in Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma: Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature

Revised Classification of Inner Ear Schwannomas

ABSTRACT

Over the past two decades, there has been increasing interest in the diagnosis and management of schwannomas of the inner ear including hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants. However, tumor nomenclature and classification within the literature have been variable and oftentimes cumbersome. The term "intralabyrinthine schwannoma" is in common use when describing these tumors but is a potential source of confusion given that people often use the term "labyrinth" or "labyrinthine" to refer to the vestibular component of the inner ear only (i.e., labyrinthectomy or the translabyrinthine approach).During the Ninth Quadrennial Conference on Vestibular Schwannoma and Other Cerebellopontine Angle Lesions in Bergen, Norway, in May 2023, a multidisciplinary group of conference participants met and discussed issues pertaining to current terminology and classifications to enhance clarity and to reflect recent advances in tumor management and hearing rehabilitation.Although a variety of terms have been previously used to describe inner ear schwannomas, consensus was achieved on the term "inner ear schwannoma (IES)" to describe eighth nerve schwannomas of the cochlea, vestibule, or semicircular canals. Subgroups under this term comprise intravestibular, intracochlear, or intravestibulocochlear inner ear schwannomas (low complexity tumors), inner ear schwannomas with transfundal extension into the internal auditory canal but without modiolar involvement (intermediate complexity tumors), and inner ear schwannomas with transfundal extension with modiolar involvement (high complexity tumors).The details of the recommendations for an updated and simplified tumor nomenclature centered around tumor control and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implantation are presented.

Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of audiological outcomes

PURPOSE

In patients with inner ear schwannomas (IES), reports on hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI) have increased over the past decade, most of which are case reports or small case series. The aim of this study is to systematically review the reported hearing results with CI in patients with IES considering the different audiologic outcome measures used in different countries.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a search of published literature was conducted. We included patients with IES (primary or with secondary extension from the internal auditory canal (IAC) to the inner ear, sporadic or NF2 related) undergoing cochlear implantation with or without tumour removal. The audiological results were divided into the categories "monosyllables", "disyllables", "multisyllabic words or numbers", and "sentences".

RESULTS

Predefined audiological outcome measures were available from 110 patients and 111 ears in 27 reports. The mean recognition scores for monosyllabic words with CI were 55% (SD: 24), for bisyllabic words 61% (SD: 36), for multisyllabic words and numbers 87% (SD: 25), and 71% (SD: 30) for sentences. Results from for multisyllabic words and numbers in general showed a tendency towards a ceiling effect. Possible risk factors for performance below average were higher complexity tumours (inner ear plus IAC/CPA), NF2, CI without tumour removal ("CI through tumour"), and sequential cochlear implantation after tumour removal (staged surgery).

CONCLUSION

Hearing loss in patients with inner ear schwannomas can be successfully rehabilitated with CI with above average speech performance in most cases. Cochlear implantation thus represents a valuable option for hearing rehabilitation also in patients with IES while at the same time maintaining the possibility of MRI follow-up. Further studies should investigate possible risk factors for poor performance. Audiological tests and outcome parameters should be reported in detail and ideally be harmonized to allow better comparison between languages.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature and summarize cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes after intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) excision and tumor observation with CI.

DATA SOURCES

OVID Medline, Embase, Web of Science; conception to 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

A literature review was performed using subject headings, MeSH terms, and keywords. Abstracts and full texts were reviewed by two independent reviewers and adjudicated by a third. Inclusion criteria included studies with ILS and CI with reported audiologic outcomes. Subjects were analyzed into two groups, ILS resection with CI and in situ ILS with CI. Patients with NF2 were included. The main outcome of interest was CI audiometric performance level, with secondary outcomes of CI user status and open-set speech attainment.

RESULTS

There were 29 articles with a total of 93 patients who met inclusion criteria. The resection group had 17% low performers, 44% intermediate performers, and 38% high performers. The in situ group had 40% low performers, 32% intermediate performers, 27% high performers. The resection group had 69 patients with 97% maintaining user status and 92% with open-set speech recognition. The observation group had 24 patients, with 87% user rate and 86% achieving open-set speech recognition. There was a greater percentage of NF2 diagnosis seen in the in situ group.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of literature on CI and ILS. Patients are managed with both resection of tumor and implantation in situ. Early data are limited, with improvement in hearing outcomes and high user rates in both populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 134:3910-3920, 2024.

First Clinical Experience with a New Device for the Removal of Cochlear Schwannomas

Background: In most cases, intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) occurs in patients with unilateral hearing deterioration or neurofibromatosis type II (NF II). The pattern of localization of these tumors varies but mostly affects the cochlea. Extirpation of the cochlear schwannoma, if hidden by the cochlea modiolus, is difficult under the aspect of complete removal. Therefore, a tissue removal device (TRD) was designed and tested in temporal bones. The principle of handling the new device is a pushing and pipe cleaner handling inside the cochlea. This present study aimed to describe the first in vivo experience with the newly developed TRD for removing cochlear intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Methods: In three patients, the TRD was used for the tumor removal of cochlear schwannomas. In two patients with a cochlear schwannoma in combination with a cochlea implantation and one patient suffering from NF II, a cochlear schwannoma was removed with the TRD. The access was performed with a posterior tympanotomy, an enlarged round window approach and an additional second turn access. The device was inserted and extracted gradually from the second turn access until the rings were visible in the second turn access. By pushing and pipe cleaner handling, the tumors were removed. An MRI control was performed on the day postoperatively with a T1 GAD sequence. Results: Tumor removal with the TRD was performed in a 15-min procedure without any complications. An MRI control confirmed complete removal on the postoperative day in all cases. Conclusions: In vivo handling of the device confirmed straightforward handling for the tumor removal. MRI scanning showed complete removal of the tumor by the TRD.

Audiological Outcome of the Simultaneous Tumor Resection and Cochlear Implantation in Two Cases of Sporadic and Two Cases of Neurofibromatosis Type 2-Associated Intracochlear Schwannoma

Objectives: Simultaneous removal and cochlear implantation (CI) have been reported in intralabyrinthine and intracochlear schwannoma. A wide range of postoperative hearing outcomes have been reported after CI in these cases. This study evaluated the outcomes of performing a simultaneous resection of Schwannoma in cochlea and cochlear implantation (CI), aiming to assess the effectiveness of this combined surgical approach for hearing rehabilitation with CI. Methods: This retrospective case series was conducted at a tertiary care center. The study included four consecutive patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss due to a mass inside the cochlea. These patients underwent simultaneous single-sided CI and tumor resection performed by the same surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative audiological assessments were conducted to evaluate the patients' hearing outcomes before and after the surgical intervention. Results: Simultaneous CI with tumor resection was successful in all cases. Two of the four patients had a unilateral tumor, while the other two had a bilateral tumor with the involvement of the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle (neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)). In two cases of unilateral tumor, aided free-field pure tone average (PTA) was 26 dB, and 46 dB hearing level (HL), and word recognition score (WRS) at 65 dB was 40% and 68%, respectively, 3 months after surgery. In two cases of tumor with NF2, aided free-field PTA was 36 dB and 60 dB HL, and both cases showed 0% WRS at 65 dB 3 months after surgery. Conclusions: Simultaneous schwannoma excision and CI in patients with Schwannoma inside cochlea are surgically practical and safe. Postoperatively, there was a notable improvement in hearing in cases of sporadic schwannoma, regardless of the type of CI used. However, there was 0% WRS in the two NF2 patients with a mass in the internal auditory canal.

Changing Management of Intravestibular Schwannomas in the Era of Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness

OBJECTIVE

Intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs) are a rare cause of deafness. Patients with ILS confined to the semicircular canals and the vestibule (intravestibular schwannomas) are potential candidates for cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation, a new option for patients with unilateral hearing loss since the 2019 FDA approval of cochlear implant (CI) for single-sided deafness. In this report, we describe an evolving management approach for ILSs causing hearing loss.

PATIENTS

Adults (≥18 years) who underwent simultaneous ILS resection and CI between January 2019 and June 2023 (n = 3).

INTERVENTION

Transmastoid labyrinthectomy with simultaneous cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing performance with cochlear implantation measured as CNC Word Recognition scores and AzBio Sentence scores.

RESULTS

Three patients with ILS confined to the semicircular canals and vestibule underwent simultaneous tumor resection via labyrinthectomy with CI placement. In all cases, complete tumor resection and full CI insertion were achieved. No patients experienced postoperative complications. Patients 1 and 2 underwent 6- and 9-month postactivation testing, respectively, with CNC scores 64% to 80% and AzBio 81% to 99% in the implanted ears. Patient 3 scored 0% on CNC and AzBio testing at 3 months and deferred her 6-month audiometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ILS confined to the vestibule and semicircular canals can be considered for simultaneous tumor resection and CI placement.

Full Endoscopic Resection of Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas: A Case Series

Objective: To investigate the technique and efficacy of fully endoscope resection of intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILS) by transcanal transpromontorial endoscopic approach (TTEA). Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Hospital. Patients: All patients who were affected by ILS, without extension to the internal auditory canal and underwent surgery with TTEA in our hospital in 2020. Intervention(s): Therapeutic. Main Outcome Measure(s): Recovery status, postoperative complications and remaining symptoms after surgery. Results: Three patients were included, all of which underwent gross total resections. The follow-up period was from 10 months to 2 years. No intraoperative and postoperative major complications were observed. There was no facial paralysis or cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively. The hospitalization time of TTEA was 5 days. Three patients' vertigo was relieved after 1 week without receiving vestibular therapy. Only 1 patient complained of transient episodes of vertigo when climbing or holding heavy objects. Conclusions: TTEA has the advantages of clear vision to identify the anatomical structure, enabling complete tumor resection, reduced operation time, and faster postoperative recovery.Level of Evidence: IV.