Evolution of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy as an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product (ATMP)-An Indian Perspective

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in veterinary ophthalmology: clinical evidence and prospects

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy presents a promising strategy for treating various ocular conditions in veterinary medicine. This review explores the therapeutic potential of MSCs in managing corneal ulcers, immune-mediated keratitis, chronic superficial keratitis, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, retinal degeneration, and ocular burns in feline, equine, and canine patients. Studies have demonstrated the immunomodulatory and regenerative properties of MSCs, highlighting their ability to mitigate inflammation and promote tissue regeneration. Experimental studies have shown the potential of MSC therapy in reducing corneal opacity and vascularization, indicating significant therapeutic advantages. Delivery methods play a crucial role in optimizing the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs in ocular diseases. Various delivery methods, such as intravitreal injection, subconjunctival injection, topical administration, and scaffold-mediated delivery, are being explored to optimize MSC delivery to the target ocular tissues. Clinical trials have shown significant improvements in clinical signs following MSC therapy, underscoring its efficacy in treating ocular diseases. Additionally, tissue engineering approaches incorporating MSCs, growth factors, and scaffolds offer innovative strategies for corneal regeneration and tissue repair. Despite challenges such as standardization of protocols and long-term safety assessment, ongoing research endeavours seek to unlock the full therapeutic potential of MSC therapy in ocular diseases. Future prospects in MSC therapy involve exploring scaffold and hydrogel-based approaches and cell-free therapies leveraging the bioactive molecules released by MSCs. Continued research and development efforts are essential to unlock the full therapeutic potential of MSCs and realize their transformative impact on ocular diseases in veterinary patients.

Effect of Cellular Dosage of Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate on the Radiological Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis(KOA), a chronic degenerative disease, significantly impairs quality of life due to pain and mobility limitations. Traditional treatments focus on symptom management without addressing the underlying disease progression, leading to a growing interest in regenerative medicine approaches. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), rich in mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors, has shown potential for cartilage repair and symptom relief in KOA. Despite promising outcomes, the optimal BMAC dosage for knee OA treatment remains undetermined. This study aims to evaluate the radiological outcomes of varying BMAC dosages in knee OA treatment.

Methods

This prospective controlled dose-escalation study involved 75 patients with early-stage knee OA, categorized into three groups based on BMAC dosage administered 10x106 cells (low-dose group), 50 × 106 cells (medium-dose group), or 100x106 cells (high-dose group). All the patients underwent a single intra-articular injection of BMAC and were monitored over a year. The primary outcomes include magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART 2.0) score to assess the cartilage.

Results

We noted significant improvement in the overall MOCART score (p = 0.027) and subchondral change sub-score (p = 0.048) and defect filling sub-score (p = 0.025) in the medium- and high-dose cohorts compared to the low-dose cohort at 1 year follow-up. Although we noted positive correlation between the clinical and radiological outcome (r = 0.43), we did not find any significant different in the clinical outcome between the treatment groups.

Conclusion

BMAC for OA knee resulted in significant improvement in the radiological scores compared to the baseline. Medium and high doses of BMAC result in significantly higher radiological scores compared to low-dose BMAC at 1 year. However, the radiological improvement did not translate into functional improvement, irrespective of the dosage administered at 1 year. Further research is necessary on the long-term outcomes to understand and optimize the dosing strategy based on clinico-radiological results.

Increased Cellular Dosage of Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate Does Not Translate to Increased Clinical Effectiveness in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase I Dose Escalation Study

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), a chronic degenerative disease, significantly impairs quality of life due to pain and mobility limitations. Traditional treatments focus on symptom management without addressing the underlying disease progression, leading to a growing interest in regenerative medicine approaches. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), rich in mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors, has shown potential for cartilage repair and symptom relief in KOA. Despite promising outcomes, the optimal BMAC dosage for knee OA treatment remains undetermined. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of varying BMAC dosages in knee OA treatment.

Methods

This prospective controlled dose-escalation study involved 75 patients with early-stage knee OA, categorized into three groups based on BMAC dosage administered 10 × 106 cells (low-dose group), 50 × 106 cells (medium-dose group), or 100 × 106 cells (high-dose group). All the patients underwent a single intra-articular injection of BMAC and were monitored over a year. The primary outcomes include Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for joint function recorded at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention. Adverse events were also documented.

Results

Significant clinical improvements in VAS and KOOS scores were noted across all groups at all time points compared to the baseline. However, these improvements did not significantly differ between dosage groups throughout the follow-up period. Adverse effects were minimal and primarily consisted of transient post-injection pain and effusion, with no dose-dependent increase in complications.

Conclusion

BMAC treatment for knee OA is safe and demonstrates potential for significant pain relief and functional improvement, irrespective of the dosage administered within the tested range. The lack of significant differences among varying dosages suggests a plateau in therapeutic efficacy beyond a certain threshold. Further research is necessary on the long-term outcomes to optimize the dosing strategy.

Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products in Bone and Cartilage Defects

The number of patients with functional loss of bone and cartilage tissue has shown an increasing trend. Insufficient or inappropriate conventional treatments applied for trauma, orthopedic diseases, or other bone and cartilage-related disorders can lead to bone and cartilage damage. This represents a worldwide public health issue and a significant economic burden. Advanced therapeutic medicinal products (ATMPs) proposed promising alternative therapeutic modalities by application of cell-based and tissue engineering approaches. Recently, several ATMPs have been developed to promote bone and cartilage tissue regeneration. Fifteen ATMPs, two related to bone and 13 related to cartilage, have received regulatory approval and marketing authorization. However, four ATMPs were withdrawn from the market for various reasons. However, ATMPs that are still on the market have demonstrated positive results, their broad application faced limitations. The development and standardization of methodologies will be a major challenge in the coming decades. Currently, the number of ATMPs in clinical trials using mesenchymal stromal cells or chondrocytes indicates a growing recognition that current ATMPs can be improved. Research on bone and cartilage tissue regeneration continues to expand. Cell-based therapies are likely to be clinically supported by the new ATMPs, innovative fabrication processes, and enhanced surgical approaches. In this study, we highlighted the available ATMPs that have been used in bone and cartilage defects and discussed their advantages and disadvantages in clinical applications.

Immune-Cell-Based Therapy for COVID-19: Current Status

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global pandemic. The interplay between innate and adaptive immune responses plays a crucial role in managing COVID-19. Cell therapy has recently emerged as a promising strategy to modulate the immune system, offering immense potential for the treatment of COVID-19 due to its customizability and regenerative capabilities. This review provides an overview of the various subsets of immune cell subsets implicated in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and a comprehensive summary of the current status of immune cell therapy in COVID-19 treatment.

Medico-Legal Implications and Regulatory Frameworks of Regenerative Orthopaedics

Regenerative orthopaedics has revolutionized traditional medicine, which represents a giant leap in science and research. The knowledge of the medico-legal implications and regulatory framework of this branch is vital for clinicians and researchers to go forward smoothly. This systematic review of the literature should shed light on these considerations and provide a comprehensive knowledge of the various implications and laws governing practice and research. The wide plethora of knowledge in the use of regenerative orthopaedics should be complemented by updated regulations and clinicians' grasp of knowledge on regenerative medicine. The review focused on peer-reviewed published articles concerned with the topic and outlined common medico-legal issues and the current regulatory frameworks in various countries. The articles suggest that developed nations like the US have faced several lawsuits in this field, and a few countries in Europe like Italy and Germany, which were frontrunners in this field based on research, have fallen back due to emerging legal and regulatory policies. Undoubtedly, regenerative orthopaedics holds the key to future orthopaedics, but the world is skeptical of this concept, and laws and regulatory frameworks can curb it if not guided well. In India, this field has received prime attention, but at a slow pace when compared to the laws. After reviewing 113 articles, we analysed eight critically in this systematic review to emphasize the comparative global frameworks, daily medico-legal problems, and solutions for the branch of regenerative orthopaedics.

Stem Cell Therapy and Rejuvenation, and Their Impact on Society

In his worldwide best-seller Homo Deus [...].

Advanced therapy medicinal products in China: Regulation and development

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) have shown dramatic efficacy in addressing serious diseases over the past decade. With the acceleration and deepening of China's drug regulatory reforms, the country sees a continuous introduction of policies that encourage drug innovation. The capacity and efficiency of the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE), National Medical Products Administration have significantly improved, where substantial resources have been allocated to ATMPs with major innovations and outstanding clinical values that satisfy urgent clinical needs. These changes have greatly stimulated the research and development of biological products in China, ushering in a period of explosive growth in the number of investigational new drug (IND) applications of ATMPs. Here, we described China's ATMP regulatory framework and analyzed data on IND applications for ATMPs submitted to CDE. The data show that China's ATMP industry is expanding dramatically, but lagging behind in terms of the innovative targets and the coverage of indications. However, in recent years, the diversity of product types, targets, and indications is growing. We discussed challenges and opportunities in ATMP regulation. Risk-based regulation and cross-discipline collaborations are encouraged to promote more ATMPs toward market authorization in China.

Distinctions in bone matrix nanostructure, composition, and formation between osteoblast-like cells, MG-63, and human mesenchymal stem cells, UE7T-13

Osteoblast-like cells and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are frequently employed as osteoprogenitor cell models for evaluating novel biomaterials in bone healing and tissue engineering. In this study, the characterization of UE7T-13 hMSCs and MG-63 human osteoblast-like cells was examined. Both cells can undergo osteogenesis and produce calcium extracellular matrix; however, calcium nodules produced by MG-63 lacked a central mass and appeared flatter than UE7T-13. The absence of growing calcium nodules in MG-63 was discovered by SEM-EDX to be associated with the formation of alternating layers of cells and calcium extracellular matrix. The nanostructure and composition analysis showed that UE7T-13 had a finer nanostructure of calcium nodules with a higher calcium/phosphate ratio than MG-63. Both cells expressed high intrinsic levels of collagen type I alpha 1 chain, while only UE7T-13 expressed high levels of alkaline phosphatase, biomineralization associated (ALPL). High ALP activity in UE7T-13 was not further enhanced by osteogenic induction, but in MG-63, low intrinsic ALP activity was greatly induced by osteogenic induction. These findings highlight the differences between the two immortal osteoprogenitor cell lines, along with some technical notes that should be considered while selecting and interpreting the pertinent in vitro model.

Extracellular vesicles and their cells of origin: Open issues in autoimmune diseases

The conventional therapeutic approaches to treat autoimmune diseases through suppressing the immune system, such as steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are not adequately practical. Moreover, these regimens are associated with considerable complications. Designing tolerogenic therapeutic strategies based on stem cells, immune cells, and their extracellular vesicles (EVs) seems to open a promising path to managing autoimmune diseases' vast burden. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), dendritic cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the main cell types applied to restore a tolerogenic immune status; MSCs play a more beneficial role due to their amenable properties and extensive cross-talks with different immune cells. With existing concerns about the employment of cells, new cell-free therapeutic paradigms, such as EV-based therapies, are gaining attention in this field. Additionally, EVs' unique properties have made them to be known as smart immunomodulators and are considered as a potential substitute for cell therapy. This review provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of cell-based and EV-based methods for treating autoimmune diseases. The study also presents an outlook on the future of EVs to be implemented in clinics for autoimmune patients.

Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Microenvironments

Major key features of stem cells' functions are self-renewal and their capacity for differentiation, allowing for maintain a proper stem cell reservoir as well as producing lineage-committed cells [...].

Clinical progress in MSC-based therapies for the management of severe COVID-19

Considering the high impact that severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases still pose on public health and their complex pharmacological management, the search for new therapeutic alternatives is essential. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) could be promising candidates as they present important immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties that can combat the acute severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the cytokine storm occurring in COVID-19, two processes that are mainly driven by an immunological misbalance. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the intricate inflammatory process derived from the immune dysregulation that occurs in COVID-19, discussing the potential that the cytokines and growth factors that constitute the MSC-derived secretome present to treat the disease. Moreover, we revise the latest clinical progress made in the field, discussing the most important findings of the clinical trials conducted to date, which follow 2 different approaches: MSC-based cell therapy or the administration of the secretome by itself, as a cell-free therapy.