1
|
Lakin KS, Wu Y, Gordon JK, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Henry RS, Denton CP, Mouthon L, Spiera RF, Thombs BD. COVID-19 vaccinations and infections among individuals with systemic sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 67:152453. [PMID: 38851172 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE We previously surveyed adults with systemic sclerosis (SSc) regarding COVID-19 vaccination in April-May 2021. The objective of the present study was to update through June-July 2022 and assess self-reported (1) COVID-19 vaccination rates, including boosters; (2) vaccine-related adverse events; (3) peri‑vaccination immunosuppressive medication management; (4) vaccine hesitancy; and (5) prevalence and severity of COVID-19 infections. METHODS In April-May 2021 and June-July 2022, SPIN Cohort participants completed surveys on COVID-19 vaccination and infection. Primary vaccine series was defined according to the standard for each COVID-19 vaccine; additional vaccine administrations were considered booster doses. Fully vaccinated was defined as having completed a primary vaccine series and at least one booster dose. RESULTS 544 participants completed the 2021 survey only, 101 the 2022 survey only, and 388 both surveys. Among 489 participants with 2022 data, 437 (89 %) had received both primary and booster vaccines. Among all 1,033 participants, 960 (93 %) received at least one dose. At least one adverse reaction was reported by 34 % (330 of 960 participants) following first, 48 % (314 of 657 participants) following second, and 34 % (147 of 437 participants) following booster vaccine doses (primarily sore arm and fatigue); no severe adverse reactions were reported. SSc symptom worsening was reported in 6 % (53 of 960) after the first, 6 % after the second (39 of 657), and 4 % (17 of 437) after the booster dose. Of participants taking methotrexate or mycophenolate (including Cellcept or Myfortic), 34 of 266 (13 %) reported that they temporarily stopped or decreased their medication at the first dose, 32 of 215 (15 %) at the second dose, and 28 of 148 (19 %) for booster vaccination. Of 52 individuals not fully vaccinated with primary and booster doses in 2022, 29 (56 %) reported worry about vaccine related SSc flares. 172 of 489 (35 %) 2022 participants reported a history of at least one COVID-19 infection; 114 (66 %) occurred after receiving at least a primary vaccine series. Among initial COVID-19 infections, 9 (5 %) were asymptomatic, 66 (38 %) involved mild symptoms, 82 (48 %) moderate symptoms, and 15 (9 %) required hospitalization. CONCLUSION Most people with SSc in the study were fully vaccinated, and most continued their methotrexate or mycophenolate post-primary and booster vaccinations. Over half of vaccine-hesitant participants were concerned regarding risk of SSc flare; however, few vaccinated participants reported this. These data may be useful for counselling people with SSc regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yin Wu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Linda Kwakkenbos
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Eve Carrier
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Richard S Henry
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christopher P Denton
- University College London, Division of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, London, UK
| | - Luc Mouthon
- Service de Médecine Interne, Centre de Référence Maladies Autoimmunes et Autoinflammatoires Systémiques Rares d'Ile de France, de l'Est et de l'Ouest, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris-Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Brett D Thombs
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen DY, Huang PI, Tang KT. Characteristics of long COVID in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2024; 8:rkae027. [PMID: 38560644 PMCID: PMC10980592 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkae027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Numerous cases of long coronavirus disease (long COVID) have been reported in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Despite the reviews on clinical manifestations of long COVID in the general population, systematic reviews on ARD patients are scarce. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients. Methods We searched the literature in PubMed and Embase as of 27 December 2022. Cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies relevant to long COVID in ARD patients were collected. Stratification based on the severity of COVID infection and subtypes of rheumatic diseases [systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) vs non-autoimmune rheumatic disease (NARD)] was also undertaken. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis. Results A total of 15 relevant studies were identified from the literature. The prevalence of long COVID was 56% (95% CI 34, 76) in 2995 patients. Hospitalized COVID patients had a higher proportion of long COVID than non-hospitalized patients. The prevalence of long COVID was similar between SARD and NARD patients. In terms of symptoms, fatigue, arthralgia and pain were commonly reported in long COVID patients with ARDs. Conclusion The characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients are generally similar to those in the general population despite a higher prevalence and a higher proportion of arthralgia and pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Der-Yuan Chen
- Rheumatology and Immunology Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Po-I Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Tung Tang
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine and Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ouaddouh C, Duijster JW, Lieber T, van Hunsel FPAM. The role of co-morbidities in the development of an AEFI after COVID-19 vaccination in a large prospective cohort with patient-reported outcomes in the Netherlands. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:323-331. [PMID: 37796980 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2267971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of a preexisting comorbidity on the occurrence of adverse events after immunization (AEFIs) has been studied poorly. In this longitudinal cohort study, we assess the association between co-morbidities and the occurrence of AEFIs after COVID-19 vaccination. Also, we described the occurrence of flare-ups and their manifestation after COVID-19 vaccination in people with rheumatic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We performed multivariable logistic regression to investigate the association between the occurrence of AEFIs and 10 common comorbidities using patient-reported data from people vaccinated with the AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Moderna, or Pfizer vaccine. RESULTS Occurrence of any AEFI, injection site reactions, headache, fatigue, and/or malaise was significantly associated with presence of comorbidities, including psychological disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and endocrine disorders after the first and second doses (OR ranges 1.23-1.77). One participant with rheumatoid arthritis experienced a flare-up after receiving the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION The results showed that the odds of reporting an AEFI after COVID-19 vaccination is significantly higher in the presence of some comorbidities whilst flare-ups are uncommon after receiving COVID-19 vaccination in people with rheumatic disease. In-depth research is needed to validate our results and unravel the observed associations from a mechanistic perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ouaddouh
- Vaccine Team, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - J W Duijster
- Vaccine Team, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - T Lieber
- Vaccine Team, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - F P A M van Hunsel
- Vaccine Team, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, FarmacoTherapie, Epidemiologie en Economie Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Picchianti-Diamanti A, Navarra A, Aiello A, Laganà B, Cuzzi G, Salmi A, Vanini V, Maggi F, Meschi S, Matusali G, Notari S, Agrati C, Salemi S, Di Rosa R, Passarini D, Di Gioia V, Sesti G, Conti F, Spinelli FR, Corpolongo A, Chimenti MS, Ferraioli M, Sebastiani GD, Benucci M, Li Gobbi F, Santoro AP, Capri A, Puro V, Nicastri E, Goletti D. Older Age, a High Titre of Neutralising Antibodies and Therapy with Conventional DMARDs Are Associated with Protection from Breakthrough Infection in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients after the Booster Dose of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1684. [PMID: 38006015 PMCID: PMC10675674 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to analyse the incidence and severity of breakthrough infections (BIs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after a COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination booster dose. Methods: We enrolled 194 RA patients and 1002 healthcare workers (HCWs) as controls. Clinical, lifestyle and demographic factors were collected at the time of the third dose, and immunogenicity analyses were carried out in a subgroup of patients at 4-6 weeks after the third dose. Results: BIs were experienced by 42% patients (82/194) with a median time since the last vaccination of 176 days. Older age (>50 years; aHR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.74), receiving conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (aHR 0.52, 95%CI: 0.30-0.90) and having a titre of neutralising antibodies >20 (aHR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.12-1.07) were identified as protective factors. Conversely, anti-IL6R treatment and anti-CD20 therapy increased BI probability. BIs were mostly pauci-symptomatic, but the hospitalisation incidence was significantly higher than in HCWs (8.5% vs. 0.19%); the main risk factor was anti-CD20 therapy. Conclusions: Being older than 50 years and receiving csDMARDs were shown to be protective factors for BI, whereas anti-IL6R or anti-CD20 therapy increased the risk. Higher neutralising antibody titres were associated with a lower probability of BI. If confirmed in a larger population, the identification of a protective cut-off would allow a personalised risk-benefit therapeutic management of RA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Picchianti-Diamanti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.P.-D.); (B.L.); (S.S.); (R.D.R.); (D.P.); (V.D.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Assunta Navarra
- Epidemiology Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Aiello
- Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.A.); (G.C.); (A.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Bruno Laganà
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.P.-D.); (B.L.); (S.S.); (R.D.R.); (D.P.); (V.D.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Gilda Cuzzi
- Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.A.); (G.C.); (A.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Andrea Salmi
- Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.A.); (G.C.); (A.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Valentina Vanini
- Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.A.); (G.C.); (A.S.); (V.V.)
- Unità Operativa Semplice (UOS) Professioni Sanitarie Tecniche, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Maggi
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Silvia Meschi
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Giulia Matusali
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Stefania Notari
- Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (S.N.); (C.A.)
| | - Chiara Agrati
- Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (S.N.); (C.A.)
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Bambino Gesù Pediatric Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy
| | - Simonetta Salemi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.P.-D.); (B.L.); (S.S.); (R.D.R.); (D.P.); (V.D.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Roberta Di Rosa
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.P.-D.); (B.L.); (S.S.); (R.D.R.); (D.P.); (V.D.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Damiano Passarini
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.P.-D.); (B.L.); (S.S.); (R.D.R.); (D.P.); (V.D.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Valeria Di Gioia
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.P.-D.); (B.L.); (S.S.); (R.D.R.); (D.P.); (V.D.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Giorgio Sesti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.P.-D.); (B.L.); (S.S.); (R.D.R.); (D.P.); (V.D.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Fabrizio Conti
- Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.R.S.)
| | - Francesca Romana Spinelli
- Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.R.S.)
| | - Angela Corpolongo
- Clinical Division of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (E.N.)
| | - Maria Sole Chimenti
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of ‘Medicina dei Sistemi’, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Mario Ferraioli
- Department of Rheumatology, San Camillo Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy; (M.F.); (G.D.S.)
| | | | - Maurizio Benucci
- Rheumatology Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Azienda USL—Toscana Centro, 50122 Florence, Italy; (M.B.); (F.L.G.)
| | - Francesca Li Gobbi
- Rheumatology Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Azienda USL—Toscana Centro, 50122 Florence, Italy; (M.B.); (F.L.G.)
| | - Anna Paola Santoro
- UOC Emerging Infections and Centro di Riferimento AIDS (CRAIDS), National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.P.S.); (A.C.); (V.P.)
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Capri
- UOC Emerging Infections and Centro di Riferimento AIDS (CRAIDS), National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.P.S.); (A.C.); (V.P.)
| | - Vincenzo Puro
- UOC Emerging Infections and Centro di Riferimento AIDS (CRAIDS), National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.P.S.); (A.C.); (V.P.)
| | - Emanuele Nicastri
- Clinical Division of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (E.N.)
| | - Delia Goletti
- Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.A.); (G.C.); (A.S.); (V.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Joudeh AI, Lutf AQ, Mahdi S, Tran G. Efficacy and safety of mRNA and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A systematic review. Vaccine 2023; 41:3801-3812. [PMID: 37244811 PMCID: PMC10201317 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) are at a potentially higher risk for COVID-19 infection complications. Given their inherent altered immune system and the use of immunomodulatory medications, vaccine immunogenicity could be unpredictable with a suboptimal or even an exaggerated immunological response. The aim of this study is to provide real-time data on the emerging evidence of COVID-19 vaccines' efficacy and safety in patients with ARDs. METHODS We performed a literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID databases up to 11-13 April 2022 on the efficacy and safety of both types of the mRNA-vaccines and the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines in patients with ARD. The risk of bias in the retrieved studies was evaluated using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Also, current clinical practice guidelines from multiple international professional societies were reviewed. RESULTS We identified 60 prognostic studies, 69 case reports and case series, and eight international clinical practice guidelines. Our results demonstrated that most patients with ARDs were able to mount humoral and/or cellular responses after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine although this response was suboptimal in patients receiving certain disease-modifying medications including rituximab, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, daily glucocorticoids >10 mg, abatacept, as well as in older individuals, and those with comorbid interstitial lung diseases. Safety reports on COVID-19 vaccines in patients with ARDs were largely reassuring with mostly self-limiting adverse events and very minimal post-vaccination disease flares. CONCLUSION Both types of the mRNA-vaccines and the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective and safe in patients with ARD. However, due to their suboptimal response in some patients, alternative mitigation strategies such as booster vaccines and shielding practices should also be followed. Management of immunomodulatory treatment regimens during the peri vaccination period should be individualized through shared decision making with patients and their attending rheumatologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwar I Joudeh
- Department of Medicine, Al Khor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Al Khor, Qatar; Internal Medicine Department, Jordan University, Amman, Jordan.
| | - Abdu Qaid Lutf
- Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Al Khor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Al Khor, Qatar
| | - Salah Mahdi
- Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Al Khor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Al Khor, Qatar
| | - Gui Tran
- Department of Rheumatology, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baroun F, Albasri A, Abutiban F, Alhajeri H. CVAPPS: A Cross-Sectional Study of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Acceptance, Perceptions, and Post-Vaccination Side Effects among Rheumatic Disease Patients in Kuwait. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030666. [PMID: 36992250 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We analyzed data collected for ascertaining severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine acceptance, perceptions, and post-vaccination side effects among Kuwaiti inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients. Methods: The current cross-sectional study was conducted on patients attending governmental rheumatology clinics across seven hospitals in Kuwait between July and September 2021. We included adults of both sexes who are national/residents of the state of Kuwait and who had a confirmed diagnosis of any IRD disease. Data on patients’ demographics, history of IRD, SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination status, as well as post-vaccination side effects and disease flare were collected from the included participants through a self-administered questionnaire. Stata MP/17 for macOS was used for statistical analyses. Results: We included 501 IRD patients, a group with a mean age of 43.38 years and a mean disease duration of 10.46 years. The majority of the included patients were female (79.8%), and the most common primary rheumatology diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (42.5%), followed by spondyloarthritis (19.4%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (19.0%). One hundred and five patients (21.0%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by PCR-positive swab; of them, 17 patients were hospitalized. None of the included patients were using steroids alone. cDMARDs, bDMARDs, and sDMARDs were reported in 37.3%, 18.0%, and 3.8% of the patients, respectively. Three hundred and fifty-one patients (70.1%) were vaccinated; 40.9% received Pfizer/BioNTech, whereas 28.7% received AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccines. Fear that the vaccination will aggravate the condition or interfere with the present therapy and concerns about its effectiveness as well as its side effects were the most prevalent causes for refusing to accept the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Other patients were worried about the paucity of the data because individuals with IRD had been omitted from earlier research, resulting in a dearth of information. The commonly reported post-vaccination side effects were body ache/pain, fatigue, and pain at the injection site (32.1%, 30.3%, and 29.7%, respectively). IRD flare post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was self-reported in only 9 patients, and 342 did not report a flare. Conclusions: This study’s findings highlight that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have an acceptable safety profile, with the majority of their side effects being temporary and mild. The occurrence of flares was low after immunization. Reassurance and trust in the safety of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IRD patients should be reassuring to rheumatologists and vaccine recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anwar Albasri
- Rheumatology Unit, Al-Sabah Hospital, Alsabah, Kuwait
| | | | - Heba Alhajeri
- Rheumatology Unit, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan TT, Ng HJ, Young B, Khan BA, Shetty V, Azmi N, Clissold S. Effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and the need for alternative preventative approaches in immunocompromised individuals: a narrative review of systematic reviews. Expert Rev Vaccines 2023; 22:341-365. [PMID: 36920116 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2191716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including administration of booster doses, continues to be the most effective method for controlling COVID-19-related complications including progression to severe illness and death.However, there is mounting evidence that more needs to be done to protect individuals with compromised immune function. AREAS COVERED Here, we review the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised patients, including those with primary immunodeficiencies, HIV, cancer (including hematological malignancies), solid organ transplant recipients and chronic kidney disease, as reported in systematic reviews/meta-analyses published over a 12-month period in PubMed. Given the varied responses to vaccination patients with compromised immune function, a major goal of this analysis was to try to identify specific risk-factors related to vaccine failure. EXPERT OPINION COVID-19 remains a global problem, with new variants of concern emerging at regular intervals. There is an ongoing need for optimal vaccine strategies to combat the pandemic. In addition, alternative treatment approaches are needed for immunocompromised patients who may not mount an adequate immune response to current COVID-19 vaccines. Identification of high-risk patients, and the introduction of newer antiviral approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, will offer physicians therapeutic options for such vulnerable individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuan Tong Tan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Heng Joo Ng
- Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Barnaby Young
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Behram Ali Khan
- Medical Services Department, The National Kidney Foundation, Singapore and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu PC, Li CL, Chang YT, Chen CC, Wu CY, Ma SH. Management of Atopic Dermatitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Key Questions and Review of the Current Evidence. Dermatitis 2023; 34:77-84. [PMID: 36917535 DOI: 10.1089/derm.2022.29019.pwu] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, management of atopic dermatitis (AD) has been widely discussed. Key issues include the risk of COVID-19 infection and related outcomes in AD patients, the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in AD populations, and management of AD in the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent studies have shown that patients with AD have a slightly increased risk of COVID-19 infection but are not associated with a worse outcome than the non-AD population. COVID-19 vaccination is generally effective and safe in patients with AD. However, temporary discontinuation of certain systemic immunomodulatory agents after vaccination is suggested. During the pandemic, continuation of all immunomodulating agents is suggested, but these agents should be paused when patients with AD are infected with COVID-19 until recovery. Further studies are warranted to investigate the long-term interaction between AD and COVID-19 to aid clinical decisions during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Chien Wu
- From the *Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
- Research Center of Big Data and Meta-Analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lun Li
- Department of Dermatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Ting Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Dermatology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chiang Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Dermatology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Yi Wu
- Department of Dermatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Dermatology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Hsiang Ma
- Department of Dermatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Third Dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine Does Not “Boost” Disease Flares and Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11030687. [PMID: 36979666 PMCID: PMC10045021 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Data on the risk of adverse events (AEs) and disease flares in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) after the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine are scarce. The aim of this multicenter, prospective study is to analyze the clinical and immunological safety of BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients followed-up from the first vaccine cycle to the third dose. The vaccine showed an overall good safety profile with no patient reporting serious AEs, and a low percentage of total AEs at both doses (40/78 (51.3%) and 13/47 (27.7%) patients after the second and third dose, respectively (p < 0.002). Flares were observed in 10.3% of patients after the end of the vaccination cycle and 12.8% after the third dose. Being vaccinated for influenza was inversely associated with the onset of AEs after the second dose, at both univariable (p = 0.013) and multivariable analysis (p = 0.027). This result could allow identification of a predictive factor of vaccine tolerance, if confirmed in larger patient populations. A higher disease activity at baseline was not associated with a higher incidence of AEs or disease flares. Effectiveness was excellent after the second dose, with only 1/78 (1.3%) mild breakthrough infection (BI) and worsened after the third dose, with 9/47 (19.2%) BI (p < 0.002), as a probable expression of the higher capacity of the Omicron variants to escape vaccine recognition.
Collapse
|
10
|
Roseti L, Grigolo B. COVID-19 and rheumatic diseases: A mini-review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:997876. [PMID: 36226148 PMCID: PMC9548696 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.997876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Joint pain and arthralgia can be manifestations of COVID-19, and studies evaluating long COVID symptoms identified the persistence of these disorders. Moreover, some case reports highlighted the development of new inflammatory arthritis in patients with COVID-19, suggesting a possible relation. Viral infections and rheumatic diseases share a documented relationship; they have been associated with genetic and environmental risk factors responsible for some of them. There is crosstalk between viruses and the immune system during the development of several rheumatic diseases. Moreover, infections may participate in the pathogenesis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases and contribute to patient mortality. Therefore, it is crucial to provide a clearer insight into the interaction between viral infections and rheumatic diseases. Here, we provide a mini-review of the current literature with the aim of shedding light on the relationship between COVID-19 and rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases, which is still unclear. Specifically, we examined several aspects: risk for the rheumatic population of acquiring the virus or developing severe symptoms, similarities of COVID-19 and arthritis, the possible rheumatic consequence of COVID-19, of rheumatic drugs and vaccines, and COVID-19 prevention in rheumatic patients through vaccination.
Collapse
|
11
|
Assawasaksakul T, Lertussavavivat T, Sathitratanacheewin S, Oudomying N, Vichaiwattana P, Wanlapakorn N, Poovorawan Y, Avihingsanon Y, Assawasaksakul N, Buranapraditkun S, Kittanamongkolchai W. Comparison of Immunogenicity and Safety of Inactivated, Adenovirus-Vectored, and Heterologous Adenovirus-Vectored/mRNA Vaccines in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10060853. [PMID: 35746461 PMCID: PMC9227480 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10060853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Impaired immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines have been observed in autoimmune rheumatic disease patients. Determining the most effective and safe vaccine regimen is critically needed in such a population. We aim to compare the immunogenicity and safety of three COVID-19 vaccine regimens in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: SLE and RA patients aged 18−65 years who received inactivated (CoronaVac or COVILO), adenovirus-vectored (AZD1222), or heterogeneous (AZD1222/BNT162b2) vaccines were enrolled. Humoral and cellular immune responses were assessed at day 28 after the second vaccination. This was performed using the serum binding antibody level against the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-RBD Ig) and IFNy-ELISpot assay (ELISpot), respectively. Reactogenicity was reviewed on day 7 following each vaccination. Disease activity was assessed before and on day 28 after the second vaccination. Results: The cohort consisted of 94 patients (64 SLE and 30 RA). Inactivated, AZD1222, and AZD1222/BNT162b2 vaccines were administered to 23, 43, and 28 patients, respectively. Anti-RBD titers were lowest in the inactivated vaccine group (2.84 AU/mL; 95% CI 0.96−8.44), followed by AZD1222 (233.7 AU/mL; 95% CI 99.0−505.5), and AZD1222/BNT162b2 (688.6 AU/mL; 95% CI 271−1745), p < 0.0001. After adjusting for relevant factors, the inactivated vaccine was associated with the lowest humoral response, while adenovirus-vectored/mRNA vaccine was the highest. The proportion of positive ELISpot test was also lowest in the inactivated vaccine group (27%), followed by the adenovirus-vectored vaccine (67%), and the adenovirus-vectored/mRNA vaccine (73%) (p = 0.03). All types of vaccine were well-tolerated. There was no flare of autoimmune disease post-vaccination. Conclusion: Adenovirus-vectored and adenovirus-vectored/mRNA vaccines elicited a stronger humoral and cellular immune response than inactivated vaccines, suggesting that they may be more suitable in SLE and RA patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theerada Assawasaksakul
- Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand;
| | - Tanat Lertussavavivat
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (T.L.); (Y.A.)
| | - Seelwan Sathitratanacheewin
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (S.S.); (N.O.); (S.B.)
| | - Nont Oudomying
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (S.S.); (N.O.); (S.B.)
| | - Preeyaporn Vichaiwattana
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (P.V.); (N.W.); (Y.P.)
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (P.V.); (N.W.); (Y.P.)
| | - Yong Poovorawan
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (P.V.); (N.W.); (Y.P.)
- The Royal Society of Thailand, Sanam Sueapa, Dusit, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
| | - Yingyos Avihingsanon
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (T.L.); (Y.A.)
| | | | - Supranee Buranapraditkun
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (S.S.); (N.O.); (S.B.)
- Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (T.L.); (Y.A.)
- Mahachakri Sirindhorn Clinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Renal Immunology and Transplantation Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Rd., Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|