A Systematic Review of Atopic Dermatitis: The Intriguing Journey Starting from Physiopathology to Treatment, from Laboratory Bench to Bedside

Paediatric Atopic Dermatitis: The Unexpected Impact on Life with a Specific Look at the Molecular Level

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a condition with a multifactorial aetiology that affects the skin. It most often begins at preschool age and involves the skin. The disease's main symptom is intense itching, which occurs especially at night and affects the child's sleep, negatively impacting the quality of life of affected children and, consequently, their families. The difficulty in resting during the night leads to many problems during the day, particularly behavioural disorders and difficulties in paying attention at school, which results in learning impairment. The unexpected symptoms of AD are caused by pathophysiological processes that include many molecular pathways and inflammatory cytokines such as IL-31, IL-1, IL-2, TNF-a, and IL-6. Drawing on a comprehensive review of the literature in PubMed/MedLine, our review offers an in-depth exploration of both the psychosocial impacts of AD and the molecular processes that contribute to this disorder.

SNG100, a novel topical treatment for moderate atopic dermatitis, in patients aged 6 years or older: A randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases. It is associated with significant itch and impaired quality of life. Systemic treatments are efficient but associated with side effects. Novel topical treatments with a favourable safety profile are needed. SNG100 is a novel composition of hydrocortisone 1% in a cream base comprising sulphated polysaccharide (SPS; extracted from in-house cultivated Porphyridium Cruentum unicellular algae), a well-known hydrating, moisturising and a skin barrier repairing agent.

Objectives

To assess the safety, usability and efficacy of SNG100 cream in patients aged ≥6 years with moderate AD.

Methods

In this proof of concept phase I, double-blind, randomised trial, participants received one of three treatments for 14 days: SNG100 twice daily (BID), hydrocortisone 1% BID or mometasone furoate once daily (QD). The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of SNG100 cream compared to hydrocortisone 1% and mometasone furoate. The secondary endpoint was the subject's usability of SNG100. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included percent change from baseline in SCOring AD (SCORAD), Eczema Area and Severity Index, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, pruritus Numerical Rating Score (NRS), peak pruritus-NRS and Investigator's Global Assessment. Subjects were also followed up without any treatment for additional 14 days.

Results

Overall, 66 participants were screened, and 60 patients were randomised. SNG100 demonstrated a high safety profile, similar to marketed products hydrocortisone 1% and mometasone furoate 0.1%, with no unanticipated drug safety related events. SNG100 and mometasone furoate 0.1% cream achieved almost similar and statistically significant greater percentage reductions from baseline in SCORAD as compared to hydrocortisone 1% cream. SNG100 demonstrated significant improvement in NRS as compared to hydrocortisone 1% cream. Remarkably, SNG100 led to a lasting effect with only 29.4% of subjects returning to IGA3 during the follow-up period compared to 50% and 38.9% in the hydrocortisone 1% and in mometasone furoate treatment arms, respectively.

Conclusions

Topical SNG100 is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated innovative treatment for moderate AD. Trial registration number: NCT04615962 (Topical Cream SNG100 for Treatment in Moderate AD Subjects).

The immunological and structural epidermal barrier dysfunction and skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis-an update

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease with various clinical presentations and combinations of symptoms. The pathophysiology of AD is complex and multifactorial. There are several factors involved in the etiopathogenesis of AD including structural and immunological epidermal barrier defect, imbalance of the skin microbiome, genetic background and environmental factors. Alterations in structural proteins, lipids, proteases, and their inhibitors, lead to the impairment of the stratum corneum which is associated with the increased skin penetration and transepidermal water loss. The elevated serum immunoglobulin E levels and blood eosinophilia have been shown in the majority of AD patients. Type 2 T-helper cell immune pathway with increased expression of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, has an important role in the etiopathogenesis of AD. Both T cells and keratinocytes contribute to epidermal barrier impairment in AD via a dynamic interaction of cytokines and chemokines. The skin microbiome is another factor of relevance in the etiopathogenesis of AD. It has been shown that during AD flares, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) colonization increased, while Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) decreased. On the contrary, S. epidermidis and species of Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium increased during the remision phases. However, it is not clear whether skin dysbiosis is one of the symptoms or one of the causes of AD. There are several therapeutic options, targeting these pathways which play a critical role in the etiopathogenesis of AD. Although topical steroids are the mainstay of the treatment of AD, new biological therapies including IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 inhibitors, as well as Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), increasingly gain more importance with new advances in the therapy of AD. In this review, we summarize the role of immunological and structural epidermal barrier dysfunction, immune abnormalities, impairment of lipids, filaggrin mutation and skin microbiome in the etiopathogenesis of AD, as well as the therapeutic options for AD and their effects on these abnormalities in AD skin.

Diseases from the Spectrum of Dermatitis and Eczema: Can "Omics" Sciences Help with Better Systematics and More Accurate Differential Diagnosis?

Researchers active in the field of inflammatory skin diseases from the spectrum of dermatitis and eczema are well aware of a considerable overlap in the clinical pictures and proposed sets of diagnostic criteria for these diseases, which can hardly be overcome through the clinical or epidemiological research. In effect, patients are included in studies based on vague and overlapping criteria, while heterogeneous study populations may, in turn, lead to non-representative outcomes and continued confusion. In this narrative review, a systematics of diseases from the spectrum of dermatitis and eczema is proposed based on the origins of causative factors and the pathomechanisms involved. Difficulties in differentiating between these diseases are discussed, and the extent to which advances in the "omics" sciences might help to overcome them is considered. Of all the "omics" research in this field, more than 90% of the published papers were devoted to atopic dermatitis, with a striking underrepresentation of other diseases from the spectrum of dermatitis and eczema, conditions which collectively exceed the rates of atopic dermatitis by far. A greater "omics" research effort is urgently needed to tackle other dermatitides, like allergic, irritant and protein contact dermatitis, as well as radiation, seborrheic, stasis or autoimmune dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis findings should be validated not only against healthy donors but also other dermatitides. A clinic-oriented approach is proposed for future "omics" studies in the field of dermatitis and eczema.