Multiplex Proteomic Evaluation in Inborn Errors with Deregulated IgE Response

A microarray-based IgE-molecular mimicry index (IgE-MMI): A biomarker for disease severity, clinical phenotypes, and therapeutic response in atopic dermatitis?

BACKGROUND

The role of autoimmune IgE responses in atopic dermatitis (AD) is highly debated. While IgE targeting self-proteins has been extensively studied, IgE responses induced by human-homologous exogenous molecular allergens (HEMAs) remains less understood.

AIM

To investigate whether IgE antibody responses to HEMAs are associated with AD, its severity, and response to dupilumab.

METHODS

We enrolled 3325 participants with a history of allergic diseases, including 577 (17.3%) diagnosed with AD. Serum IgE antibodies against 183 exogenous allergenic molecules were measured using the IgE microarray (Allergy Explorer-ALEX-2®, MADX, Vienna). Based on international classification criteria, participants were stratified by AD severity and clinical phenotypes. For each patient, we developed an 'IgE molecular-mimicry index' (IgE-MMI), calculated from IgE reactivity to a panel of five HEMA protein families: arginine kinase, enolase (ENO), cyclophilin (CYP), lipocalin, and MnSOD. Logistic regression was employed to assess the association between IgE to HEMAs or IgE-MMI and AD, its severity, and response to dupilumab.

RESULTS

IgE sensitization to most HEMAs (32/48, 67%), but only to a small fraction of non-HEMAs (3/135, 2.2%), was significantly more common in patients with severe AD compared to other patient groups. The IgE-MMI was positive in 295/2748 (10.7%) of allergic patients without AD, and in 58/283 (20%), 52/134 (39%), and 86/160 (54%) of patients with remitting, moderate, or severe AD, respectively. It was strongly associated with specific phenotypes, such as flexural dermatitis (OR 8.4, 95% CI: 6.3-11.2), head and neck dermatitis (OR: 16.5, 95% CI: 7.4-37.2), and generalized eczema (OR: 8.6, 95% CI: 4.9-15.6). Poor response to dupilumab was associated with IgE antibodies to ENO (OR: 22.7, 95% CI: 1.7-302.9), but inversely associated with IgE antibodies to MnSOD (OR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.02-0.8) and NPC-2 from dust mites (OR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.01-0.9).

CONCLUSION

IgE microarrays are useful for broadly assessing IgE to HEMAs in allergic patients. IgE reactivity to HEMAs and a positive IgE-MMI may serve as valuable biomarkers for severe AD, its clinical phenotypes, and the response to dupilumab.

Editorial to the Special Issue "Clinical Immunology in Italy, with Special Emphasis to Primary and Acquired Immunodeficiencies: A Commemorative Issue in Honor of Prof. Fernando Aiuti"

Fernando Aiuti (Figure 1), born in Urbino on 8 June 1935, suddenly died on 9 January 2019, leaving a great void not only among his family members and those who knew him and appreciated his great humanity and acute intelligence, but in the entire immunological scientific community [...].

Evolution Toward Chip-Based Arrays in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Allergic Disease

Multiplex-based specific IgE antibody assays have emerged into the clinical immunology laboratory through the combined use of pure, recombinant allergenic molecules and new methods to simultaneously and accurately analyze specific IgE antibodies to hundreds of allergens. This review traces the historical development and examines outstanding questions related to the strengths and limitations of these new molecular allergen multipex technologies for the assessment of human allergic sensitization. Multiplexed technologies are poised to provide the most cost-effective and comprehensive evaluation of patients with suspected allergy as compared with the commonly used singleplex autoanalyzers. How analytically sensitive and quantitative are the multiplex technologies, down to 0.1 kUA/L? Because each allergen is viewed as a unique assay, how will analytical and clinical performance be documented at the manufacturing and clinical laboratory levels to guarantee reproducibility and obtain government regulatory clearance? Will interference by naturally occurring allergen-specific IgG compromise analytical performance? Successful resolution of these and other questions covered in this review will position multiplex technologies to become the single most-effective means of screening patients for allergic sensitization, assessing IgE antibody cross-reactivity, and planning therapy directed at the patient with allergy.