Combination of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid vs. Platelet-Rich Plasma Alone for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

A critical overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intra-articular injection of platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis

This study is to summarize and evaluate the available evidence for the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Eight databases were searched from inception to September 15, 2024. All systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) treated with PRP versus HA for KOA were collected. Literature screening and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. The methodological quality, reporting quality, risk of bias, evidence quality, and evidence overlap rate of the included studies were evaluated by using AMSTAR 2, PRISMA 2020, ROBIS, GRADE, and GROOVE systems. Seventeen SRs were included. The results showed that the effectiveness and safety of PRP in the treatment of KOA may be superior to HA. The methodological quality of all 17 documents was extremely low quality. Sixteen of them had poor reporting quality, and there were relatively serious information deficiencies. All SRs were determined to be at high risk. Among the 221 outcome indicators, there were two medium-quality evidences, 30 low-quality evidences, and 189 extremely low-quality evidences. It was found that there was a very high overlap among the included articles. Currently, the quality of SRs on the treatment of KOA with PRP versus HA is relatively low. Future authors of SRs should adhere to quality assessment tool criteria, expand sample sizes to reduce overlap, and evaluate the quality of evidence for merged study results, in order to provide more reliable and rigorous evidence-based support for clinical practice.

A Meta-Analytical Way of Systematizing the Use of Hyaluronan Gels for the Relief of Osteoarthritis, Compared with New Treatment Alternatives

Hyaluronic acid, in the form of a gel or viscoelastic colloidal solution, is currently used for the viscosupplementation of joints affected by osteoarthritis, but its effectiveness is under debate in relation to newer alternatives. Based on meta-analytical arguments, the present article reinforces the opinion that there are still no decisive arguments for its complete replacement but for its use adapted to the peculiarities of the disease manifestation and of the patients. A "broad" comparison is first made with almost all alternatives studied in the last decade, and then a meta-regression study is performed to compare and predict the effect size induced by viscosupplementation therapy and its main challenger of clinical interest, the platelet-rich plasma treatment. If they are computerized, the developed models can represent tools for clinicians in determining the appropriateness of the option or not for viscosupplementation in a manner adapted to the pain felt by the patients, to their age, or to other clinical circumstances. The models were generated using algorithms implemented in the R language and assembled in different R packages. All primary data and necessary R scripts are provided in accordance with the philosophy of reproducible research. Finally, we adhere in a documented way to the opinion that HA-based products, currently under circumspection, are still clinically useful.

Efficacy of stromal vascular fraction for knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, single-centre, non-randomized study with 2 years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Current osteoarthritis (OA) treatments focus on symptom relief without addressing the underlying disease process. In regenerative medicine, current treatments have limitations. In regenerative medicine, more research is needed for intra-articular stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injections in OA, including dosage optimization, long-term efficacy, safety, comparisons with other treatments, and mechanism exploration.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of intra-articular SVF with corticosteroid (ICS) injections in patients with primary knee OA.

METHODS

The study included 50 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grades II and III OA. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a single intra-articular SVF injection (group A) or a single intra-articular ICS (triamcinolone) (group B) injection. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Visual analog score (VAS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were administered before the procedure and at all follow-ups. The safety of SVF in terms of adverse and severe adverse events was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 26.0, IBM Corp, Chicago, IL, United States.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar demographics and baseline clinical characteristics. Follow-up showed minor patient loss, resulting in 23 and 24 in groups A and B respectively. Group A experienced a notable reduction in pain, with VAS scores decreasing from 7.7 to 2.4 over 24 months, compared to a minor reduction from 7.8 to 6.2 in Group B. This difference in pain reduction in group A was statistically significant from the third month onwards. Additionally, Group A showed significant improvements in knee functionality, with IKDC scores rising from 33.4 to 83.10, whereas Group B saw a modest increase from 36.7 to 45.16. The improvement in Group A was statistically significant from 6 months and maintained through 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that intra-articular administration of SVF can lead to reduced pain and improved knee function in patients with primary knee OA. More adequately powered, multi-center, double-blinded, randomised clinical trials with longer follow-ups are needed to further establish safety and justify its clinical use.

StemOneTM/Stempeucel®: CDSCO Approved, Adult Human Bone Marrow-Derived, Cultured, Pooled, Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis

The knee, the most likely joint to present osteoarthritis (OA), is accountable for approximately 80% of the global burden of the OA [...].

Allogenic Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common shoulder disorder leading to pain and restricted range of motion (ROM) and affects the patient's activities of daily living (ADL) and overall quality of life (QoL). Conservative therapies are prioritized, resorting to surgical intervention only when necessary. Unfortunately, these modalities have limitations and do not address the underlying pathological cause of AC. The use of autologous biologics, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), has evolved and shown promise for managing musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries, including AC. However, subpar functional outcomes have led clinicians to question the long-term efficacy of autologous PRP. To circumvent this, the possibility of utilizing a standardized and well-characterized allogenic PRP for AC has been explored. In this manuscript, we qualitatively present in vitro, pre-clinical, clinical, and ongoing studies investigating the varied applications of allogenic PRP for the management of AC. The results demonstrated that allogenic PRP acts in a pleiotropic manner and decreases pro-inflammatory cytokines only in the inflammatory condition. In addition, the administration of allogenic PRP is safe and potentially efficacious, in terms of reducing pain and improving range of motion, shoulder strength, and function, in non-surgical management of AC. Nonetheless, more pre-clinical studies and adequately powered, multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, and randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are warranted to further establish the safety and efficacy of allogenic PRP and justify its routine clinical use.