Blood Composite Scores in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Do novel inflammation biomarkers arising from routine complete blood count play a role in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus?

BACKGROUND

Laboratory-based biomarkers accurately presenting systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity may have a practical value in clinical routine. As shown in many other conditions, complete blood count (CBC)-derived biomarkers may also play a role in SLE.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to study for the first time the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV, monocytes x platelets x neutrophils/lymphocytes) and the more established systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, neutrophils x platelets /lymphocytes) in SLE patients and correlate it with serological and clinical findings including disease outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicentric investigation, we reviewed the clinical records of 148 SLE who had an available CBC at baseline. The latter served for the determination of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), SII, and the PIV. Control groups were studied as well. Univariable as well as multivariable statistics were employed.

RESULTS

The values for baseline systemic immune-inflammation biomarkers (SIIB) studied were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than those observed in healthy controls but comparable to those obtained from patients with other inflammatory conditions. Multivariable analysis revealed that ANA titer > 1:640 remained the only significant (p < 0.0001) baseline predictor of SLE flare (odds ratio: 7.6, 95% CI 3.1 to 18.8). Improvement of SLE following treatment was associated with the absence of lymphopenia as well as ANA > 1:640 (p = 0.041). The SLEDAI-2K significantly correlated with NLR, SII, CRP, lymphocytes, and monocytes only on univariable testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to healthy controls the CBC-based SIIB investigated are significantly increased in SLE patients. However, SIIB do not appear to be useful in managing SLE clinically. Nevertheless, we confirm that higher ANA titers can predict flares of SLE.

Psoriasis and Lupus Erythematosus-Similarities and Differences between Two Autoimmune Diseases

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriasis (Ps) are two clinically distinct diseases with different pathogenesis. However, recent studies indicate some similarities in both clinical presentation and pathogenetic mechanisms. The coexistence of both entities is very uncommon and has not been fully elucidated. Thus, it remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In fact, drugs used in SLE can induce psoriatic lesions, whereas phototherapy effective in Ps is an important factor provoking skin lesions in patients with SLE. The aim of this work is to discuss in detail the common pathogenetic elements and the therapeutic options effective in both diseases.

Potential Biomarkers for Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

The study has as main objective the evaluation of the potential roles of vitamin D, the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the systemic inflammation index (SII) as future biomarkers regarding the classification of flares in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Individuals diagnosed with SLE were encompassed in this observational study. The current applicable criteria, namely The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 criteria had to be fulfilled. The participants underwent specific musculoskeletal examination, paraclinical investigations including complete blood count (CBC), determination of serum creatinine levels, as well as liver enzymes, and also the markers of inflammation. The fractions of the serum complement (C3 and C4) were also evaluated, together with serum vitamin D concentrations. Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) was required in order to analyze the research group's disease activity.

RESULTS

NLR and SII demonstrated validity, having statistically significant correlations with SELENA-SLEDAI (p value less than 0.001). The ROC analysis proved a strong discriminative power for NLR (AUC=0.96) and SII (AUC=0.963) in predicting severe disease flares. Optimal cut-off values were 3.45 for NLR and 877,002.19 for SII. Serum vitamin D concentrations had a weak association with the SLEDAI score (p=0.048, r=0.213).

CONCLUSIONS

NLR and SII can be considered reliable biomarkers for discriminating between the levels of disease activity in SLE individuals. Low serum levels of vitamin D may also influence disease severity, but require further validation.

The association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic sclerosis and its complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The identification of new, easily measurable biomarkers might assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although the full blood count is routinely assessed in the evaluation of SSc, the diagnostic utility of specific cell-derived inflammatory indices, i.e., neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), has not been critically appraised in this patient group.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the NLR, PLR, and MLR, in SSc patients and healthy controls and in SSc patients with and without relevant complications. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 23 February 2024. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using validated tools.

Results

In 10 eligible studies, compared to controls, patients with SSc had significantly higher NLR (standard mean difference, SMD=0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.91, p<0.001; I2 = 74.5%, p<0.001), and PLR values (SMD=0.52, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83, p=0.001; I2 = 77.0%, p=0.005), and a trend towards higher MLR values (SMD=0.60, 95% CI -0.04 to 1.23, p=0.066; I2 = 94.1%, p<0.001). When compared to SSc patients without complications, the NLR was significantly higher in SSc with interstitial lung disease (ILD, SMD=0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.46, p<0.001; I2 = 43.9%, p=0.11), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, SMD=1.59, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.1, p=0.045; I2 = 87.6%, p<0.001), and digital ulcers (DU, SMD=0.43, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.74, p=0.006; I2 = 0.0%, p=0.49). The PLR was significantly higher in SSc patients with ILD (SMD=0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.59, p<0.001; I2 = 24.8%, p=0.26). The MLR was significantly higher in SSc patients with PAH (SMD=0.63, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.08, p=0.007; I2 = 66.0%, p=0.086), and there was a trend towards a higher MLR in SSc patients with ILD (SMD=0.60, 95% CI -0.04 to 1.23, p=0.066; I2 = 94.1%, p<0.001).

Discussion

Pending the results of appropriately designed prospective studies, the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that blood cell-derived indices of inflammation, particularly the NLR and PLR, may be useful in the diagnosis of SSc and specific complications.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024520040.

The prevalence of neutropenia and association with infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a Swedish single-center study conducted over 14 years

Hematologic abnormalities are common manifestations of SLE, although neutropenia is observed less frequently and is not included in the classification criteria. Nonetheless, neutropenia is a risk factor for infections, especially those caused by bacteria or fungi. We aimed to evaluate the impact of neutropenia in SLE through a systematic investigation of all infections in a large cohort of well-characterized patients, focusing on neutropenia, lymphopenia, and hypocomplementemia. Longitudinal clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at visits to the Rheumatology Unit, Linköping University Hospital, and linked data on all forms of healthcare utilization for all the subjects included in our regional SLE register during 2008-2022 were assessed. Data regarding confirmed infections were retrieved from the medical records. Overall, 333 patients were included and monitored during 3,088 visits to a rheumatologist during the study period. In total, 918 infections were identified, and 94 occasions of neutropenia (ANC < 1.5 × 109/L) were detected in 40 subjects (12%). Thirty neutropenic episodes in 15 patients occurred in association with infections, of which 13 (43%) required in-hospital care, 4 (13%) needed intensive care, and 1 (3%) resulted in death. Bayesian analysis showed that patients with ≥ 1 occasion of neutropenia were more likely to experience one or more infections (OR = 2.05; probability of association [POA] = 96%). Both invasiveness (OR = 7.08; POA = 98%) and severity (OR = 2.85; POA = 96%) of the infections were significantly associated with the present neutropenia. Infections are common among Swedish SLE patients, 12% of whom show neutropenia over time. Importantly, neutropenia is linked to both the invasiveness and severity of infections. Awareness of the risks of severe infections in neutropenic patients is crucial to tailor therapies to prevent severe illness and death.

Correlation of Hematological Indices and Acute-Phase Reactants in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Acute-phase markers are often used to evaluate the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Occasionally, the serum levels of acute-phase reactants remain normal in patients with obvious inflamed joints. Hematological indices derived from complete blood counts have been shown to correlate with disease activity. This provides a potential practical implementation in daily practice. Only a few studies have evaluated the relation between hematological indices and novel RA treatment (i.e., biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs); no research has examined the changes in hematological indices in RA treatments longitudinally. We conducted a retrospective study involving 273 RA patients with b/tsDMARD treatment and followed them for at least a year. Baseline, 3-month, and 6-month lab data were collected. The results indicated a reduction in the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) post-treatment. Higher baseline PLRs and SIIs were associated with a more significant reduction in ESR at three months (η2 = 0.03/0.13, p = 0.21/0.023). NLR and SII correlated with CRP moderately at three months (r = 0.373/0.394, p < 0.001/< 0.001). A correlation comparison showed that the correlation of NLR and PLR with CRP differs during different periods (p = 0.037/0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that the time effect on correlation is related to treatment with Janus kinase inhibitor and anti-interleukin-6 but not antitumor necrosis factors.