Optimal Scaling Approaches for Perfusion MRI with Distorted Arterial Input Function (AIF) in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Core and penumbra estimation using deep learning-based AIF in association with clinical measures in computed tomography perfusion (CTP)

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether utilizing a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based arterial input function (AIF) improves the volumetric estimation of core and penumbra in association with clinical measures in stroke patients.

METHODS

The study included 160 acute ischemic stroke patients (male = 87, female = 73, median age = 73 years) with approval from the institutional review board. The patients had undergone CTP imaging, NIHSS and ASPECTS grading. convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to fit a raw AIF curve to a gamma variate function. CNN AIF was utilized to estimate the core and penumbra volumes which were further validated with clinical scores.

RESULTS

Penumbra estimated by CNN AIF correlated positively with the NIHSS score (r = 0.69; p < 0.001) and negatively with the ASPECTS (r =  - 0.43; p < 0.001). The CNN AIF estimated penumbra and core volume matching the patient symptoms, typically in patients with higher NIHSS (> 20) and lower ASPECT score (< 5). In group analysis, the median CBF < 20%, CBF < 30%, rCBF < 38%, Tmax > 10 s, Tmax > 10 s volumes were statistically significantly higher (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

With inclusion of the CNN AIF in perfusion imaging pipeline, penumbra and core estimations are more reliable as they correlate with scores representing neurological deficits in stroke.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

With CNN AIF perfusion imaging pipeline, penumbra and core estimations are more reliable as they correlate with scores representing neurological deficits in stroke.

Arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) in longitudinal evaluation of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) could be helpful to separate true disease progression from pseudo-progression in brain metastases when assessing the need for retreatment. However, the selection of arterial input functions (AIFs) is not standardized for analysis, limiting its use for this application.

PURPOSE

To compare population-based AIFs, AIFs specific to each patient, and AIFs specific to every visit in the longitudinal follow-up of brain metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Longitudinal data were collected from eight patients before treatment (6 of 8 patients) and after treatment (6-17 visits). Imaging was performed using a 1.5-T MRI system. Lesions were segmented by subtracting precontrast images from postcontrast images. Cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were computed, and Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate similarity of DSC parameters dependent on various AIF choices across time. AIF shape characteristics were compared. Parameter differences between white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) were obtained to determine which AIF choice maximizes tissue differentiation.

RESULTS

Although DSC parameters follow similar patterns in time, the various AIF selections cause large parameter variations with relative standard deviations of up to ±60%. AIFs sampled in one patient across sessions more similar in shape than AIFs sampled across patients. Estimates of rCBV based on scan-specific AIFs differentiated better between perfusion in WM and GM than patient-specific or population-based AIFs (P ≤ 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that scan-specific AIFs are the best choice for DSC-MRI parameter estimations in the longitudinal follow-up of brain metastases.