A Challenge for Palliative Psychology: Freedom of Choice at the End of Life among the Attitudes of Physicians and Nurses

Euthanasia in psychiatric practice: ethical and religious perspectives from India in a global context

The growing focus on palliative care for terminally ill patients, such as those with advanced cancer and AIDS, has intensified the debate over euthanasia, or 'mercy killing'. This issue is increasingly relevant as both developed and developing countries, including India, see rising numbers of severely ill patients facing complex medical, emotional, and existential challenges. The legal and moral aspects of euthanasia remain controversial in India highlighting the need for a detailed examination of this topic. This review explores euthanasia from historical, legal, cultural, and clinical perspectives, emphasizing the significant regional variations in approach and the ethical, legal, and medical issues involved. Socio-cultural and legal factors further complicate the debate in India, leading to growing support for passive euthanasia despite existing restrictions. The review also considers the unique challenges of euthanasia in psychiatric conditions, underscoring the importance of stringent criteria and comprehensive evaluations.

Re-evaluation of the psychometric properties of ATE following changes in euthanasia regulations in Spain

Understanding healthcare professionals' attitudes toward euthanasia, especially within teams assisting patients who request it, is essential for providing appropriate support throughout the process. The objectives of this study were to re-adapt and validate the Attitude Towards Euthanasia Scale for the Spanish context, to examine its dimensional structure, and to estimate its reliability, particularly in light of the 2021 regulation of euthanasia in Spain. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a non-probabilistic sample of 778 healthcare professionals from the Balearic Health Service. Data collection involved a self-reported sociodemographic questionnaire and the Attitude Towards Euthanasia Scale. The scale's psychometric properties were assessed through reliability and validity tests, including confirmatory factor analysis. The Attitude Towards Euthanasia Scale demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of α = 0.889 and item homogeneity ranging from 0.66 to 0.78. Factor loadings were reported for four models, including a unidimensional model and models with two, three, and four factors. The two-factor model explained 64.51% of the variance, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.873. Fit indices indicated good model fit: root mean square residual = 0.040, goodness-of-fit index = 0.960, adjusted goodness-of-fit index = 0.927, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.069. After performing a Parallel Analysis, two loading factor were found. The adapted version of the Attitude Towards Euthanasia Scale, aligned with the current societal and legislative context, is a valid and reliable tool for assessing healthcare professionals' attitudes toward euthanasia, with psychometric properties consistent with the original version.

Shared care planning in people with cognitive disorders and dementia: a survey among patients and caregivers in Italy

BACKGROUND

There is wide convergence in the positions of scientific societies, patient associations and public bodies regarding the advisability of advance care planning (ACP) in cognitive disorders and dementia to respect the specificity of the person. Nevertheless, planning in advance for dementia represents a unique challenge. In Italy, law n. 219/2017 introduced ACP for the first time at the regulatory level, under the name of shared care planning (SCP). Few surveys on the law implementation have been conducted in Italy, but none have specifically involved patients with cognitive disorders and their caregivers. To contribute filling the gap, we conducted a survey among patients and caregivers attending a memory clinic to investigate what their knowledge, attitudes and experiences were regarding SCP.

METHODS

We developed two semi-structured questionnaires for patients and caregivers organized into the following sections: (i) knowledge of the law; (ii) general attitude on SCP; (iii) experience about SCP; (iv) attitude about realizing a SCP; (v) advance directives. Participation in the survey was offered to consecutive patients discharged from the memory clinic during 26 target weeks and to their caregivers. The interviews were conducted on the occasion of the last scheduled visit to the facility; telephone interview was also provided. Information was collected by means of an online platform (Google Forms). Descriptive and basic inferential analysis was performed by means of SPSS (IBM). The analysis of the open-ended questions was also conducted with the support of the Voyant Tools.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patient and 65 caregiver interviews were collected. No participant reported that a doctor has ever talked to the patient about SCP. The large majority of patients (85%) and almost all caregivers (95%) agree/absolutely agree with the opportunity for patients to realize SCP. Almost all participants agree/absolutely agree with the usefulness for the patients of indicating a trusted person to act on their behalf (91% patients and 95% caregivers). Forty-three (65%) patients and 48 (74%) caregivers believe it would be good to start SCP with the patient when the time is right. Among them, 20 caregivers and 12 patients believe it is already time to talk about SCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results showed patients' and caregivers' interest in the SCP process and, at the same time, their mixed attitude when SCP is referred specifically to themselves or their loved ones. This indicates the need to introduce the discourse on SCP into clinical practice while remaining very sensitive to the individual patient's pace and wishes, including his/her possible refusal to talk about SCP.

Effect of Music Therapy on Chemotherapy Anticipatory Symptoms in Adolescents: A Mixed Methods Study

INTRODUCTION

This study explores the feasibility and effects of music therapy on anticipatory nausea and vomiting, stress, pain and quality of life in adolescents undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

This is a single group, quasi-experimental study using pre/post-test design. Participants received four individual sessions of music therapy (MT), led by a certified music therapist. State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory Y-1, and a 0-4 Likert scale for pain, nausea and vomiting were recorded. Heart rate variability (LF/HF) was collected during sessions. PedsQL was collected before and at the end of the trial. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in anxiety, nausea and vomiting, both pre-post single sessions and between different sessions, was observed. A significant increase in LF/HF and PedsQL scores was observed. Relevant themes also emerged from interviews.

CONCLUSION

Results support the feasibility of introducing music therapy with adolescents undergoing chemotherapy. Perceived stress and psychological/physical wellbeing were improved in participants.

Towards the implementation of law n. 219/2017 on informed consent and advance directives for patients with psychiatric disorders and dementia. Physicians' knowledge, attitudes and practices in four northern Italian health care facilities

BACKGROUND

On December 2017 the Italian Parliament approved law n. 219/2017 "Provisions for informed consent and advance directives" regarding challenging legal and bioethical issues related to healthcare decisions and end-of life choices. The law promotes the person's autonomy as a right and provides for the centrality of the individual in every scenario of health care by mean of three tools: informed consent, shared care planning and advance directives. Few years after the approval of the law, we conducted a survey among physicians working in four health care facilities specific for the care of people suffering from psychiatric disorders, cognitive disorders and dementia located in the North of Italy aiming to investigate their perceived knowledge and training need, attitudes regarding law n. 219/2017 provisions, and practices of implementation of the law.

METHODS

A semi-structured questionnaire was developed on an online platform. The invitation to participate in the survey was sent by email to the potential participants. Information was collected by means of the online platform (Google Forms) which allows to export data in a spreadsheet (Windows Excel) to perform basic statistical analysis (frequency distributions, bar chart representation).

RESULTS

Twenty-five out of sixty physicians participated in the survey. None of the respondents value their knowledge of the law as very good, 10 good, 13 neither poor nor good, 1 poor and 1 very poor. All the respondents want to learn more about the law (21 yes and 4 absolutely yes). The majority of respondents agrees with the content of the law as a whole (3 absolutely agree, 13 agree), and on each provision. The question on the clarity of the concept of capacity in the law received mixed answers and this impacted on the physicians' opinion regarding the legitimacy in principle for our groups of patients to realize shared care planning and write advance directives. Thirteen physicians neither introduced the theme of shared care planning nor arranged for shared care planning and the main reason for this was that no patient was in a clinical situation to require it. When shared care planning is realized, a variability in terms of type and number of meetings, mode of tracking and communication is registered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey results indicate a need for more clarity regarding the interpretation and implementation of the law in the patient groups under study. There are in particular two related areas that deserve further discussion: (1) the question of whether these patient groups are in principle legitimized by the law to realize shared care planning or write advance directives; (2) the notion of capacity required by the law and how this notion can be declined in real-life situations.

Italian law n. 219/2017 on consent and advance directives: survey among Ethics Committees on their involvement and possible role

Background

On December 2017 the Italian Parliament approved law n. 219/2017 “Provisions for informed consent and advance directives” regarding challenging legal and bioethical issues related to healthcare decisions and end-of-life choices. The law does not contain an explicit reference to Ethics Committees (ECs), but they could still play a role in implementing the law.

Methods

A questionnaire-based survey was performed among the ECs of the Italian Institute for Research and Care belonging to the Network of neuroscience and neurorehabilitation, with the aim of (1) knowing whether the ECs participated and, if so, how in the process of implementation of law n. 219/2017 in the referring institutes; (2) investigating the point of view of the ECs regarding their possible involvement in the process; (3) exploring the contribution ECs can provide to give effective implementation to the law principles and provisions.

Results

Seventeen ECs out of thirty took part in the survey; the characteristics of the responding and non-responding committees are similar, so the responding ECs can be regarded as representative of all ECs in the Network. Nine ECs did not discuss the law in anyway: the main reason for this is that the referring institutions (6) and the health care professionals (3) did not ask for an EC intervention. Nevertheless, the large majority of the ECs believe that their involvement in the implementation of the law as a whole is appropriate (8) or absolutely appropriate (6), while 3 of them are neutral. No EC believes that the involvement is inappropriate. The aspect of the law on which the 14 ECs converge in considering the EC involvement appropriate/absolutely appropriate is the one related to the health facilities obligation to guarantee the full and proper implementation of the principles of the law.

Conclusions

Our survey confirms that ECs believe they can play a role in the implementation of law n. 219/2017, although this does not entirely correspond to what the committees have actually done in reality. This role could be better exercised by ECs specifically established for clinical practice, which would have a composition, functioning and a mandate better suited to the purpose. This supports the call for a national regulation of ECs for clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-022-00858-w.

New Psychological Perspectives on Death and Dying-Between Normality and the COVID-19 Emergency

In recent decades, there has been a constantly increasing preoccupation with physical perfection and the scientific urge to improve life expectancy [...].

"Imagine You Have ALS": Death Education to Prepare for Advance Treatment Directives

The study presents the results of qualitative research carried out within a death education project dedicated to advance treatment directives (ATDs) in which it was proposed to participants to empathize with people who had received a diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). The study involved 104 people who discussed and reflected on issues related to the knowledge of having to die, palliative care and ATDs, investigating what choices they would have made if they had received such a diagnosis. Finally, they were asked to write a paper describing their impressions and hypothetical choices. Qualitative analysis has elucidated among fundamental themes. Four thematic areas emerged from the data analysis: (1) ATDs and the family; (2) the importance of reducing pain and suffering; (3) emotions and considerations regarding death, illness and spirituality; and (4) opinions on the DeEd course. It has emerged that some people are unfamiliar with palliative care or the right to self-determination and that addressing these issues helps manage the thought of the future with less terror. The experience of death education has therefore proven to be very positive in dealing with complex and often censored issues, allowing thinking about death in a less distressing way.