1
|
Tesson M, Morton JP. The preclinical gap in pancreatic cancer and radiotherapy. Dis Model Mech 2024; 17:dmm050703. [PMID: 38979684 PMCID: PMC11261628 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.050703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. Chemotherapy offers little benefit and, although there is some evidence that radiotherapy may improve response, its use in the clinical management of pancreatic cancer remains controversial due to conflicting reports on its survival benefit. There has also been a lack of clinical trials that directly investigate the efficacy of radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer. The limited progress in the development of radiotherapeutic strategies in pancreatic cancer can be attributed, at least in part, to a dearth of preclinical research and our limited understanding of the effects of radiation on the pancreatic tumour microenvironment. In this Perspective, we discuss how insight into the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment and the complex signalling between tumour and stromal cells following radiation is needed to develop effective radiosensitising strategies for pancreatic cancer. We also highlight that to have the best chance for successful clinical translation, more preclinical research is required in appropriately complex models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Tesson
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Switchback Rd, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK
| | - Jennifer P. Morton
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Switchback Rd, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tesson M, Stevenson K, Karim SA, Nixon C, Chalmers AJ, Sansom OJ, O'Neill E, Jones K, Morton JP. Targeted irradiation in an autochthonous mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Dis Model Mech 2024; 17:dmm050463. [PMID: 38421046 PMCID: PMC10958199 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.050463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The value of radiotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer has been the subject of much debate but limited preclinical research. We hypothesise that the poor translation of radiation research into clinical trials of radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer is due, in part, to inadequate preclinical study models. Here, we developed and refined methods for targeted irradiation in autochthonous mouse models of pancreatic cancer, using a small animal radiotherapy research platform. We tested and optimised strategies for administration of contrast agents, iohexol and the liver imaging agent Fenestra LC, to enable the use of computed tomography imaging in tumour localisation. We demonstrate accurate tumour targeting, negligible off-target effects and therapeutic efficacy, depending on dose, number of fractions and tumour size, and provide a proof of concept that precise radiation can be delivered effectively to mouse pancreatic tumours with a clinically relevant microenvironment. This advance will allow investigation of the radiation response in murine pancreatic cancer, discovery of mechanisms and biomarkers of radiosensitivity or resistance, and development of radiosensitising strategies to inform clinical trials for precision radiotherapy in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katrina Stevenson
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
| | | | - Colin Nixon
- CRUK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, UK
| | | | - Owen J. Sansom
- CRUK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
| | - Eric O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Keaton Jones
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Jennifer P. Morton
- CRUK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elkhamisy SA, Valentini C, Lattermann A, Radhakrishna G, Künzel LA, Löck S, Troost EGC. Normo- or Hypo-Fractionated Photon or Proton Radiotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3771. [PMID: 37568587 PMCID: PMC10416887 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
LAPC is associated with a poor prognosis and requires a multimodal treatment approach. However, the role of radiation therapy in LAPC treatment remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to explore the role of proton and photon therapy, with varying radiation techniques and fractionation, in treatment outcomes and their respective toxicity profiles. METHODS Clinical studies published from 2012 to 2022 were systematically reviewed using PubMed, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane databases. Different radiotherapy-related data were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 31 studies matched the inclusion criteria. Acute toxicity was less remarkable in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT), while in proton beam therapy (PBT) grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was observed more commonly with doses of 67.5 Gy (RBE) or higher. Late toxicity was not reported in most studies; therefore, comparison between groups was not possible. The range of median overall survival (OS) for the CFRT and SBRT groups was 9.3-22.9 months and 8.5-20 months, respectively. For the PBT group, the range of median OS was 18.4-22.3 months. CONCLUSION CFRT and SBRT showed comparable survival outcomes with a more favorable acute toxicity profile for SBRT. PBT is a promising new treatment modality; however, additional clinical studies are needed to support its efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally A. Elkhamisy
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Annika Lattermann
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Luise A. Künzel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill CS, Herman JM. The Current Role of Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer and Future Directions. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:12-23. [PMID: 36804206 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Survival outcomes for localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains poor. Multimodality therapeutic regimens are critical to maximizing survival outcomes for these patients, which includes the use of systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation. In this review, the evolution of radiation techniques are discussed with a focus on modern techniques such as intensity modulated radiation and stereotactic body radiation therapy. However, the current role of radiation within the most common clinical scenarios for pancreatic cancer in the neoadjuvant, definitive, and adjuvant settings continues to be highly debated. The role of radiation in these settings is reviewed in the context of historical and modern clinical studies. In addition, emerging concepts including dose-escalated radiation, magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, and particle therapy are discussed to promote an understanding of how such concepts may change the role of radiation in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin S Hill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
He X, Cai W, Li F, Zhang P, Reyngold M, Cuaron JJ, Cerviño LI, Li T, Li X. Automatic stent recognition using perceptual attention U-net for quantitative intrafraction motion monitoring in pancreatic cancer radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:5283-5293. [PMID: 35524706 PMCID: PMC9827417 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stent has often been used as an internal surrogate to monitor intrafraction tumor motion during pancreatic cancer radiotherapy. Based on the stent contours generated from planning CT images, the current intrafraction motion review (IMR) system on Varian TrueBeam only provides a tool to verify the stent motion visually but lacks quantitative information. The purpose of this study is to develop an automatic stent recognition method for quantitative intrafraction tumor motion monitoring in pancreatic cancer treatment. METHODS A total of 535 IMR images from 14 pancreatic cancer patients were retrospectively selected in this study, with the manual contour of the stent on each image serving as the ground truth. We developed a deep learning-based approach that integrates two mechanisms that focus on the features of the segmentation target. The objective attention modeling was integrated into the U-net framework to deal with the optimization difficulties when training a deep network with 2D IMR images and limited training data. A perceptual loss was combined with the binary cross-entropy loss and a Dice loss for supervision. The deep neural network was trained to capture more contextual information to predict binary stent masks. A random-split test was performed, with images of ten patients (71%, 380 images) randomly selected for training, whereas the rest of four patients (29%, 155 images) were used for testing. Sevenfold cross-validation of the proposed PAUnet on the 14 patients was performed for further evaluation. RESULTS Our stent segmentation results were compared with the manually segmented contours. For the random-split test, the trained model achieved a mean (±standard deviation) stent Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), the center-of-mass distance (CMD), and volume difference V o l d i f f $Vo{l_{diff}}$ were 0.96 (±0.01), 1.01 (±0.55) mm, 0.66 (±0.46) mm, and 3.07% (±2.37%), respectively. The sevenfold cross-validation of the proposed PAUnet had the mean (±standard deviation) of 0.96 (±0.02), 0.72 (±0.49) mm, 0.85 (±0.96) mm, and 3.47% (±3.27%) for the DSC, HD95, CMD, and V o l d i f f $Vo{l_{diff}}$ . CONCLUSION We developed a novel deep learning-based approach to automatically segment the stent from IMR images, demonstrated its clinical feasibility, and validated its accuracy compared to manual segmentation. The proposed technique could be a useful tool for quantitative intrafraction motion monitoring in pancreatic cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuxiu He
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Weixing Cai
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Feifei Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Pengpeng Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - John J. Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Laura I. Cerviño
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Tianfang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Xiang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Corresponding Author: Xiang Li, Ph.D., Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, Tel: (516) 559-1501,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Meschini G, Vai A, Barcellini A, Fontana G, Molinelli S, Mastella E, Pella A, Vitolo V, Imparato S, Orlandi E, Ciocca M, Baroni G, Paganelli C. Time-resolved MRI for off-line treatment robustness evaluation in carbon-ion radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer. Med Phys 2022; 49:2386-2395. [PMID: 35124811 PMCID: PMC9306947 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we investigate the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the clinical evaluation of gating treatment robustness in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) of pancreatic cancer. Indeed, MRI allows radiation-free repeated scans and fast dynamic sequences for time-resolved (TR) imaging (cine-MRI), providing information on inter- and intra-fraction cycle-to-cycle variations of respiratory motion. MRI can therefore support treatment planning and verification, overcoming the limitations of the current clinical standard, that is, four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), which describes an "average" breathing cycle neglecting breathing motion variability. METHODS We integrated a technique to generate a virtual CT (vCT) from 3D MRI with a method for 3D reconstruction from 2D cine-MRI, to produce TR vCTs for dose recalculations. For eight patients, the method allowed evaluating inter-fraction variations at end-exhale and intra-fraction cycle-to-cycle variability within the gating window in terms of tumor displacement and dose to the target and organs at risk. RESULTS The median inter-fraction tumor motion was in the range 3.33-12.16 mm, but the target coverage was robust (-0.4% median D95% variation). Concerning cycle-to-cycle variations, the gating technique was effective in limiting tumor displacement (1.35 mm median gating motion) and corresponding dose variations (-3.9% median D95% variation). The larger exposure of organs at risk (duodenum and stomach) was caused by inter-fraction motion, whereas intra-fraction cycle-to-cycle dose variations were limited. CONCLUSIONS This study proposed a method for the generation of TR vCTs from MRI, which enabled an off-line evaluation of gating treatment robustness and suggested its feasibility to support treatment planning of pancreatic tumors in CIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgia Meschini
- Department of Electronics, Information and BioengineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Alessandro Vai
- Medical Physics UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Clinical DepartmentNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Giulia Fontana
- Clinical Bioengineering UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Medical Physics UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Edoardo Mastella
- Medical Physics UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Andrea Pella
- Clinical Bioengineering UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Clinical DepartmentNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Sara Imparato
- Radiology UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Clinical DepartmentNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Medical Physics UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and BioengineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
- Clinical Bioengineering UnitNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO)PaviaItaly
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and BioengineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Niedzielski JS, Liu Y, Ng SSW, Martin RM, Perles LA, Beddar S, Rebueno N, Koay EJ, Taniguchi C, Holliday EB, Das P, Smith GL, Minsky BD, Ludmir EB, Herman JM, Koong A, Sawakuchi GO. Dosimetric Uncertainties Resulting From Interfractional Anatomic Variations for Patients Receiving Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:1298-1309. [PMID: 34400267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the effects of interfractional anatomic changes on dose to organs at risk (OARs) and tumors, as measured with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We evaluated 11 patients with pancreatic cancer whom were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (33-40 Gy in 5 fractions) using daily CT-on-rails (CTOR) image guidance immediately before treatment with breath-hold motion management. CBCT alignment was simulated in the treatment planning software by aligning the original planning CT to each fractional CTOR image set via fiducial markers. CTOR data sets were used to calculate fractional doses after alignment by applying the rigid shift of the planning CT and CTOR image sets to the planning treatment isocenter and recalculating the fractional dose. Accumulated dose to the gross tumor volume (GTV), tumor vessel interface, duodenum, small bowel, and stomach were calculated by summing the 5 fractional absolute dose-volume histograms into a single dose-volume histogram for comparison with the original planned dose. RESULTS Four patients had a GTV D100% of at least 1.5 Gy less than the fractional planned value in several fractions; 4 patients had fractional underestimation of duodenum dose by 1.0 Gy per fraction. The D1.0 cm3 <35 Gy constraint was violated for at least 1 OAR in 3 patients, with either the duodenum (n = 2) or small bowel (n = 1) D1.0 cm3 being higher on the accumulated dose distribution (P = .01). D100% was significantly lower according to accumulated dose GTV (P = .01) and tumor vessel interface (P = .02), with 4 and 2 patients having accumulated D100% ≥4 Gy lower than the planned value for the GTV and tumor vessel interface, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For some patients, CBCT image guidance based on fiducial alignment may cause large dosimetric uncertainties for OARs and target structures, according to accumulated dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yufei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Sylvia S W Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Luis A Perles
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Neal Rebueno
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Albert Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Gabriel O Sawakuchi
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Han D, Hooshangnejad H, Chen CC, Ding K. A Beam-Specific Optimization Target Volume for Stereotactic Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100757. [PMID: 34604607 PMCID: PMC8463829 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigate two margin-based schemes for optimization target volumes (OTV), both isotropic expansion (2 mm) and beam-specific OTV, to account for uncertainties due to the setup errors and range uncertainties in pancreatic stereotactic pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Also, as 2-mm being one of the extreme sizes of margin, we also study whether the plan quality of 2-mm uniform expansion could be comparable to other plan schemes. METHODS AND MATERIALS We developed 2 schemes for OTV: (1) a uniform expansion of 2 mm (OTV2mm) for setup uncertainty and (2) a water equivalent thickness-based, beam-specific expansion (OTVWET) on beam direction and 2 mm expansion laterally. Six LAPC patients were planned with a prescribed dose of 33 Gy (RBE) in 5 fractions. Robustness optimization (RO) plans on gross tumor volumes, with setup uncertainties of 2 mm and range uncertainties of 3.5%, were implemented as a benchmark. RESULTS All 3 optimization schemes achieved decent target coverage with no significant difference. The OTV2mm plans show superior organ at risk (OAR) sparing, especially for proximal duodenum. However, OTV2mm plans demonstrate severe susceptibility to range and setup uncertainties with a passing rate of 19% of the plans meeting the goal of 95% volume covered by the prescribed dose. The proposed dose spread function analysis shows no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS The use of OTVWET mimics a union volume for all scenarios in robust optimization but saves optimization time noticeably. The beam-specific margin can be attractive to online adaptive stereotactic body proton therapy owing to the efficiency of the plan optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Han
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chin-Cheng Chen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kai Ding
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu Y, Lei Y, Wang T, Fu Y, Tang X, Curran WJ, Liu T, Patel P, Yang X. CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using deep-attention cycleGAN for pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:2472-2483. [PMID: 32141618 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Current clinical application of cone-beam CT (CBCT) is limited to patient setup. Imaging artifacts and Hounsfield unit (HU) inaccuracy make the process of CBCT-based adaptive planning presently impractical. In this study, we developed a deep-learning-based approach to improve CBCT image quality and HU accuracy for potential extended clinical use in CBCT-guided pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy. METHODS Thirty patients previously treated with pancreas SBRT were included. The CBCT acquired prior to the first fraction of treatment was registered to the planning CT for training and generation of synthetic CT (sCT). A self-attention cycle generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) was used to generate CBCT-based sCT. For the cohort of 30 patients, the CT-based contours and treatment plans were transferred to the first fraction CBCTs and sCTs for dosimetric comparison. RESULTS At the site of abdomen, mean absolute error (MAE) between CT and sCT was 56.89 ± 13.84 HU, comparing to 81.06 ± 15.86 HU between CT and the raw CBCT. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in the PTV and OAR dose-volume-histogram (DVH) metrics between the CT- and sCT-based plans, while significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between the CT- and the CBCT-based plans. CONCLUSIONS The image similarity and dosimetric agreement between the CT and sCT-based plans validated the dose calculation accuracy carried by sCT. The CBCT-based sCT approach can potentially increase treatment precision and thus minimize gastrointestinal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingzi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Yabo Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Xiangyang Tang
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Pretesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang C, Zhu X, Hong JC, Zheng D. Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Present and Future. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 18:1533033819873922. [PMID: 31495281 PMCID: PMC6732844 DOI: 10.1177/1533033819873922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment planning is an essential step of the radiotherapy workflow. It has become more sophisticated over the past couple of decades with the help of computer science, enabling planners to design highly complex radiotherapy plans to minimize the normal tissue damage while persevering sufficient tumor control. As a result, treatment planning has become more labor intensive, requiring hours or even days of planner effort to optimize an individual patient case in a trial-and-error fashion. More recently, artificial intelligence has been utilized to automate and improve various aspects of medical science. For radiotherapy treatment planning, many algorithms have been developed to better support planners. These algorithms focus on automating the planning process and/or optimizing dosimetric trade-offs, and they have already made great impact on improving treatment planning efficiency and plan quality consistency. In this review, the smart planning tools in current clinical use are summarized in 3 main categories: automated rule implementation and reasoning, modeling of prior knowledge in clinical practice, and multicriteria optimization. Novel artificial intelligence-based treatment planning applications, such as deep learning-based algorithms and emerging research directions, are also reviewed. Finally, the challenges of artificial intelligence-based treatment planning are discussed for future works.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhao Wang
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Zhu
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Julian C Hong
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dandan Zheng
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lekka K, Tzitzi E, Giakoustidis A, Papadopoulos V, Giakoustidis D. Contemporary management of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2019; 23:97-108. [PMID: 31225409 PMCID: PMC6558121 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.2.97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive tumors, with a low rate of survival, likely due to the tendency of the tumor for early local and distant spread. Pancreatic cancer accounts for about 3% of all cancers in the US and about 7% of all cancer deaths. Surgical resection still represents the best curative treatment for PDAC, although only 10–20% of patients are upfront resectable at diagnosis, 50% has metastatic disease and 35% locally advanced cancer. The 5-year overall survival (OS) after curative resection is limited to 20%. Moreover among patients who undergo surgery, 30% develop early recurrence while most of them will eventually relapse. The risk of early failure after surgery could be associated with inadequate preoperative radiological staging, lack of radical surgery and differences in tumor aggressiveness. In recent years, more accurate patient categorization due to sophisticated imaging tools and techniques increase the survival rate while neoadjuvant treatment can help surgeons select patients who will benefit most from surgery. Neoadjuvant therapy includes chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy with chemoradiation and targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to present the available data concerning the management of patients with borderline PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriaki Lekka
- First Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Evanthia Tzitzi
- First Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Vassilios Papadopoulos
- First Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Giakoustidis
- First Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aghevlian S, Cai Z, Lu Y, Hedley DW, Winnik MA, Reilly RM. Radioimmunotherapy of PANC-1 Human Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts in NRG Mice with Panitumumab Modified with Metal-Chelating Polymers Complexed to 177Lu. Mol Pharm 2019; 16:768-778. [PMID: 30589553 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and normal tissue toxicity of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of s.c. PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer (PnCa) xenografts in NRG mice using anti-EGFR panitumumab linked to metal-chelating polymers (MCPs) that present 13 DOTA chelators to complex the β-emitter, 177Lu. The clonogenic survival (CS) of PANC-1 cells treated in vitro with panitumumab-MCP-177Lu (0.3-1.2 MBq) and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleus of these cells were measured by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy for γ-H2AX. Subcellular distribution of radioactivity for panitumumab-MCP-177Lu was measured, and absorbed doses to the cell nucleus were calculated. Normal tissue toxicity was assessed in non tumor-bearing NRG mice by monitoring body weight, complete blood cell counts (CBC), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine (Cr) after i.v. injection of 6 MBq (10 μg) of panitumumab-MCP-177Lu. RIT was performed in NRG mice with s.c. PANC-1 tumors injected i.v. with 6 MBq (10 μg) of panitumumab-MCP-177Lu. Control mice received nonspecific human IgG-MCP-177Lu (6 MBq; 10 μg), unlabeled panitumumab (10 μg), or normal saline. The tumor growth index (TGI) was compared. Tumor and normal organ doses were estimated based on biodistribution studies. Panitumumab-MCP-177Lu reduced the CS of PANC-1 cells in vitro by 7.7-fold at the highest amount tested (1.2 MBq). Unlabeled panitumumab had no effect on the CS of PANC-1 cells. γ-H2AX foci were increased by 3.8-fold by panitumumab-MCP-177Lu. Panitumumab-MCP-177Lu deposited 3.84 Gy in the nucleus of PANC-1 cells. Administration of panitumumab-MCP-177Lu (6 MBq; 10 μg) to NRG mice caused no change in body weight, CBC, or ALT and only a slight increase in Cr compared to NRG mice treated with normal saline. Panitumumab-MCP-177Lu strongly inhibited tumor growth in NRG mice (TGI = 2.3 ± 0.2) compared to normal saline-treated mice (TGI = 5.8 ± 0.5; P < 0.01). Unlabeled panitumumab had no effect on tumor growth (TGI = 6.0 ± 1.6; P > 0.05). The absorbed dose of PANC-1 tumors was 12.3 Gy. The highest normal organ doses were absorbed by the pancreas, liver, spleen, and kidneys. We conclude that EGFR-targeted RIT with panitumumab-MCP-177Lu was able to overcome resistance to panitumumab in KRAS mutant PANC-1 tumors in NRG mice and may be a promising approach to treatment of PnCa in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadaf Aghevlian
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of Toronto , 144 College Street , Toronto , Ontario M5S 3M2 , Canada
| | - Zhongli Cai
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of Toronto , 144 College Street , Toronto , Ontario M5S 3M2 , Canada
| | - Yijie Lu
- Department of Chemistry , University of Toronto , 80 St. George Street , Toronto , Ontario M5S 3H6 , Canada
| | - David W Hedley
- Department of Medical Oncology , Princess Margaret Cancer Centre , 610 University Avenue , Toronto , Ontario M5G 2M9 , Canada
| | - Mitchell A Winnik
- Department of Chemistry , University of Toronto , 80 St. George Street , Toronto , Ontario M5S 3H6 , Canada
| | - Raymond M Reilly
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of Toronto , 144 College Street , Toronto , Ontario M5S 3M2 , Canada.,Department of Medical Imaging , University of Toronto , 263 McCaul Street , Toronto , Ontario M5T 1W7 , Canada.,Toronto General Research Institute and Joint Department of Medical Imaging , University Health Network , 200 Elizabeth Street , Toronto , Ontario M5G 2C4 , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li X, Wu J, Palta M, Zhang Y, Sheng Y, Zhang J, Wang C. A Collimator Setting Optimization Algorithm for Dual-Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 18:1533033819870767. [PMID: 31426721 PMCID: PMC6702773 DOI: 10.1177/1533033819870767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To optimize collimator setting to improve dosimetric quality of pancreas volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for stereotactic body radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-five volumetric modulated arc therapy cases in stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreas were retrospectively included in this study with internal review board approval. Different from the routine practice of initializing collimator settings with a template, the proposed algorithm simultaneously optimizes the collimator angles and jaw positions that are customized to the patient geometry. Specifically, this algorithm includes 2 key steps: (1) an iterative optimization algorithm via simulated annealing that generates a set of potential collimator settings from 39 cases with pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy, and (2) a multi-leaf collimator modulation scoring system that makes the final decision of the optimal collimator settings (collimator angles and jaw positions) based on organs at risk sparing criteria. For validation, the other 16 cases with pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy were analyzed. Two plans were generated for each validation case, with one plan optimized using the proposed algorithm (Planopt) and the other plan with the template setting (Planconv). Each plan was optimized with 2 full arcs and the same set of constraints for the same case. Dosimetric results were analyzed and compared, including target dose coverage, conformity, organs at risk maximum dose, and modulation complexity score. All results were tested by Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and the statistical significance level was set to .05. RESULTS Both plan groups had comparable target dose coverage and mean doses of all organs at risk. However, organs at risk (stomach, duodenum, large/small bowel) maximum dose sparing (D0.1 cc and D0.03 cc) was improved in Planopt compared to Planconv. Planopt also showed lower modulation complexity score, which suggests better capability of handling complex shape and sparing organs at risk . CONCLUSIONS The proposed collimator settings optimization algorithm successfully improved dosimetric performance for dual-arc pancreas volumetric modulated arc therapy plans in stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreas. This algorithm has the capability of immediate clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - You Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jiahan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Saccomandi P, Lapergola A, Longo F, Schena E, Quero G. Thermal ablation of pancreatic cancer: A systematic literature review of clinical practice and pre-clinical studies. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 35:398-418. [PMID: 30428728 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1506165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic cancer is a challenging malignancy with low treatment option and poor life expectancy. Thermal ablation techniques were proposed as alternative treatment options, especially in advanced stages and for unfit-for-surgery patients. This systematic review describes the thermal ablative techniques -i.e., Laser (LA), Radiofrequency (RFA), Microwave (MWA) Ablation, High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) and cryoablation- available for pancreatic cancer treatment. Additionally, an analysis of the efficacy, complication rate and overall survival for each technique is conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS This review collects the ex vivo, preclinical and clinical studies presenting the use of thermal techniques in the pancreatic cancer treatment, searched up to March 2018 in PubMed and Medline. Abstracts, letters-to-the-editor, expert opinions, reviews and non-English language manuscripts were excluded. RESULTS Sixty-five papers were included. For the ex vivo and preclinical studies, there are: 12 records for LA, 8 for RFA, 0 for MWA, 6 for HIFU, 1 for cryoablation and 3 for hybrid techniques. For clinical studies, 1 paper for LA, 14 for RFA, 1 for MWA, 17 for HIFU, 1 for cryoablation and 1 for hybrid techniques. CONCLUSIONS Important technological advances are presented in ex vivo and preclinical studies, as the real-time thermometry, nanotechnology and hybrid techniques to enhance the thermal outcome. Conversely, a lack of standardization in the clinical employment of the procedures emerged, leading to contrasting results on the safety and feasibility of some analyzed techniques. Uniform conclusions on the safety and feasibility of these techniques for pancreatic cancer will require further structured investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Saccomandi
- a IHU-Strasbourg Institute of Image-Guided Surgery , Strasbourg , France.,b Departement of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Alfonso Lapergola
- a IHU-Strasbourg Institute of Image-Guided Surgery , Strasbourg , France.,c Università G. D'Annunzio , Chieti , Italy
| | - Fabio Longo
- a IHU-Strasbourg Institute of Image-Guided Surgery , Strasbourg , France.,d Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Quero
- d Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|