1
|
Barzegar Behrooz A, Darzi Ramandi H, Latifi-Navid H, Peymani P, Tarharoudi R, Momeni N, Sabaghpour Azarian MM, Eltonsy S, Pour-Rashidi A, Ghavami S. Genetic Prognostic Factors in Adult Diffuse Gliomas: A 10-Year Experience at a Single Institution. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2121. [PMID: 38893240 PMCID: PMC11172038 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are primary brain lesions involving cerebral structures without well-defined boundaries and constitute the most prevalent central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. Among gliomas, glioblastoma (GB) is a glioma of the highest grade and is associated with a grim prognosis. We examined how clinical variables and molecular profiles may have affected overall survival (OS) over the past ten years. A retrospective study was conducted at Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran and examined patients with confirmed glioma diagnoses between 2012 and 2020. We evaluated the correlation between OS in GB patients and sociodemographic as well as clinical factors and molecular profiling based on IDH1, O-6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT), TERTp, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification (EGFR-amp) status. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess patient survival. A total of 178 patients were enrolled in the study. The median OS was 20 months, with a 2-year survival rate of 61.0%. Among the 127 patients with available IDH measurements, 100 (78.7%) exhibited mutated IDH1 (IDH1-mut) tumors. Of the 127 patients with assessed MGMT promoter methylation (MGMTp-met), 89 (70.1%) had MGMT methylated tumors. Mutant TERTp (TERTp-mut) was detected in 20 out of 127 cases (15.7%), while wildtype TERTp (wildtype TERTp-wt) was observed in 107 cases (84.3%). Analyses using multivariable models revealed that age at histological grade (p < 0.0001), adjuvant radiotherapy (p < 0.018), IDH1 status (p < 0.043), and TERT-p status (p < 0.014) were independently associated with OS. Our study demonstrates that patients with higher tumor histological grades who had received adjuvant radiotherapy exhibited IDH1-mut or presented with TERTp-wt experienced improved OS. Besides, an interesting finding showed an association between methylation of MGMTp and TERTp status with tumor location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Barzegar Behrooz
- Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba College of Medicine, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada;
- Electrophysiology Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran;
- Brain Cancer Research Group, Department of Cancer, Asu Vanda Gene Industrial Research Company, Tehran 1533666398, Iran; (R.T.); (N.M.)
| | - Hadi Darzi Ramandi
- Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan 6517838623, Iran;
- Department of Molecular Physiology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj 7155863511, Iran
- Department of Biostatistics, Asu Vanda Gene Industrial Research Company, Tehran 1533666398, Iran
| | - Hamid Latifi-Navid
- Electrophysiology Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran;
- Department of Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 14965/161, Tehran 1497716316, Iran
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran 1953833511, Iran
| | - Payam Peymani
- College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada; (P.P.); (S.E.)
| | - Rahil Tarharoudi
- Brain Cancer Research Group, Department of Cancer, Asu Vanda Gene Industrial Research Company, Tehran 1533666398, Iran; (R.T.); (N.M.)
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran
| | - Nasrin Momeni
- Brain Cancer Research Group, Department of Cancer, Asu Vanda Gene Industrial Research Company, Tehran 1533666398, Iran; (R.T.); (N.M.)
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran
| | | | - Sherif Eltonsy
- College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada; (P.P.); (S.E.)
| | - Ahmad Pour-Rashidi
- Brain Cancer Research Group, Department of Cancer, Asu Vanda Gene Industrial Research Company, Tehran 1533666398, Iran; (R.T.); (N.M.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran
| | - Saeid Ghavami
- Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba College of Medicine, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada;
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, Cancer Care Manitoba-University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
- Biology of Breathing Theme, Children Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nguyen AV, Soto JM, Digbeu BD, Nguyen CY, Wu E, Huang JH, Kuo YF. Factors associated with longer survival among older medicare patients after diagnosis of supratentorial primary brain malignancies: a retrospective cohort study. Neurol Res 2024; 46:379-390. [PMID: 38415699 DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2024.2323335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite recent advances, the prognosis for primary malignant brain tumors (PMBTs) remains poor. Some commonly prescribed medications may exhibit anti-tumor properties in various cancers, and neurodegenerative diseases may activate pathways that counteract gliomagenesis. Our study is focused on determining if there is a correlation between the use of metformin, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or the presence of Parkinson's disease (PD), and the survival rates following a diagnosis of a PMBT. METHODS This analysis of the 100% Texas Medicare Database identified patients aged 66+ years diagnosed with a supratentorial PMBT from 2014-2017. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to analyze survival following diagnosis and associations of survival with surgical intervention, radiation, PD diagnosis, and prescription of metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs. RESULTS There were 1,943 patients who met study criteria, and the median age was 74 years. When medication utilization was stratified by none, pre-diagnosis only, post-diagnosis only, or both pre- and post-diagnosis (continuous), continuous utilization of metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with prolonged survival compared to no utilization (hazard ratio [HR]:0.45, 95% CI:0.33-0.62; HR:0.71. 95% CI:0.59-0.86; HR:0.59, 95% CI:0.48-0.72; and HR:0.45, 95% CI:0.35-0.58 respectively). PD was also associated with longer survival (HR:0.59-0.63 across the four models). DISCUSSION Our study suggests that metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, ARBs, and comorbid PD are associated with a survival benefit among geriatric Medicare patients with supratentorial PMBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony V Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA
| | - Jose M Soto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA
| | - Biai D Digbeu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Office of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Christine Y Nguyen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Health, Scott and White Medical Center, Temple, TX, USA
| | - Erxi Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA
- Department of Surgery, Texas A&M University School of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Texas A&M University School of Pharmacy, College Station, TX, USA
- LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes and Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Jason H Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA
- Department of Surgery, Texas A&M University School of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Office of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mazarakis NK, Robinson SD, Sinha P, Koutsarnakis C, Komaitis S, Stranjalis G, Short SC, Chumas P, Giamas G. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100761. [PMID: 38500668 PMCID: PMC10945210 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
High grade gliomas are the most common primary aggressive brain tumours with a very poor prognosis and a median survival of less than 2 years. The standard management protocol of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients involves surgery followed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy in the form of temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. The recent advances in molecular profiling of high-grade gliomas have further enhanced our understanding of the disease. Although the management of glioblastoma is standardised in newly diagnosed adult patients there is a lot of debate regarding the best treatment approach for the newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients. In this review article we attempt to summarise the findings regarding surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their combination in order to offer the best possible management modality for this group of patients. Elderly patients 65-70 with an excellent functional level could be considered as candidates for the standards treatment consisting of surgery, standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Similarly, elderly patients above 70 with good functional status could receive the above with the exception of receiving a shorter course of radiotherapy instead of standard. In elderly GBM patients with poorer functional status and MGMT promoter methylation temozolomide chemotherapy can be considered. For elderly patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy is an option. In contrast to the younger adult patients, it seems that a careful individualised approach is a key element in deciding the best treatment options for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nektarios K. Mazarakis
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
- School of Medicine RCSI, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Stephen D. Robinson
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
| | - Priyank Sinha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, LS1 3EX, UK
| | | | - Spyridon Komaitis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, Athens, Greece
| | - George Stranjalis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, Athens, Greece
| | - Susan C. Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s Wellcome Trust Brenner Building St James’s University Hospital Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Paul Chumas
- School of Medicine RCSI, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Georgios Giamas
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pasqualetti F, Gabelloni M, Faggioni L, Aquaro GD, De Vietro F, Mendola V, Spina N, Frey J, Montemurro N, Cantarella M, Caccese M, Gadducci G, Giannini N, Valenti S, Morganti R, Ius T, Caffo M, Vergaro G, Cosottini M, Naccarato AG, Lombardi G, Bocci G, Neri E, Paiar F. Glioblastoma and Internal Carotid Artery Calcium Score: A Possible Novel Prognostic Partnership? J Clin Med 2024; 13:1512. [PMID: 38592330 PMCID: PMC10933913 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical evidence suggests an association between comorbidities and outcome in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We hypothesised that the internal carotid artery (ICA) calcium score could represent a promising prognostic biomarker in a competing risk analysis in patients diagnosed with GBM. Methods: We validated the use of the ICA calcium score as a surrogate marker of the coronary calcium score in 32 patients with lung cancer. Subsequently, we assessed the impact of the ICA calcium score on overall survival in GBM patients treated with radio-chemotherapy. Results: We analysed 50 GBM patients. At the univariate analysis, methyl-guanine-methyltransferase gene (MGMT) promoter methylation (p = 0.048), gross total tumour resection (p = 0.017), and calcium score (p = 0.011) were significant prognostic predictors in patients with GBM. These three variables also maintained statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: the ICA calcium score could be a promising prognostic biomarker in GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pasqualetti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (S.V.); (F.P.)
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.F.); (G.D.A.); (F.D.V.); (V.M.); (N.S.); (J.F.); (E.N.)
| | - Giovanni Donato Aquaro
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.F.); (G.D.A.); (F.D.V.); (V.M.); (N.S.); (J.F.); (E.N.)
| | - Fabrizio De Vietro
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.F.); (G.D.A.); (F.D.V.); (V.M.); (N.S.); (J.F.); (E.N.)
| | - Vincenzo Mendola
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.F.); (G.D.A.); (F.D.V.); (V.M.); (N.S.); (J.F.); (E.N.)
| | - Nicola Spina
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.F.); (G.D.A.); (F.D.V.); (V.M.); (N.S.); (J.F.); (E.N.)
| | - Jessica Frey
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.F.); (G.D.A.); (F.D.V.); (V.M.); (N.S.); (J.F.); (E.N.)
| | - Nicola Montemurro
- Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Martina Cantarella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (S.V.); (F.P.)
| | - Mario Caccese
- Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.L.)
| | - Giovanni Gadducci
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (S.V.); (F.P.)
| | - Noemi Giannini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (S.V.); (F.P.)
| | - Silvia Valenti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (S.V.); (F.P.)
| | - Riccardo Morganti
- Section of Statistics, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Tamara Ius
- Neurosurgery Unit, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| | - Maria Caffo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Vergaro
- Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy;
- Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Mirco Cosottini
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato
- Division of Pathology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.L.)
| | - Guido Bocci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.F.); (G.D.A.); (F.D.V.); (V.M.); (N.S.); (J.F.); (E.N.)
| | - Fabiola Paiar
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (S.V.); (F.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin H, Li D, Zhu J, Liu S, Li J, Yu T, Tuchin VV, Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya O, Zhu D. Transcranial photobiomodulation for brain diseases: review of animal and human studies including mechanisms and emerging trends. NEUROPHOTONICS 2024; 11:010601. [PMID: 38317779 PMCID: PMC10840571 DOI: 10.1117/1.nph.11.1.010601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
The brain diseases account for 30% of all known diseases. Pharmacological treatment is hampered by the blood-brain barrier, limiting drug delivery to the central nervous system (CNS). Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) is a promising technology for treating brain diseases, due to its effectiveness, non-invasiveness, and affordability. tPBM has been widely used in pre-clinical experiments and clinical trials for treating brain diseases, such as stroke and Alzheimer's disease. This review provides a comprehensive overview of tPBM. We summarize emerging trends and new discoveries in tPBM based on over one hundred references published in the past 20 years. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tPBM and highlight successful experimental and clinical protocols for treating various brain diseases. A better understanding of tPBM mechanisms, the development of guidelines for clinical practice, and the study of dose-dependent and personal effects hold great promise for progress in treating brain diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lin
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics – Advanced Biomedical Imaging Facility, Wuhan, China
| | - Dongyu Li
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics – Advanced Biomedical Imaging Facility, Wuhan, China
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, School of Optical Electronic Information, Wuhan, China
| | - Jingtan Zhu
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics – Advanced Biomedical Imaging Facility, Wuhan, China
| | - Shaojun Liu
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics – Advanced Biomedical Imaging Facility, Wuhan, China
| | - Jingting Li
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, School of Engineering Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Tingting Yu
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics – Advanced Biomedical Imaging Facility, Wuhan, China
| | - Valery V. Tuchin
- Saratov State University, Science Medical Center, Saratov, Russia
- Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Moscow, Russia
- Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Laser Molecular Imaging and Machine Learning, Tomsk, Russia
| | - Oxana Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya
- Saratov State University, Science Medical Center, Saratov, Russia
- Humboldt University, Department of Physics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dan Zhu
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics – Advanced Biomedical Imaging Facility, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Strokotova AV, Sokolov DK, Molodykh OP, Koldysheva EV, Kliver EE, Ushakov VS, Politko MO, Mikhnevich NV, Kazanskaya GM, Aidagulova SV, Grigorieva EV. Prolonged use of temozolomide leads to increased anxiety and decreased content of aggrecan and chondroitin sulfate in brain tissues of aged rats. Biomed Rep 2024; 20:7. [PMID: 38124768 PMCID: PMC10729309 DOI: 10.3892/br.2023.1695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) is an essential part of anticancer therapy used for malignant tumors (mainly melanoma and glioblastoma); however, the long-term effects on patient health and life quality are not fully investigated. Considering that tumors often occur in elderly patients, the present study was conducted on long-term (4 months) treatment of adult Wistar rats (9 months old, n=40) with TMZ and/or dexamethasone (DXM) to investigate potential behavioral impairments or morphological and molecular changes in their brain tissues. According to the elevated plus maze test, long-term use of TMZ affected the anxiety of the adult Wistar rats, although no significant deterioration of brain morphology or cellular composition of the brain tissue was revealed. The expression levels of all studied heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans (HSPGs) (syndecan-1, syndecan-3, glypican-1 and HSPG2) and the majority of the studied chondroitin sulfate (CS) proteoglycans (CSPGs) (decorin, biglycan, lumican, brevican, neurocan aggrecan, versican, Cspg4/Ng2, Cspg5 and phosphacan) were not affected by TMZ/DXM, except for neurocan and aggrecan. Aggrecan was the most sensitive proteoglycan to TMZ/DXM treatment demonstrating downregulation of its mRNA and protein levels following TMZ (-10-fold), DXM (-45-fold) and TMZ-DXM (-80-fold) treatment. HS content was not affected by TMZ/DXM treatment, whereas CS content was decreased 1.5-2.5-fold in the TMZ- and DXM-treated brain tissues. Taken together, the results demonstrated that treatment of adult Wistar rats with TMZ had long-term effects on the brain tissues, such as decreased aggrecan core protein levels and CS chain content and increased anxiety of the experimental animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia V. Strokotova
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Dmitry K. Sokolov
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Olga P. Molodykh
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Pathomorphology, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Elena V. Koldysheva
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Pathomorphology, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Evgenii E. Kliver
- Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk 630055, Russia
- Laboratory of Cellular Biology and Fundamentals of Reproduction, Central Scientific Research Laboratory, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia
| | - Victor S. Ushakov
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Maxim O. Politko
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Nadezhda V. Mikhnevich
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Galina M. Kazanskaya
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| | - Svetlana V. Aidagulova
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
- Laboratory of Cellular Biology and Fundamentals of Reproduction, Central Scientific Research Laboratory, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia
| | - Elvira V. Grigorieva
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chandra A, Lopez-Rivera V, Ryba B, Chandran AS, Brandel MG, Dono A, Sheinberg DL, Esquenazi YL, Aghi MK. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of infratentorial glioblastoma in the elderly. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 236:108084. [PMID: 38141552 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infratentorial glioblastoma(itGBM) is a rare and rapidly progressive form of GBM with poor prognosis. However, no studies have adequately examined itGBM outcomes in elderly patients (>65 years). Here, we used a national database to fill this knowledge gap. METHODS SEER 18 registries were utilized to identify adult itGBM patients diagnosed between 2000-2016. itGBM cases were further divided into cerebellar and brainstem GBM as cGBM and bGBM, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox hazards proportional regression models were performed to assess factors associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 137 (33%) elderly patients from the study cohort (N = 420), median age was 74 years, 38% were female, and 85% were white. Median OS in elderly itGBM patients was shorter than younger adults (10 vs. 5-months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis by tumor location revealed that older age was associated with poor survival for cGBM, but not for bGBM. Gross-total resection (GTR) was associated with better outcomes for both cGBM and bGBM. Radiotherapy had survival benefits for cGBM; meanwhile, chemotherapy prolonged OS in bGBM. In the elderly, advanced age (80 + years) was associated with poor outcomes, while GTR, CT and RT were all associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS In our study, while elderly patients had worse survival compared to younger adults for both cGBM and bGBM, GTR improved OS in elderly itGBM, with CT and RT exhibiting a location-dependent survival benefit. Thus, elderly itGBM patients should undergo a combination of maximal resection and adjuvant treatment guided by infratentorial tumor location for maximal survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush Chandra
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Bryan Ryba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Arjun S Chandran
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael G Brandel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Dono
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dallas L Sheinberg
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yoshua L Esquenazi
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, CA 94131, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bathla G, Soni N, Ward C, Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa R, Agarwal A, Priya S. Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2023; 47:919-923. [PMID: 37948367 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survival prediction in glioblastoma remains challenging, and identification of robust imaging markers could help with this relevant clinical problem. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomics to assess prediction of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODOLOGY A retrospective, institutional review board-approved study was performed. There were 93 eligible patients, of which 55 underwent gross tumor resection and chemoradiation (GTR-CR). Overall survival and PFS were assessed in the entire cohort and the GTR-CR cohort using multiple machine learning pipelines. A model based on multiple clinical variables was also developed. Survival prediction was assessed using the radiomics-only, clinical-only, and the radiomics and clinical combined models. RESULTS For all patients combined, the clinical feature-derived model outperformed the best radiomics model for both OS (C-index, 0.706 vs 0.597; P < 0.0001) and PFS prediction (C-index, 0.675 vs 0.588; P < 0.001). Within the GTR-CR cohort, the radiomics model showed nonstatistically improved performance over the clinical model for predicting OS (C-index, 0.638 vs 0.588; P = 0.4). However, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical feature model for predicting PFS in GTR-CR cohort (C-index, 0.641 vs 0.550; P = 0.004). Combined clinical and radiomics model did not yield superior prediction when compared with the best model in each case. CONCLUSIONS When considering all patients, regardless of therapy, the radiomics-derived prediction of OS and PFS is inferior to that from a model derived from clinical features alone. However, in patients with GTR-CR, radiomics-only model outperforms clinical feature-derived model for predicting PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girish Bathla
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Neetu Soni
- Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Caitlin Ward
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, MN
| | | | - Amit Agarwal
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Sarv Priya
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Niu X, Chang T, Yang Y, Mao Q. Prognostic nomogram models for predicting survival probability in elderly glioblastoma patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:14145-14157. [PMID: 37552311 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05232-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the prognostic factors of survival and develop a predictive nomogram model for elderly GBM patients. METHODS Elderly patients (> = 65 years) with histologically diagnosed GBM were extracted from the SEER database. Survival analysis of overall survival (OS) was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors and these factors were used to further construct the nomogram model. RESULTS A total of 9068 elderly GBM patients (5122 males and 3946 females) were included, with a median age of 72 years (65-96 years). All patients were divided randomly into the training group (n = 6044) and the validation group (n = 3024) by a ratio of 2:1. Cox regression analyses on OS showed eight independent prognostic factors (race, age, tumor side, tumor size, metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) in the training cohort. Also, seven variables (except for race) were identified on CSS in the training group. By comprising these variables, the nomogram models on OS and CSS for predicting the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival probability were constructed and exhibited moderate consistency, respectively. Then, they could be validated well in the validation cohort and by C-index, time-dependent ROC curve, calibration plot, and DCA curve. CONCLUSIONS Nomogram models on OS and CSS could provide an applicable tool to predict the survival probability and provide clinical references regarding treatment strategies and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Niu
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurosurgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Tao Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurosurgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yuan Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurosurgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Qing Mao
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurosurgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya O, Sokolovski S, Fedosov I, Shirokov A, Navolokin N, Bucharskaya A, Blokhina I, Terskov A, Dubrovski A, Telnova V, Tzven A, Tzoy M, Evsukova A, Zhlatogosrkaya D, Adushkina V, Dmitrenko A, Manzhaeva M, Krupnova V, Noghero A, Bragin D, Bragina O, Borisova E, Kurths J, Rafailov E. Transcranial Photosensitizer-Free Laser Treatment of Glioblastoma in Rat Brain. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13696. [PMID: 37762000 PMCID: PMC10530910 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241813696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Over sixty years, laser technologies have undergone a technological revolution and become one of the main tools in biomedicine, particularly in neuroscience, neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumors. Glioblastoma is the most lethal form of brain cancer, with very limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. In this study on rats, we demonstrate that glioblastoma (GBM) growth can be suppressed by photosensitizer-free laser treatment (PS-free-LT) using a quantum-dot-based 1267 nm laser diode. This wavelength, highly absorbed by oxygen, is capable of turning triplet oxygen to singlet form. Applying 1267 nm laser irradiation for a 4 week course with a total dose of 12.7 kJ/cm2 firmly suppresses GBM growth and increases survival rate from 34% to 64%, presumably via LT-activated apoptosis, inhibition of the proliferation of tumor cells, a reduction in intracranial pressure and stimulation of the lymphatic drainage and clearing functions. PS-free-LT is a promising breakthrough technology in non- or minimally invasive therapy for superficial GBMs in infants as well as in adult patients with high photosensitivity or an allergic reaction to PSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oxana Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya
- Physics Department, Humboldt University, Newtonstrasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany;
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Sergey Sokolovski
- Optoelectronics and Biomedical Photonics Group, AIPT, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK;
| | - Ivan Fedosov
- Physics Department, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (I.F.); (A.D.); (M.T.)
| | - Alexander Shirokov
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
- Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants and Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Entuziastov 13, 410049 Saratov, Russia
| | - Nikita Navolokin
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Saratov Medical State University, Bolshaya Kazachaya Str. 112, 410012 Saratov, Russia;
| | - Alla Bucharskaya
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Saratov Medical State University, Bolshaya Kazachaya Str. 112, 410012 Saratov, Russia;
| | - Inna Blokhina
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Andrey Terskov
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Alexander Dubrovski
- Physics Department, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (I.F.); (A.D.); (M.T.)
| | - Valeria Telnova
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Anna Tzven
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Maria Tzoy
- Physics Department, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (I.F.); (A.D.); (M.T.)
| | - Arina Evsukova
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Daria Zhlatogosrkaya
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Viktoria Adushkina
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Alexander Dmitrenko
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Maria Manzhaeva
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Valeria Krupnova
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Alessio Noghero
- Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA; (A.N.); (D.B.); (O.B.)
| | - Denis Bragin
- Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA; (A.N.); (D.B.); (O.B.)
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Olga Bragina
- Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA; (A.N.); (D.B.); (O.B.)
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Ekaterina Borisova
- Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Tsarigradsko Chaussee Blvd. 72, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria;
| | - Jürgen Kurths
- Physics Department, Humboldt University, Newtonstrasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany;
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (A.S.); (N.N.); (I.B.); (A.T.); (V.T.); (A.T.); (A.E.); (D.Z.); (V.A.); (A.D.); (M.M.); (V.K.)
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg A31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
- Centre for Analysis of Complex Systems, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University Moscow, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Edik Rafailov
- Optoelectronics and Biomedical Photonics Group, AIPT, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ius T, Sabatino G, Panciani PP, Fontanella MM, Rudà R, Castellano A, Barbagallo GMV, Belotti F, Boccaletti R, Catapano G, Costantino G, Della Puppa A, Di Meco F, Gagliardi F, Garbossa D, Germanò AF, Iacoangeli M, Mortini P, Olivi A, Pessina F, Pignotti F, Pinna G, Raco A, Sala F, Signorelli F, Sarubbo S, Skrap M, Spena G, Somma T, Sturiale C, Angileri FF, Esposito V. Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2023; 162:267-293. [PMID: 36961622 PMCID: PMC10167129 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04274-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal. METHODS A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients. RESULTS A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B). CONCLUSIONS A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Ius
- Division of Neurosurgery, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Giovanni Sabatino
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Panciani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Marco Maria Fontanella
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10094, Torino, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10094, Torino, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Hospital of Castelfranco Veneto, 31033, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
| | - Antonella Castellano
- Department of Neuroradiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (G.F. Ingrassia), Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco" University Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Belotti
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Catapano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Della Puppa
- Neurosurgical Clinical Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Meco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Garbossa
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Iacoangeli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Azienda Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federico Pessina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Neurosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Pignotti
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Giampietro Pinna
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonino Raco
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of NESMOS, AOU Sant'Andrea, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Sala
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicines and Movement Sciences, Institute of Neurosurgery, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Signorelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Neurosurgery Unit, University "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Sarubbo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale Per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Miran Skrap
- Division of Neurosurgery, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Somma
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Vincenzo Esposito
- Department of Neurosurgery "Giampaolo Cantore"-IRCSS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human, Neurosciences-"Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya O, Bragin D, Bragina O, Socolovski S, Shirokov A, Fedosov I, Ageev V, Blokhina I, Dubrovsky A, Telnova V, Terskov A, Khorovodov A, Elovenko D, Evsukova A, Zhoy M, Agranovich I, Vodovozova E, Alekseeva A, Kurths J, Rafailov E. Low-Level Laser Treatment Induces the Blood-Brain Barrier Opening and the Brain Drainage System Activation: Delivery of Liposomes into Mouse Glioblastoma. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:567. [PMID: 36839889 PMCID: PMC9966329 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The progress in brain diseases treatment is limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which prevents delivery of the vast majority of drugs from the blood into the brain. In this study, we discover unknown phenomenon of opening of the BBBB (BBBO) by low-level laser treatment (LLLT, 1268 nm) in the mouse cortex. LLLT-BBBO is accompanied by activation of the brain drainage system contributing effective delivery of liposomes into glioblastoma (GBM). The LLLT induces the generation of singlet oxygen without photosensitizers (PSs) in the blood endothelial cells and astrocytes, which can be a trigger mechanism of BBBO. LLLT-BBBO causes activation of the ABC-transport system with a temporal decrease in the expression of tight junction proteins. The BBB recovery is accompanied by activation of neuronal metabolic activity and stabilization of the BBB permeability. LLLT-BBBO can be used as a new opportunity of interstitial PS-free photodynamic therapy (PDT) for modulation of brain tumor immunity and improvement of immuno-therapy for GBM in infants in whom PDT with PSs, radio- and chemotherapy are strongly limited, as well as in adults with a high allergic reaction to PSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oxana Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya
- Institute of Physics, Humboldt University, Newtonstrasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Denis Bragin
- Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Olga Bragina
- Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA
| | - Sergey Socolovski
- Optoelectronics and Biomedical Photonics Group, Aston Institute of Photonic Technologies, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
| | - Alexander Shirokov
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
- Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants and Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Entuziastov 13, 410049 Saratov, Russia
| | - Ivan Fedosov
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Vasily Ageev
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Inna Blokhina
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Alexander Dubrovsky
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Valeria Telnova
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Andrey Terskov
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Alexander Khorovodov
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Daria Elovenko
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Arina Evsukova
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Maria Zhoy
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Ilana Agranovich
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Elena Vodovozova
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Alekseeva
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Jürgen Kurths
- Institute of Physics, Humboldt University, Newtonstrasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Biology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 82, 410012 Saratov, Russia
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Department of Complexity Science, Telegrafenberg A31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
| | - Edik Rafailov
- Optoelectronics and Biomedical Photonics Group, Aston Institute of Photonic Technologies, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pando A, Patel AM, Choudhry HS, Eloy JA, Goldstein IM, Liu JK. Palliative Care Effects on Survival in Glioblastoma: Who Receives Palliative Care? World Neurosurg 2023; 170:e847-e857. [PMID: 36481442 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-grade glioma has a poor overall survival with profoundly negative effects on the patient's quality of life and their caregivers. In this study, we investigate the factors associated with receiving palliative care in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM) and the association of receiving or not receiving palliative care with overall survival. METHODS The National Cancer Database was analyzed for patterns of care in patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with histologically confirmed grade IV GBM between 2004 and 2017. All statistical analyses were conducted based on univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS A total of 85,380 patients with the diagnosis of GBM were identified. Of the study population, 2803 patients (3.28%) received palliative therapy. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥70 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.58; P < 0.001), Medicare (OR, 1.348; CI, 1.13-1.61; P = 0.001), tumor size ≥5 cm (OR, 1.15; CI, 1.01-1.31; P = 0.036), tumor multifocality (OR, 1.69; CI, 1.47-1.96; P < 0.001), lobe overlapping tumor (OR, 2.09; CI, 1.13-3.86; P = 0.018), Charlson-Deyo score >0, receiving treatment at a nonacademic/research program, and medium volume of cancers managed at the treatment facility (OR, 1.19; CI, 1.02-1.38; P = 0.026) were independent risk factors associated with an increased chance of receiving palliative care. In contrast, a household income of ≥$40,227 and high volume of cancer managed at the treatment facility (OR, 0.75; CI, 0.58-0.96; P = 0.02) were independent risk factors associated with decreased palliative care. Patients who received no palliative care had a 2-year overall survival longer than those who received palliative care (22% vs. 8.8%; P < 0.001). In patients receiving palliative care, those who received recommended treatment had a 2-year overall survival longer than those who declined part or whole recommended treatment (9.1% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS In patients with high-grade glioma, receiving palliative care is associated with decreased survival. When receiving palliative care, recommended treatment increases the number of patients who survive more than 2 years approximately 3-fold compared with those declining part or whole treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Pando
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
| | - Aman M Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Hannaan S Choudhry
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ira M Goldstein
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James K Liu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Photodynamic Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier and the Meningeal Lymphatic System: The New Niche in Immunotherapy for Brain Tumors. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14122612. [PMID: 36559105 PMCID: PMC9784636 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising add-on therapy to the current standard of care for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). The traditional explanation of the anti-cancer PDT effects involves the PDT-induced generation of a singlet oxygen in the GBM cells, which causes tumor cell death and microvasculature collapse. Recently, new vascular mechanisms of PDT associated with opening of the blood-brain barrier (OBBB) and the activation of functions of the meningeal lymphatic vessels have been discovered. In this review, we highlight the emerging trends and future promises of immunotherapy for brain tumors and discuss PDT-OBBB as a new niche and an important informative platform for the development of innovative pharmacological strategies for the modulation of brain tumor immunity and the improvement of immunotherapy for GBM.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sánchez-Villalobos JM, Aledo-Serrano Á, Villegas-Martínez I, Shaikh MF, Alcaraz M. Epilepsy treatment in neuro-oncology: A rationale for drug choice in common clinical scenarios. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:991244. [PMID: 36278161 PMCID: PMC9583251 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.991244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy represents a challenge in the management of patients with brain tumors. Epileptic seizures are one of the most frequent comorbidities in neuro-oncology and may be the debut symptom of a brain tumor or a complication during its evolution. Epileptogenic mechanisms of brain tumors are not yet fully elucidated, although new factors related to the underlying pathophysiological process with possible treatment implications have been described. In recent years, the development of new anti-seizure medications (ASM), with better pharmacokinetic profiles and fewer side effects, has become a paradigm shift in many clinical scenarios in neuro-oncology, being able, for instance, to adapt epilepsy treatment to specific features of each patient. This is crucial in several situations, such as patients with cognitive/psychiatric comorbidity, pregnancy, or advanced age, among others. In this narrative review, we provide a rationale for decision-making in ASM choice for neuro-oncologic patients, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each drug. In addition, according to current literature evidence, we try to answer some of the most frequent questions that arise in daily clinical practice in patients with epilepsy related to brain tumors, such as, which patients are the best candidates for ASM and when to start it, what is the best treatment option for each patient, and what are the major pitfalls to be aware of during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Manuel Sánchez-Villalobos
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Complex of Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology and Histology, School of Medicine, Regional Campus of International Excellence, “Campus Mare Nostrum”, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ángel Aledo-Serrano
- Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- *Correspondence: Ángel Aledo-Serrano,
| | | | - Mohd Farooq Shaikh
- Neuropharmacology Research Laboratory, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Miguel Alcaraz
- Department of Radiology and Physical Medicine, School of Medicine, Regional Campus of International Excellence, “Campus Mare Nostrum”, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Surgery for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Retrospective Case Control Study. World Neurosurg 2022; 166:e624-e631. [PMID: 35870781 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of surgery in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains a controversial topic. The goal of this study was to perform a case control analysis including time to tumor recurrence as an additional prognostic factor in order to determine which patients benefit most from repeat surgery. METHODS Our brain tumor database was reviewed over a 10-year period for all adult (≥18 years old) patients with primary isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype GBM who received surgery for recurrent disease. These patients were then age, sex, and treatment matched to case controls from our institution who received medical therapy for recurrent disease. RESULTS A total of 174 adult patients with GBM were included in the study, 87 patients who received surgery for recurrent GBM (surgery cohort) and 87 patients who did not receive surgery for recurrent GBM (nonsurgery cohort). The surgery cohort had longer overall survival (P = 0.0003) and postrecurrence survival (P = 0.001) than the nonsurgery cohort. When the surgery cohort was split into 2 groups on the basis of time to tumor recurrence, the long time to recurrence group (>6 months) demonstrated significantly increased survival compared with the short time to recurrence group (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis of both cohorts demonstrated surgery for recurrent GBM was independently significant after adjusting for age, Karnofsky Performance Scale, and time to tumor recurrence (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Surgery for recurrent GBM leads to improved survival independent of age, Karnofsky Performance Scale, and time to tumor recurrence. Patients with time to tumor recurrence >6 months benefit most from additional surgery.
Collapse
|
17
|
Multidisciplinary tumor board behavior consistency in the management of glioblastoma: A multi-center study. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
18
|
Impact of temporalis muscle thickness in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radio or radio-chemotherapy. Radiol Med 2022; 127:919-924. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01524-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
19
|
Hu Y, Xue Z, Qiu C, Feng Z, Qi Q, Wang J, Jin W, Zhong Z, Liu X, Li W, Zhang Q, Huang B, Chen A, Wang J, Yang N, Zhou W. Knockdown of NUSAP1 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion through downregulation of TOP2A in human glioblastoma. Cell Cycle 2022; 21:1842-1855. [PMID: 35532155 PMCID: PMC9359390 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2022.2074199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1 (NUSAP1), an indispensable mitotic regulator, has been reported to be involved in the development, progression, and metastasis of several types of cancer. Here, we investigated the expression and biological function of NUSAP1 in human glioblastoma (GBM), an aggressive brain tumor type with largely ineffective treatment options. Analysis of the molecular data in CGGA, TCGA and Rembrandt datasets demonstrated that NUSAP1 was significantly upregulated in GBM relative to low grade gliomas and non-neoplastic brain tissue samples. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with tumors showing high NUSAP1 expression exhibited significantly poorer survival in both CGGA (P = 0.002) and Rembrandt cohorts (P = 0.017). Analysis of RNA sequencing data from P3-cells with stable knockdown of NUSAP1 revealed topoisomerase 2A (TOP2A) as a possible molecule downregulated by the loss of NUSAP1. Molecular analysis of the CGGA data revealed a strong correlation between NUSAP1 and TOP2A expression in primary gliomas and recurrent gliomas samples. SiRNA knockdown of either NUSAP1 or TOP2A in U251, T98 and GBM derived patient P3 cells inhibited GBM cell proliferation and invasion, and induced cell apoptosis. Finally, stable knockdown of NUSAP1 with shRNA led to decreased tumor growth in an orthotopic xenograft model of GBM in mice. Taken together, NUSAP1 gene silencing induced apoptosis possibly through the downregulation of the candidate downstream molecule TOP2A. Interference with the expression of NUSAP1 might therefore inhibit malignant progression in GBM, and NUSAP1 might thus serve as a promising molecular target for GBM treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaotian Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zhiyi Xue
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Chen Qiu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zichao Feng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Qichao Qi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jiwei Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Wenxing Jin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zhaoyang Zhong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaofei Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Wenjie Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Bin Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Anjing Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Ning Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital and Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Wenjing Zhou
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Uribe D, Niechi I, Rackov G, Erices JI, San Martín R, Quezada C. Adapt to Persist: Glioblastoma Microenvironment and Epigenetic Regulation on Cell Plasticity. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:313. [PMID: 35205179 PMCID: PMC8869716 DOI: 10.3390/biology11020313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive brain tumor, characterized by great resistance to treatments, as well as inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. GBM exhibits infiltration, vascularization and hypoxia-associated necrosis, characteristics that shape a unique microenvironment in which diverse cell types are integrated. A subpopulation of cells denominated GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) exhibits multipotency and self-renewal capacity. GSCs are considered the conductors of tumor progression due to their high tumorigenic capacity, enhanced proliferation, invasion and therapeutic resistance compared to non-GSCs cells. GSCs have been classified into two molecular subtypes: proneural and mesenchymal, the latter showing a more aggressive phenotype. Tumor microenvironment and therapy can induce a proneural-to-mesenchymal transition, as a mechanism of adaptation and resistance to treatments. In addition, GSCs can transition between quiescent and proliferative substates, allowing them to persist in different niches and adapt to different stages of tumor progression. Three niches have been described for GSCs: hypoxic/necrotic, invasive and perivascular, enhancing metabolic changes and cellular interactions shaping GSCs phenotype through metabolic changes and cellular interactions that favor their stemness. The phenotypic flexibility of GSCs to adapt to each niche is modulated by dynamic epigenetic modifications. Methylases, demethylases and histone deacetylase are deregulated in GSCs, allowing them to unlock transcriptional programs that are necessary for cell survival and plasticity. In this review, we described the effects of GSCs plasticity on GBM progression, discussing the role of GSCs niches on modulating their phenotype. Finally, we described epigenetic alterations in GSCs that are important for stemness, cell fate and therapeutic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Uribe
- Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile; (D.U.); (I.N.); (J.I.E.); (R.S.M.)
| | - Ignacio Niechi
- Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile; (D.U.); (I.N.); (J.I.E.); (R.S.M.)
| | - Gorjana Rackov
- Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain;
| | - José I. Erices
- Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile; (D.U.); (I.N.); (J.I.E.); (R.S.M.)
| | - Rody San Martín
- Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile; (D.U.); (I.N.); (J.I.E.); (R.S.M.)
| | - Claudia Quezada
- Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile; (D.U.); (I.N.); (J.I.E.); (R.S.M.)
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Outcome of glioblastoma resection in patients 80 years of age and older. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164:373-383. [PMID: 33660052 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04776-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role and possible complications of tumor resection in the management of glioblastoma (GBM) in a series of patients 80 years of age and older with review of literature. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed cases involving patients 80 years or older who underwent biopsy or initial resection of GBM at their hospital between 2007 and 2018. A total of 117 patients (mean age 82 years) met the inclusion criteria; 57 had resection (group A) and 60 had biopsy (group B). Functional outcomes and survival at follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS Group A differed significantly from group B at baseline in having better WHO performance status, better ASA scores, more right-sided tumors, and no basal ganglia or "butterfly" gliomas. Nevertheless, 56% of group A patients had an ASA score of 3. Median survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 8-17 months) in group A, 4 months (95% CI 3.5-6 months) in group B, and 17.5 months (95% CI 12-24 months) in the 56% of group A patients treated with resection and Stupp protocol. Rates of postoperative neurologic and medical complications were almost identical in the 2 groups, but the rate of surgical site complications was substantially greater in group A (12% vs 5%). There was no significant difference in mean preoperative and postoperative KPS scores (group A). CONCLUSIONS In selected patients 80 years or older, radical removal of GBM was associated with acceptable survival and a low perioperative complication rate which is comparable to that of a biopsy. Although the median survival of the whole group was lower than reported for younger patients, a subgroup amenable to radical surgery and Stupp protocol achieved a median survival of 17.5 months.
Collapse
|
22
|
Treatment of Older Adult Patients with Glioblastoma: Moving towards the Inclusion of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Guiding Management. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:360-376. [PMID: 35049706 PMCID: PMC8774312 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29010032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, and over half of patients with newly diagnosed GBM are over the age of 65. Management of glioblastoma in older patients includes maximal safe resection followed by either radiation, chemotherapy, or combined modality treatment. Despite recent advances in the treatment of older patients with GBM, survival is still only approximately 9 months compared to approximately 15 months for the general adult population, suggesting that further research is required to optimize management in the older population. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been shown to have a prognostic and predictive role in the management of older patients with other cancers, and domains of the CGA have demonstrated an association with outcomes in GBM in retrospective studies. Furthermore, the CGA and other geriatric assessment tools are now starting to be prospectively investigated in older GBM populations. This review aims to outline current treatment strategies for older patients with GBM, explore the rationale for inclusion of geriatric assessment in GBM management, and highlight recent data investigating its implementation into practice.
Collapse
|
23
|
Krigers A, Demetz M, Grams AE, Thomé C, Freyschlag CF. The diagnostic value of contrast enhancement on MRI in diffuse and anaplastic gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164:2035-2040. [PMID: 35018531 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-05103-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated differentiations in gadolinium contrast enhancement (CE) between low-grade WHO °II and high-grade WHO °III gliomas in conventional MRI, which have been repeatedly questioned. METHODS Ninety-nine patients, who underwent first resection of WHO°II and °III gliomas, were retrospectively retrieved from a prospective database. The quantitative metric volume of Gd-CE in T1-weighted pre-operative MRI was measured using volumetric segmentation. RESULTS The OR to detect CE in anaplastic gliomas was seven times higher than that in diffuse gliomas (CI95% 2.8-17.2, p<0.0001). No CE was seen in 50% (8/16) of focal anaplastic and in 28% (10/36) of entirely anaplastic gliomas. CE was present in 21% (10/47) of diffuse gliomas. Anaplasia correlated with a larger CE volume (r=0.49, p<0.0001) and provided additional 4 cm3 of CE volume compared to entirely diffuse tumors. The OR to have CE was 3.6 times for IDH1 wild-type tumors (CI95% 1.3-10.2, p=0.05) and 4.8 for tumors with ATRX expression (CI95% 1.3-17.2, p=0.05). In all sub-groups, at least a quarter of cases showed no CE at all and there were cases with present CE. CONCLUSION CE is associated with higher odds of unfavorable prognostic features like anaplasia, wild-type IDH1 and retained ATRX. There was no CE in one-fourth of anaplastic gliomas and half of gliomas with focal anaplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandrs Krigers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Matthias Demetz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Astrid E Grams
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian F Freyschlag
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhao R, Zeng J, DeVries K, Proulx R, Krauze AV. Optimizing management of the elderly patient with glioblastoma: Survival prediction online tool based on BC Cancer Registry real-world data. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac052. [PMID: 35733517 PMCID: PMC9209750 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is associated with fatal outcomes and devastating neurological presentations especially impacting the elderly. Management remains controversial and representation in clinical trials poor. We generated 2 nomograms and a clinical decision making web tool using real-world data. METHODS Patients ≥60 years of age with histologically confirmed GBM (ICD-O-3 histology codes 9440/3, 9441/3, and 9442/3) diagnosed 2005-2015 were identified from the BC Cancer Registry (n = 822). Seven hundred and twenty-nine patients for which performance status was captured were included in the analysis. Age, performance and resection status, administration of radiation therapy (RT), and chemotherapy were reviewed. Nomograms predicting 6- and 12-month overall survival (OS) probability were developed using Cox proportional hazards regression internally validated by c-index. A web tool powered by JavaScript was developed to calculate the survival probability. RESULTS Median OS was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-7.2 months). Management involved concurrent chemoradiation (34%), RT alone (42%), and chemo alone (2.3%). Twenty-one percent of patients did not receive treatment beyond surgical intervention. Age, performance status, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and RT administration were all significant independent predictors of OS. Patients <80 years old who received RT had a significant survival advantage, regardless of extent of resection (hazard ratio range from 0.22 to 0.60, CI 0.15-0.95). A nomogram was constructed from all 729 patients (Harrell's Concordance Index = 0.78 [CI 0.71-0.84]) with a second nomogram based on subgroup analysis of the 452 patients who underwent RT (Harrell's Concordance Index = 0.81 [CI 0.70-0.90]). An online calculator based on both nomograms was generated for clinical use. CONCLUSIONS Two nomograms and accompanying web tool incorporating commonly captured clinical features were generated based on real-world data to optimize decision making in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Zhao
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jonathan Zeng
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kimberly DeVries
- Cancer Surveillance & Outcomes, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ryan Proulx
- Safe Software, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andra Valentina Krauze
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yakar F, Egemen E, Dere ÜA, Sağınç H, Gökdeniz U, Bakırarar B, Gökdeniz CG, Baltalarlı B, Coşkun ME, Acar F. The effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery for the management of residual high-grade gliomas: A single institutional study. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 95:159-163. [PMID: 34929640 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are presently managed via surgical resection, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and chemotherapy. Although Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is currently used to manage HGGs, it has not been considered standard care. This paper aims to compare the contribution of GKRS to clinical outcomes in patients in which gross total resection (GTR) cannot be achieved. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 99 patients with HGG (World Health Organization (WHO) grade III and IV) from two groups: group 1 consisted of 68 patients for which only EBRT was administered, and group 2 consisted of 31 patients for which EBRT and GKRS were administered. Patient demographic data, the extent of resection, IDH mutation, radiation dosage, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and follow-up time were recorded and compared across groups. The grade III/IV tumor ratio was 10/58 and 10/21 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 2, PFS and OS were higher than in group 1 (P = 0.030 and 0.021). The mean follow-up time was 15.02 ± 11.8 (3-52) and 18.9 ± 98.6 (7-43) months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In addition to the standard management of HGGs in patients without GTR, boost GKRS during the early postoperative period is beneficial for increasing PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Yakar
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey.
| | - Emrah Egemen
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey
| | - Ümit A Dere
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey
| | - Halil Sağınç
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey
| | - Ulaş Gökdeniz
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey
| | - Batuhan Bakırarar
- Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Hacettepe, A. Adnan Saygun Cd, 06230 Altındağ/Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ceyda G Gökdeniz
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey
| | - Bahar Baltalarlı
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey.
| | - Mehmet E Coşkun
- Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Çamlaraltı, Kınıklı Cd No:37, 20160 Pamukkale/Denizli, Turkey
| | - Feridun Acar
- Odak Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Sümer Mah. No: 18, 20100 Merkez/Denizli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Krauze AV, Camphausen K. Molecular Biology in Treatment Decision Processes-Neuro-Oncology Edition. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:13278. [PMID: 34948075 PMCID: PMC8703419 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Computational approaches including machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence are growing in importance in all medical specialties as large data repositories are increasingly being optimised. Radiation oncology as a discipline is at the forefront of large-scale data acquisition and well positioned towards both the production and analysis of large-scale oncologic data with the potential for clinically driven endpoints and advancement of patient outcomes. Neuro-oncology is comprised of malignancies that often carry poor prognosis and significant neurological sequelae. The analysis of radiation therapy mediated treatment and the potential for computationally mediated analyses may lead to more precise therapy by employing large scale data. We analysed the state of the literature pertaining to large scale data, computational analysis, and the advancement of molecular biomarkers in neuro-oncology with emphasis on radiation oncology. We aimed to connect existing and evolving approaches to realistic avenues for clinical implementation focusing on low grade gliomas (LGG), high grade gliomas (HGG), management of the elderly patient with HGG, rare central nervous system tumors, craniospinal irradiation, and re-irradiation to examine how computational analysis and molecular science may synergistically drive advances in personalised radiation therapy (RT) and optimise patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra V. Krauze
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Friso F, Rucci P, Rosetti V, Carretta A, Bortolotti C, Ramponi V, Martinoni M, Palandri G, Zoli M, Badaloni F, Franceschi E, Asioli S, Fabbri VP, Rustici A, Foschini MP, Brandes AA, Mazzatenta D, Sturiale C, Conti A. Is There a Role for Surgical Resection of Multifocal Glioblastoma? A Retrospective Analysis of 100 Patients. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:1042-1051. [PMID: 34662898 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma with multiple localizations (mGBMs) can be defined as multifocal, where enhancing lesions present a connection visible on magnetic resonance imaging fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging, or multicentric, in the absence of a clear dissemination pathway. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of the extent of resection (EOR) in the treatment of mGBMs and its correlation with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). METHODS One hundred patients with mGBMs were treated at our Institution between 2009 and 2019. Clinical, radiological, and follow-up data were collected. EOR of the contrast-enhancing part of lesions was classified as gross total resection (GTR, absence of tumor remnant), subtotal resection (STR, residual tumor < 30% of the initial mass), partial resection (PR, residual tumor > 30% of the initial mass), and needle or open biopsy (residual tumor > 75% of the initial mass). RESULTS Approximately 15% of patients underwent GTR, 14% STR, 32% PR, and 39% biopsy. Median OS was 17 mo for GTR, 11 mo for STR, 7 mo for PR, and 5 mo for biopsy. Greater EOR was associated with a significantly longer OS than biopsy. GTR and STR were associated with a longer PFS in Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. After adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), number of lesions, and adjunctive therapy in multivariable Cox regression analyses, GTR, STR, and PR were still associated with OS, but only GTR remained associated with PFS. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that EOR may positively influence survival of patients with mGBM. Surgical resection can be a reasonable option when performance and access to adjuvant treatment can be preserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Friso
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Paola Rucci
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Vittoria Rosetti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Carretta
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Bortolotti
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vania Ramponi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Martinoni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Palandri
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Zoli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Programma Neurochirurgia Ipofisi- Pituitary Unit, Bologna, Italy
| | - Filippo Badaloni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sofia Asioli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Programma Neurochirurgia Ipofisi- Pituitary Unit, Bologna, Italy.,Unit of Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Azienda USL di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Viscardo Paolo Fabbri
- Unit of Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Azienda USL di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Arianna Rustici
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria P Foschini
- Unit of Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Azienda USL di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alba A Brandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Diego Mazzatenta
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Programma Neurochirurgia Ipofisi- Pituitary Unit, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carmelo Sturiale
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vaugier L, Ah-Thiane L, Aumont M, Jouglar E, Campone M, Colliard C, Doucet L, Frenel JS, Gourmelon C, Robert M, Martin SA, Riem T, Roualdes V, Campion L, Mervoyer A. Standard 6-week chemoradiation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22057. [PMID: 34764361 PMCID: PMC8586368 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01537-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is frequent in elderly patients, but their frailty provokes debate regarding optimal treatment in general, and the standard 6-week chemoradiation (CRT) in particular, although this is the mainstay for younger patients. All patients with newly diagnosed GBM and age ≥ 70 who were referred to our institution for 6-week CRT were reviewed from 2004 to 2018. MGMT status was not available for treatment decision at that time. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), early adverse neurological events without neurological progression ≤ 1 month after CRT and temozolomide hematologic toxicity assessed by CTCAE v5. 128 patients were included. The median age was 74.1 (IQR: 72-77). 15% of patients were ≥ 80 years. 62.5% and 37.5% of patients fulfilled the criteria for RPA class I-II and III-IV, respectively. 81% of patients received the entire CRT and 28% completed the maintenance temozolomide. With median follow-up of 11.7 months (IQR: 6.5-17.5), median OS was 11.7 months (CI 95%: 10-13 months). Median PFS was 9.5 months (CI 95%: 9-10.5 months). 8% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 hematologic events. 52.5% of patients without neurological progression had early adverse neurological events. Post-operative neurological disabilities and age ≥ 80 were not associated with worsened outcomes. 6-week chemoradiation was feasible for "real-life" elderly patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, even in the case of post-operative neurological disabilities. Old does not necessarily mean worse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïg Vaugier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Boulevard J. Monod, 44805, Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - Loïc Ah-Thiane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Boulevard J. Monod, 44805, Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Maud Aumont
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Boulevard J. Monod, 44805, Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Boulevard J. Monod, 44805, Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Camille Colliard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Ludovic Doucet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Carole Gourmelon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Marie Robert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Stéphane-André Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), Nantes-Saint Herblain, France
| | - Tanguy Riem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), Nantes-Saint Herblain, France
| | - Vincent Roualdes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), Nantes-Saint Herblain, France
| | - Loïc Campion
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, St-Herblain, France.,Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie Nantes-Angers (CRCNA), UMR 1232 Inserm-6299 CNRS, Institut de Recherche en Santé de l'Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Augustin Mervoyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Boulevard J. Monod, 44805, Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ram Z, Kim CY, Hottinger AF, Idbaih A, Nicholas G, Zhu JJ. Efficacy and Safety of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 EF-14 Clinical Trial. Front Oncol 2021; 11:671972. [PMID: 34692470 PMCID: PMC8526342 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.671972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Understudied elderly patients comprise a large segment of high-risk patients with glioblastoma (GBM) that are challenging to treat. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) is a locoregional, noninvasive, antimitotic therapy delivering low-intensity, intermediate-frequency alternating electric fields to the tumor. In the phase 3 EF-14 clinical trial, TTFields (200 kHz) improved median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) when added concomitantly to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ). This EF-14 subgroup analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of TTFields in elderly patients. Methods All 134 patients who are ≥65 years of age were included (TTFields/TMZ combination, n=89; TMZ monotherapy, n=45; 2:1 ratio of randomization). PFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology (α=0.05). Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality-of-life questionnaire QLQ-C30 supplemented with the brain tumor module (QLQ-BN20). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v4.0. Results The PFS was 6.5 months in patients randomized to the treatment group with TTFields/TMZ combination versus 3.9 months in patients treated with TMZ monotherapy (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.74; P=0.0236). The OS was 17.4 months in patients treated with TTFields/TMZ combination versus 13.7 months in patients treated with TMZ monotherapy (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.77; P=0.0204). Annual survival rates with TTFields/TMZ versus TMZ monotherapy were 39% (95% CI, 29-50%) versus 27% (95% CI, 15-41%; P=0.072) at 2 years, 19% (95% CI, 11-29%) versus 11% (95% CI, 4-23%; P=0.135) at 3 years, and 15% (95% CI, 7-25%) versus 0% at 5 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in the preselected items of HRQoL assessment. Grade ≥3 systemic AEs were 46% in the TTFields/TMZ group versus 40% in the TMZ monotherapy group, without statistically significant difference between the two groups. The only TTFields-related AEs were reversible scalp skin reactions, with grades 1-2 and grade 3 skin reactions reported by 51% and 2% of patients, respectively. Conclusions Combining TTFields with maintenance TMZ significantly improved PFS and OS in elderly patients with ndGBM in the phase 3 EF-14 clinical trial, without significant increases in systemic toxicity or negatively affecting patient HRQoL. TTFields-related skin AEs were low-grade and manageable. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00916409, identifier: NCT00916409.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zvi Ram
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center and Tel Aviv University School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Chae-Yong Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Andreas F Hottinger
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, CHUV Lausanne University Hospital & University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | - Garth Nicholas
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jay-Jiguang Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Regorafenib in Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Large and Monocentric Real-Life Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184731. [PMID: 34572958 PMCID: PMC8471957 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the last years, treatments for recurrent glioblastoma patients have shown limited efficacy in terms of OS. In the REGOMA trial, regorafenib demonstrated encouraging results in this setting of population. Indeed, in this randomized, phase 2 study the OS was significantly improved in the regorafenib arm compared with the standard lomustine treatment. Noteworthy, based on the REGOMA trial results, regorafenib was included in the NCCN 2021 guidelines as a preferred regimen for recurrent glioblastoma patients. To date, no studies have analyzed the impact of regorafenib in patients treated outside of clinical trials. We performed a large study in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in the real-life population of recurrent GBM patients. Our results were superimposable to the ones reported in the REGOMA trial and regorafenib should be considered as an interesting drug in a population with a very poor prognosis and an unmet clinical need. Abstract Despite multimodal treatment with surgery and radiochemotherapy, the prognosis of glioblastoma remains poor, and practically all glioblastomas relapse. To date, no standard treatment exists for recurrent glioblastoma patients and traditional therapies have showed limited efficacy. Regorafenib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor showing encouraging benefits in recurrent GBM patients enrolled in the REGOMA trial. We performed a large study to investigate clinical outcomes and the safety of regorafenib in a real-life population of recurrent glioblastoma patients. Patients receiving regorafenib outside clinical trials at the Veneto Institute of Oncology were retrospectively reviewed. The major inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of glioblastoma, prior first line therapy according to “Stupp protocol”, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score ≤1. According to the original schedule, patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival and safety. A total of 54 consecutive patients were enrolled. The median age was 56, MGMT methylated status was found in 28 out of 53 available patients (52.8%), IDH mutation in 5 (9.3%) and 22 patients were receiving steroids at baseline. The median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% CI, 6.4–13.9), the OS-12 was 43%. Age, MGMT methylation status and steroid use at baseline were not statistically significant on a multivariate analysis for OS. Patients reporting a disease control as best response to regorafenib demonstrated a significant longer survival (24.8 months vs. 6.2 months for patients with progressive disease, p = 0.0001). Grade 3 drug-related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (18%); 1 patient (2%) reported a grade 4 adverse event (rash maculo-papular). No death was considered to be drug-related. This study reported the first large “real-life” experience of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma. Overall, our results are close to the ones reported in the previous phase 2 study, despite the fact that we had a longer survival. We showed the encouraging activity and tolerability of this treatment in recurrent glioblastoma patients when used as a second-line treatment.
Collapse
|
31
|
Tantawy MF, Nazim WM. Brain tumor surgery in the elderly: a single institution experience of short-term outcome—a retrospective case study. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s41983-021-00350-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is an evolving concern in the management of brain tumors in the elderly. The number of elderly people (aged 65 years or more) increases progressively, and there is a considerable percent of brain tumors affecting this age group. Elderly people may have one or more chronic illnesses that may render cranial surgery of high risk for mortality and morbidity. This study was carried out to evaluate the short-term (30 days) outcome of brain tumor surgery in elderly patients.
Results
This is a single-institution retrospective study of elderly patients harboring brain tumors who were managed by surgery. The study included 31 patients between 2014 and 2019. Elective and emergency cases were included. The mean age for the study population was 68.29 years. The mean functional status using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) changed from 58.06 before surgery to 70 after surgery. Meningioma grade I and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were the most common neoplasms, 41.9 and 29%, respectively. There was a statistically significant relationship between the mortality and GBM (P value < 0.05) while there was no correlation with concomitant diseases, KPS, or extent of resection (P value > 0.05). Preoperative concomitant diseases were found in 16 patients. Mortality occurred in 11 cases (35.4%).
Conclusions
Old age by itself should not be a risk factor alone for increasing mortality or morbidity in cranial surgery for patients with brain tumors. Glioblastoma in old patients with poor KPS carries a significant risk for mortality. Further studies with a larger number of patients and inclusion of more variables are required.
Collapse
|
32
|
Mir T, Pond G, Greenspoon JN. Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme Treated with Short-Course Radiation Alone Compared to Short-Course Radiation and Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide Based on Performance Status and Extent of Resection. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:2399-2408. [PMID: 34206775 PMCID: PMC8293260 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28040220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Studies in elderly patients over the age of 65 with glioblastoma have shown survival benefits of short-course radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, making it the standard of care adopted at Juravinski Cancer Center. Our study retrospectively examines patients with GBM aged ≥ 70 at the JCC treated with short-course radiation alone compared to those treated with short-course radiation and concurrent and adjuvant TMZ, to determine if there is a difference in outcomes based on performance status. (2) Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at JCC using patients diagnosed with GBM in 2014–2017 (treated with the old protocol of short-course RT alone) versus those diagnosed in 2017–2019 (treated with the new protocol of short-course radiation and TMZ). Patient demographics, treatments, outcomes, and baseline KPS were analyzed. (3) Results: No clear benefit and more neurologic decline post treatment were seen in patients with borderline performance status and subtotal resection who underwent concurrent treatment with temozolomide and radiation. The addition of temozolomide was most helpful in patients with good performance status and a gross total resection. Variable outcomes were seen in patients with mixed traits. (4) Conclusions: This study suggests that performance status and extent of resection are significant determinants of patient response to treatment. In the case of elderly patients with borderline performance status and GTR or those with good performance status and STR, also described as “mixed traits”, it may be beneficial to pursue single modality treatment, ideally based on MGMT promoter methylation status as opposed to bimodality treatment in order to maintain the best QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taskia Mir
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(905)-3879495 (ext. 63123)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Voisin MR, Sasikumar S, Zadeh G. Predictors of survival in elderly patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab083. [PMID: 34355171 PMCID: PMC8331047 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) has a median age of diagnosis of 64 years old and the incidence increases with age. An increasing number of elderly patients are being diagnosed with GBM and undergoing surgery. These patients often present with multiple medical comorbidities and have significantly worse outcomes compared to adult patients. The goal of this study was to determine clinical predictors of survival in elderly patients undergoing surgery for GBM. Methods Our brain tumor database was reviewed for all patients 65 years of age and older that underwent surgery for newly diagnosed GBM over a 14-year period from 2005 to 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and treatment were collected. A total of 150 patients were included, and subdivided into two age categories; 65–74 years old and 75 years or older. Results The median OS for all patients was 9.4 months. Neither the presence nor number of medical comorbidities were associated with decreased survival (P = .9 and P = .1, respectively). Postoperative complications were associated with worse survival for all patients (HR = 2.34, P = .01) and occurred in patients in the older age category and patients with longer lengths of stay (P < .0001). Conclusions The presence of medical comorbidities is not a reason to exclude patients with GBM from surgical consideration. Excluding EOR and adjuvant treatment, postoperative complication is the most significant predictor of survival in elderly patients. Postoperative complications are associated with a longer LOS and are more common in patients 75 years of age and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew R Voisin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sanskriti Sasikumar
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ni H, Zhi R, Zuo J, Liu W, Xie P, Zhi Z. Pseudogene ANXA2P2 knockdown shows tumor-suppressive function by inhibition of the PI3K/PKB pathway in glioblastoma cells. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2021; 35:e22824. [PMID: 34047431 DOI: 10.1002/jbt.22824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The pseudogene annexin A2 pseudogene 2 (ANXA2P2) is highly expressed in glioblastoma (GBM). However, its role and mechanism involved in the progression of GBM remain poorly understood. ANXA2P2 messenger RNA expression was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The protein levels were detected by Western blot. Cell viability was evaluated by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assays. Cell invasive ability was investigated by the transwell assay and by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Cell apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry. The results showed that ANXA2P2 expression was increased in GBM tissues and cells. Silencing of ANXA2P2 inhibited the activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PKB) pathway in GBM cells. Knockdown of ANXA2P2 decreased cell viability, promoted LDH release, suppressed cell invasive ability, and EMT, and induced cell apoptosis in GBM cells. The addition of the PI3K/PKB activator 740Y-P abrogated the effects of ANXA2P2 knockdown on cell viability, LDH release, invasive ability, and apoptosis. In conclusion, knockdown of ANXA2P2 inhibited cell viability and invasion but promoted the apoptotic rate by suppressing the PI3K/PKB pathway in GBM cells. ANXA2P2 may represent a new target for the treatment of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongzao Ni
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Rongrong Zhi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lianshui County People's Hospital Affiliated to Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Jiandong Zuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Wenguang Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Peng Xie
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Zhongwen Zhi
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tritz ZP, Ayasoufi K, Johnson AJ. Anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade monotherapy in the orthotopic GL261 glioma model: the devil is in the detail. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab066. [PMID: 34151268 PMCID: PMC8209580 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The GL261 cell line, syngeneic on the C57BL/6 background, has, since its establishment half a century ago in 1970, become the most commonly used immunocompetent murine model of glioblastoma. As immunotherapy has entered the mainstream of clinical discourse in the past decade, this model has proved its worth as a formidable opponent against various immunotherapeutic combinations. Although advances in surgical, radiological, and chemotherapeutic interventions have extended mean glioblastoma patient survival by several months, 5-year survival postdiagnosis remains below 5%. Immunotherapeutic interventions, such as the ones explored in the murine GL261 model, may prove beneficial for patients with glioblastoma. However, even common immunotherapeutic interventions in the GL261 model still have unclear efficacy, with wildly discrepant conclusions being made in the literature regarding this topic. Here, we focus on anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade monotherapy as an example of this pattern. We contend that a fine-grained analysis of how biological variables (age, sex, tumor location, etc.) predict treatment responsiveness in this preclinical model will better enable researchers to identify glioblastoma patients most likely to benefit from checkpoint blockade immunotherapy moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachariah P Tritz
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Aaron J Johnson
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Corresponding Author: Aaron J. Johnson, PhD, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gatson NTN, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Drappatz J, Henriksson R, Hottinger AF, Hinoul P, Kruchko C, Puduvalli VK, Tran DD, Wong ET, Glas M. Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Oncol 2021; 11:679702. [PMID: 34026655 PMCID: PMC8139188 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has placed excessive strain on health care systems and is especially evident in treatment decision-making for cancer patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) patients are among the most vulnerable due to increased incidence in the elderly and the short survival time. A virtual meeting was convened on May 9, 2020 with a panel of neuro-oncology experts with experience using Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). The objective was to assess the risk-to-benefit ratio and provide guidance for using TTFields in GBM during the COVID-19 pandemic. Panel Discussion Topics discussed included support and delivery of TTFields during the COVID-19 pandemic, concomitant use of TTFields with chemotherapy, and any potential impact of TTFields on the immune system in an intrinsically immunosuppressed GBM population. Special consideration was given to TTFields' use in elderly patients and in combination with radiotherapy regimens. Finally, the panel discussed the need to better capture data on COVID-19positive brain tumor patients to analyze longitudinal outcomes and changes in treatment decision-making during the pandemic. Expert Opinion TTFields is a portable home-use device which can be managed via telemedicine and safely used in GBM patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. TTFields has no known immunosuppressive effects which is important during a crisis where other treatment methods might be limited, especially for elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities. It is too early to estimate the full impact of COVID-19 on the global healthcare system and on patient outcomes and the panel strongly recommended collaboration with existing cancer COVID-19 registries to follow CNS tumor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Tosha N Gatson
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Geisinger Health, Neuroscience & Cancer Institutes, Danville, PA & Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, United States.,Neuro-Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Jill Barnholtz-Sloan
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine & Research and Education, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jan Drappatz
- Hillman Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Roger Henriksson
- Department of Radiation Sciences & Oncology at the University of Ume, Ume, Sweden
| | - Andreas F Hottinger
- Departments of Clinical Neurosciences & Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Piet Hinoul
- Global Medical Affairs, Novocure Inc., New York, NY, United States
| | - Carol Kruchko
- Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), Hinsdale, IL, United States
| | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David D Tran
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery and Preston A. Wells, Jr. Brain Tumor Center at the McKnight Brain Institute of the University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Eric T Wong
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Martin Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Putavet DA, de Keizer PLJ. Residual Disease in Glioma Recurrence: A Dangerous Liaison with Senescence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1560. [PMID: 33805316 PMCID: PMC8038015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
With a dismally low median survival of less than two years after diagnosis, Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal type of brain cancer. The standard-of-care of surgical resection, followed by DNA-damaging chemo-/radiotherapy, is often non-curative. In part, this is because individual cells close to the resection border remain alive and eventually undergo renewed proliferation. These residual, therapy-resistant cells lead to rapid recurrence, against which no effective treatment exists to date. Thus, new experimental approaches need to be developed against residual disease to prevent GBM survival and recurrence. Cellular senescence is an attractive area for the development of such new approaches. Senescence can occur in healthy cells when they are irreparably damaged. Senescent cells develop a chronic secretory phenotype that is generally considered pro-tumorigenic and pro-migratory. Age is a negative prognostic factor for GBM stage, and, with age, senescence steadily increases. Moreover, chemo-/radiotherapy can provide an additional increase in senescence close to the tumor. In light of this, we will review the importance of senescence in the tumor-supportive brain parenchyma, focusing on the invasion and growth of GBM in residual disease. We will propose a future direction on the application of anti-senescence therapies against recurrent GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter L. J. de Keizer
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Division LAB, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584CG Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Grading Gliomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2021; 2020:2127062. [PMID: 33746649 PMCID: PMC7952179 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2127062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning- (ML-) based radiomics in differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGG) from low-grade gliomas (LGG) and to identify potential covariates that could affect the diagnostic accuracy of ML-based radiomic analysis in classifying gliomas. Method A primary literature search of the PubMed database was conducted to find all related literatures in English between January 1, 2009, and May 1, 2020, with combining synonyms for “machine learning,” “glioma,” and “radiomics.” Five retrospective designed original articles including LGG and HGG subjects were chosen. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, their 95% confidence interval, area under curve (AUC), and hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HSROC) models were obtained. Result The pooled sensitivity when diagnosing HGG was higher (96% (95% CI: 0.93, 0.98)) than the specificity when diagnosing LGG (90% (95% CI 0.85, 0.93)). Heterogeneity was observed in both sensitivity and specificity. Metaregression confirmed the heterogeneity in sample sizes (p=0.05), imaging sequence types (p=0.02), and data sources (p=0.01), but not for the inclusion of the testing set (p=0.19), feature extraction number (p=0.36), and selection of feature number (p=0.18). The results of subgroup analysis indicate that sample sizes of more than 100 and feature selection numbers less than the total sample size positively affected the diagnostic performance in differentiating HGG from LGG. Conclusion This study demonstrates the excellent diagnostic performance of ML-based radiomics in differentiating HGG from LGG.
Collapse
|
39
|
Fisher JP, Adamson DC. Current FDA-Approved Therapies for High-Grade Malignant Gliomas. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9030324. [PMID: 33810154 PMCID: PMC8004675 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9030324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard of care (SOC) for high-grade gliomas (HGG) is maximally safe surgical resection, followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for 6 weeks, then adjuvant TMZ for 6 months. Before this SOC was established, glioblastoma (GBM) patients typically lived for less than one year after diagnosis, and no adjuvant chemotherapy had demonstrated significant survival benefits compared with radiation alone. In 2005, the Stupp et al. randomized controlled trial (RCT) on newly diagnosed GBM patients concluded that RT plus TMZ compared to RT alone significantly improved overall survival (OS) (14.6 vs. 12.1 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS6) (53.9% vs. 36.4%). Outside of TMZ, there are four drugs and one device FDA-approved for the treatment of HGGs: lomustine, intravenous carmustine, carmustine wafer implants, bevacizumab (BVZ), and tumor treatment fields (TTFields). These treatments are now mainly used to treat recurrent HGGs and symptoms. TTFields is the only treatment that has been shown to improve OS (20.5 vs. 15.6 months) and PFS6 (56% vs. 37%) in comparison to the current SOC. TTFields is the newest addition to this list of FDA-approved treatments, but has not been universally accepted yet as part of SOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob P. Fisher
- Division of Biochemistry, Southern Virginia University, Buena Vista, VA 24416, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - David C. Adamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA;
- Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Decatur, GA 30033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Goldman DA, Reiner AS, Diamond EL, DeAngelis LM, Tabar V, Panageas KS. Lack of survival advantage among re-resected elderly glioblastoma patients: a SEER-Medicare study. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdaa159. [PMID: 33506202 PMCID: PMC7813163 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The survival benefit of re-resection for glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial, owing to the immortal time bias inadequately considered in many studies where re-resection was treated as a fixed, rather than a time-dependent factor. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare (SEER-Medicare) database, we assessed treatment patterns for older adults and evaluated the association between re-resection and overall survival (OS), accounting for the timing of re-resection. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included elderly patients (age ≥66) in the SEER-Medicare linked database diagnosed with GBM between 2006 and 2015 who underwent initial resection. Time-dependent Cox regression was used to assess the association between re-resection and OS, controlling for age, gender, race, poverty level, geographic region, marital status, comorbidities, receipt of radiation + temozolomide, and surgical complications. RESULTS Our analysis included 3604 patients with median age 74 (range: 66-96); 54% were men and 94% were white. After initial resection, 44% received radiation + temozolomide and these patients had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.31, P < .001). In total, 9.5% (n = 343) underwent re-resection. In multivariable analyses, no survival benefit was seen for patients who underwent re-resection (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.99-1.27, P = .07). CONCLUSIONS Re-resection rates were low among elderly GBM patients, and no survival advantage was observed for patients who underwent re-resection. However, patients who received standard of care at initial diagnosis had a lower risk of death. Older adults benefit from receiving radiation + temozolomide after initial resection, and future studies should assess the relationship between re-resection and OS taking the time of re-resection into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra A Goldman
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anne S Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eli L Diamond
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Viviane Tabar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Eftekhar Javadi A, Moradi Tabriz H, Zandnejadi A. Postoperative Extra-Cranial Metastasis of Glioblastoma: A Case Report. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2020; 16:90-94. [PMID: 33391387 PMCID: PMC7691704 DOI: 10.30699/ijp.2020.122780.2349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) is the most common malignant tumor of neural tissues in adults as a primary tumor. Because of blood brain barrier and short median survival of patients with glioblastoma, metastasis of this tumor is very rare. A 46-year-old man was admitted to Sina hospital with chief complaint of headache and visual impairment. After neuro-radiologic evaluation the patient underwent surgery. Pathologic examination of the tumor confirmed the diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme. Cytogenetic study of the tumor cells confirmed GBM IDH1 wild type with TERT mutation and EGFR amplification. Two months after surgical resection, the tumor recurred with involvement of the dura matter. After the second operation, metastasis to the pelvic cavity and cervical lymph node was found. Almost all cases of glioblastoma metastasis had undergone surgery or any manipulation; this fact suggests that iatrogenic intra-vascular seeding of tumor cells at the time of resection and disruption of blood brain barrier could cause extra-neural metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arezoo Eftekhar Javadi
- Department of Anatomical and Surgical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hedieh Moradi Tabriz
- Department of Anatomical and Surgical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Atieh Zandnejadi
- Department of Anatomical and Surgical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ius T, Somma T, Altieri R, Angileri FF, Barbagallo GM, Cappabianca P, Certo F, Cofano F, D'Elia A, Della Pepa GM, Esposito V, Fontanella MM, Germanò A, Garbossa D, Isola M, La Rocca G, Maiuri F, Olivi A, Panciani PP, Pignotti F, Skrap M, Spena G, Sabatino G. Is age an additional factor in the treatment of elderly patients with glioblastoma? A new stratification model: an Italian Multicenter Study. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 49:E13. [PMID: 33002864 DOI: 10.3171/2020.7.focus20420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Approximately half of glioblastoma (GBM) cases develop in geriatric patients, and this trend is destined to increase with the aging of the population. The optimal strategy for management of GBM in elderly patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the role of surgery in the elderly (≥ 65 years old) based on clinical, molecular, and imaging data routinely available in neurosurgical departments and to assess a prognostic survival score that could be helpful in stratifying the prognosis for elderly GBM patients. METHODS Clinical, radiological, surgical, and molecular data were retrospectively analyzed in 322 patients with GBM from 9 neurosurgical centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival. A random forest approach (classification and regression tree [CART] analysis) was utilized to create the prognostic survival score. RESULTS Survival analysis showed that overall survival (OS) was influenced by age as a continuous variable (p = 0.018), MGMT (p = 0.012), extent of resection (EOR; p = 0.002), and preoperative tumor growth pattern (evaluated with the preoperative T1/T2 MRI index; p = 0.002). CART analysis was used to create the prognostic survival score, forming six different survival groups on the basis of tumor volumetric, surgical, and molecular features. Terminal nodes with similar hazard ratios were grouped together to form a final diagram composed of five classes with different OSs (p < 0.0001). EOR was the most robust influencing factor in the algorithm hierarchy, while age appeared at the third node of the CART algorithm. The ability of the prognostic survival score to predict death was determined by a Harrell's c-index of 0.75 (95% CI 0.76-0.81). CONCLUSIONS The CART algorithm provided a promising, thorough, and new clinical prognostic survival score for elderly surgical patients with GBM. The prognostic survival score can be useful to stratify survival risk in elderly GBM patients with different surgical, radiological, and molecular profiles, thus assisting physicians in daily clinical management. The preliminary model, however, requires validation with future prospective investigations. Practical recommendations for clinicians/surgeons would strengthen the quality of the study; e.g., surgery can be considered as a first therapeutic option in the workflow of elderly patients with GBM, especially when the preoperative estimated EOR is greater than 80%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Ius
- 1Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine
| | - Teresa Somma
- 2Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples
| | - Roberto Altieri
- 3Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (G.F. Ingrassia); Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco" University Hospital, University of Catania
| | | | - Giuseppe Maria Barbagallo
- 3Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (G.F. Ingrassia); Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco" University Hospital, University of Catania.,4Interdisciplinary Research Center on Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment, University of Catania
| | - Paolo Cappabianca
- 2Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples
| | - Francesco Certo
- 3Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (G.F. Ingrassia); Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco" University Hospital, University of Catania.,4Interdisciplinary Research Center on Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment, University of Catania
| | - Fabio Cofano
- 6Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin
| | - Alessandro D'Elia
- 7Department of Neurosurgery "Giampaolo Cantore"-IRCSS Neuromed, Pozzilli
| | | | - Vincenzo Esposito
- 7Department of Neurosurgery "Giampaolo Cantore"-IRCSS Neuromed, Pozzilli.,9Department of Human Neurosciences-"Sapienza" University of Rome
| | - Marco Maria Fontanella
- 10Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia
| | - Antonino Germanò
- 5Division of Neurosurgery, BIOMORF Department, University of Messina
| | - Diego Garbossa
- 6Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin
| | | | - Giuseppe La Rocca
- 8Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome.,13Department of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Francesco Maiuri
- 2Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples
| | - Alessandro Olivi
- 8Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome
| | - Pier Paolo Panciani
- 10Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia
| | | | - Miran Skrap
- 1Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine
| | | | - Giovanni Sabatino
- 8Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome.,13Department of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gabrovsky N, Laleva M, Poptodorov G, Velinov N, Kamenova M, Kaneva R, Gabrovsky S. Impact of surgical treatment on the performance status of patients with high-grade gliomas. Neurol Res 2020; 42:1074-1079. [PMID: 32892718 DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1802147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of neurosurgical operative treatment on the performance status assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) in patients with HGG for the first, for the second intervention and for the different age groups. METHODS A group of 425 patients operated consecutively for high-grade gliomas were included in this study. The performance status was evaluated preoperatively and 15 days postoperatively with the KPS. Analyses for the different histological grade, tumor locations and age groups divided by decades have been made. RESULTS The initial, preoperative KPS score for patients with grade III tumor was 77.65 and for grade IV - 71.35. Following the first operation mean KPS has a statistically significant increase and reaches 82.24 and 78.41, respectively. The improvement of the performance status after the first operation was significant for all relevant age groups, including the sixth, seventh and eighth decades. Although the obtained mean KPS scores after the second operation did not show improvement there was also no clear evidence for worsening in this group of patients (n = 100) and the negative results obtained were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION According to our study, the first operation has a beneficial effect on the performance status in patients with HGG. The results for the second operation are more ambiguous, but there is no clear evidence for worsening of the KPS score after the second intervention. These results were relevant for all age groups, so we may expect amelioration in the performance status even in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolay Gabrovsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pirogov , Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Maria Laleva
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pirogov , Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - George Poptodorov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pirogov , Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nikolay Velinov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pirogov , Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Radka Kaneva
- Molecular Medicine Center, Medical University of Sofia , Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Stefan Gabrovsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pirogov , Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Di L, Heath RN, Shah AH, Sanjurjo AD, Eichberg DG, Luther EM, de la Fuente MI, Komotar RJ, Ivan ME. Resection versus biopsy in the treatment of multifocal glioblastoma: a weighted survival analysis. J Neurooncol 2020; 148:155-164. [PMID: 32394325 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03508-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Diffuse tumor invasion in multifocal/multicentric GBM (mGBM) often foreshadows poor survival outcome. The correlation between extent of resection in gliomas and patient outcome is well described. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of gross total resection compared to biopsy for mGBM on patient overall survival and progression free survival. METHODS Thirty-four patients with mGBM received either biopsy or resection of their largest enhancing lesion from 2011 to 2019. Relevant demographic, peri-operative, and radiographic data were collected. Tumor burden and extent of resection was assessed through measurement of pre-operative and post-operative contrast-enhancing volume. An adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for the covariates of age, number of lesions, satellite tumor volume, total pre-operative tumor volume, degree of spread, and location. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were identified with sixteen (47.1%) and eighteen (52.9%) patients receiving resection and biopsy respectively. Patients receiving resection exhibited greater median overall survival but not progression free survival compared to biopsy on IPTW analysis (p = 0.026, p = 0.411). Greater than or equal to 85% extent of resection was significantly associated with increased median overall survival (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION Overall, our study suggests that resection of the largest contrast-enhancing lesion may provide a survival benefit. Our volumetric analysis suggests that a greater degree of resection results in improved survival. Employing IPTW analysis, we sought to control for selection bias in our retrospective analysis. Thus, aggressive surgical treatment of mGBM may offer improved outcomes. Further clinical trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Di
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| | - Rainya N Heath
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Ashish H Shah
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Alexander D Sanjurjo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Daniel G Eichberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Evan M Luther
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Macarena I de la Fuente
- Department of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Ricardo J Komotar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terr, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nori P, Kline-Quiroz C, Stubblefield MD. Cancer Rehabilitation:: Acute and Chronic Issues, Nerve Injury, Radiation Sequelae, Surgical and Chemo-Related, Part 2. Med Clin North Am 2020; 104:251-262. [PMID: 32035567 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Cancer affects millions of individuals, and approximately half will develop functional impairments. Cancers that commonly, either from direct effects or from its treatments, result in functional impairments include breast, head and neck, brain, and spinal cord tumors. There is a plethora of potential impairments including pain, spasticity, dystonia, weakness, and neurogenic bowel or bladder. This article reviews the functional impairments frequently encountered in breast, head and neck, brain, and spinal cord tumors. The authors also discuss management and treatment options incorporated in comprehensive cancer rehabilitation to address these impairments to maximize and maintain function and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phalgun Nori
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA
| | - Cristina Kline-Quiroz
- MedStar Health/Georgetown, National Rehabilitation Hospital, 102 Irving Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Michael D Stubblefield
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Select Medical, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lisi L, Chiavari M, Ciotti GMP, Lacal PM, Navarra P, Graziani G. DNA inhibitors for the treatment of brain tumors. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2020; 16:195-207. [PMID: 32067518 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2020.1729352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The worldwide incidence of central nervous system (CNS) primary tumors is increasing. Most of the chemotherapeutic agents used for treating these cancer types induce DNA damage, and their activity is affected by the functional status of repair systems involved in the detection or correction of DNA lesions. Unfortunately, treatment of malignant high-grade tumors is still an unmet medical need.Areas covered: We summarize the action mechanisms of the main DNA inhibitors used for the treatment of brain tumors. In addition, studies on new agents or drug combinations investigated for this indication are reviewed, focusing our attention on clinical trials that in the last 3 years have been completed, terminated or are still recruiting patients.Expert opinion: Much still needs to be done to render aggressive CNS tumors curable or at least to transform them from lethal to chronic diseases, as it is possible for other cancer types. Drugs with improved penetration in the CNS, toxicity profile, and activity against primary and recurrent tumors are eagerly needed. Targeted agents with innovative mechanisms of action and ability to harness the cells of the tumor microenvironment against cancer cells represent a promising approach for improving the clinical outcome of CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Lisi
- Department of Safety and Bioethics, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Chiavari
- Department of Safety and Bioethics, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pedro M Lacal
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Navarra
- Department of Safety and Bioethics, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy.,Department of Safety and Bioethics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Grazia Graziani
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ius T, Pignotti F, Della Pepa GM, La Rocca G, Somma T, Isola M, Battistella C, Gaudino S, Polano M, Dal Bo M, Bagatto D, Pegolo E, Chiesa S, Arcicasa M, Olivi A, Skrap M, Sabatino G. A Novel Comprehensive Clinical Stratification Model to Refine Prognosis of Glioblastoma Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E386. [PMID: 32046132 PMCID: PMC7072471 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite recent discoveries in genetics and molecular fields, glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis still remains unfavorable with less than 10% of patients alive 5 years after diagnosis. Numerous studies have focused on the research of biological biomarkers to stratify GBM patients. We addressed this issue in our study by using clinical/molecular and image data, which is generally available to Neurosurgical Departments in order to create a prognostic score that can be useful to stratify GBM patients undergoing surgical resection. By using the random forest approach [CART analysis (classification and regression tree)] on Survival time data of 465 cases, we developed a new prediction score resulting in 10 groups based on extent of resection (EOR), age, tumor volumetric features, intraoperative protocols and tumor molecular classes. The resulting tree was trimmed according to similarities in the relative hazard ratios amongst groups, giving rise to a 5-group classification tree. These 5 groups were different in terms of overall survival (OS) (p < 0.000). The score performance in predicting death was defined by a Harrell's c-index of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [0.76-0.81]). The proposed score could be useful in a clinical setting to refine the prognosis of GBM patients after surgery and prior to postoperative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Ius
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Pignotti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy; (F.P.); (G.S.); (G.L.R.)
| | | | - Giuseppe La Rocca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy; (F.P.); (G.S.); (G.L.R.)
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.D.P.); (A.O.)
| | - Teresa Somma
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Miriam Isola
- Department of Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy; (M.I.); (C.B.)
| | - Claudio Battistella
- Department of Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy; (M.I.); (C.B.)
| | - Simona Gaudino
- Institute of radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Maurizio Polano
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (M.P.); (M.D.B.)
| | - Michele Dal Bo
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (M.P.); (M.D.B.)
| | - Daniele Bagatto
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging ASUIUD Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| | - Enrico Pegolo
- Institute of Pathology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| | - Silvia Chiesa
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Mauro Arcicasa
- Department of Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Olivi
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.D.P.); (A.O.)
| | - Miran Skrap
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Sabatino
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy; (F.P.); (G.S.); (G.L.R.)
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.D.P.); (A.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
The Plant-Derived Compound Resveratrol in Brain Cancer: A Review. Biomolecules 2020; 10:biom10010161. [PMID: 31963897 PMCID: PMC7023272 DOI: 10.3390/biom10010161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite intensive research, malignant brain tumors are among the most difficult to treat due to high resistance to conventional therapeutic approaches. High-grade malignant gliomas, including glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma, are among the most devastating and rapidly growing cancers. Despite the ability of standard treatment agents to achieve therapeutic concentrations in the brain, malignant gliomas are often resistant to alkylating agents. Resveratrol is a plant polyphenol occurring in nuts, berries, grapes, and red wine. Resveratrol crosses the blood‒brain barrier and may influence the central nervous system. Moreover, it influences the enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase and, more importantly, the resistance to standard treatment via various mechanisms, such as O6-methylguanine methyltransferase. This review summarizes the anticancer effects of resveratrol in various types of brain cancer. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have presented promising results; however, further clinical research is necessary to prove the therapeutic efficacy of resveratrol in brain cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
49
|
Nassiri F, Taslimi S, Wang JZ, Badhiwala JH, Dalcourt T, Ijad N, Pirouzmand N, Almenawer S, Stupp R, Zadeh G. Determining the Optimal Adjuvant Therapy for Improving Survival in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:2664-2672. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
50
|
|