1
|
Pavlovic B, Bräutigam K, Dartiguenave F, Martel P, Rakauskas A, Cesson V, Veit M, Oechslin P, Gu A, Hermanns T, Saba K, Poyet C, Hötker AM, Rupp NJ, Valerio M, Derré L, Eberli D, Banzola I. Urine biomarkers can predict prostate cancer and PI-RADS score prior to biopsy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:18148. [PMID: 39103428 PMCID: PMC11300834 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) based screening of prostate cancer (PCa) needs refinement. The aim of this study was the identification of urinary biomarkers to predict the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score and the presence of PCa prior to prostate biopsy. Urine samples from patients with elevated PSA were collected prior to prostate biopsy (cohort = 99). The re-analysis of mass spectrometry data from 45 samples was performed to identify urinary biomarkers to predict the PI-RADS score and the presence of PCa. The most promising candidates, i.e. SPARC-like protein 1 (SPARCL1), Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE1), Alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP), keratin 13 (KRT13), cluster of differentiation 99 (CD99) and hornerin (HRNR), were quantified by ELISA and validated in an independent cohort of 54 samples. Various biomarker combinations showed the ability to predict the PI-RADS score (AUC = 0.79). In combination with the PI-RADS score, the biomarkers improve the detection of prostate carcinoma-free men (AUC = 0.89) and of those with clinically significant PCa (AUC = 0.93). We have uncovered the potential of urinary biomarkers for a test that allows a more stringent prioritization of mpMRI use and improves the decision criteria for prostate biopsy, minimizing patient burden by decreasing the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blaz Pavlovic
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Konstantin Bräutigam
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Florence Dartiguenave
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martel
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Arnas Rakauskas
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Valérie Cesson
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Markus Veit
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Oechslin
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Gu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Karim Saba
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas M Hötker
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Pestalozzistrasse 3, 8032, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Derré
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Irina Banzola
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kawada T, Shim SR, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Pradere B, Yanagisawa T, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, von Deimling M, Teoh JYC, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Shariat SF. Diagnostic Accuracy of Liquid Biomarkers for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis of Multiple Thresholds. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:649-662. [PMID: 37981495 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Many liquid biomarkers have entered clinical practice with the praise to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), helping avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multianalyte biomarkers for csPCa detection using multiple thresholds. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive literature search was done through PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in March 2023 for prospective and retrospective studies reporting the diagnostic performance of liquid biomarkers for detecting csPCa. The outcomes of interest were the diagnostic performance of liquid biomarkers for csPCa detection and identification of optimal thresholds for each biomarker. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 49 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Using each representative threshold based on the Youden Index, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting csPCa were 0.85 and 0.37 for prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3), 0.85 and 0.52 for prostate health index (PHI), 0.87 and 0.58 for four kallikrein (4K), 0.82 and 0.56 for SelectMDx, 0.85 and 0.54 for ExoDx, and 0.82 and 0.59 for mi prostate score (MPS), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was highest for 4K (8.84), followed by MPS (7.0) and PHI (6.28). According to the meta-analysis incorporating multiple thresholds, the corresponding sensitivity was 0.77 for 4K, 0.69 for PHI, and 0.63 for PCA3; specificity was 0.72 for PHI, 0.70 for 4K, and 0.69 for PCA3. CONCLUSIONS Regarding the detection of csPCa, 4K had the highest diagnostic performance among the commercial liquid biomarkers. Based on the optimal thresholds calculated by the present meta-analysis, 4K had the highest sensitivity and PHI had the highest specificity for detecting csPCa. Nevertheless, clinical decision-making requires combination strategies between liquid and imaging biomarkers. PATIENT SUMMARY Novel biomarkers for prostate cancer detection were useful for more accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer to avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, AI-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Center: A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Y, Hatano K, Nonomura N. Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:42.e45. [PMID: 38772530 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major health concern that necessitates appropriate diagnostic approaches for timely intervention. This review critically evaluates the role of liquid biopsy techniques, focusing on blood- and urine-based biomarkers, in overcoming the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods. The 4Kscore test and Prostate Health Index have demonstrated efficacy in distinguishing PCa from benign conditions. Urinary biomarker tests such as PCa antigen 3, MyProstateScore, SelectMDx, and ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore test have revolutionized risk stratification and minimized unnecessary biopsies. Emerging biomarkers, including non-coding RNAs, circulating tumor DNA, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) glycosylation, offer valuable insights into PCa biology, enabling personalized treatment strategies. Advancements in non-invasive liquid biomarkers for PCa diagnosis may facilitate the stratification of patients and avoid unnecessary biopsies, particularly when PSA is in the gray area of 4 to 10 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutong Liu
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Koji Hatano
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu H, Wu Y, He P, Liang J, Xu X, Ji C. A meta-analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of SelectMDx in prostate cancer. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0285745. [PMID: 38329970 PMCID: PMC10852267 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
To overview the diagnostic accuracy of SelectMDx for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and to review sources of methodologic variability. Four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies investigating the diagnostic value of SelectMDx compared with the gold standard. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Included studies were assessed according to the Standards for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The review identified 14 relevant publications with 2579 patients. All reports constituted phase 1 biomarker studies. Pooled analysis of findings found an area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis curve of 70% [95% CI, 66%-74%], a sensitivity of 81% [95% CI, 69%-89%], and a specificity of 52% [95% CI, 41%-63%]. The positive likelihood ratio was 1.68, and the negative predictive value is 0.37. Factors that may influence variability in test results included the breath collection method, the patient's physiologic condition, the test environment, and the method of analysis. Considerable heterogeneity was observed among the studies owing to the difference in the sample size. SelectMDx appears to have moderate to good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating patients with clinically significant prostate cancer from people at high risk of developing prostate cancer. Higher-quality clinical studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SelectMDx for clinically significant cancer are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanting Wu
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanling Wu
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peijie He
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Juan Liang
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujuan Xu
- Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Conghua Ji
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dang VT, Péricart S, Manceau C, Aziza R, Portalez D, Lagarde S, Soulié M, Gamé X, Malavaud B, Thoulouzan M, Doumerc N, Prudhomme T, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M. Significant prostate cancer risk after MRI-guided biopsy showing benign findings: Results from a cohort of 381 men. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102547. [PMID: 37858376 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MRI-guided biopsy (MGB) contributes to the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa). However, there are no clear recommendations for the management of men after a negative MGB. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of csPCa after a first negative MGB. METHODS Between 2014 and 2020, we selected men with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3 on MRI and a negative MGB (showing benign findings) performed for suspected prostate cancer. MGB (targeted and systematic biopsies) was performed using fully integrated mobile fusion imaging (KOELIS). The primary endpoint was the rate of csPCa (defined as an ISUP grade ≥ 2) diagnosed after a first negative MGB. RESULTS A total of 381 men with a negative MGB and a median age of 65 (IQR: 59-69, range: 46-85) years were included. During the median follow-up of 31 months, 124 men (32.5%) had a new MRI, and 76 (19.9%) were referred for a new MGB, which revealed csPCa in 16 (4.2%) of them. We found no statistical difference in the characteristics of men diagnosed with csPCa compared with men with no csPCa after the second MGB. CONCLUSION We observed a risk of significant prostate cancer in 4% of men two years after a negative MRI-guided biopsy. Performing a repeat MRI could improve the selection of men who will benefit from a repeat MRI-guided biopsy, but a clear protocol is needed to follow these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V T Dang
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - S Péricart
- Department of Anatomopathological, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - C Manceau
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - R Aziza
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - D Portalez
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - S Lagarde
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - M Soulié
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - X Gamé
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - B Malavaud
- Department of Urology, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - M Thoulouzan
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - N Doumerc
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - T Prudhomme
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - G Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferro M, Rocco B, Maggi M, Lucarelli G, Falagario UG, Del Giudice F, Crocetto F, Barone B, La Civita E, Lasorsa F, Brescia A, Catellani M, Busetto GM, Tataru OS, Terracciano D. Beyond blood biomarkers: the role of SelectMDX in clinically significant prostate cancer identification. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2023; 23:1061-1070. [PMID: 37897252 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2277366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New potential biomarkers to pre-intervention identification of a clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) will prevent overdiagnosis and overtreatment and limit quality of life impairment of PCa patients. AREAS COVERED We have developed a comprehensive review focusing our research on the increasing knowledge of the role of SelectMDX® in csPCa detection. Areas identified as clinically relevant are the ability of SelectMDX® to predict csPCa in active surveillance setting, its predictive ability when combined with multiparametric MRI and the role of SelectMDX® in the landscape of urinary biomarkers. EXPERT OPINION Several PCa biomarkers have been developed either alone or in combination with clinical variables to improve csPCa detection. SelectMDX® score includes genomic markers, age, PSA, prostate volume, and digital rectal examination. Several studies have shown consistency in the ability to improve detection of csPCa, avoidance of unnecessary prostate biopsies, helpful in decision-making for clinical benefit of PCa patients with future well designed, and impactful studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science, University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via A. Di Rudini 8, Milan 20142, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Umberto I - 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Via A.Gramsci 89/91, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5 - 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology Unit, AORN Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Via Ferdinando Palasciano, 81100 Caserta , Italy
| | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I 40 - 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Umberto I - 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Brescia
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Michele Catellani
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Via A.Gramsci 89/91, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mures, Gh Marinescu 35, 540142 Târgu Mures, Romania
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I 40 - 80138 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
del Pino-Sedeño T, Infante-Ventura D, de Armas Castellano A, de Pablos-Rodríguez P, Rueda-Domínguez A, Serrano-Aguilar P, Trujillo-Martín MM. Molecular Biomarkers for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 46:105-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
8
|
A Model to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Integrating Urinary Peptide and Extracellular Vesicle RNA Data. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14081995. [PMID: 35454901 PMCID: PMC9027643 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a clinical need to improve assessment of biopsy-naïve patients for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we investigated whether the robust integration of expression data from urinary extracellular vesicle RNA (EV-RNA) with urine proteomic metabolites can accurately predict PCa biopsy outcome. Urine samples collected within the Movember GAP1 Urine Biomarker study (n = 192) were analysed by both mass spectrometry-based urine-proteomics and NanoString gene-expression analysis (167 gene-probes). Cross-validated LASSO penalised regression and Random Forests identified a combination of clinical and urinary biomarkers for predictive modelling of significant disease (Gleason Score (Gs) ≥ 3 + 4). Four predictive models were developed: ‘MassSpec’ (CE-MS proteomics), ‘EV-RNA’, and ‘SoC’ (standard of care) clinical data models, alongside a fully integrated omics-model, deemed ‘ExoSpec’. ExoSpec (incorporating four gene transcripts, six peptides, and two clinical variables) is the best model for predicting Gs ≥ 3 + 4 at initial biopsy (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77−0.88) and is superior to a standard of care (SoC) model utilising clinical data alone (AUC = 0.71, p < 0.001, 1000 resamples). As the ExoSpec Risk Score increases, the likelihood of higher-grade PCa on biopsy is significantly greater (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1−3.7). The decision curve analyses reveals that ExoSpec provides a net benefit over SoC and could reduce unnecessary biopsies by 30%.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sari Motlagh R, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Huebner NA, Baltzer PA, Karakiewicz PI, Heidenreich A, Shariat SF. Accuracy of SelectMDx compared to mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022; 25:187-198. [PMID: 35414118 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00538-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SelectMDx test is a promising biomarker that is developed based on detecting urinary messenger RNA in combination with clinical prostate cancer (PCa) risk factors. We aimed to compare SelectMDx and mpMRI as a diagnostic test in detecting PCa and high grade(HG)-PCa in men suspected to have PCa. METHODS According to PRISMA, a systematic search was performed using major web databases for studies published before September 30, 2021. Studies that compared sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of SelectMDx and/or mpMRI were included. The bivariate random model that plotted sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and likelihood ratio (LR) for PCa and HG-PCa detection was applied to compare SelectMDx, mpMRI, and combination strategies (both positive and one or both positive). RESULTS Seven studies comprising 1328 patients who had undergone SelectMDx and mpMRI to detect PCa were included. Regarding PCa detection, SelectMDx had a pooled sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 69.8%, PPV of 64.7%, NPV of 85%, and LRs of +2.68 to -0.27, while mpMRI had a pooled sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 73.4%, PPV of 72.4%, NPV of 83.5%, and LRs of +3.03 to -0.26. The one or both positive strategy had the highest sensitivity (96.3%), NPV (95.7%), and the lowest -LR (0.06). While the both positive strategy had the highest specificity (80.9%), the PPV (76.5%) and +LR (3.68). In the scenario of PI-RADS 3 lesions not being biopsied in case of a negative SelectMDx (n = 44), unnecessary biopsies would be reduced by 42% (44/105) while the risk of missing HG-PCa would be 9% (4/44). CONCLUSION The performance of SelectMDx is comparable to that of mpMRI with regards to PCa and HG-PCa detection. In addition, this biomarker could help refine the clinical decision-making regarding the necessity of a biopsy in patients suspected to has been PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilan Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Working Group for Diagnostic imaging in Urology (ABDU), Austrian association of Urology (ÖGU), Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascal A Baltzer
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. .,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. .,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. .,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. .,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. .,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bajeot AS, Covin B, Meyrignac O, Pericart S, Aziza R, Portalez D, Graff-Cailleaud P, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M, Malavaud B. Managing Discordant Findings Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Prostate Biopsy-The Key Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Transperineal Biopsy. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:296-303. [PMID: 34154979 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discordant findings between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transrectal image-guided biopsies of the prostate (TRUS-P) may result in inadequate risk stratification of localized prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To assess transperineal image-guided biopsies of the index target (TPER-IT) in terms of disease reclassification and treatment recommendations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cases referred for suspicion or treatment of localized prostate cancer were reviewed in a multidisciplinary setting, and discordance was characterized into three scenarios: type I-negative biopsies or International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 1 cancer in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥4 index target (IT); type II-negative biopsies or ISUP grade 1 cancer in anterior IT; and type III-<3 mm stretch of cancer in PI-RADS ≥3 IT. Discordant findings were characterized in 132/558 (23.7%) patients after TRUS-P. Of these patients, 102 received reassessment TPER-IT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary objective was to report changes in treatment recommendations after TPER-IT. Therefore, cores obtained by primary TRUS-P and TPER-IT were analyzed in terms of cancer detection, ISUP grade, and Cambridge Prognostic Group classification using descriptive statistics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS TPER-IT biopsies that consisted of fewer cores than the initial TRUS-P (seven vs 14, p < 0.0001) resulted in more cancer tissue materials for analysis (56 vs 42.5 mm, p = 0.0003). As a result, 40% of patients initially considered for follow-up (12/30) and 49% for active surveillance (30/61) were reassigned after TPER-IT to surgery or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Nonconcordance between pathology and imaging was observed in a significant proportion of patients receiving TRUS-P. TPER-IT better informed the presence and grade of cancer, resulting in a significant impact on treatment recommendations. A multidisciplinary review of mpMRI and TRUS-P findings and reassessment TPER-IT in type I-II discordances is recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, patients with suspicious imaging of the prostate, but no or well-differentiated cancer on transrectal image-guided -biopsies, were offered transperineal image-guided biopsies for reassessment. We found that a large share of these had a more aggressive cancer than initially suspected. We conclude that discordant results warrant reassessment transperineal image-guided biopsies as these may impact disease risk classification and treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie Bajeot
- Department of Urology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France; Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Bertrand Covin
- Department of Urology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - Oliver Meyrignac
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - Sarah Pericart
- Department of Pathology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - Richard Aziza
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - Daniel Portalez
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France; Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France; Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Bernard Malavaud
- Department of Urology, Toulouse Cancer Institute, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Maggi M, De Marco F, Porreca A, Sperduti I, Magliocca FM, Salciccia S, Chung BI, De Berardinis E, Sciarra A. Prospective assessment of two-gene urinary test with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate for men undergoing primary prostate biopsy. World J Urol 2021; 39:1869-1877. [PMID: 32681273 PMCID: PMC8217060 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03359-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SelectMDx and its association with multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) on prostate biopsies among men scheduled for initial prostate biopsy. METHODS In this single-center prospective study, 52 men scheduled for initial prostate biopsy, based on elevated total PSA level (> 3 ng/ml) or abnormal digital rectal examination, were consecutively included. All subjects underwent SelectMDx, PSA determination and mpMRI. RESULTS SelectMDx score was positive in 94.1 and 100% of PCa and csPCa, respectively, and in only 8.6% of negative cases at biopsy. The probability for a csPCa at the SelectMDx score was significantly (p = 0.002) higher in csPCa (median value 52.0%) than in all PCa (median value 30.0%). SelectMDx showed slightly lower sensitivity (94.1 versus 100.0%) but higher specificity (91.4%) than total PSA (17.1%), and the same sensitivity but higher specificity than mpMRI (80.0%) in predicting PCa at biopsy. The association of SelectMDx plus mpMRI rather than PSA density (PSAD) plus mpMRI showed higher specificity (both 91.4%) compared to the association of PSA plus mpMRI (85.7%). In terms of csPCa predictive value, SelectMDx showed higher specificity (73.3%) than PSA (13.3%) and mpMRI (64.4%); as for the association of SelectMDx plus mpMRI (75.6%) versus PSA plus mpMRI (68.9%), the association of PSAD plus mpMRI showed the highest specificity (80.0%). CONCLUSION Our results of SelectMDx can be confirmed as significant but their impact on clinical practice together with a cost-effectiveness evaluation should be investigated in a larger prospective multicenter analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ferdinando De Marco
- I.N.I Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano-Urology Division-Grottaferrata, Grottaferrata, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistical Unit-IRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Massimo Magliocca
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Salciccia
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guo CC, Shen SS, Ro JY. Pathogenesis and Diagnosis of Genitourinary Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:347. [PMID: 33477810 PMCID: PMC7832837 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Genitourinary (GU) cancers are among the most common malignant diseases in men [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C. Guo
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 085, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Steven S. Shen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Jae Y. Ro
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Couñago F, López-Campos F, Díaz-Gavela AA, Almagro E, Fenández-Pascual E, Henríquez I, Lozano R, Linares Espinós E, Gómez-Iturriaga A, de Velasco G, Quintana Franco LM, Rodríguez-Melcón I, López-Torrecilla J, Spratt DE, Guerrero LL, Martínez-Salamanca JI, del Cerro E. Clinical Applications of Molecular Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1550. [PMID: 32545454 PMCID: PMC7352850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is clinically relevant molecular heterogeneity in prostate cancer (PCa), but this biological diversity has had only a minimal impact on clinical practice. Treatment outcomes in patients with localised PCa are often highly variable, even among patients stratified to the same risk group or disease state based on standard clinical and pathological parameters. In recent years, the development of gene panels has provided valuable data on the differential expression of genes in patients with PCa. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to identify and validate prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can be applied across clinical scenarios, ranging from localised disease to metastatic castration-resistant PCa. The availability of such tools would allow for precision medicine to finally reach PCa patients. In this review, we evaluate current data on molecular biomarkers for PCa, with an emphasis on the biomarkers and gene panels with the most robust evidence to support their application in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Couñago
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Almagro
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Esaú Fenández-Pascual
- Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.F.-P.); (E.L.E.)
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Iván Henríquez
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain;
| | - Rebeca Lozano
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Genitourinary Cancer Traslational Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research, 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Estefanía Linares Espinós
- Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.F.-P.); (E.L.E.)
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | | | | | | | - Ignacio Rodríguez-Melcón
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain;
| | - José López-Torrecilla
- Radiation Oncology-ERESA, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Luis Leonardo Guerrero
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca
- Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.F.-P.); (E.L.E.)
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Madrid, Spain
| | - Elia del Cerro
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|