Imaging Features and Patterns of Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with RET Rearrangements

Targeting ALK receptors in non-small cell lung cancer: what is the road ahead?

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene-rearrangements are identified in about 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), and ALK-rearranged NSCLC is to be considered an oncogene-addicted cancer with peculiar clinical characteristics.

AREAS COVERED

Several ALK inhibitors have been studied and approved for use in the treatment of advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC with reported superiority in terms of efficacy and safety profile compared with chemotherapy. Second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) offer to NSCLC patients a clinically meaningful prolongment of survival with a very good quality of life profile. However, resistances to these agents always occur, with less satisfying options for second-line treatments. Direct comparisons among these agents are not available, and the choice among brigatinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib as first-line treatment remains challenging. Very recently, alectinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy also in resected stage IB-IIIA ALK-rearranged NSCLC, extending the clinical benefit offered by ALK inhibitors also to the adjuvant setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Future development of ALK inhibitors in NSCLC treatment includes the search for optimal management of acquired resistance to first-line treatments and the extension of use of ALK inhibitors also to neoadjuvant and preferably to perioperative setting.

RET Fusion Testing in Patients With NSCLC: The RETING Study

Introduction

RET inhibitors with impressive overall response rates are now available for patients with NSCLC, yet the identification of RET fusions remains a difficult challenge. Most guidelines encourage the upfront use of next-generation sequencing (NGS), or alternatively, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) when NGS is not possible or available. Taken together, the suboptimal performance of single-analyte assays to detect RET fusions, although consistent with the notion of encouraging universal NGS, is currently widening some of the clinical practice gaps in the implementation of predictive biomarkers in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

This situation prompted us to evaluate several RET assays in a large multicenter cohort of RET fusion-positive NSCLC (n = 38) to obtain real-world data. In addition to RNA-based NGS (the criterion standard method), all positive specimens underwent break-apart RET FISH with two different assays and were also tested by an RT-PCR assay.

Results

The most common RET partners were KIF5B (78.9%), followed by CCDC6 (15.8%). The two RET NGS-positive but FISH-negative samples contained a KIF5B(15)-RET(12) fusion. The three RET fusions not identified with RT-PCR were AKAP13(35)-RET(12), KIF5B(24)-RET(9) and KIF5B(24)-RET(11). All three false-negative RT-PCR cases were FISH-positive, exhibited a typical break-apart pattern, and contained a very high number of positive tumor cells with both FISH assays. Signet ring cells, psammoma bodies, and pleomorphic features were frequently observed (in 34.2%, 39.5%, and 39.5% of tumors, respectively).

Conclusions

In-depth knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of the different RET testing methodologies could help clinical and molecular tumor boards implement and maintain sensible algorithms for the rapid and effective detection of RET fusions in patients with NSCLC. The likelihood of RET false-negative results with both FISH and RT-PCR reinforces the need for upfront NGS in patients with NSCLC.

2021 WHO Classification of Lung Cancer: Molecular Biology Research and Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for thoracic tumors (including lung cancer) contains several updates to the 2015 edition. Revisions for lung cancer include a new grading system for invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma that better reflects prognosis, reorganization of squamous cell carcinomas and neuroendocrine neoplasms, and description of some new entities. Moreover, remarkable advancements in our knowledge of genetic mutations and targeted therapies have led to a much greater emphasis on genetic testing than that in 2015. In 2015, guidelines recommended evaluation of only two driver mutations, ie, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions, in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The 2021 guidelines recommend testing for numerous additional gene mutations for which targeted therapies are now available including ROS1, RET, NTRK1-3, KRAS, BRAF, and MET. The correlation of imaging features and genetic mutations is being studied. Testing for the immune biomarker programmed death ligand 1 is now recommended before starting first-line therapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Because 70% of lung cancers are unresectable at patient presentation, diagnosis of lung cancer is usually based on small diagnostic samples (ie, biopsy specimens) rather than surgical resection specimens. The 2021 version emphasizes differences in the histopathologic interpretation of small diagnostic samples and resection specimens. Radiologists play a key role not only in evaluation of tumor and metastatic disease but also in identification of optimal biopsy targets. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions in the supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.

Six-Membered Aromatic Nitrogen Heterocyclic Anti-Tumor Agents: Synthesis and Applications

Cancer stands as a serious malady, posing substantial risks to human well-being and survival. This underscores the paramount necessity to explore and investigate novel antitumor medications. Nitrogen-containing compounds, especially those derived from natural sources, form a highly significant category of antitumor agents. Among these, antitumor agents with six-membered aromatic nitrogen heterocycles have consistently attracted the attention of chemists and pharmacologists. Accordingly, we present a comprehensive summary of synthetic strategies and clinical implications of these compounds in this review. This entails an in-depth analysis of synthesis pathways for pyridine, quinoline, pyrimidine, and quinazoline. Additionally, we explore the historical progression, targets, mechanisms of action, and clinical effectiveness of small molecule inhibitors possessing these structural features.

Noggin contributes to brain metastatic colonization of lung cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis is a common complication among patients with lung cancer, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the pathogenesis of brain metastasis in lung cancer.

METHODS

We established highly colonizing metastatic lung cancer cells, A549-M2, through multiple implantations of A549 human lung cancer cells in the carotid artery of athymic nude mice.

RESULTS

Compared to parental cells (M0), M2 cells demonstrated slower growth in culture plates and soft agar, as well as lower motility and higher adhesion, key characteristics of mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET). Further analysis revealed that M2 cells exhibited decreased expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers, including ZEB1 and Vimentin. M2 cells also demonstrated reduced invasiveness in co-culture systems. RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis confirmed that M2 cells underwent MET. Intriguingly, depletion of Noggin, a BMP antagonist, was observed in M2 cells, and replenishment of Noggin restored suppressed migration and invasion of M2 cells. In addition, Noggin knockdown in control M0 cells promoted cell attachment and suppressed cell migration, suggesting that Noggin reduction during brain colonization causes inhibition of migration and invasion of metastatic lung cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that lung cancer cells undergo MET and lose their motility and invasiveness during brain metastatic colonization, which is dependent on Noggin.

Lung adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: Molecular markers testing and treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

Among the histologic types of lung cancer, adenocarcinoma is the most common. Moreover, lung adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (LANED) is a rare histologic character. So far, the clinical significance remains unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched for the patients diagnosed with LANED from the electronic pathology database between January 2000 and June 2020 in a tertiary hospital. The tumor specimens were reviewed by a pathologist to confirm the diagnosis. EGFR mutation, ALK translocation, as well as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and rearranged during transfection (RET) expression were tested in the specimens of LANED. The clinical data were also collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients diagnosed with LANED were included. Most were male (80%) and ever smokers (70%). The median age was 71.5 years old. At diagnosis, most had tumors harboring no EGFR mutation (70%), negative ALK translocation (88.9%), and without PD-L1 expression (90%). All specimens tested by immunohistochemical staining for RET expression (n = 9) showed positive results. Among the 10 patients, five underwent operation (stage I, n = 4; stage II, n = 1). The patient with stage II disease had recurrence 11 months later. For patients with advanced stages (stage III, n = 1; stage IV, n = 4), the treatment modalities varied and the overall survival ranged from 11.0 to 46.7 months.

CONCLUSION

LANED might be associated with a high proportion of RET expression, whereas EGFR mutation, ALK alteration, and PD-L1 expression were uncommon. Further large-scale prospective studies on molecular testing profile and clinical significance of LANED are warranted.

Clinical experience and management of adverse events in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer receiving alectinib

Alectinib is a preferred first-line therapy for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in several national clinical practice guidelines. The randomized, global, phase III ALEX study has demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival for alectinib over crizotinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive NSCLC. It was also the first study to show clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival for a next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor relative to crizotinib. The J-ALEX and ALESIA phase III studies confirmed the clinical benefit of alectinib relative to crizotinib in the first-line ALK-positive NSCLC treatment setting in Japanese and Asian patients, respectively. Across these pivotal phase III trials, alectinib had a manageable, well-characterized safety profile. Here, we review the safety and tolerability of long-term alectinib treatment in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and provide guidance for physicians, based on clinical experience, on the management of the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs). Most AEs associated with alectinib can be managed by dose reduction. Some alectinib-related AEs are not yet fully characterized, including myalgia and peripheral oedema and deciphering their underlying mechanism of action could enhance their management. With longer-term follow-up, the safety profile of alectinib continues to remain consistent in the ALEX study, with no new safety signals observed. Safety and tolerability data from the first-line phase III alectinib trials are also consistent with those observed in clinical trials of alectinib in later-line settings. These results add to the weight of evidence recommending alectinib as a preferred therapy for treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

Molecular typing of lung adenocarcinoma with computed tomography and CT image-based radiomics: a narrative review of research progress and prospects

Objective

The purpose of this paper was to perform a narrative review of current research evidence on conventional computed tomography (CT) imaging features and CT image-based radiomic features for predicting gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma and discuss how to translate the research findings to guide future practice.

Background

Lung cancer, especially lung adenocarcinoma, is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. With advances in the diagnosis and treatment of lung adenocarcinoma with the emergence of molecular testing, the prediction of oncogenes and even drug resistance gene mutations have become key to individualized and precise clinical treatment in order to prolong survival and improve quality of life. The progress of imageological examination includes the development of CT and radiomics are promising quantitative methods for predicting different gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma, especially common mutations, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutation.

Methods

The PubMed electronic database was searched along with a set of terms specific to lung adenocarcinoma, radiomics (including texture analysis), CT, computed tomography, EGFR, ALK, KRAS, rearranging transfection (RET) rearrangement and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS-1), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutations et al. This review has been reported in compliance with the Narrative Review checklist guidelines. From each full-text article, information was extracted regarding a set of terms above.

Conclusions

Research on the application of conventional CT features and CT image-based radiomic features for predicting the gene mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma is still in a preliminary stage. Noninvasively determination of mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma before targeted therapy with conventional CT features and CT image-based radiomic features remains both hopes and challenges. Before radiomics could be applied in clinical practice, more work needs to be done.

Primary tumor location in lung cancer: the evaluation and administration

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, which is classically subgrouped into two major histological types: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (85% of patients) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (15%). Tumor location has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of various solid tumors. Several types of cancer often occur in a specific region and are more prone to spread to predilection locations, including colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, bladder cancer, lung tumor, and so on. Besides, tumor location is also considered as a risk factor for lung neoplasm with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema. Additionally, the primary lung cancer location is associated with specific lymph node metastasis. And the recent analysis has shown that the primary location may affect metastasis pattern in metastatic NSCLC based on a large population. Numerous studies have enrolled the "location" factor in the risk model. Anatomy location and lobe-specific location are both important in prognosis. Therefore, it is important for us to clarify the characteristics about tumor location according to various definitions. However, the inconsistent definitions about tumor location among different articles are controversial. It is also a significant guidance in multimode therapy in the present time. In this review, we mainly aim to provide a new insight about tumor location, including anatomy, clinicopathology, and prognosis in patients with lung neoplasm.

Cancer driver gene and non-coding RNA alterations as biomarkers of brain metastasis in lung cancer: A review of the literature

Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common event in patients with lung cancer. Despite multimodal treatments and advances in systemic therapies, development of BM remains one of the main factors associated with poor prognosis and mortality in patients with lung cancer. Therefore, better understanding of mechanisms involved in lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM) is of great importance to suppress cancer cells and to improve the overall survival of patients. Several cancer-related genes such as EGFR and KRAS have been proposed as potential predictors of LCBM. In addition, there is ample evidence supporting crucial roles of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in mediating LCBM. In this review, we provide comprehensive information on risk assessment, predictive, and prognostic panels for early detection of BM in patients with lung cancer. Moreover, we present an overview of LCBM molecular mechanisms, cancer driver genes, and ncRNAs which may predict the risk of BM in lung cancer patients. Recent clinical studies have focused on determining mechanisms involved in LCBM and their association with diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes. These studies have shown that alterations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and ALK, as the most frequent coding gene alterations, and dysregulation of ncRNAs such as miR-423, miR-330-3p, miR-145, piR-651, and MALAT1 can be considered as potential biomarkers of LCBM.

RET Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

RET rearrangements are observed in 1-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and result in the constitutive activation of downstream pathways normally implied in cell proliferation, growth, differentiation and survival. In NSCLC patients, RET rearrangements have been associated with a history of non-smoking, a higher rate of brain metastasis at initial diagnosis and a low immune infiltrate. Traditionally, RET fusions are considered mutually exclusive with other oncogenic drivers, even though a co-occurrence with EGFR mutations and MET amplifications has been observed. Cabozantinib, vandetanib and lenvatinib are the first multi-kinase inhibitors tested in RET-rearranged NSCLC patients with contrasting results. More recently, two selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, demonstrated higher efficacy rates and good tolerability and they were approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC on the bases of the results of phase II studies. Two ongoing phase III clinical trials are currently comparing selpercatinib or pralsetinib to standard first line treatments and will definitively establish their efficacy in RET-positive NSCLC patients.

Relationship between clinical features and gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer with osteoblastic bone metastasis

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer patients presenting with osteoblastic bone metastases at the first visit is rare. We investigated the clinical characteristics and gene mutation rate of non-small cell lung cancer patients with osteoblastic bone metastases at the time of the initial diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively screened newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer patients with osteoblastic bone metastases who presented from June 2015 to March 2021, and analyzed their clinical characteristics and status of EGFR gene mutations, EML4-ALK translocation and ROS1 rearrangements. For comparison, we collected data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had osteolytic bone metastases at their first visit between June 2015 and March 2021.

RESULTS

Fifty patients had bone metastases at the initial diagnosis. Among them, eight patients (8/50 = 16%) had osteoblastic bone metastases, and the lung tumors in all of them were histopathologically adenocarcinomas. Among the eight cases, two were EGFR mutation-positive, none were EML4-ALK translocation-positive, two were ROS1 rearrangement-positive, and the remaining four cases were negative for all three gene mutations/rearrangements. Compared with the osteolytic bone metastasis group, the percentage of non-smokers was higher (p = 0.020) and the ROS1 rearrangement positivity rate was higher (p = 0.05) in the osteoblastic bone metastasis group.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that osteoblastic bone metastases in NSCLC are suggestive of adenocarcinoma, and that a high proportion of these patients might be positive for ROS1 rearrangements, and hence, indicated for more aggressive diagnostic biopsies.

Clinical and Imaging Features of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with G12C KRAS Mutation

Simple Summary

KRAS G12C mutations are important oncogenic mutations in lung cancer that can now be targeted by allosteric small molecule inhibitors. We assessed the imaging features and patterns of metastases in these lung cancers compared to other mutated lung cancers. We found that KRAS G12C NSCLC has distinct primary tumor imaging features and patterns of metastasis when compared to those of NSCLC driven by other genetic alterations. These distinct imaging features may offer clues to its presence and potentially guide management in the future.

Abstract

KRAS G12C mutations are important oncogenic mutations that confer sensitivity to direct G12C inhibitors. We retrospectively identified patients with KRAS+ NSCLC from 2015 to 2019 and assessed the imaging features of the primary tumor and the distribution of metastases of G12C NSCLC compared to those of non-G12C KRAS NSCLC and NSCLC driven by oncogenic fusion events (RET, ALK, ROS1) and EGFR mutations at the time of initial diagnosis. Two hundred fifteen patients with KRAS+ NSCLC (G12C: 83; non-G12C: 132) were included. On single variate analysis, the G12C group was more likely than the non-G12C KRAS group to have cavitation (13% vs. 5%, p = 0.04) and lung metastasis (38% vs. 21%; p = 0.043). Compared to the fusion rearrangement group, the G12C group had a lower frequency of pleural metastasis (21% vs. 41%, p = 0.01) and lymphangitic carcinomatosis (4% vs. 39%, p = 0.0001) and a higher frequency of brain metastasis (42% vs. 22%, p = 0.005). Compared to the EGFR+ group, the G12C group had a lower frequency of lung metastasis (38% vs. 67%, p = 0.0008) and a higher frequency of distant nodal metastasis (10% vs. 2%, p = 0.02). KRAS G12C NSCLC may have distinct primary tumor imaging features and patterns of metastasis when compared to those of NSCLC driven by other genetic alterations.

Inferior outcome of bone metastasis in non-small-cell-lung-cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

•

BoM was prone to multiple organs metastases and had more complex aberrations.

•

BoM was associated with worse prognosis which cannot be salvaged by Osimertinib.

•

BoM was an independent prognostic factor for EGFR-TKI treatment in PFS and OS.

Background

Targeted therapy has been established as the standard-of-care for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Among patients with advanced lung cancer, 30–40% have bone metastases (BoM) at first diagnosis. However, little is known on the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of BoM in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Methods

Treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who were prescribed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were screened and enrolled between June 2009 and April 2019 from West China Hospital. Patients were dichotomized according to whether they had BoM. The demographic characteristics, gene mutation status and therapeutic efficacy, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were collected.

Results

A cohort of 604 patients were enrolled. The BoM group had worse PFS (11.7 vs. 14.0 months, HR = 0.73, p = 0.00013) and OS (32.8 vs. 46.1 months, HR = 0.54, p < 0.0001) compared with the non-BoM group. No significant differences were observed in disease control rate (p = 0.407) or ORR (p = 0.537) between the two groups. The metastatic sites in the two groups exhibited obvious differences. In multivariate analysis, BoM was found to be an independent factor of worse prognosis.

Conclusion

BoM was identified as an independent inferior prognostic factor for EGFR-TKI treatment, and may have complex biological implications.

Management and Outcomes of Suspected Infectious and Inflammatory Lung Abnormalities Identified on Lung Cancer Screening CT

Background: Incidental findings are frequently encountered during lung cancer screening (LCS). Limited data describe the prevalence of suspected acute infectious and inflammatory lung processes on LCS and how they should be managed. Objective: To determine the prevalence, radiologic reporting and management, and outcome of suspected infectious and inflammatory lung processes identified incidentally during LCS, and to propose a management algorithm. Methods: This retrospective study included 6314 low dose CT (LDCT) examinations performed between June 2014 and April 2019 in 3800 patients as part of an established LCS program. Radiology reports were reviewed, and patients with potentially infectious or inflammatory lung abnormalities were identified and analyzed for descriptors of imaging findings, Lung-RADS designation, recommendations, and clinical outcomes. Based on the descriptors, outcomes and a >2% threshold risk of malignancy, a follow-up algorithm was developed to decrease additional imaging without affecting cancer detection. Results: A total of 331/3800 (8.7%) patients (178 men, 153 women; mean age: 66 ± 7 years) undergoing LCS had lung findings that were attributed to infection or inflammation. These abnormalities were reported as potentially significant findings using the "S" modifier in 149/331 (45.0%) and as the "dominant nodule" determining the Lung-RADS category in 96/331 (29.0%). Abnormalities were multiple or multifocal in 260/331 (78.5%). Common descriptors were ground-glass (155/331; 46.8%), tree-in-bud (56/331; 16.9%), consolidation (41/331; 12.4%), and clustered (67/331; 20.2%) opacities. A follow-up chest CT outside of screening was performed within 12 months or less in 264/331 (79.8%) and within 6 months or less in 286/331 (56.2%). A total of 260/331 (78.5%) opacities resolved on follow-up imaging. Two malignancies (2/331; 0.60%) were associated with these abnormalities, and both had consolidations. Theoretical adoption of a proposed management algorithm for suspected infectious and inflammatory findings reduced unnecessary follow-up imaging by 82.6% without missing a single malignancy. Conclusions: Presumed acute infectious or inflammatory lung abnormalities are frequently encountered in the setting of LCS. These opacities are commonly multifocal and resolve on follow-up. Less than 1% are associated with malignancy. Clinical impact: Adoption of a conservative management algorithm can standardize recommendations and reduce unnecessary imaging without increasing the risk of missing a malignancy.

Clinical and Imaging Features of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Young Patients

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in young adult patients is rare, with scarce data available in patients aged < 40 years and even less in those aged < 35 years. Our goal was to determine the presenting symptoms, clinicopathologic characteristics, and imaging features of young patients with NSCLC at time of diagnosis and compare them to those of older adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and imaging of young patients (≤ 40 years old) with NSCLC treated at our institution between 1998 and 2018. Patients < 35 years old were compared to those between 35 and 40 years old. Characteristics of patients ≤ 40 years old were compared to older patients (> 40 years) from publicly available data sets.

RESULTS

We identified 166 young patients with NSCLC (median age, 36.6 years; range, 18-40 years). Most presented with nonspecific respiratory symptoms and were diagnosed with pneumonia (84/136, 62%). Compared to patients < 35 years old, patients 35-40 years old were more likely to have malignancy detected incidentally (15% vs. 5%, P = .04). Patients < 35 years old were more likely to have central tumors (55% vs. 33%, P = .02) and to have bone (38% vs. 19%, P = .007) and lung (39% vs. 24%, P = .03) metastases. Compared to older patients (> 40 years), young patients were more likely to be never smokers (65.0% vs. 14.7%, P < .001) and to have advanced disease (88% vs. 66%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Young patients with NSCLC often present with nonspecific symptoms and have advanced disease at diagnosis, often mimicking other pathologies. Awareness of the clinical presentation and imaging features of NSCLC in young patients may help minimize delays in diagnoses.