Muscle Characteristics Obtained Using Computed Tomography as Prognosticators in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Small non-coding RNA profiling in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Small non-coding (snc)RNAs, including microRNAs and P-element induced wimpy testis (PIWI)-interacting-RNAs (piRNAs), crucially regulate gene expression in both physiological and pathological conditions. In particular, some muscle-specific microRNAs (myomiRs) have been involved in the pathogenesis of cancer-induced muscle wasting. The aims of the present study were (i) to profile sncRNAs in both skeletal muscle and plasma of gastrointestinal cancer patients and (ii) to investigate the association among differentially expressed sncRNAs and the level of muscularity at body composition analysis.

METHODS

Surgical patients with gastrointestinal cancer or benign disease were recruited. Blood samples and muscle biopsies (rectus abdominis) were collected during surgery. Low muscularity patients were those at the lowest tertile of skeletal muscle index (SMI; CT-scan), whereas moderate/high muscularity patients were in the middle and highest SMI tertiles. SncRNAs in the muscle were assessed by RNAseq, circulating microRNAs were evaluated by qPCR.

RESULTS

Cancer patients (n = 25; 13 females, 52%) showed a mean age of 71.6 ± 11.2 years, a median body weight loss of 4.2% and a mean BMI of 27.0 ± 3.2 kg/m2 . Control group (n = 15; 9 females, 60%) showed a mean age 58.1 ± 13.9 years and a mean BMI of 28.0 ± 4.3 kg/m2 . In cancer patients, the median L3-SMI (cm2 /m2 ) was 42.52 (34.42; 49.07). Males showed a median L3-SMI of 46.08 (41.17-51.79) and females a median L3-SMI of 40.77 (33.73-42.87). Moderate-high and low muscularity groups included 17 and 8 patients, respectively. As for circulating microRNAs, miR-21-5p and miR-133a-3p were up-regulated in patients compared with controls, whereas miR-15b-5p resulted down-regulated in the same comparison (about 30% of control values). Sample clustering by muscularity and sex revealed increased miR-133a-3p and miR-206 only in moderate-high muscularity males. SncRNA profiling in the muscle identified 373 microRNAs and 190 piRNAs (72.5% and 18.7% of raw reads, respectively). As for microRNAs, 10 were up-regulated, and 56 were down-regulated in cancer patients versus controls. Among the 24 dysregulated piRNAs, the majority were down-regulated, including the top two most expressed piRNAs in the muscle (piR-12790 and piR-2106). Network analysis on validated mRNA targets of down-regulated microRNAs revealed miR-15b-5p, miR-106a-5p and miR-106b-5p as main interactors of genes related to ubiquitin ligase/transferase activities.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show dysregulation of both muscle microRNAs and piRNAs in cancer patients compared with controls, the former following a sex-specific pattern. Changes in circulating microRNAs are associated with the degree of muscularity rather than body weight loss.

Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia in Patients with Advanced Prostate Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men and the fifth leading cause of death from cancer. The possibility of sarcopenia being a prognostic factor in advanced PCa patients has recently become a subject of interest. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in advanced prostate carcinoma. A systematic review was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science (March, 2021). The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Meta-analyses for overall, cancer-specific, and progression-free survival were performed. Nine studies (n = 1659) were included. Sarcopenia was borderline associated with a shorter overall survival (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.44, P = 0.04, I2 = 43%) but was significantly associated with progression-free survival (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.06, P < 0.01; k = 3; n = 588). Available evidence supports sarcopenia as an important prognostic factor of progression-free survival in patients with advanced PCa. However, sarcopenia has a weak association with a shorter overall survival. The evidence on the role of sarcopenia in prostate-cancer-specific survival is insufficient and supports the need for further research. Patient summary: The literature was reviewed to determine whether the loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) affects the survival in patients with advanced PCa. Patients with advanced PCa and sarcopenia were found to have a shorter progression-free survival (the length of time during and after treatment of a cancer that the patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse), but sarcopenia did not have much influence on the overall survival and cancer-specific survival (the length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment to the date of death due to the cancer).

Clinical Features and Body Composition in Men with Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study Examining Differences by Race

Black men treated with frontline therapies for metastatic prostate cancer (MPC) show better clinical outcomes than non-Black men receiving similar treatments. Variations in body composition may contribute to these findings. However, preliminary data are required to support this concept. We conducted a retrospective cohort study for all men with MPC evaluated at our center over a 4-year period, collecting demographic and clinical data (N = 74). Of these, 55 men had diagnostic computed tomography images to quantify adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, specifically sarcopenia and myosteatosis. Nineteen men had repeat imaging to explore changes over time. Frequencies, medians, interquartile ranges, and time to event analyses (hazard ratios (HR); confidence interval (CI)) are presented, stratified by race. Overall, 49% (n = 27) of men had sarcopenia, 49% (n = 27) had myosteatosis, and 29% (n = 16) had sarcopenia and myosteatosis simultaneously. No significant relationship between body mass index (Log-rank $p=0.86$ ; HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.45–2.49) or sarcopenia (Log-rank $p=0.92$ ; HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.46–2.19) and overall survival was observed. However, the presence of myosteatosis at diagnosis was associated with decreased overall survival (Log-rank $p=0.09$ ; HR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.05–5.23), with more pronounced (statistically nonsignificant) negative associations for Black (HR: 4.39, 95% CI: 0.92–21.1, $p=0.06$ ) versus non-Black men (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 0.79–4.54, $p=0.16$ ). Over the median 12.5 months between imaging, the median decline in skeletal muscle was 4% for all men. Black men displayed a greater propensity to gain more adipose tissue than non-Black men, specifically subcutaneous ( $p=0.01$ ). Because of the potential for Type II errors in this pilot, future studies should seek to further evaluate the implications of body composition on outcomes. This will require larger, adequately powered investigations with diverse patient representation.

Associations of fat and muscle mass with overall survival in men with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To systematically review and analyse the associations between fat and muscle mass measures with overall survival in men with prostate cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2020, while abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA), and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) conferences were searched from 2014 to 2020. Eligible articles examined the association of body composition measures, such as fat mass (e.g., fat mass, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and VAT/SAT) and muscle mass measures, with overall survival in prostate cancer patients at any treatment stage. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted for studies reporting multivariable or univariable analysis assessing the associations of fat mass measures (i.e., fat mass, VAT, SAT, VAT/SAT) and muscle mass measures with overall survival.

RESULTS

Sixteen cohort studies that comprised 4807 men with prostate cancer were included. Total adiposity (hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% CI: 0.75-1.28, p = 0.888) and VAT (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.74-1.43, p = 0.873) were not significantly associated with overall survival, while higher subcutaneous adipose tissue levels were associated with higher survival (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.84, p = 0.001). Greater mortality risk was found in patients with localised (HR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.40-2.62, p < 0.001) and advanced disease (HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.07-1.92, p = 0.020) presenting with low levels of muscle mass compared to those presenting with high levels.

DISCUSSION

These results indicate that although overall adiposity should be cautiously interpreted in regards to survival, high muscle mass and SAT, and low VAT/SAT ratio values are associated with overall survival in men with prostate cancer.

Skeletal muscle radiodensity and cancer outcomes: A scoping review of the literature

Patients with cancer are more prone to experience myosteatosis than healthy individuals. The aim of this review was to summarize the methodologies applied for low skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD) assessment in oncology patients, as well as to describe the major findings related to SMD and cancer outcomes. This scoping review included studies that were published until November 2020 in English, Portuguese, or Spanish; were performed in humans diagnosed with cancer, adult and/or elderly, of both sexes; investigated SMD through computed tomography of the region between the third and fifth lumbar vertebrae, considering at least two muscular groups; and evaluated clinical and/or surgical outcomes. Eighty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 37,583 patients). Survival was the most evaluated outcome. Most studies reported a significant association between low SMD and unfavorable outcomes. However, this relationship was not clear for survival, antineoplastic treatment, and surgical complications, potentially because of the unstandardized approaches for the assessment of SMD and inadequate study design. Future studies should address these issues to provide an in-depth understanding of the clinical relevance of SMD in cancer outcomes as well as how SMD is influenced by individuals and tumor-related characteristics in patients with cancer.