Brain Metastases from Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer

Zimberelimab combined with systemic therapy extended tumor control in post-radiotherapy cervical cancer with brain metastases: A case report

Out of the total cases of cervical cancer, brain metastases (BMs) are relatively rare, with an estimated incidence rate of 0.63% (range: 0.1%-2.2%). Additionally, BMs prognosis remains poor, and the average patient survival time following a BM diagnosis is 3 to 5 months. Few studies have addressed the effect of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors against BMs in cervical cancer, although they are an established option for recurrent/metastatic disease. Hence, we report a case involving a 54-year-old post-surgery patient with cervical cancer with a body mass index of 19.5 kg/m2 and Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3; the disease recurred with BMs 1 year later. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy concurrent with temozolomide and bevacizumab was initiated, following which zimberelimab immunotherapy combined with anlotinib was administered to extend tumor control. The patient had a progression-free survival duration of 10 months, the tumor response was assessed as a partial response based on the evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST1.1), and the ECOG status improved to 1 after therapy. These findings suggest that immunotherapy-based combination therapy following radiotherapy may be a good choice for patients with cervical cancer and BMs.

Surgically Treated Brain Metastases from Uterine Origin: A Case Series and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe our institutional case series of 9 surgically treated uterine brain metastases and perform a survival analysis through a systematic review and a pooled individual patient data study.

METHODS

This study was divided into 2 sections: 1) a retrospective, single center patient series assessing outcomes of neurosurgical treatment modalities in patients with malignancy arising in the uterus with brain metastases and 2) a systematic review of the literature between 1980 and 2021 regarding treatment outcomes of individual patients with intracranial metastasis of uterine origin. Pooled cohort survival analysis was done via univariate and Cox regression multivariable analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Final statistical analysis included a total of 124 pooled cohort patients: one hundred fifteen patients from literature review studies plus 9 patients from our institution. Median age at the time of diagnosis was 54 years. Median time from diagnosis of the primary cancer to brain metastasis was 19 months (0-166 months). Surgery and radiotherapy resulted in the highest median OS of 11 months (P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses indicated that the presence of more than one central nervous systemlesion had an increased risk on OS (P = 0.003). Microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and whole brain radiotherapy remain the evidence-based mainstay applicable to the treatment of multiple brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain metastases of cancer arising in the uterus appear to result most often in multiple lesions with dismal prognosis. The seemingly most efficacious treatment modality is surgery and radiotherapy. However, this treatment is often not an option when more than 1 or 2 brain lesions are present.

Factors associated with receipt of second-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer treatment in the United States: A retrospective administrative claims analysis

Purpose

Contemporary, real-world data on eligible patients receiving treatment following progression on first-line (1L) recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) therapy are needed to inform treatment algorithms and identify potential gaps in the r/mCC care continuum.

Methods

This study estimated the prevalence and predictors of second-line (2L) r/mCC therapy among 1L-treated patients using the 2015-2020 IBM MarketScan® commercial claims database. Women ≥ 18 years diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated with first-line systemic therapies were identified and followed for 12 months from their 1L therapy end date. Women with claims for a new therapy after 60 days but no later than 365 days from the end of 1L treatment were identified as those who progressed and received 2L therapy for r/mCC. Descriptive statistics examined baseline cohort characteristics and multivariable logistic regression model examined the factors associated with receiving 2L treatment.

Results

We identified 384 1L-treated patients with r/mCC with ≥ 12 months of follow-up post-1L treatment. During follow-up, over half (51.0 %) of the 1L-treated r/mCC patients received 2L treatment. Patients from the South and Midwest had a lower likelihood of receiving 2L treatment compared with those living in the Northeast (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.43; 0.23-0.84) and (aOR = 0.52; 0.28-0.95, respectively). Patients not treated with bevacizumab in 1L were also less likely to receive 2L therapy (aOR = 0.65; 0.43-0.99).

Conclusion

Additional research and targeted outreach efforts are needed to understand geography-, population-, or practice-specific barriers impacting access to 2L therapy among patients with r/mCC.

Factors associated with receipt of second-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer treatment in the United States: A retrospective administrative claims analysis

Purpose

Contemporary, real-world data on eligible patients receiving treatment following progression on first-line (1L) recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) therapy are needed to inform treatment algorithms and identify potential gaps in the r/mCC care continuum.

Methods

This study estimated the prevalence and predictors of second-line (2L) r/mCC therapy among 1L-treated patients using the 2015-2020 IBM MarketScan® commercial claims database. Women ≥ 18 years diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated with first-line systemic therapies were identified and followed for 12 months from their 1L therapy end date. Women with claims for a new therapy after 60 days but no later than 365 days from the end of 1L treatment were identified as those who progressed and received 2L therapy for r/mCC. Descriptive statistics examined baseline cohort characteristics and multivariable logistic regression model examined the factors associated with receiving 2L treatment.

Results

We identified 384 1L-treated patients with r/mCC with ≥ 12 months of follow-up post-1L treatment. During follow-up, over half (51.0 %) of the 1L-treated r/mCC patients received 2L treatment. Patients from the South and Midwest had a lower likelihood of receiving 2L treatment compared with those living in the Northeast (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.43; 0.23-0.84) and (aOR = 0.52; 0.28-0.95, respectively). Patients not treated with bevacizumab in 1L were also less likely to receive 2L therapy (aOR = 0.65; 0.43-0.99).

Conclusion

Additional research and targeted outreach efforts are needed to understand geography-, population-, or practice-specific barriers impacting access to 2L therapy among patients with r/mCC.

Prognostic factors for brain metastasis in women presenting cervical cancer

PURPOSE

Although rare, brain metastases (BM) from cervical cancer (CC) are highly lethal. Adequate patient selection for specific treatments can improve survival rates in patients afflicted by this condition. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of CC patients who developed BM and overall survival-associated factors. Brain metastasis impact on the overall survival was assessed as a secondary objective.

METHODS

This assessment comprises a retrospective cohort study on 3394 women presenting CC diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2017 at a single referral center. Incident BM cases were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the survival analysis and a Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to explore the risk of death according to the analyzed independent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 48 incident BM cases were identified. The median time between CC diagnosis and BM development was 1.5 years. Headaches (29.2%), dizziness/altered balance (29.2%), vertigo (29.2%) and motor disturbances (25.0%) were the most common signs and symptoms at presentation. Median overall survival after BM diagnosis was of 1.6 months (95% CI 0.9-2.3) while in the group of women without BM it was 5.5 years (95% CI 4.9-6.1). Concerning the Cox multivariate analysis, presenting one extracerebral metastases site (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3-6.2; p = 0.009) and receiving supportive treatment (HR 13.7; 95% CI 3.1-60.5; p 0.001) were independently associated with the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

The median survival of women with BM following CC was poor. Women without extracerebral metastases and undergoing multimodal treatment displayed better overall survival rates.

Incidence and risk factors for the development of cerebral metastasis in cervical cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral metastasis (CM) in cervical cancer (CC) cases, although rare, results in high lethality rates. The present study aimed to assess CM incidence in a Brazilian reference CC center and evaluate the risk factors for CM development. Retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with CC between 2010 and 2017.

METHODS

Cumulative CM incidence and incidence density were evaluated. Characteristics associated to CM development risks were identified using crude (cOR) or adjusted (aOR) odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 3,397 patients were included in this study. Patient age ranged from 18 to 101 years, with a mean age of 48.8±14.0. After a mean follow-up time of 3.2±2.1 years, 51 CM cases were identified, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 1.5% (95% confidence intervals [CI]=1.12-1.97) and an incidence density at the end of the 6th year of 27.4 per 1,000 women/year. Advanced clinical stage (aOR=3.15; 95% CI=1.16-8.58; p=0.025), the presence of previous lung metastasis (aOR=4.04; 95% CI=1.82-8.94; p=0.001) and the adenocarcinoma (aOR=2.90; 95% CI=1.46-5.76; p=0.002), adenosquamous carcinoma (aOR=7.33; 95% CI=2.87-18.73; p<0.001), undifferentiated carcinoma (aOR=14.37; 95% CI=3.77-54.76; p<0.001) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (aOR=21.31; 95% CI=6.65-68.37, p<0.001) histological types were associated with a higher risk for CM development. CM risk was higher in the first years of follow-up, with no cases observed after the 6th year.

CONCLUSION

CC patients in advanced clinical stages, displaying previous lung metastasis and non-squamous histological types are at high risk of developing CM.

The risk of distant metastases in patients with gynecologic cancers after surgery: a population-based study

The aim of the study was to determine the risk of distant metastases in patients with gynecologic cancers after surgery, including cervical, uterine and ovarian cancers. This is a retrospective study evaluating gynecologic cancer from 2009 to 2014 using population-based administrative datasets from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC) and from The National Health Informatics Project (NHIP). A total of 1,464 gynecologic cancer patients, including 321 cervical cancer patients, 724 uterine cancer patients and 419 ovarian cancer patients, were analyzed retrospectively from 2009 to 2014. Among the cervical cancer patients, 173 (53.89%) received surgery only and 148 (46.11%) received surgery with radiotherapy /chemotherapy. Among the uterus cancer patients, 425(58.70%) received surgery only and 299 (41.3%) received surgery with radiotherapy /chemotherapy. Among the ovarian cancer patients, 81 (19.33%) received surgery only and 338 (80.67%) received surgery with radiotherapy/chemotherapy. Among patients with brain, liver or lung metastasis, cervical cancer patients have more cumulative metastasis-free survival than those ovarian cancer (p=0.0041). In analyzing liver metastasis based on primary cancer sites, cervical cancer patients and uterine cancer cases have more cumulative metastasis- free survival than those ovarian cancer (p<0.0001). In conclusion, ovarian cancer patients have higher risk of liver metastasis than cervical or uterine cancer. There were significantly different of pathological stage for cumulative metastasis-free survival among gynecologic cancer patients with brain or liver or lung metastasis. Pathological T stage remains the main predictive for distant metastasis of gynecologic cancer.

Brain metastases: the role of clinical imaging

Imaging of brain metastases (BMs) has advanced greatly over the past decade. In this review, we discuss the main challenges that BMs pose in clinical practice and describe the role of imaging.Firstly, we describe the increased incidence of BMs of different primary tumours and the rationale for screening. A challenge lies in selecting the right patients for screening: not all cancer patients develop BMs in their disease course.Secondly, we discuss the imaging techniques to detect BMs. A three-dimensional (3D) T1W MRI sequence is the golden standard for BM detection, but additional anatomical (susceptibility weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging), functional (perfusion MRI) and metabolic (MR spectroscopy, positron emission tomography) information can help to differentiate BMs from other intracranial aetiologies.Thirdly, we describe the role of imaging before, during and after treatment of BMs. For surgical resection, imaging is used to select surgical patients, but also to assist intraoperatively (neuronavigation, fluorescence-guided surgery, ultrasound). For treatment planning of stereotactic radiosurgery, MRI is combined with CT. For surveillance after both local and systemic therapies, conventional MRI is used. However, advanced imaging is increasingly performed to distinguish true tumour progression from pseudoprogression.FInally, future perspectives are discussed, including radiomics, new biomarkers, new endogenous contrast agents and theranostics.