Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy with Three-Field Lymph Node Dissection for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Clinical Stage III and with Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis

Long-term survival analysis of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Robotic esophagectomy has improved early outcomes and enhanced the quality of lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer surgery. This study aimed to determine risk factors for long-term survival following robotic esophagectomy and the causes of long-term mortality. We included patients who underwent robotic esophagectomy at our institute between 2010 and 2022. Robotic esophagectomy was defined as a surgical procedure performed robotically in both the abdomen and thorax. Robotic esophagectomy was performed in patients at all stages, including advanced stages, even in patients with stage IV and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis. A total of 340 patients underwent robotic esophagectomy during the study period. Ivor-Lewis operation and McKeown operation were performed on 153 (45.0%) and 187 (55.0%) patients, respectively. The five-year survival rates based on clinical stages were as follows: 85.2% in stage I, 62.0% in stage II, 54.5% in stage III, and 40.3% in stage IV. Risk factors for long-term survival included body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, clinical stages, and postoperative complications of grade 4 or higher. Among the cases of long-term mortality, recurrence accounted for 42 patients (61.7%), while non-cancer-related death occurred in 26 patients (38.2%). The most common cause of non-cancer-related death was malnutrition and poor general condition, observed in 11 patients (16.2%). Robotic esophagectomy has demonstrated the ability to achieve acceptable long-term survival rates, even in patients with cervical lymph node metastasis. However, addressing high-grade postoperative complications and long-term malnutrition remains crucial for further improving the long-term survival outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer.

Current status and prospects of diagnosis and treatment for esophageal cancer with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis

Patients with supraclavicular lymph node (SLN) metastasis from esophageal cancer encounter significant variations in treatment approaches due to differences in pathological subtypes and the lack of a unified regional staging system between East Asian and Western countries. The Tiger study aims to develop an internationally recognized staging system and to delineate the extent of regional lymph node dissection. In the context of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with SLN metastasis, the treatment paradigms from East Asia offer valuable insights. The Japan Esophageal Society (JES) 12th edition staging system guides a tailored comprehensive treatment strategy, emphasizing either radiotherapy and chemotherapy or surgical intervention. In contrast, esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) predominates in Western countries, where the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system classifies SLN metastasis as a distant metastasis, advocating for systemic therapy as the primary treatment modality. Nonetheless, compelling evidence suggests that a multidisciplinary treatment approach, incorporating either radiotherapy and chemotherapy or surgery as the initial treatment, can yield superior outcomes for these patients compared to chemotherapy alone.

The patterns and risk factors for relapse in oesophageal squamous cell cancers that achieve pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the patterns and risk factors for recurrence in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2018, a total of 96 patients with pCR were enrolled in this study. Lymph nodes with a pCR [LN-ypCR response (+)] were defined as those lymph nodes without residual tumour but with the presence of treatment response to nCRT. Prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed with Cox proportional hazards models and Fine-Gray competing risk models. Lymph node (LN) stations were counted according to the Japan Esophageal Society classification.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 51.5 months. Recurrence occurred in 15 cases (15.6%) with a 9.9-month median time to recurrence and a 15.6-month median survival after recurrence. The majority of recurrent diseases developed within the first 2 years postoperatively. Distant recurrences were detected in 14 cases (14.6%), in which the most common recurrence sites were no.104 LN and the lung, followed by no.16 LN. The mean RFS in the whole cohort was 116.6 months. The LN-ypCR response (+) was identified as the independent prognostic factor for worse RFS in both the multivariate Cox model and the Fine-Gray competing risk model (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse is not rare in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases with pCR after nCRT. Distant recurrences, the predominant pattern of relapse, occur primarily within the first 2 years after oesophagectomy. Patients with pCR with an LN-ypCR response (+) have a higher risk for postoperative recurrence.

Survival in esophageal cancer with nonregional lymphadenopathy: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Survival among patients with esophageal cancer with stage IV nonregional lymphadenopathy treated with neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is not well described. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of patients with nonregional lymphadenopathy with a propensity-matched cohort of patients with locoregional disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained database from a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network in Quebec, Canada. From January 2010 to December 2022, patients with radiologically suspicious nonregional retroperitoneal or supraclavicular lymphadenopathy were identified. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, a control group without nonregional disease was created.

RESULTS

Of the 1235 patients identified, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were allocated to the study group of whom 35 of 39 (89%) had adenocarcinoma. Retroperitoneal and supraclavicular lymphadenopathy occurred in 26 of 39 patients (67%) and 13 of 39 patients (33%). Of the 39 patients, 34 (87%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 5 (13%) received chemoradiotherapy. After resection, ypN0 of nonregional lymph node stations occurred in 21 of 39 patients (54%). When comparing the study group with a matched non-stage IV control group, the median overall survival was similar in patients with retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (21.0 months [95% CI, 8.0-21.0] vs 27.0 months [95% CI, 13.0-41.0]; P = .262) but not with supraclavicular disease (13.0 months; 95% CI, 8.0-18.0; P = .039). The median follow-up intervals were 40.1 months (95% CI, 1.0-83.0) for the study group and 70.0 (95% CI, 33.0-106.0) for the control groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with a matched cohort of patients with similar disease burden but not stage IV disease, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy did not negatively affect survival outcomes. Multimodal curative intent therapy may be appropriate in select cases.

Pretreatment periodontitis is predictive of a poorer prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Poor oral health is an independent risk factor for upper-aerodigestive tract cancers, including esophageal cancer. Several studies have investigated short-term outcomes after esophagectomy and the impact of periodontal disease, but few have examined the impact of periodontal disease on long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of periodontitis among esophagectomy patients and the prognostic value of periodontitis and its effect on prognosis after esophagectomy.

METHODS

A total of 508 patients who underwent esophagectomy received oral health care from a dentist before cancer treatment at Akita University Hospital between January 2009 and December 2021. We assessed the presence and severity of the patients' periodontitis and divided them into no-periodontitis, mild periodontitis, severe periodontitis and edentulous jaw groups. We then assessed 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) and determined whether periodontitis was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS and DSS.

RESULTS

We found that 101 (19.9%) patients had no periodontitis, 207 (40.8%) had mild periodontitis, 176 (34.6%) had severe periodontitis requiring tooth extraction, and 24 (4.7%) had edentulous jaw. Both OS and DSS were significantly poorer in the periodontitis than no-periodontitis group (p < 0.001). In detail, the edentulous jaw group had the poorest prognosis (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that periodontitis was an independent risk factor affecting OS and DSS.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal cancer patients had a high prevalence of periodontitis. Moreover, the presence of periodontitis and severity of periodontitis are independent risk factors contributing to a poorer prognosis after esophagectomy.

Neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer

As the major malignant tumors in the chest, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and esophageal cancer (EC) bring huge health burden to human beings worldwide. Currently, surgery is still the mainstay for comprehensive treatment for NSCLC and EC, but the prognosis is still poor as the results of cancer recurrence and distant metastasis. Neoadjuvant therapy refers to a single or combined treatment before surgery, aiming to improve the therapeutic effects of the traditional therapies. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes and effects of neoadjuvant therapy are still controversial due to its apparent advantages and disadvantages, and different patients may respond differentially to the same scheme of neoadjuvant therapy, which makes it urgent and necessary to develop personalized scheme of neoadjuvant therapy for different individuals. Therefore, this review summarizes the novel schemes and strategies of neoadjuvant therapy, which may help to significantly improve of life quality of patients suffering from chest-related malignancies.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Upregulates the Immunogenicity of Cold to Hot Tumors in Esophageal Cancer Patients

Objective

To test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is more effective against hot esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and that it may upregulate tumor immunogenicity.

Background

There have been several recent reports showing the efficacy of immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) against esophageal cancer, especially immunologically hot tumors. In addition, several studies have suggested that chemotherapy and radiotherapy may convert cold tumors to hot tumors.

Methods

Of 105 ESCC patients who underwent surgery after NACRT between 2010 and 2018 at our hospital, 99 whose biopsy tissue samples were obtained were enrolled. Based on immunohistochemical analysis, tumors that were FOXA1 (+) and/or EYA2 (+) were defined as hot tumors, others were cold tumors. We then investigated the association between tumor immunogenicity and clinicopathological features.

Results

The 29 patients with hot tumors before NACRT had a significantly better 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate than the remaining 70 patients with cold tumors (85% vs 64%; P = 0.036). In a multivariate analysis, tumor immunogenicity was a significant independent predictor of DSS. Of 68 patients without a pathological complete response (non-pCR) in their primary tumor, 51 (75%) had hot tumors after NACRT. Moreover, 75% (36/48) of tumors that were cold before NACRT were converted to hot tumors after NACRT.

Conclusions

Patients with hot ESCC tumors treated with NACRT plus esophagectomy had a better prognosis than those with cold tumors. NACRT upregulated cold tumor immunogenicity to hot tumors, suggesting NACRT may increase the sensitivity of ESCC to adjuvant ICIs.

Preoperative inspiratory muscle weakness as a risk factor of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether preoperative inspiratory muscle weakness (IMW) is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent subtotal esophagectomy.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a scheduled subtotal esophagectomy between June 2020 and May 2022. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) was measured as inspiratory muscle strength using a respiratory dynamometer, and we defined IMW as MIP < 80% of the predicted value. Our primary outcome comprised overall PPCs. We investigated the relationship between IMW and PPCs using the Bayesian logistic regression model.

RESULTS

After exclusion, 72 patients were included in this study. IMW was identified in 26 patients (36%), and PPCs developed in 28 patients (39%). Among patients with IMW, 15 (58%) developed PPCs. Preoperative IMW was associated with PPCs (mean odds ratio [OR]: 3.58; 95% credible interval [95% CrI]: 1.29, 9.73) in the unweighted model. A similar association was observed in the weighted model adjusted for preoperative and intraoperative contributing factors (mean OR: 4.15; 95% CrI: 2.04, 8.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative IMW was associated with PPCs in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent subtotal esophagectomy. This association remained after adjusting for preoperative and intraoperative contributing factors.

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy provides borderline resectable thoracic esophageal cancer with equivalent treatment results as clinically T3 thoracic esophageal cancer

Aim

Because the optimal treatment strategy for borderline resectable (cT3br) thoracic esophageal cancer patients remains unclear, it is of great interest whether preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for cT3br could achieve results comparable to those seen with resectable T3 cancer (cT3r). We speculated that preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) would be particularly effective in cT3br thoracic esophageal cancer patients and compared to cT3br and cT3r.

Methods

Of 186 cT3 thoracic esophageal cancer patients treated with intended NACRT, 162 received radical esophagectomy. More than 97% were squamous cell carcinomas. Patients were partitioned into two groups according to whether invasion of adjacent organs was suspected (cT3br and cT3r). Treatment outcomes and survival were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-eight patients (36.6%) were classified as cT3br and 118 (63.4%) as cT3r. The cT3br group had significantly more tumors in the upper and middle mediastinum (p < 0.0001) and more cases with cM1 (lymph node) (p = 0.0104) than the cT3r group. In addition, the cT3br patients receiving esophagectomy exhibited a significantly lower pathological complete response rate than the cT3r patients (p = 0.0374). However, the R0 resection rate did not differ between the cT3br and cT3r patients (p = 0.0978), and the two groups treated with intended NACRT had similar 5-year overall (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.3831 and p = 0.9020). In addition, the incidence and patterns of recurrence did not differ between the cT3br and cT3r patients receiving esophagectomy (p = 0.8109 and p = 0.3128).

Conclusions

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be a promising treatment for patients with borderline resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The Evolution of Neo-Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Oesophageal and Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas

Historically, oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas were associated with a poor prognosis. The advent of neoadjuvant therapy has transformed the management of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas further and offers the possibility to reverse disease progression, eliminate micrometastasis, and offer potentially better outcomes for these patients. This review provides an overview of landmark clinical trials in this area, with different treatment regimens considered over the years as well as potential therapeutic agents on the horizon that may transform the management of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas further.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by oesophagectomy may be the optimal treatment option for lower thoracic oesophageal cancer with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis: An inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis of SEER database

INTRODUCTION

Whether supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis in patients with oesophageal cancer belongs to regional disease is controversial, leading to heterogeneity in clinical treatment decisions. This study aimed to determine the optimal treatment for lower thoracic oesophageal cancer (LTOC) with SCLN metastasis.

METHODS

Patients with LTOC registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2010-2015 were identified. Selected patients were grouped according to disease spread as those with locoregional disease, with SCLN metastasis or with distant metastasis, as well as according to treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (nCRT+S group), upfront surgery ± adjuvant therapy (upfront S group) and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT group)). The Cox regression analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to identify the optimal treatment modality for different groups.

RESULTS

Of 11,767 LTOC patients identified from the database, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with the locoregional disease (n = 7,541), SCLN metastasis (n = 120) and distant metastasis (n = 4,106) were 28.3%, 10.0% and 3.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). Among patients with SCLN metastasis, median OS in the nCRT+S, upfront S and dCRT groups were 25, 14 and 8 months, respectively (P < 0.001). After IPTW, the nCRT+S group was still associated with better median OS compared with other groups. The multivariate analysis identified treatment modality as an independent prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by oesophagectomy may be the optimal treatment modality for LTOC with SCLN metastasis. The findings of this study need to be validated in large prospective studies.

The Prediction of Survival Outcome and Prognosis Factor in Association with Comorbidity Status in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Research-Based Study

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is rising exponentially in Asia, representing 11% of cancer worldwide. This study analysed the influence of CRC on patients’ life expectancy (survival and prognosis factors) via clinicopathology data and comorbidity status of CRC patients. Methodology: A retrospective study performed in HUSM using clinical data from the Surgery unit from 2015 to 2020. The demographic and pertinent clinical data were retrieved for preliminary analyses (data cleansing and exploration). Demographics and pathological characteristics were illustrated using descriptive analysis; 5-year survival rates were calculated using Kaplan−Meier methods; potential prognostic variables were analysed using simple and multivariate logistic regression analysis conducted via the Cox proportional hazards model, while the Charlson Comorbidity Scale was used to categorize patients’ disease status. Results: Of a total of 114 CRC patients, two-thirds (89.5%) were from Malay tribes, while Indian and Chinese had 5.3% each. The 50−69.9 years were the most affected group (45.6%). Overall, 40.4% were smokers (majorly male (95.7%)), 14.0% ex-smokers, and 45.6% non-smokers (p-value = 0.001). The Kaplan−Meier overall 5-year median survival time was 62.5%. From the outcomes, patients who were male and >70 years had metastasis present, who presented with per rectal bleeding and were classified as Duke C; and who has tumour in the rectum had the lowest survival rate. Regarding the prognosis factors investigated, “Gender” (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.62; 95% CI: 1.56−7.81, p-value = 0.040), “Presence of metastases” (HR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.89−7.32, p-value = 0.010), “Metastasis site: Liver” (HR: 5.04; 95% CI: 1.71−19.05, p-value = 0.039), “Lymphovascular permeation” (HR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.99−5.92, p-value = 0.021), and “CEA-level” (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.49−5.80, p-value = 0.001) remained significant in the final model for multiple Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. There was a significant mean association between tumour grades and the patient’s comorbidity status. Conclusions: Histopathological factors (gender, metastases presence, site of metastases, CEA level, and lymphovascular permeation) showed the best prognosis-predicting factors in CRC.

Definition of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer and impact of local oligometastasis-directed treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) for oligometastatic disease (OMD) in patients with esophagogastric cancer may improve overall survival (OS). The primary aim was to identify definitions of esophagogastric OMD. A secondary aim was to perform a meta-analysis of OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone for OMD.

METHODS

Studies and study protocols reporting on definitions or OS after local treatment for esophagogastric OMD were included. The primary outcome was the maximum number of organs/lesions considered OMD and the maximum number of lesions per organ (i.e. 'organ-specific' OMD burden). Agreement was considered to be either absent/poor (< 50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥ 75%). The secondary outcome was the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone. The ROBINS tool was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 97 studies, including 7 study protocols, and 2 prospective studies, were included. OMD was considered in 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases (consensus). 'Organ-specific' OMD burden could involve bilobar ≤ 3 liver metastases, unilateral ≤ 2 lung metastases, 1 extra-regional lymph node station, ≤ 2 brain metastases, or bilateral adrenal gland metastases (consensus). Local treatment for OMD was associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone based on 6 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74) and for liver oligometastases based on 5 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59). All studies scored serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature considers esophagogastric cancer spread limited to 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station to be OMD. Local treatment for OMD appeared associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.

Association between ABCC2 polymorphism and hematological toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer receiving platinum plus 5-fluorouracil therapy

BACKGROUND

Platinum agents are taken up into cells by copper transporter (CTR) 1 (gene code: SLC31A1) and are excreted from cells by copper-transporting P-type adenosine triphosphatase (ATP7B) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2 (gene code: ABCC2). In addition, glutathione S transferase (GST) P1 is involved in the metabolism of platinum agents. The present study aimed to determine whether the rate of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity associated with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy in 239 patients with esophageal cancer was affected by the SLC31A1 rs10981694A>C and rs12686377G>T, ATP7B rs9535828A>G, GSTP1 rs1695A>G, and ABCC2 -24C>T polymorphisms.

METHODS

Chemotherapy consisted of protracted infusion of 5-FU (800 mg/m²/day) on days 1-5 and cisplatin or nedaplatin (80 mg/m²/day) on day 1.

RESULTS

A total of 82 of 239 patients developed grade 3-4 hematological toxicity after chemotherapy. Univariate analysis showed that ABCC2 -24C/T + T/T genotypes (P = 0.038), radiation therapy (P = 0.013), baseline white blood cell count < 6000/μL (P = 0.003), and baseline neutrophil count < 3900/μL (P = 0.021) were statistically significant predictors of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity. Multivariate analysis revealed that ABCC2 -24C/T + T/T genotypes (P = 0.036), radiation therapy (P = 0.005), and baseline white blood cell count < 6000/μL (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that ABCC2 -24C>T is significantly associated with grade 3-4 hematological toxicity after platinum plus 5-FU therapy. These findings might contribute to improved treatment strategies for patients with esophageal cancer.

Patterns and timing of recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy

Background

Tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant therapy is reportedly predictive of prognosis in esophageal cancer patients, as lack of a response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a poor prognosis. However, there is little information available on the timing and pattern of recurrence after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) that takes into consideration TRG after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). Here, in an effort to gain insight into a treatment strategy that improves the prognosis of NACRT non-responders, we evaluated the patterns and timing of recurrence in TESCC patients, taking into consideration TRG after NACRT.

Methods

A total of 127 TESCC patients treated with NACRT and esophagectomy between 2009 and 2017 were enrolled in this observational cohort study. TRGs were assigned based on the proportion of residual tumor cells in the area (TRG1, ≥1/3 viable cancer cells; 2, < 1/3 viable cancer cells; 3, no viable cancer cells). We retrospectively investigated the timing and patterns of recurrence and the prognoses in TESCC patients, taking into consideration TRG after NACRT.

Results

The 127 participating TESCC patients were categorized as TRG1 (42 patients, 33%), TRG2 (56 patients, 44%) or TRG3 (29 patients, 23%). The locoregional recurrence rate was higher in TRG1 (36.4%) patients than combined TRG2–3 (7.4%) patients. Patients with TRG3 had better prognoses, though a few TRG3 patients experienced distant recurrence. There were no significant differences in median time to first recurrence or OS among patients with locoregional or distant recurrence. There was a trend toward better OS in TRG2–3 patients with recurrence than TRG1 patients with recurrence, but the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

NACRT non-responders (TRG1 patients) experienced higher locoregional recurrence rates and earlier recurrence with distant or locoregional metastasis. TRG appears to be useful for establishing a strategy for perioperative treatments to improve TESCC patient survival, especially among TRG1 patients. (303 words).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08918-x.

Recent Progress in the Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Neoadjuvant therapies, primarily chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, are able to improve the overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer (EC) based on the results of several randomized clinical trials. The advantage of neoadjuvant therapy is chiefly attributed to the decreased risk of local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis. Thus, it has been recommended as standard treatment for patients with resectable EC. However, several fundamental problems remain. First, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and surgery for EC patients with different histological types remain controversial. Furthermore, to reduce the toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy and the risk of complications caused by preoperative radiation therapy, the treatment protocols of nCT and nCRT still need to be investigated and optimized by prospective trials. Moreover, for patients with complete clinical response following neoadjuvant therapy, it is worth ascertaining whether a "watch and wait" surveillance plus surgery-as-needed policy is more favorable, as well as, in addition to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, whether immunotherapy, especially when combined with the traditional neoadjuvant therapy regimens, brings new prospects for EC treatment. In this review, we summarize the recent insights into the research progress and existing problems of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced resectable EC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

S-1 shows good efficacy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) under single use or combined with cisplatin or radiotherapy. The S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) regimen is one of the chemotherapy candidates for ESCC. However, the efficacy of the SP regimen for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been verified. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of NAC with SP for advanced ESCC. In this study, patients with clinical stage II/III/IV ESCC received NAC with SP regimen from June 2016 to July 2020 in Ogaki Municipal Hospital were retrospectively evaluated. In the SP regimen, S-1 80 mg/m² was administered on days 1-14, and cisplatin was administered 70 mg/m² on day 1, repeated every 4 weeks, for two cycles. The completion rate, clinical and pathological response rate, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were analyzed. 43 ESCC patients were diagnosed clinical stage II/III/IV ESCC. Among the 43 patients, 31 patients underwent NAC with SP regimen. The completion rate was 93.5%. The clinical response and pathological response rates (grade 2 or 3) were 83.9% and 32.3%, respectively. Seven patients (22.6%) had a pathological complete response (grade 3). Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 33.7% of cases. No other grade 3 cases or higher toxicity was observed. The 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 52.6% and 65.6%, respectively. NAC with SP is a feasible and effective treatment strategy for advanced. ESCC. The antitumor response could be higher than that under the cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil regimen.

PET-Uptake Reduction into Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Therapy is Highly Predictive of Prognosis for Patients Who have Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy Plus Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Patients with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-positive lymph nodes before treatment have a poor prognosis after esophagectomy. This study investigated whether FDG uptake into lymph nodes on FDG-PET (PET-N) during the pre- or posttreatment stage is more predictive of survival for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by esophagectomy.

METHODS

Of 129 TESCC patients with clinical lymphatic metastasis who underwent curative-intent esophagectomy after NACRT between 2010 and 2018, 97 who received PET before and after NACRT were enrolled in the study. The study defined lymph nodes with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) greater than 2.5 on FDG-PET before NACRT as cPET-N(+) and after NACRT as CRT-cPET-N(+). Both the cPET-N(+) and CRT-cPET-N(-) patients were defined as PET-N responders. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

No significant difference in survival was detected between the cPET-N(+) and cPET-N(-) patients. However, the CRT-cPET-N(-) patients had significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) than the CRT-cPET-N (+) patients. The PET-N responders had significantly better 5-year OS and DSS than the PET-N non-responders, and PET-N response was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year DSS.

CONCLUSION

The PET-N response is a highly predictive prognostic marker for TESCC patients who undergo NACRT followed by esophagectomy. The PET-N response may help clinicians to establish a strategy for perioperative treatments that improves survival for patients with lymph node metastasis in TESCC.