Review of Intra-Arterial Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation is superior to microwave ablation alone for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9-16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1-10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26-34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18-34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67).

CONCLUSION

The combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.

The prognostic and therapeutic potential of vimentin in colorectal cancer

Several cells and molecules in the tumor microenvironment have been introduced as effective factors in the prognosis and progression of colorectal cancer. As a key element of the intermediate filament family, vimentin is expressed by mesenchymal cells in a ubiquitous manner and contributes significantly to cellular integrity and stress resistance in colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that alterations in the expression patterns of intermediate filaments are significantly related to cancer progression, especially in phenotypes associated with cellular migration and invasion. In addition to its multiple biological roles, vimentin also has a substantial function in mediating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Therefore, evaluating vimentin as an effective factor involved in the prognosis of colorectal cancer and targeting it as a novel approach to cancer therapy have become one of the main goals of many researchers worldwide. In this article, we will review the various biological functions of vimentin, as well as its relationship with colorectal cancer with the aim of providing novel insights into its clinical importance in the prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Patterns and Predictors of Recurrence After Curative Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis (CRLM)

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to determine the predictors and patterns of relapses after curative colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective study of CRLM patients operated between 2010 and 2022 was performed. The site of first recurrence was either hepatic (marginal (≤ 1 cm) or extramarginal), extrahepatic, or both. Factors that predicted relapse patterns and overall survival were determined by multivariable Cox regression analysis with backward elimination of variables.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 258 patients, with a similar proportion of synchronous (144; 56%) and metachronous(114; 43%) metastasis. At a 43-month median follow-up, 156 patients (60.4%) developed recurrences with 33 (21.1%) in the liver, 62(24.03%) extra-hepatic recurrences, and 58 (22.48%) having both. Isolated marginal liver relapses were seen in seven (9.89%) liver recurrence patients. The median overall and relapse-free survivals were 38 months (30-54) and 13 months (11-16), respectively. The 3-year liver-relapse-free survival was 54.4% (44.9-60.6). Size of liver metastases > 5 cm (HR 2.06 (1.34-3.17), involved surgical margins (HR 2.16 (1.27-3.68)), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.89 (1.07-3.35)) were predictors of hepatic recurrences. Node positivity of primary (HR 1.61 (1.02-2.56)), presence of baseline extra-hepatic metastases (HR 0.30 (0.18-0.51)), size of liver metastases > 5 cm (HR 2.02 (1.37-2.99)), poorly differentiated histology (HR 2.25 (1.28-3.49)), presence of LVI (HR 2.25 (1.28-3.94)), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.15 (1.28-3.61)) were predictors of extra-hepatic recurrences.

CONCLUSION

The study found majority relapses occurred at extrahepatic sites whilst isolated marginal recurrences were few. The consistent predictors of recurrence were size and inability to deliver adjuvant therapy. A tailored adjuvant therapy might improve outcomes after liver metastasectomy in colorectal cancers.

Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is affected by two groups of malignant tumours: primary liver cancers and liver metastases. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer, and five-year survival after radical surgical treatment of liver metastases ranges from 28% to 50%, depending on primary cancer site. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in most people; therefore, other treatments have to be considered in the case of non-resectability. One possible option is based on the concept that the blood supply to hepatic tumours originates predominantly from the hepatic artery. Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of the peripheral branches of the hepatic artery can be achieved by administering a chemotherapeutic drug followed by vascular occlusive agents and can lead to selective necrosis of the cancer tissue while leaving normal liver parenchyma virtually unaffected. The entire procedure can be performed without infusion of chemotherapy and is then called bland transarterial embolisation (TAE). These procedures are usually applied over a few sessions. Another possible treatment option is systemic chemotherapy which, in the case of colorectal cancer metastases, is most commonly performed using FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) regimens applied in multiple sessions over a long period of time. These therapies disrupt the cell cycle, leading to death of rapidly dividing malignant cells. Current guidelines determine the role of TAE and TACE as non-curative treatment options applicable in people with liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic disease that is unresectable or non-ablatable, and in people who have failed systemic chemotherapy. Regarding the treatment modalities in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases, we found no systematic reviews comparing the efficacy of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) compared with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver-dominant unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three additional databases up to 4 April 2024. We also searched two trials registers and the European Medicines Agency database and checked reference lists of retrieved publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in adults (aged 18 years or older) with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality; overall survival (time to mortality); and any adverse events or complications. Our secondary outcomes were cancer mortality; health-related quality of life; progression-free survival; proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease; time to progression of liver metastases; recurrence of liver metastases; and tumour response measures (complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease). For the purpose of the review and to perform necessary analyses, whenever possible, we converted survival rates to mortality rates, as this was our primary outcome. For the analysis of dichotomous outcomes, we used the risk ratio (RR); for continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference; and for time to event outcomes, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the standardised mean difference with 95% CIs when the trials used different instruments. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We based our conclusions on outcomes analysed at the longest follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three trials with 118 participants randomised to TACE versus 120 participants to systemic chemotherapy. Four participants were excluded; one due to disease progression prior to treatment and three due to decline in health. The trials reported data on one or more outcomes. Two trials were performed in China and one in Italy. The trials differed in terms of embolisation techniques and chemotherapeutic agents. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 50 months. TACE may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. TACE may have little to no effect on overall survival (time to mortality) (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.01; 1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), any adverse events or complications (3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), health-related quality of life (2 trials, 154 participants; very low-certainty evidence), progression-free survival (1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate) (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.96; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. No trials reported cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases. We found no trials comparing the effects of TAE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence regarding effectiveness of TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases is of very low certainty and is based on three trials. Our confidence in the results is limited due to the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. It is very uncertain whether TACE confers benefits with regard to reduction in mortality, overall survival (time to mortality), reduction in adverse events or complications, improvement in health-related quality of life, improvement in progression-free survival, and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate). Data on cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases are lacking. We found no trials assessing TAE versus systemic chemotherapy. More randomised clinical trials are needed to strengthen the body of evidence and provide insight into the benefits and harms of TACE or TAE in comparison with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are common liver-directed therapies (LDTs) for unresectable HCC. While both deliver intra-arterial treatment directly to the site of the tumor, they differ in mechanisms of action and side effects. Several studies have compared their side effect profile, time to progression, and overall survival data, but often these lack practical considerations when choosing which treatment modality to use. Many factors can impact operator's choice for treatment, and the choice depends on treatment availability, cost, insurance coverage, operator's comfort level, patient-specific factors, tumor location, tumor biology, and disease stage. This review discusses survival data, time to progression data, as well as more practical patient and tumor characteristics for personalized LDT with TACE or TARE.

Chemoembolization Beyond Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Tumors Can We Treat and When?

Liver metastases are the most common malignancy found in the liver and are 20 to 40 times more common than primary hepatic tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with liver metastases often present with advanced disease and are not eligible for curative-intent surgery or ablative techniques. The unique hepatic arterial blood supply of liver metastases allows interventional radiologists to target these tumors with transarterial therapies. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been studied in the treatment of liver metastases originating from a variety of primary malignancies and has demonstrated benefits in terms of hepatic progression-free survival, overall survival, and symptomatic relief, among other benefits. Depending on the primary tumor from which they originate, liver metastases may have different indications for TACE, may utilize different TACE regimens and techniques, and may result in different post-procedural outcomes. This review offers an overview of TACE techniques and specific considerations in the treatment of liver metastases, provides an in-depth review of TACE in the treatment of liver metastases originating from colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and uveal melanoma, which represent some of the many tumors beyond hepatocellular carcinoma that can be treated by TACE, and summarizes data regarding when one should consider TACE in their treatment algorithms.

Exploring a Novel Technique to Tackle the Shortage of Devices for Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy: Early Results of an Alternate Approach for Percutaneous Arterial Port Catheter Placement

Dedicated catheters for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy were removed from the market. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of a novel approach to overcome the shortage of dedicated catheters for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. We retrospectively included patients who underwent a percutaneous placement of a hepatic intra-arterial port catheter in a single tertiary center from February 2021 to June 2022. We examined the patient baseline characteristics, technical features of the modified procedures, technical success rates, complications and oncological outcomes. Fourteen patients (median age: 60 years; q1 = 54; q3 = 70; range: 53-81 years) underwent 15 modified procedures. The main modification of our placement technique consisted of the use of an indwelling 5-Fr Vertebral catheter, on the tip of which we created a two-sided additional lateral hole. The catheter was connected to a pediatric port. The primary success rate was 100%, and the secondary success rate was 93.3%. There were two late major complications, graded IIIa according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The median liver progression free survival was 6.1 months (q1 = 2.5; q3 = 7.2; range: 1.3-11.6). Our experience suggests that the derived utilization of the devices used routinely in interventional radiology provides an effective solution that can compensate for the shortage of dedicated devices.

Drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan to treat synchronous liver-only metastases of colorectal cancer non-responsive to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with synchronous liver-only metastases non-responsive to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (BBC).

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Treatment response to BBC and DEBIRI were determined by the morphological criteria and Choi's criteria, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. The correlation between pre-DEBIRI CT parameters and treatment response to DEBIRI was analyzed.

RESULTS

CRC patients were divided into the BBC responsive group (R group) (n = 16) and the non-responsive group (n = 42), which was further divided into the NR group (23 patients who did not receive DEBIRI) and the NR+DEBIRI group (19 patients who received DEBIRI after failing BBC). Among the R, NR and NR+DEBIRI groups, the median PFS were 11, 12, and 4 months, respectively (p < 0.01); median OS were 36, 23, and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.01). In the NR+DEBIRI group, 33 metastatic lesions were treated with DEBIRI, of which 18 (54.5%) reached objective response. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) before DEBIRI could predict objective response (AUC = 0.737, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In CRC patients, DEBIRI can achieve acceptable objective response for liver metastases non-responsive to BBC. However, this locoregional control does not prolong survival. The pre-DEBIRI CER can predict OR in these patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

DEBIRI can act as an acceptable locoregional management in CRC patients with liver metastases non-responsive to BBC, and the pre-DEBIRI CER is a potential indicator of locoregional control.

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Genomics and Biomarkers with Focus on Local Therapies

Molecular cancer biomarkers help personalize treatment, predict oncologic outcomes, and identify patients who can benefit from specific targeted therapies. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most common cancer, with the liver being the most frequent visceral metastatic site. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF V600E Mutations, DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency/Microsatellite Instability Status, HER2 Amplification, and NTRK Fusions are NCCN approved and actionable molecular biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Additional biomarkers are also described and can be helpful in different image-guided hepatic directed therapies specifically for CRLM. For example, tumors maintaining the Ki-67 proliferation marker after thermal ablation was shown to be particularly resilient to ablation. Ablation margin was also shown to be an important factor in predicting local recurrence, with a ≥10 mm minimal ablation margin being required to attain local tumor control, especially for patients with mutant KRAS CRLM.

Coil Embolization of Variant Hepatic Arteries During Percutaneous Arterial Port Catheter Placement for Intraarterial Chemotherapy: Analysis of Intrahepatic Perfusion Redistribution and Treatment Efficacy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the intrahepatic perfusion redistribution after embolization of hepatic arterial variants during percutaneous arterial port catheter placement as well as to investigate the treatment efficacy of intraarterial chemotherapy in perfusion redistribution-dependent compared to redistribution-independent liver areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 62 patients (67.7% males, mean age of 56 ± 12 years). A replaced left hepatic artery was encountered in 36/62 (58.1%), a replaced right hepatic artery in 19/62 (30.6%) and a replaced left and right hepatic artery in 7/62 of patients (11.3%), respectively. Subjective perfusion analysis was performed on digital subtracted angiography and computed tomography (CT)/cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images evaluating the visibility of the main, segmental and subsegmental branches of the embolized variant hepatic artery, re-perfused from intrahepatic arterial anastomoses. For objective perfusion analysis ROI measurements on CT/CBCT images were taken in the redistribution-dependent and redistribution-independent liver lobe. Response analysis according to RECIST 1.1 was separately calculated for the redistribution-dependent and redistribution-independent liver lobe.

RESULTS

Intrahepatic reperfusion of the embolized variant hepatic artery was observed immediately after embolization with visualization of the subsegmental branches in 95.2% of patients. ROI measurements on CT/CBCT images (right lobe mean 76 ± 30.2 HU, left lobe mean 74.4 ± 30.5, p-value 0.88) did not show any differences. Treatment response after intraarterial chemotherapy did not differ between the redistribution-dependent and redistribution-independent liver lobes.

CONCLUSION

Embolization of hepatic arterial variants during percutaneous arterial port catheter placement results in effective intrahepatic perfusion redistribution and does not compromise treatment efficacy of intraarterial chemotherapy in the redistribution-dependent liver lobe.

Prognostic Factors for Effectiveness Outcomes After Transarterial Radioembolization in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the Multicentre Observational Study CIRT

BACKGROUND

Transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres is a treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the liver (mCRC). A better understanding of the prognostic factors and treatment application can improve survival outcomes.

METHODS

We analysed the safety and effectiveness of 237 mCRC patients included in the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy (CIRT) for independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) using the Cox proportional-hazard model.

RESULTS

The median OS was 9.8 months, median PFS was 3.4 months and median hPFS was 4.2 months. Independent prognostic factors for an improved overall survival were the absence of extra-hepatic disease (P= .0391), prior locoregional procedures (P= .0037), an Aspartate transaminase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) value of ≤0.40 (P< .0001) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤1 (P= .0078). Partition model dosimetry resulted in improved OS outcomes compared to the body surface area model (P = .0120). Independent predictors for PFS were APRI >0.40 (P = .0416) and prior ablation (P = .0323), and for hPFS these were 2 to 5 tumor nodules (P = .0148), Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 3 (P = .0075) and APRI >0.40 (P = .0207). During the study, 95 of 237 (40.1%) patients experienced 197 adverse events, with 28 of 237 (11.8%) patients having a grade 3 or higher adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Including easy-to-acquire laboratory markers INR, APRI, ALBI and using partition model dosimetry can identify mCRC patients that may benefit from TARE.