Age-Related Biology of Early-Stage Operable Breast Cancer and Its Impact on Clinical Outcome

Adjuvant capecitabine versus nihil in older patients with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer receiving ibandronate - The ICE randomized clinical trial

AIM OF THE STUDY

Evaluation of the impact of a de-escaleted chemotherapy regimen consisting of capecitabine (Cap) on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients ≥65 years with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer (BC) receiving ibandronate (Ib).

METHODS

ICE (Ib with or without Cap in Elderly patients with early breast cancer) was a multicentre phase 3 clinical trial with a 2020 update of long-term follow-up for overall survival enroling node-positive/high-risk node-negative patients ≥65 years with early BC. Patients were randomised to Cap 2000 mg/m² day 1-14 q3w for 6 cycles plus Ib (50 mg p.o. daily or alternatively 6 mg intravenous q4w) or Ib alone for 2 years. Endocrine therapy was recommended for hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients. The primary endpoint was iDFS analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

1358 (96.4%) of 1409 randomised patients started treatment. 564 (83.4%) completed 6 cycles of Cap. 513 (77.7%) and 516 (78.8%) completed Ib in the Cap+Ib and Ib alone arm, respectively. Median age was 71 (range 64-88) years, 1099 (81%) were HR-positive, 705 (51.9%) node-negative. At a median follow-up of 61.3 months, 5-year iDFS was 78.8% for Cap+Ib versus 75.0% for Ib alone (p = 0.80). Effects were independent of age, nodal, and HR status. The addition of Cap caused significantly higher skin and gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The adjuvant combination of Cap+Ib did not show significantly better iDFS than Ib alone in node-positive/high-risk node-negative older BC patients, of whom HR-positive patients were also treated with endocrine therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Study in elderly patients with early breast cancer (ICE), NCT00196859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00196859?term=NCT00196859.

Assessment of the Androgen Receptor in Older Women with Primary Breast Cancer: Association with a Panel of Biomarkers and Breast Cancer Specific Survival

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer in older women tends to have more favourable biology, compared to younger women. Androgen receptor (AR) is significant for breast tumour carcinogenesis; however, the role of AR in older women has not been fully explored.

METHODS

Surgical specimens were obtained from an existing series of 1758 older women (≥ 70 years) with primary breast cancer, treated in a single institution with long-term (≥ 37 years) follow-up. As part of previous work, it was possible to construct good quality tissue microarrays (TMAs) in 575 surgical specimens and a panel of 24 biomarkers was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in these TMAs. AR positivity was assessed by IHC and defined as H-score ≥ 40. The relationship between AR in this cohort was compared to an equivalent group of younger women (< 70 years, n = 1708); the panel of 24 biomarkers and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in the older cohort.

RESULTS

AR was assessed in 509 samples. Overall, 59% of the older women cohort had positive expression of AR, compared to 63% in the younger cohort. AR positivity (regardless of age) was associated with smaller size of tumour, lower grade of tumour, lower tubule formation, lower nuclear polymorphism and lower mitotic frequency. AR positivity was associated with positive expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1), cytokeratin (CK) 7/8, CK18, CK19, B cell lymphoma (Bcl)2 and Mucin 1 (Muc1) expression. Conversely, AR-positive expression was associated with negative expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki-67, CK5, CK17, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and CD44 expression. Older women with AR-positive tumours had better BCSS compared to AR-negative tumours (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in AR expression between older and younger women with breast cancer. AR has prognostic potential in terms of BCSS. Further work is needed to investigate AR as a therapeutic target.

Quality Indicators Compliance and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer according to Age in a Certified Center

Age as a breast cancer (BC) prognostic factor remains debatable. Several studies have investigated clinicopathological features at different ages, but few make an age group direct comparison. The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists quality indicators (EUSOMA-QIs) allow a standardized quality assurance of BC diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Our objective was to compare clinicopathological features, compliance to EUSOMA-QIs and BC outcomes in three age groups (≤45 years, 46-69 years, and ≥70 years). Data from 1580 patients with staged 0-IV BC from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed. The minimum standard and desirable target on 19 mandatory and 7 recommended QIs were studied. The 5-year relapse rate, overall survival (OS), and BC-specific survival (BCSS) were also evaluated. No meaningful differences in TNM staging and molecular subtyping classification between age groups were found. On the contrary, disparities in QIs compliance were observed: 73.1% in ≤45 years and 46-69 years women vs. 54% in older patients. No differences in loco-regional or distant progression were observed between age groups. Nevertheless, lower OS was found in older patients due to concurrent non-oncological causes. After survival curves adjustment, we underscored evidence of undertreatment impacting BCSS in ≥70 years women. Despite a unique exception-more invasive G3 tumors in younger patients-no age-specific differences in BC biology impacting outcome were found. Although increased noncompliance in older women, no outcome correlation was observed with QIs noncompliance in any age group. Clinicopathological features and differences in multimodal treatment (not the chronological age) are predictors of lower BCSS.