Immunotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Bispecific T cell engager-armed T cells targeting integrin ανβ6 exhibit enhanced T cell redirection and antitumor activity in cholangiocarcinoma

Advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) presents a clinical challenge due to limited treatment options, necessitating exploration of innovative therapeutic approaches. Bispecific T cell engager (BTE)-armed T cell therapy shows promise in hematological and solid malignancies, offering potential advantages in safety over continuous BTE infusion. In this context, we developed a novel BTE, targeting CD3 on T cells and integrin αvβ6, an antigen elevated in various epithelial malignancies, on cancer cells. The novel BTE was generated by fusing an integrin αvβ6-binding peptide (A20) to an anti-CD3 (OKT3) single-chain variable fragment (scFv) through a G4S peptide linker (A20/αCD3 BTE). T cells were then armed with A20/αCD3 BTE (A20/αCD3-armed T cells) and assessed for antitumor activity. Our results highlight the specific binding of A20/αCD3 BTE to CD3 on T cells and integrin αvβ6 on target cells, effectively redirecting T cells towards these targets. After co-culture, A20/αCD3-armed T cells exhibited significantly heightened cytotoxicity against integrin αvβ6-expressing target cells compared to unarmed T cells in both KKU-213A cells and A375.β6 cells. Moreover, in a five-day co-culture, A20/αCD3-armed T cells demonstrated superior cytotoxicity against KKU-213A spheroids compared to unarmed T cells. Importantly, A20/αCD3-armed T cells exhibited an increased proportion of the effector memory T cell (Tem) subset, upregulation of T cell activation markers, enhanced T cell proliferation, and increased cytolytic molecule/cytokine production, when compared to unarmed T cells in an integrin αvβ6-dependent manner. These findings support the potential of A20/αCD3-armed T cells as a novel therapeutic approach for integrin αvβ6-expressing cancers.

Efficacy of dual checkpoint inhibitors in a patient with a mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma

A woman in her 60s was diagnosed with a metastatic, unresectable rare histological type of liver cancer; combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma. She had palliative chemotherapy, initially with gemcitabine and cisplatin, and then with oxaliplatin, L-folinic acid and fluorouracil. Both treatment strategies demonstrated disease progression, and somatic mutation profiling revealed no actionable mutations. The patient was started on immuno-oncology (IO) with nivolumab and ipilimumab, followed by maintenance nivolumab. She has achieved a sustained ongoing partial response since the start of this therapy for at least 12 months. The outcome in this patient is in keeping with the growing evidence of the role that IO agents have in metastatic biliary tract cancer and also serves to highlight their importance in mixed histology liver tumours.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the ongoing, randomised, double-blind phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with significant improvements in overall survival compared with placebo, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in people with advanced biliary tract cancer at the pre-planned intermin analysis. In this paper, we present patient-reported outcomes from TOPAZ-1.

METHODS

In TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235), participants aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and one or more measurable lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the durvalumab group or the placebo group using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. Participants received 1500 mg durvalumab or matched placebo intravenously every 3 weeks (on day 1 of the cycle) for up to eight cycles in combination with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Thereafter, participants received either durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by disease status (initially unresectable vs recurrent) and primary tumour location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder cancer). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as a secondary outcome in all participants who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's 30-item Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the 21-item Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Quality of Life Module (QLQ-BIL21). We calculated time to deterioration-ie, time from randomisation to an absolute decrease of at least 10 points in a patient-reported outcome that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or the date of death (by any cause) in the absence of deterioration-and adjusted mean change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes.

FINDINGS

Between April 16, 2019, and Dec 11, 2020, 685 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 341 to the durvalumab group and 344 to the placebo group. Overall, 345 (50%) of participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Data for the QLQ-C30 were available for 318 participants in the durvalumab group and 328 in the placebo group (median follow-up 9·9 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·1]). Data for the QLQ-BIL21 were available for 305 participants in the durvalumab group and 322 in the placebo group (median follow-up 10·2 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·3]). The proportions of participants in both groups who completed questionnaires were high and baseline scores were mostly similar across treatment groups. For global health status or quality of life, functioning, and symptoms, we noted no difference in time to deterioration or adjusted mean changes from baseline were observed between groups. Median time to deterioration of global health status or quality of life was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6 to 8·9) in the durvalumab group and 6·7 months (5·6 to 7·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·12]). The adjusted mean change from baseline was 1·23 (95% CI -0·71 to 3·16) in the durvalumab group and 0·35 (-1·63 to 2·32) in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin did not have a detrimental effect on patient-reported outcomes. These results suggest that durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin is a tolerable treatment regimen in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Current and Future Therapeutic Targets for Directed Molecular Therapies in Cholangiocarcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data, clinical trials (MEDLINE; ncbi.pubmed.com), congress contributions (asco.org; esmo.org), and active recruiting clinical trains (clinicaltrial.gov) on targeted therapies in cholangiocarcinoma. Palliative treatment regimens were analyzed as well as preoperative and perioperative treatment options. We summarized the current knowledge for each mutation and molecular pathway that is or has been under clinical evaluation and discussed the results on the background of current treatment guidelines. We established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for second-line settings, including IDH-, BRAF-, and NTRK-mutated tumors, as well as for FGFR2 fusion, HER2/neu-overexpression, and microsatellite instable tumors. Other options for targeted treatment include EGFR- or VEGF-dependent pathways, which are known to be overexpressed or dysregulated in this cancer type and are currently under clinical investigation. Targeted therapy in CCA is a hallmark of individualized medicine as these therapies aim to specifically block pathways that promote cancer cell growth and survival, leading to tumor shrinkage and improved patient outcomes based on the molecular profile of the tumor.

Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis

Aim: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6 months and median PFS was 3.2 months. Conclusion: The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.

Co-Expression of Immunohistochemical Markers MRP2, CXCR4, and PD-L1 in Gallbladder Tumors Is Associated with Prolonged Patient Survival

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare pathology in Western countries. However, it constitutes a relevant health problem in Asia and Latin America, with a high mortality in middle-aged Chilean women. The limited therapeutic options for GBC require the identification of targetable proteins with prognostic value for improving clinical management support. We evaluated the expression of targetable proteins, including three epithelial tumor markers, four proteins associated with multidrug and apoptosis resistance, and eleven immunological markers in 241 primary gallbladder adenocarcinomas. We investigated correlations between tumor marker expression, the primary tumor staging, and GBC patients' survival using automated immunohistochemistry, a semi-automatic method for image analysis, univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, and machine learning algorithms. Our data show a significant association between the expression of MRP2 (p = 0.0028), CXCR4 (p = 0.0423), and PD-L1 (p = 0.0264), and a better prognosis for patients with late-stage primary tumors. The expression of the MRP2/CXCR4/PD-L1 cluster of markers discriminates among short-, medium-, and long-term patient survival, with an ROC of significant prognostic value (AUC = 0.85, p = 0.0012). Moreover, a high MRP2/CXCR4/PD-L1 co-expression is associated with increased survival time (30 vs. 6 months, p = 0.0025) in GBC patients, regardless of tumor stage. Hence, our results suggest that the MRP2/CXCR4/PD-L1 cluster could potentially be a prognostic marker for GBC.

Therapeutic yield of extensive molecular profiling in cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective single-center study

INTRODUCTION

Current available systemic therapies for advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are of limited effectiveness and prognosis is poor. Recently, introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies led to a better understanding of the genetic pathophysiology and, consequently, identification of molecular alterations for targeted treatment.

AIM

To determine the proportion of actionable alterations using extensive molecular profiling in a routine diagnostic setting and to study the effect of targeted treatment on disease control.

METHODS

Results of extensive molecular testing by either FoundationOne NGS or an in-house developed 96 cancer gene panel were retrospectively collected from patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA diagnosed between 01/12/2018 and 01/08/2021 in a single center. Gene variants were classified according to ESCAT and correlated with efficacy endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 125 patients included, 65 patients had an intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). FGFR2 fusions and IDH1/BAP1 mutations were more frequent in iCCA, while KRAS and SMAD4 mutations were predominant in extrahepatic CCA (eCCA). Targetable alterations (ESCAT tiers I-IV) were identified in 73,6% of patients. Overall survival was significantly better for higher tiers regardless of treatment. Thirteen patients (10.4%) received targeted treatment based on molecular profiling, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive molecular characterization led to the identification of targetable and potentially targetable alterations in a significant proportion of patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. We confirmed the association between higher ESCAT tier and benefit of a targeted treatment. Molecular analysis should therefore be considered in all patients fit enough for systemic treatment.

Place of durvalumab in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: A review

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a group of rare and aggressive types of malignancies that arise from the epithelium of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts (cholangiocarcinoma) and gallbladder. The prognosis of unresectable BTC is poor, and less than 5% of patients are alive at 5 years after diagnosis. Radical surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for early stage BTC, and antitumor chemotherapy extends survival rates in patients with unresectable or metastatic BTC. With the emerging of monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, the possibility of such therapy in first- and subsequent-line treatment of advanced BTC has been actively studied. The positive high-level results from the TOPAZ-1 Phase III trial showed durvalumab, in combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin), statistically improved overall survival versus chemotherapy alone and showed improvements versus chemotherapy alone in prespecified secondary endpoints including progression-free survival and objective response rate. Durvalumab plus chemotherapy was well tolerated, had a similar safety profile versus the comparator arm and did not increase the discontinuation rate due to adverse events compared to chemotherapy alone. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the combination of durvalumab and chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) as the first immunotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC. In July 2022, durvalumab plus chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) was added to the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) as a preferred regimen category 1 in first-line therapy for Unresectable or metastatic BTC based on the data from TOPAZ-1. In addition, the durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin was recently added to the practical recommendations of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO) for the treatment of hepatobiliary cancers as an alternative to standard first-line treatment of BTC.

Real-world outcomes of patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with programmed cell death protein-1-targeted immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of effective treatment to improve the prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-targeted immunotherapy has shown promising results in a variety of malignant tumours. However, in patients with advanced ICC, the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 agents remain unclear.

METHODS

Forty-two advanced ICC patients treated with anti-PD-1 agents from August 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumour response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to tumour progression (TTP) were evaluated. Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 12.1 months, and the median time of treatment was 6.7 months for all patients. The median OS, median PFS, and median TTP for the whole cohort were 19.3 months, 11.6 months, and 11.6 months, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the whole cohort were 23.8% and 85.7%, respectively. Of the 42 evaluable individuals, two (4.8%) had hyperprogressive disease. The most common adverse events (AEs) were pain (n = 6; 14.3%), anorexia (n = 4; 9.5%), hypertension (n = 4; 9.5%), pyrexia (n = 3; 7.1%), cough (n = 3; 7.1%), and hypothyroidism (n = 3; 7.1%). The median OS of patients with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 was longer than that of patients with ALBI grade 2 (19.3 months vs. 14.7 months). The median PFS did not show a significant difference between ALBI grade 1 and grade 2 patients (13.6 months vs. 6.9 months).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1-targeted immunotherapy showed promising efficacy and safety in advanced ICC patients.Key messagesPD-1-targeted immunotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for advanced ICC patients.This study provides therapeutic strategy for advanced ICC patients.

Model-informed approach for risk management of bleeding toxicities for bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1

PURPOSE

Bintrafusp alfa (BA) is a bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor II fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 antibody blocking programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was selected based on phase 1 efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic data, assuming continuous inhibition of PD-L1 and TGF-β is required. Here, we describe a model-informed dose modification approach for risk management of BA-associated bleeding adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

The PK and AE data from studies NCT02517398, NCT02699515, NCT03840915, and NCT04246489 (n = 936) were used. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate potential relationships between bleeding AEs and BA time-averaged concentration (C_avg), derived using a population PK model. The percentage of patients with trough concentrations associated with PD-L1 or TGF-β inhibition across various dosing regimens was derived.

RESULTS

The probability of bleeding AEs increased with increasing C_avg; 50% dose reduction was chosen based on the integration of modeling and clinical considerations. The resulting AE management guidance to investigators regarding temporary or permanent treatment discontinuation was further refined with recommendations on restarting at RP2D or at 50% dose, depending on the grade and type of bleeding (tumoral versus nontumoral) and investigator assessment of risk of additional bleeding.

CONCLUSION

A pragmatic model-informed approach for management of bleeding AEs was implemented in ongoing clinical trials of BA. This approach is expected to improve benefit-risk profile; however, its effectiveness will need to be evaluated based on safety data generated after implementation.

Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Some BTC types respond to pembrolizumab, but there are no known prognostic factors to predict its treatment benefits. In this study, we attempted to identify the prognostic factors associated with pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment for gemcitabine-refractory BTC. This retrospective and single tertiary-center study involved all the consecutive patients (n = 80) with refractory advanced BTC, who were diagnosed as programmed cell death ligand 1-positive and treated with pembrolizumab between August 2017 and February 2021. The overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Cox regression analysis. The median OS was 6.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.87−8.20]; median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.82−1.98); and the response rate was 15.9%. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the TB [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.286; 95% CI: 1.177−4.440; p = 0.015), albumin levels (adjusted HR = 0.392; 95% CI: 0.211−0.725; p = 0.003), ALP levels (adjusted HR = 1.938; 95% CI: 1.105−3.400; p = 0.021), and LMR (adjusted HR = 0.325; 95% CI: 0.173−0.609; p < 0.001) were identified as significant variables associated with the OS. High albumin levels and LMR and low ALP levels and TB were significantly associated with better OS in patients treated with pembrolizumab.

Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer have a poor prognosis, and first-line standard of care (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) has remained unchanged for more than 10 years. The TOPAZ-1 trial evaluated durvalumab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we randomly assigned patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer or with recurrent disease 1:1 to receive durvalumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 685 patients were randomly assigned to durvalumab (n=341) or placebo (n=344) with chemotherapy. As of data cutoff, 198 patients (58.1%) in the durvalumab group and 226 patients (65.7%) in the placebo group had died. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.97; P=0.021). The estimated 24-month overall survival rate was 24.9% (95% CI, 17.9 to 32.5) for durvalumab and 10.4% (95% CI, 4.7 to 18.8) for placebo. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P=0.001). Objective response rates were 26.7% with durvalumab and 18.7% with placebo. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 75.7% and 77.8% with durvalumab and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy and showed improvements versus placebo plus chemotherapy in prespecified secondary end points including progression-free survival and objective response rate. The safety profiles of the two treatment groups were similar. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03875235.)

An Immunity-Related Gene Model Predicts Prognosis in Cholangiocarcinoma

The prognosis of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is closely related to both immune cell infiltration and mRNA expression. Therefore, we aimed at conducting multi-immune-related gene analyses to improve the prediction of CCA recurrence. Immune-related genes were selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used to establish the multi-gene model that was significantly correlated with the recurrence-free survival (RFS) in two test series. Furthermore, compared with single genes, clinical characteristics, tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE), and tumor inflammation signature (TIS), the 8-immune-related differentially expressed genes (8-IRDEGs) signature had a better prediction value. Moreover, the high-risk subgroup had a lower density of B-cell, plasma, B-cell naïve, CD8+ T-cell, CD8+ T-cell naïve, and CD8+ T-cell memory infiltration, as well as more severe immunosuppression and higher mutation counts. In conclusion, the 8-IRDEGs signature was a promising biomarker for distinguishing the prognosis and the molecular and immune features of CCA, and could be beneficial to the individualized immunotherapy for CCA patients.

Micro-RNA in Cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

Bile-duct cancers (BDC) are a group of solid tumors arising from the biliary tree. Despite their classification as rare cancers, the incidence of BDC is increasing worldwide. Poor prognosis is a common feature of this type of cancer and is mainly determined by the following factors: late diagnosis, lack of effective therapeutic approaches, and resistance to conventional treatments. In the past few years, next-generation sequencing technologies has allowed us to study the genome, exome, and transcriptome of BDC deeper, revealing a previously underestimated class of RNA: the noncoding RNA (ncRNA). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small ncRNAs that play an important regulatory role in gene expression. The aberrant expression of miRNAs and their pivotal role as oncogenes or tumor suppressors in biliary carcinogenesis has been widely described in BDC. Due to their ability to regulate multiple gene networks, miRNAs are involved in all cancer hallmarks, including sustaining proliferative signaling, evading growth suppressors, resisting cell death, enabling replicative immortality, inducing/accessing vasculature, activating invasion and metastasis, reprogramming cellular metabolism, and avoiding immune destruction. Their use as diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers has been widely explored in several human cancers, including BDC. Furthermore, miRNA-based therapeutic strategies are currently the subject of numerous clinical trials that are providing evidence of their efficacy as potent anticancer agents. In this review, we will provide a detailed update of miRNAs affecting BDC, discussing their regulatory function in processes underlying the molecular pathology of BDC. Finally, an overview of their potential use as biomarkers or therapeutic tools in BDC will be further addressed.

Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) represent a heterogeneous and aggressive group of tumors with dismal prognosis. For a long time, BTC has been considered an orphan disease with very limited therapeutic options. In recent years a better understanding of the complex molecular landscape of biology is rapidly changing the therapeutic armamentarium. However, while 40-50% of patients there are molecular drivers susceptible to target therapy, for the remaining population new therapeutic options represent an unsatisfied clinical need. The role of immunotherapy in the continuum of treatment of patients with BTC is still debated. Despite initial signs of antitumor-activity, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrated limited efficacy in an unselected population. Therefore, identifying the best partner to combine ICIs and predictive biomarkers represents a key challenge to optimize the efficacy of immunotherapy. This review provides a critical analysis of completed trials, with an eye on future perspectives and possible biomarkers of response.

Tumor Mutational Burden as a Biomarker for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Background: High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) has been reported as a predictive marker to immunotherapy or prognostic marker in various tumor types. However, there has been little study of the role of TMB-H in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods: We analyzed 119 advanced BTC patients who received Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (GP) as a first-line treatment between November 2019 and April 2021. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including TMB analysis, as a routine clinical practice was performed in 119 patients. The TruSight^TM Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel. Results: Among 119 patients, 18 (18.5%) had a tumor with high TMB (≥ 10 Muts/Mb). There were no significant differences between the status of TMB and clinical outcomes with GP, including objective response rate (ORR) (P = .126), disease control rate (DCR) (p = .454), and median progression-free survival (PFS) (p = .599). The median overall survival (OS) was not different between patients with TMB-H and no TMB-H (p = .430). In subgroup analysis of 32 patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs), there were significant differences in ORR (p = .034) and median PFS (p = .025) with ICIs between patients with and without TMB-H. Conclusions: This study revealed that TMB-H in advanced BTCs did not have a prognostic or role in the standard first-line treatment. However, TMB-H might be a predictive biomarker for response to ICIs in advanced BTC.

A case from the future of HPB surgical oncology: resection of biliary tract cancer after immunotherapy

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have limited response to systemic therapy and poor prognosis. Immunotherapy in BTCs has been investigated in recent years. Here, we report a case of locally advanced, unresectable gallbladder adenocarcinoma that progressed on chemotherapy. The patient was then treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, which resulted in tumor shrinkage and autoimmune hepatitis, but established technical resectability. He underwent complete resection through extended right hepatectomy with en bloc cholecystectomy bile duct resection, hepatic and portal lymphadenectomy and Roux-Y hepaticojejunostomy reconstruction. The final pathology revealed a pathologic complete response. The scope of operative intervention after immunotherapy is still evolving for BTCs. Establishing resectability in tumors not susceptible to cytotoxic agents but responding to immunotherapy not only facilitates curative intent resection but also enhances the importance of infection prevention through operative stent-free long-term biliary decompression. Immunotherapy may also carry a unique risk profile for post-operative morbidity potential as in this case with autoimmune hepatitis.

Beneficial autoimmunity links primary biliary cholangitis to the avoidance of cholangiocarcinoma

It has been an open conundrum why primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a major risk factor for developing cholangiocarcinoma (CAA), while primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is not. In mouse models of PSC and PBC, it turned out that the latter condition, an autoimmune disease affecting the bile ducts, reduces transgene-induced cholangiocarcinogenesis, as well as the progression of subcutaneously implanted CCA. This CCA-delaying effect is lost upon depletion of T lymphocytes and involves tumor infiltration by T cell clonotypes that are also found in PBC lesions. Hence, organ-specific autoimmunity may improve immunosurveillance.

Atezolizumab: an investigational agent for the treatment of biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a dismal prognosis and limited treatment options. The role of immunotherapy in BTC is unclear. BTCs respond poorly to PD-(L)1 blockade, highlighting the need for combination regimens to augment antitumor immunity. Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with other therapies is under investigation in advanced BTC.

AREAS COVERED

This paper provides an overview of the recent progress and future applications of immunotherapy for BTCs and sheds light on the status and therapeutic potential of atezolizumab. We discuss published data for atezolizumab and an examine the rationale and design of ongoing clinical studies. We offer insights and opinions on the future applications and challenges of immunotherapy in BTC.

EXPERT OPINION

Atezolizumab monotherapy has demonstrated limited antitumor activity in BTC, indicating the need for combination regimens to unlock effective anticancer immunity, and the development of predictive biomarkers to enrich the population. Data for atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy, anti-VEGF agents and other targeted drugs in solid tumors justifies their evaluation in BTC. Several novel atezolizumab-based combinations have been or are currently under investigation in Phase II studies. It is hoped that data from these studies, along with other immunotherapy trials, will provide more effective treatments for patients with BTC.

Targeted therapies for gallbladder cancer: an overview of agents in preclinical and clinical development

Introduction: Gallbladder cancer (GC) is a rare malignancy with a dismal prognosis. When diagnosed early enough, it can be cured by surgical removal. Unfortunately, only few GC patients can be amenable to surgery, though, with a high relapse rate. Conventional chemotherapy remains the golden standard for unresectable or metastatic GC, both in the first and second-line settings, even if leading to a fair outcome improvement.Areas covered: In recent years, according to the concept of 'precision medicine', new potential molecular targets have been examined. We provided a general outline of the current first- and second-line chemotherapies. New therapeutic possibilities are also reviewed, particularly HER2, EGFR, VEGF, TKI, MEK and BRAF inhibitors, and immunotherapy. Furthermore, published clinical trials are utilized to analyze the principal drug effectiveness in GC.Expert opinion: GC is characterized by vast cancer heterogeneity and individual's efficacy to different drugs. The ongoing trials have the potentiality of reshaping the landscape of systemic treatments for GC in the very next years. Nowadays, amongst therapeutic combinations, the addition of ICIs to chemotherapy has yielded encouraging results needing confirmation. In the next future, systematic implementation of gene profiling and further explorations of combination therapies will likely change the treatment scenario.