Plain language summary of the TOPAZ-1 study: durvalumab and chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This is a summary describing the results of a Phase III study called TOPAZ-1. The study looked at treatment with durvalumab (a type of immunotherapy) and chemotherapy to treat participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Advanced BTC is usually diagnosed at late stages of disease, when it cannot be cured by surgery. This study included participants with advanced BTC who had not received previous treatment, or had their cancer come back at least 6 months after receiving treatment or surgery that aimed to cure their disease. Participants received treatment with durvalumab and chemotherapy or placebo and chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to find out if treatment with durvalumab and chemotherapy could increase the length of time that participants with advanced BTC lived, compared with placebo and chemotherapy.

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY?

Participants who took durvalumab and chemotherapy had a 20% lower chance of experiencing death at any point in the study compared with participants who received placebo and chemotherapy. The side effects experienced by participants were similar across treatment groups, and less than 12% of participants in either treatment group had to stop treatment due to treatment-related side effects.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?

Overall, these results support durvalumab and chemotherapy as a new treatment option for people with advanced BTCs. Based on the results of this study, durvalumab is now approved for the treatment of adults with advanced BTCs in combination with chemotherapy by government organizations in Europe, the United States and several other countries.

Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Durvalumab Combination for Biliary Tract CancerThis trial randomly assigned patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer to receive durvalumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Median overall survival (95% Cl) was 12.8 (11.1-14.0) months in the durvalumab group. Rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were similar between groups.

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) in patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC): TOPAZ-1

378

Background: BTC is a rare, heterogenous cancer with poor prognosis. Reports on immunogenic features of BTC suggest checkpoint inhibition may result in antitumor immune responses, and limited clinical activity has been seen with single agents in advanced settings. Durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) + GemCis showed promising antitumor activity in advanced BTC in a phase 2 study. TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235) is the first global phase 3 study to evaluate first-line immunotherapy + GemCis in advanced BTC. Methods: In this double-blind study, pts previously untreated for unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic BTC were randomized 1:1 to receive durvalumab (1500 mg every 3 weeks [Q3W]) or placebo + GemCis (Gem 1000 mg/m2 and Cis 25 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 Q3W) for up to 8 cycles, followed by durvalumab (1500 mg Q4W) or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by disease status (initially unresectable, recurrent) and primary tumor location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer). The primary objective was to assess overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: At data cutoff for this interim analysis (11 August 2021), 685 pts were randomized to durvalumab + GemCis (n=341) or placebo + GemCis (n=344; Table). The primary objective was met: durvalumab + GemCis significantly improved OS vs placebo + GemCis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–0.97; p=0.021). PFS was also significantly improved with durvalumab vs placebo (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64–0.89; p=0.001). ORR was 26.7% with durvalumab and 18.7% with placebo. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 62.7% of pts receiving durvalumab and 64.9% of pts receiving placebo. TRAEs led to discontinuation of any study medication in 8.9% of pts receiving durvalumab and 11.4% of pts receiving placebo. Conclusions: In pts with advanced BTC, durvalumab + GemCis significantly improved OS and PFS vs placebo + GemCis with manageable safety, indicating durvalumab + GemCis may be a new first-line standard of care regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT03875235. [Table: see text]

Real-world evaluation of molecular testing and treatment patterns for EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer in Latin America

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Latin America, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most prevalent. The current study aimed to report real-world data on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational testing and treatment regimens at diagnosis and progression in patients with metastatic NSCLC across four Latin American countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Uruguay). A retrospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in patients with NSCLC using medical records from participating countries. The study population was categorized into two cohorts: Cohort 1 comprised of newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with stage IV NSCLC; and cohort 2 comprised of stage IV NSCLC EGFR mutation (EGFRm)-positive patients who had progressed after first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Measures included demographic variables, health characteristics, treatment regimen, molecular testing rate and turnaround time at diagnosis and at progression for cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize all study measures. Of the 462 patients enrolled, 431 were newly diagnosed or treatment naïve with metastatic NSCLC. In cohort 1, the majority of patients with private health insurance (57.31%) underwent molecular diagnosis while only 41.3% of patients within the public sector had access to testing. The average molecular testing rate in cohort 1 varied across countries, with Argentina having the highest testing rate (79%) and Uruguay the lowest (27.63%). EGFRm was observed in 22% of patients. Cohort 2 comprised 31 patients who had progressed after first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment and of these, only 22 (70.97%) underwent testing after progression. Access to molecular testing is still a challenge impacting the choice of first-line treatment in Latin American patients with NSCLC. These findings underline the unmet needs of ensuring early diagnosis, molecular profiling and use of correct treatment to alleviate NSCLC burden in the region.