ctDNA to Guide Adjuvant Therapy in Localized Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

Biomarker Profile of Colorectal Cancer: Current Findings and Future Perspective

OBJECTIVE

Breakthroughs in omics technology have led to a deeper understanding of the fundamental molecular changes that play a critical role in the development and progression of cancer. This review delves into the hidden molecular drivers of colorectal cancer (CRC), offering potential for clinical translation through novel biomarkers and personalized therapies.

METHODS

We summarizes recent studies utilizing various omics approaches, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, metabolomics and data integration with computational algorithms, to investigate CRC.

RESULTS

Integrating multi-omics data in colorectal cancer research unlocks hidden biological insights, revealing new pathways and mechanisms. This powerful approach not only identifies potential biomarkers for personalized prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, but also predicts patient response to specific therapies, while computational tools illuminate the landscape by deciphering complex datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should prioritize validating promising biomarkers and seamlessly translating them into clinical practice, ultimately propelling personalized CRC management to new heights.

Unrevealing the therapeutic benefits of radiotherapy and consolidation immunotherapy using ctDNA-defined tumor clonality in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Progression occurs in approximately two-thirds of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) receiving chemoradiation and consolidation immunotherapy. Molecular indicators for outcome prediction are under development. A novel metric, the ratio of mean to max variant allele frequency (mmVAF), was derived from 431 pre-treatment tissue biopsies from The Cancer Genome Atlas and evaluated in serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from 70 LA-NSCLC patients receiving definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) with/without immunotherapy. High mmVAFs in pre-treatment tissue biopsies, indicating clonal predominant tumors (P < 0.01), were associated with inferior overall survival [OS, hazard ratio (HR): 1.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.98]. Similar associations of mmVAF with clonality (P < 0.01) and OS (HR: 2.24, 95 % CI: 0.71-7.08) were observed in pre-treatment ctDNA. At 1-month post-RT, ctDNA mmVAF-high patients receiving consolidation immunotherapy exhibited improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those who did not (HR: 0.14, 95 % CI: 0.03-0.67). From the baseline to week 4 of RT and/or 1-month post-RT, survival benefits from consolidation immunotherapy were exclusively observed in ctDNA mmVAF-increased patients (PFS, HR: 0.39, 95 % CI: 0.14-1.15), especially in terms of distant metastasis (HR: 0.11, 95 % CI: 0.01-0.95). In summary, our longitudinal data demonstrated the applicability of ctDNA-defined clonality for prognostic stratification and immunotherapy benefit prediction in LA-NSCLC.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Minimal Residual Disease Assessment and Recurrence Risk in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection with or without Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Emerging data have suggested that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be a reliable biomarker for minimal residual disease (MRD) in CRC patients. Recent studies have shown that the ability to detect MRD using ctDNA assay after curative-intent surgery will change how to assess the recurrence risk and patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. We performed a meta-analysis of post-operative ctDNA in stage I-IV (oligometastatic) CRC patients after curative-intent resection. We included 23 studies representing 3568 patients with evaluable ctDNA in CRC patient post-curative-intent surgery. Data were extracted from each study to perform a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. software. Subsequent subgroup analysis was performed for stages I-III and oligometastatic stage IV CRC patients. Results showed that the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in post-surgical ctDNA-positive versus -negative patients in all stages was 7.27 (95% CI 5.49-9.62), p < 0.00001. Subgroup analysis revealed pooled HRs of 8.14 (95% CI 5.60-11.82) and 4.83 (95% CI 3.64-6.39) for stages I-III and IV CRC, respectively. The pooled HR for RFS in post-adjuvant chemotherapy ctDNA-positive versus -negative patients in all stages was 10.59 (95% CI 5.59-20.06), p < 0.00001. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has revolutionized non-invasive cancer diagnostics and monitoring, with two primary forms of analysis emerging: tumor-informed techniques and tumor-agnostic or tumor-naive techniques. Tumor-informed methods involve the initial identification of somatic mutations in tumor tissue, followed by the targeted sequencing of plasma DNA using a personalized assay. In contrast, the tumor-agnostic approach performs ctDNA analysis without prior knowledge of the patient's tumor tissue molecular profile. This review highlights the distinctive features and implications of each approach. Tumor-informed techniques enable the precise monitoring of known tumor-specific mutations, leveraging the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA detection. Conversely, the tumor-agnostic approach allows for a broader genetic and epigenetic analysis, potentially revealing novel alterations and enhancing our understanding of tumor heterogeneity. Both approaches have significant implications for personalized medicine and improved patient outcomes in the field of oncology. The subgroup analysis based on the ctDNA method showed pooled HRs of 8.66 (95% CI 6.38-11.75) and 3.76 (95% CI 2.58-5.48) for tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic, respectively. Our analysis emphasizes that post-operative ctDNA is a strong prognostic marker of RFS. Based on our results, ctDNA can be a significant and independent predictor of RFS. This real-time assessment of treatment benefits using ctDNA can be used as a surrogate endpoint for the development of novel drugs in the adjuvant setting.

[Current trends in liquid biopsy and diagnostics-contributions from ASCO and ESMO 2022]

BACKGROUND

Liquid biopsy is a promising new diagnostic tool that is already used in clinical practice for multiple tumor entities and which also has great potential for head and neck cancer. Herein, the authors discuss a selection of publications from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meetings in 2022.

OBJECTIVE

Relevant publications are evaluated and summarized.

METHODS

Using a databank inquiry, abstracts from the 2022 ASCO and ESMO conferences regarding liquid biopsy and related diagnostics for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were collected. Work without relevant data and statements of intent were not included. Duplicate articles across conferences were only quoted once. A total of 532 articles were screened, 50 articles were selected for further review, and 9 articles were selected for presentation.

RESULTS

Six articles on cell- and RNA-based liquid biopsy and three articles on more general diagnostic tools in the treatment of head and neck cancer are presented. The results are discussed in relation to current treatment standards.

CONCLUSION

Multiple studies show promising results for the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for treatment surveillance in head and neck cancer. Integration into clinical practice will depend on larger study cohorts and sinking costs.

Circulating tumor DNA: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors - can we RECIST? Focus on colorectal cancer

Interest in the measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased during the past decade. The analysis of quantitative ctDNA changes as a general response evaluation criterion during systemic treatment is a scientific approach with high clinical potential, and results can be transferred to a pan-cancer concept if relevantly investigated. The purpose of this overview is to discuss the current evidence for ctDNA as a marker of response in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and to propose criteria for definitions of response to systemic therapies applicable in prospective clinical trials. We discuss the literature, which supports a new definition of ctDNA Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Finally, we discuss the challenges in preparations of the optimal trial design to establish the true clinical utility of ctDNA.

ctDNA to Guide Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Ready for Standard of Care?

OPINION STATEMENT

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has already shown clinically relevant results in early-stage colon cancer patient management. Its prognostic value is by far much stronger than that of the available clinico-pathological biomarkers, therefore, has the potential to personalize the treatment after radical surgery through intensifying or de-intensifying the adjuvant therapy. Further developments and improvements should be pursued by (a) optimizing ctDNA assays and (b) validating its clinical utility in the different stages of this disease. Two main avenues of ctDNA testing are being pursued: tumor-informed vs tumor-agnostic assays. Two main clinical trial designs are under study: ctDNA-based strategy and ctDNA-by-treatment interaction. The former needs large sample sizes to address the main questions of the studies; thus, the target delta benefit may be the main challenge in these trial designs. The latter may be challenged by unavoidable contamination bias. To date, several clinical trials are ongoing worldwide. We believe that this large number of trials may provide an excellent common database for the demonstration of surrogacy of ctDNA for the classical 3-year disease-free survival endpoint. This would mark a huge methodological improvement to speed up new drug testing and development in the adjuvant treatment of this disease.

Integrative analysis of multi-omics data for liquid biopsy

The innovation of liquid biopsy holds great potential to revolutionise cancer management through early diagnosis and timely treatment of cancer. Integrative analysis of different tumour-derived omics data (such as genomics, epigenetics, fragmentomics, and proteomics) from body fluids for cancer detection and monitoring could outperform the analysis of single modality data alone. In this review, we focussed on the discussion of early cancer detection and molecular residual disease surveillance based on multi-omics data of blood. We summarised diverse types of tumour-derived components, current popular platforms for profiling cancer-associated signals, machine learning approaches for joint analysis of liquid biopsy data, as well as multi-omics-based early detection of cancers, molecular residual disease monitoring, and treatment response surveillance. We also discussed the challenges and future directions of multi-omics-based liquid biopsy. With the development of both experimental protocols and computational methods dedicated to liquid biopsy, the implementation of multi-omics strategies into the clinical workflow will likely benefit the clinical management of cancers including decision-making guidance and patient outcome improvement.

The Application of Nanotechnology for Quantification of Circulating Tumour DNA in Liquid Biopsies: A Systematic Review

Technologies for quantifying circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in liquid biopsies could enable real-time measurements of cancer progression, profoundly impacting patient care. Sequencing methods can be too complex and time-consuming for regular point-of-care monitoring, but nanotechnology offers an alternative, harnessing the unique properties of objects tens to hundreds of nanometres in size. This systematic review was performed to identify all examples of nanotechnology-based ctDNA detection and assess their potential for clinical use. Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Patents, Espacenet and Embase/MEDLINE were searched up to 23rd March 2021. The review identified nanotechnology-based methods for ctDNA detection for which quantitative measures (e.g., limit of detection, LOD) were reported and biologically relevant samples were used. The pre-defined inclusion criteria were met by 66 records. LODs ranged from 10 zM to 50nM. 25 records presented an LOD of 10fM or below. Nanotechnology-based approaches could provide the basis for the next wave of advances in ctDNA diagnostics, enabling analysis at the point-of-care, but none are currently used clinically. Further work is needed in development and validation; trade-offs are expected between different performance measures e.g., number of sequences detected and time to result.

Circulation tumour DNA in predicting recurrence and prognosis in operable colorectal cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Selecting the appropriate patient for further treatment after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) can improve the patient's prognosis. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to predict recurrence and prognosis after CRC surgery and ACT, but the results are still inconclusive.

OBJECTIVES

As the completed studies have small sample sizes and different experimental methods, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the ctDNA on recurrence and prognosis after CRC surgery and ACT.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for potentially eligible studies published up to 6 March 2022. Pooled relative risk (RR) and pooled hazard ratio (HR) were calculated to evaluate recurrence and the prognosis of recurrence-free survival (RFS) following CRC surgery and ACT.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies published between 2014 and 2022 included 2393 patients, and 7189 serum samples were eventually included in the meta-analysis. The pooled revealed that ctDNA-positive patients were at high risk of recurrence after CRC surgery (RR = 4.43, 95% CI: 3.58-5.48, p < .05) and had a poorer prognosis for RFS (HR = 7.26, 95% CI: 5.48-9.62, p < .05). The pooled revealed that ctDNA-positive patients were at high risk of recurrence after ACT (RR = 5.77 95% CI: 4.33-7.69, p < .05) and had a poorer prognosis for RFS (HR = 13.96, 95% CI: 8.71-22.4, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

ctDNA-positive patients were at a high risk of recurrence after CRC surgery and ACT and had a poorer prognosis. Hence, ctDNA-positive patients required close follow-up and further treatments.

[hPG80 and cancer: A new blood biomarker in development for patient monitoring]

Recent technological advances coupled with our improved understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with cancer development have enabled better overall patient care. Among the newly identified biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA or circulating tumor cells, hPG₈₀ (circulating progastrin) that is easy to detect and quantify by a simple ELISA assay has the potential to become a new routine clinical tool in oncology if on-going studies validated its utility. Indeed, on the one hand, hPG₈₀ was found in the blood of patients with different tumors (colorectal, pancreatic, liver, lung, stomach, kidney cancers) at a significantly higher concentration than in healthy donors. Moreover, some studies suggested a potential association between hPG₈₀ concentration changes and anti-cancer treatment efficacy in patients with gastro-intestinal and hepatocellular carcinomas. Finally, hPG₈₀ might be a prognostic factor for overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma cancer (mRCC) and in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). If these hypotheses were validated, hPG₈₀ might help better stratify patients according to their prognosis, and also become a tool to monitor relapse and predict treatment response. Prospective validation studies are on-going.

Ongoing and evolving clinical trials enhancing future colorectal cancer treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Molecular profiling has led to significantly longer survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Clinical guidelines recommend testing for KRAS/NRAS, BRAF and MSI status and over the last few years several promising new biomarkers have also been identified. Circulating tumor DNA has reshaped the prognosis of localized CRC. These genomic findings can guide treatment management to improve clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

Preclinical and clinical data over the last decade were reviewed for known and novel biomarkers with clinical implications in refractory and metastatic CRC. In the localized stage, al clinical trials involving new approaches such as liquid biopsy or neoadjuvant immunotherapy are also discussed. Molecular alterations and targeted agents are described, and data from completed and ongoing studies with targeted therapy and immunotherapies are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

The implementation of liquid biopsies in the localized CRC setting has reshaped management of this disease. The expanded use of biomarkers to guide the treatment of patients with CRC has revealed a level of complexity arising from interactions between different biomarkers. Prevalence of most established targetable biomarkers is low, however the number of identified biomarkers in CRC is increasing. Thus, metastatic CRC may ultimately be considered an umbrella diagnosis encompassing numerous rare disease subtypes.