Playing on the Dark Side: SMYD3 Acts as a Cancer Genome Keeper in Gastrointestinal Malignancies

The novel SMYD3 inhibitor EM127 impairs DNA repair response to chemotherapy-induced DNA damage and reverses cancer chemoresistance

BACKGROUND

SMYD3 has been found implicated in cancer progression. Its overexpression correlates with cancer growth and invasion, especially in gastrointestinal tumors. SMYD3 transactivates multiple oncogenic mechanisms, favoring cancer development. Moreover, it was recently shown that SMYD3 is required for DNA restoration by promoting homologous recombination (HR) repair.

METHODS

In cellulo and in vivo models were employed to investigate the role of SMYD3 in cancer chemoresistance. Analyses of SMYD3-KO cells, drug-resistant cancer cell lines, patients' residual gastric or rectal tumors that were resected after neoadjuvant therapy and mice models were performed. In addition, the novel SMYD3 covalent inhibitor EM127 was used to evaluate the impact of manipulating SMYD3 activity on the sensitization of cancer cell lines, tumorspheres and cancer murine models to chemotherapeutics (CHTs).

RESULTS

Here we report that SMYD3 mediates cancer cell sensitivity to CHTs. Indeed, cancer cells lacking SMYD3 functions showed increased responsiveness to CHTs, while restoring its expression promoted chemoresistance. Specifically, SMYD3 is essential for the repair of CHT-induced double-strand breaks as it methylates the upstream sensor ATM and allows HR cascade propagation through CHK2 and p53 phosphorylation, thereby promoting cancer cell survival. SMYD3 inhibition with the novel compound EM127 showed a synergistic effect with CHTs in colorectal, gastric, and breast cancer cells, tumorspheres, and preclinical colorectal cancer models.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results show that targeting SMYD3 may be an effective therapeutic strategy to overcome chemoresistance.

SMYD3 Modulates the HGF/MET Signaling Pathway in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most deadly cancer worldwide. Considerable efforts have been made to find targetable drivers in order to improve patient outcomes. MET is one of the most important factors involved in GC initiation and progression as it plays a major role in GC invasiveness and is related to cancer stemness. Unfortunately, treatment strategies targeting MET are still limited, with a proportion of patients responding to therapy but later developing resistance. Here, we showed that MET is a molecular partner of the SMYD3 methyltransferase in GC cells. Moreover, we found that SMYD3 pharmacological inhibition affects the HGF/MET downstream signaling pathway. Extensive cellular analyses in GC models indicated that EM127, a novel active site-selective covalent SMYD3 inhibitor, can be used as part of a synergistic approach with MET inhibitors in order to enhance the targeting of the HGF/MET pathway. Importantly, our data were confirmed in a 3D GC cell culture system, which was used as a surrogate to evaluate stemness characteristics. Our findings identify SMYD3 as a promising therapeutic target to impair the HGF/MET pathway for the treatment of GC.

Histone and DNA Methylation as Epigenetic Regulators of DNA Damage Repair in Gastric Cancer and Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities

Gastric cancer (GC), one of the most common malignancies worldwide, is a heterogeneous disease developing from the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes. One of the most critical epigenetic alterations in GC is DNA and histone methylation, which affects multiple processes in the cell nucleus, including gene expression and DNA damage repair (DDR). Indeed, the aberrant expression of histone methyltransferases and demethylases influences chromatin accessibility to the DNA repair machinery; moreover, overexpression of DNA methyltransferases results in promoter hypermethylation, which can suppress the transcription of genes involved in DNA repair. Several DDR mechanisms have been recognized so far, with homologous recombination (HR) being the main pathway involved in the repair of double-strand breaks. An increasing number of defective HR genes are emerging in GC, resulting in the identification of important determinants of therapeutic response to DDR inhibitors. This review describes how both histone and DNA methylation affect DDR in the context of GC and discusses how alterations in DDR can help identify new molecular targets to devise more effective therapeutic strategies for GC, with a particular focus on HR-deficient tumors.

The chromatin remodeling factors EP300 and TRRAP are novel SMYD3 interactors involved in the emerging 'nonmutational epigenetic reprogramming' cancer hallmark

SMDY3 is a histone-lysine N-methyltransferase involved in several oncogenic processes and is believed to play a major role in various cancer hallmarks. Recently, we identified ATM, BRCA2, CHK2, MTOR, BLM, MET, AMPK, and p130 as direct SMYD3 interactors by taking advantage of a library of rare tripeptides, which we first tested for their in vitro binding affinity to SMYD3 and then used as in silico probes to systematically search the human proteome. Here, we used this innovative approach to identify further SMYD3-interacting proteins involved in crucial cancer pathways and found that the chromatin remodeling factors EP300 and TRRAP interact directly with SMYD3, thus linking SMYD3 to the emerging 'nonmutational epigenetic reprogramming' cancer hallmark. Of note, we validated these interactions in gastrointestinal cancer cell lines, including HCT-116 cells, which harbor a C-terminal truncating mutation in EP300, suggesting that EP300 binds to SMYD3 via its N-terminal region. While additional studies are required to ascertain the functional mechanisms underlying these interactions and their significance, the identification of two novel SMYD3 interactors involved in epigenetic cancer hallmark pathways adds important pieces to the puzzle of how SMYD3 exerts its oncogenic role.

SMYD3 regulates gastric cancer progression and macrophage polarization through EZH2 methylation

SET and MYND domain-containing protein 3 (SMYD3), a known histone methyltransferase, was reported to regulate cancer pathogenesis. However, its role in gastric development and progression remains unclear. EZH2 methylation had been associated with cancer metastasis, but the EZH2 methylation status in gastric cancer (GC) is unknown. Here, we report that EZH2 K421 methylation was responsible for gastric cancer cell soft agar colony formation, in vivo metastasis, and macrophage polarization. Mechanically, we identified SMYD3 as the methyltransferase of EZH2 at K421 residue which accelerates EZH2 Ubiquitin proteasome degradation. Cell harboring non-methylated EZH2 mutants promotes gastric cancer cell metastasis. Taken together, our results showed that SMYD3-EZH2 axis restricts gastric cancer metastasis via integrating epigenetic signaling.

SMYD3 promotes aerobic glycolysis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma via H3K4me3-mediated PKM2 transcription

Genetic abnormalities in histone methyltransferases (HMTs) frequently occur in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and are related to its progression. SET and MYND domain containing 3 (SMYD3) is an HMT that is upregulated in various tumors and promotes their malignancy. However, to the best of our knowledge, the function of SMYD3 in DLBCL has not been investigated thus far. In the present study, 22 HMT genes related to cancer development were first selected according to current literature, and it was found that high SMYD3 expression was significantly associated with poor progression-free survival in patients with DLBCL. SMYD3 protein levels were upregulated and positively associated with poor prognosis and poor responsiveness to chemotherapy in patients with DLBCL. Functional examinations demonstrated that SMYD3 increased cell proliferation and the flux of aerobic glycolysis in DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo and decreased cell sensitivity to doxorubicin in vitro. Moreover, SMYD3 could directly bind to specific sequences of Pyruvate Kinase M2 (PKM2) and promote DLBCL cell proliferation and aerobic glycolysis via H3K4me3-mediated PKM2 transcription. Clinically, SMYD3 expression positively correlated with that of PKM2, and high SMYD3 was significantly associated with high maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) detected by [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) in DLBCL samples. Concomitant expression of SMYD3 and PKM2 positively correlated with poor progression-free and overall survival in patients with DLBCL and may serve as novel biomarkers in DLBCL.

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of SMYD3 in Human Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Dysregulation of the SET and MYND domain-containing protein 3 (SMYD3) has been found in multiple cancers. This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the association between SMYD3 expression and clinical outcomes in cancer. Methods: A systematic search of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI was conducted. The relationship between SMYD3 expression and cancer patients' overall survival (OS) was evaluated using pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding confidence intervals (95% CIs). The association between SMYD3 expression and clinicopathological features was assessed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs, including tumor size, lymph node metastasis (LNM), distance metastasis, and TNM stage. Results: In total, 715 cancer patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, glioma, colorectal cancer, and/or bladder cancer from seven studies were included in our meta-analysis. SMYD3 overexpression was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.38-2.37, p < 0.01) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0.0%, p = 0.929) in various cancers. Subgroup analysis showed that the prognostic value of SMYD3 across multiple tumors was constant as the tumor type, sample size, and methods of data extraction changed. Increased SMYD3 expression was positively associated with LNM (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.33-2.66, p < 0.001), tumor size (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.09-2.60, p = 0.019), and advanced TNM stage (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.25-2.69, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Upregulation of SMYD3 was significantly associated with poor prognosis in various cancers, suggesting that SMYD3 may be a useful prognostic biomarker.

Identifying novel SMYD3 interactors on the trail of cancer hallmarks

SMYD3 overexpression in several human cancers highlights its crucial role in carcinogenesis. Nonetheless, SMYD3 specific activity in cancer development and progression is currently under debate. Taking advantage of a library of rare tripeptides, which we first tested for their in vitro binding affinity to SMYD3 and then used as in silico probes, we recently identified BRCA2, ATM, and CHK2 as direct SMYD3 interactors. To gain insight into novel SMYD3 cancer-related roles, here we performed a comprehensive in silico analysis to cluster all potential SMYD3-interacting proteins identified by screening the human proteome for the previously tested tripeptides, based on their involvement in cancer hallmarks. Remarkably, we identified mTOR, BLM, MET, AMPK, and p130 as new SMYD3 interactors implicated in cancer processes. Further studies are needed to characterize the functional mechanisms underlying these interactions. Still, these findings could be useful to devise novel therapeutic strategies based on the combined inhibition of SMYD3 and its newly identified molecular partners. Of note, our in silico methodology may be useful to search for unidentified interactors of other proteins of interest.