Philadelphia-Negative Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Future Scenarios

Epidemiology and disease characteristics of myelofibrosis: a comparative analysis between Italy and global perspectives

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic stem cells characterized by altered bone marrow function and fibrosis. The aim of this narrative review is to report on the most recent epidemiologic data and to discuss features of MF and current strategies for the management of this condition in clinical practice. MF features covered by our review will include: characteristics of patients with MF; myeloproliferative and myelodepletive phenotypes; MF-associated thrombosis and bleeding; risk of infections; prefibrotic and overt PMF; secondary MF. Finally, we will discuss a few aspects of MF management in clinical practice and suggest strategies for its optimization and standardization. The focus of our paper is on Italy, but relevant data from other countries will also be reviewed.

Ten years of treatment with ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: a review of safety

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, anemia, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and splenomegaly. Patients with MF are at risk for reduced survival versus the general population and often experience burdensome signs and symptoms that reduce quality of life. The oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib was initially approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011 for the treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk MF, including primary MF, post-polycythemia vera MF, and post-essential thrombocythemia MF, based on efficacy and safety findings from the randomized, controlled, phase 3 COMFORT trials. Over a decade later, ruxolitinib continues to be the standard of care in higher-risk MF, and dose optimization and management remain crucial for safely maximizing clinical benefits of ruxolitinib. This review summarizes the safety profile of ruxolitinib in patients with MF in the COMFORT trials leading up to approval and in the subsequent JUMP, ROBUST, EXPAND, and REALISE trials; in pooled analyses; and in postmarketing analyses in the 10 years following approval. There is a focus on the occurrence of common hematologic and nonhematologic adverse events, with guidance provided on the management of patients with anemia or thrombocytopenia, including dosing strategies based on findings from the REALISE and EXPAND trials. Finally, to ensure a greater understanding of the safety profile of ruxolitinib, practical considerations are discussed.

Ten years after ruxolitinib approval for myelofibrosis: a review of clinical efficacy

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, abnormal cytokine expression, cytopenias, and progressive bone marrow fibrosis. The disease often manifests with burdensome symptoms and is associated with reduced survival. Ruxolitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2 inhibitor, was the first agent approved for MF. As a first-in-class targeted treatment, ruxolitinib approval transformed the MF treatment approach and remains standard of care. In addition, targeted inhibition of JAK1/JAK2 signaling, a key molecular pathway underlying MF pathogenesis, and the large volume of literature evaluating ruxolitinib, have led to a better understanding of the disease and improved management in general. Here we review ruxolitinib efficacy in patients with MF in the 10 years following approval, including demonstration of clinical benefit in the phase 3 COMFORT-I/II trials, real-world evidence, translational studies, and expanded access data. Lastly, future directions for MF treatment are discussed, including ruxolitinib-based combination therapies.

Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm follow-up: when the phone rings. Changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and patient satisfaction. Experience in 30 health centers in Spain

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has favored the expansion of telemedicine. Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPN) might be good candidates for virtual follow-up. In this study, we aimed to analyze the follow-up of patients with Ph-MPN in Spain during COVID-19, its effectiveness, and acceptance among patients. We present a multicenter retrospective study from 30 centers. Five hundred forty-one patients were included with a median age of 67 years (yr). With a median follow-up of 19 months, 4410 appointments were recorded. The median of visits per patient was 7 and median periodicity was 2.7 months; significantly more visits and a higher frequency of them were registered in myelofibrosis (MF) patients. 60.1% of visits were in-person, 39.5% were by telephone, and 0.3% were videocall visits, with a predominance of telephone visits for essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) patients over MF, as well as for younger patients (< 50 yr). The proportion of phone visits significantly decreased after the first semester of the pandemic. Pharmacological modifications were performed only in 25.7% of the visits, and, considering overall management, ET patients needed fewer global treatment changes. Telephone contact effectiveness reached 90% and only 5.4% required a complementary in-person appointment. Although 56.2% of the cohort preferred in-person visits, 90.5% of our patients claimed to be satisfied with follow-up during the pandemic, with an 83% of positive comments. In view of our results, telemedicine has proven effective and efficient, and might continue to play a complementary role in Ph-MPN patients' follow-up.

Fedratinib, the first selective JAK2 inhibitor approved for treatment of myelofibrosis - an option beyond ruxolitinib

Introduction: Myelofibrosis, a life shortening clonal disorder, presents with a constellation of features: bone marrow fibrosis, abnormal blood counts, extramedullary hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, thrombohemorrhagic complications and constitutional symptoms. Until recently Ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and 2 inhibitor, has been the only targeted therapy available for transplant-ineligible patients requiring treatment for splenomegaly and disease related symptoms. However, most patients discontinue Ruxolitinib after 3-5 years, mostly due to loss of response. There has been an unmet need for this patient group. In August 2019 Fedratinib (INREBIC® capsules, Impact Biomedicines, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Meyer Squibb), a JAK2 inhibitor, was approved by US FDA for treatment of myelofibrosis in both JAK inhibitor naïve and pre-treated patients for the management of symptoms and splenomegaly.Areas covered: Here, we discuss the development, evidence base to date for Fedratinib. Including early and late phase, and ongoing trials, safety issues, potential role and current position of Fedratinib in the treatment of myelofibrosis, as well as future direction of targeted therapy in myelofibrosis.Expert opinion: Fedratinib presents a much needed option of treatment, particularly, for patients failing Ruxolitinib, with response rates that are quite similar. Nonetheless, there remain important questions including sequencing and options for combining therapy.

Analysis of the Clinical Significance and Safety of Interferon in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloproliferative Tumors

Objective

To investigate the clinical significance and safety of interferon in the treatment of chronic myeloproliferative tumors (MPN).

Methods

In this prospective study, a total of 120 patients with advanced chronic MPN admitted to our hospital between April 2016 and August 2020 were assessed for eligibility and recruited, including 62 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET (ET group) and 58 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV (PV group). 62 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET were assigned (1 : 1) to receive interferon-α (IFN-α) or hydroxyurea (HU). A similar subgrouping method for treatment of IFN-α and HU was introduced to patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV. Outcome measures included efficacy and adverse reactions.

Results

For patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET and PV, there were no significant differences in the overall response rate between the groups treated with IFN-α or HU (P > 0.05); however, the patients treated with IFN-α had a significantly higher 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with HU (P < 0.05). IFN-α was associated with a significantly lower incidence of disease progression, thrombotic events, splenomegaly, myelofibrosis, nausea, and vomiting and a higher incidence of hematological adverse reactions and flu-like symptoms versus HU (P < 0.05). After six months of treatment, the PV group had 12 cases of hematological response both in the IFN-α subgroup and the HU subgroup and fewer PV patients treated with IFN-α required phlebotomy versus those treated with HU (P < 0.05), in which 4 patients in the IFN-α subgroup had no hematological response and 6 patients in the HU subgroup had no hematological response. There was no significant difference in the number of cases with phlebotomy between the two subgroups of PV patients without hematological response (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of IFN in the treatment of JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET and PV patients yields a prominent clinical effect by prolonging PFS and avoiding phlebotomy for JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV patients.

MPN and thrombosis was hard enough . . . now there's COVID-19 thrombosis too

Both myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are characterized by an intrinsic thrombotic risk. Little is known about the incidence and the outcome of thrombotic events in patients with MPN infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but common mechanisms of coagulation activation, typical of both disorders, suggest that these patients can be at particularly high risk. To define the best thromboprophylaxis and treatment regimens in both MPN and COVID-19, individual- and disease-specific thrombotic risk factors, bleeding risk, and concomitant specific treatments need to be considered. In this case-based review, an individualized approach is presented in a case of SARS-CoV-2 infection occurring in a man with polycythemia vera (PV). A primary anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis strategy and adjustment of his PV treatment were implemented. However, during the hospital stay, he experienced pulmonary embolism and therapeutic anticoagulation had to be set. Then his condition improved, and discharge was planned. Postdischarge decisions had to be made about the type and duration of venous thromboembolism treatment as well as the management of PV-specific drugs. The steps of our decisions and recommendations are presented.