Surgical Therapy of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-Current Standards and Future Perspectives

Total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Thoracic esophageal cancer surgery using robotic approaches for the thoracic and abdominal parts has recently been reported as total robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). We herein present the first report of a new technique for esophageal cancer: total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method.

METHODS

We reviewed 20 patients who underwent total RAMIE with 3FLND by a simultaneous two-team approach at the National Cancer Center East Hospital from March 2023 to September 2023. Short-term surgical outcomes and the safety and efficacy of this technique were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean operative time for abdominal surgery with this new docking technique was 135 ± 19.6 min. The total operative time was 488 ± 42.9 min, and the time from the end of abdominal manipulation to the end of surgery was 80.1 ± 15.6 min. The intraoperative blood loss was 116.7 ± 64.4 mL. The incidence of anastomotic leakage, postoperative vocal cord paralysis, and postoperative pneumonia was 10%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (range 11-63 days). No in-hospital deaths occurred, and R0 resection was possible in all cases. The average number of lymph nodes dissected was 87.7.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that total RAMIE with a simultaneous two-team approach using the new docking method can be safely introduced. The simultaneous cervical and abdominal manipulation with the new docking method allowed total RAMIE without prolonging the operating time, suggesting that it may be a valuable approach for esophageal cancer surgery.

Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome

BACKGROUND

Currently, little is known regarding the optimal technique for the abdominal phase of RAMIE. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in both the abdominal and thoracic phase (full RAMIE) compared to laparoscopy during the abdominal phase (hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE).

METHODS

This retrospective propensity-score matched analysis of the International Upper Gastrointestinal International Robotic Association (UGIRA) database included 807 RAMIE procedures with intrathoracic anastomosis between 2017 and 2021 from 23 centers.

RESULTS

After propensity-score matching, 296 hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE patients were compared to 296 full RAMIE patients. Both groups were equal regarding intraoperative blood loss (median 200 ml versus 197 ml, p = 0.6967), operational time (mean 430.3 min versus 417.7 min, p = 0.1032), conversion rate during abdominal phase (2.4% versus 1.7%, p = 0.560), radical resection (R0) rate (95.6% versus 96.3%, p = 0.8526) and total lymph node yield (mean 30.4 versus 29.5, p = 0.3834). The hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE group showed higher rates of anastomotic leakage (28.0% versus 16.6%, p = 0.001) and Clavien Dindo grade 3a or higher (45.3% versus 26.0%, p < 0.001). The length of stay on intensive care unit (median 3 days versus 2 days, p = 0.0005) and in-hospital (median 15 days versus 12 days, p < 0.0001) were longer for the hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE and full RAMIE were oncologically equivalent with a potential decrease of postoperative complications and shorter (intensive care) stay after full RAMIE.

[Video-assisted Double-lumen Tubes in Robot-assisted Oesophageal Surgery]

Robot-assisted esophagectomies are still considered high-risk procedures requiring complex surgical and anesthesiological planning and coordination. The operative space during the thoracic operative part is created by one-lung ventilation. Due to special patient positioning and intraoperative repositioning maneuvers, however, access to patient airway or double-lumen tube manipulation, if necessary, is only possible to a certain extent. In this work, we present our experiences establishing a video-guided double-lumen tube for esophageal surgery. From our point of view, the use of video-guided double-lumen tubes is very suitable increasing patient safety and coordination in the operational team during esophagectomy.

Controlling Nutritional Status Score Serves as a Prognosticator in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Optimal Timing of Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment

BACKGROUND

Usefulness of various nutritional indices for management of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been reported. Although Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is among promising indices to predict outcome, the optimal timing for its measurement during the perioperative period remains unknown. Here the prognostic value of the CONUT score was assessed among patients with ESCC.

METHODS

We analyzed 464 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy of ESCC, of which 276 patients were treated with neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The significance of the associations between candidate parameters including the CONUT score and postoperative prognosis were evaluated.

RESULT

Among the 25 candidate predictors, the preoperative CONUT score had the highest correlation with overall survival (OS) after surgery. Patients were categorized as follows: normal, mild, and moderate or severe, on the basis of the preoperative CONUT score. OS was significantly shortened as the CONUT score worsened. Multivariable analysis revealed that the CONUT scores of the subgroups mild (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.69) and moderate or severe (HR 2.18) were independent predictors of poor prognosis for OS. Furthermore, in an analysis limited to patients who underwent NAT, OS was significantly shortened as the preoperative CONUT score worsened. On the contrary, there was no significant difference in RFS among patient groups stratified by the CONUT score determined before NAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that the preoperative CONUT score serves as a prognosticator in resectable ESCC. The preoperative CONUT value was more useful than that before NAT in patients administered NAT.