Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in the Treatment of Gastro-Esophageal Cancer: A Closer Look at the Emerging Evidence

Immune-related adverse events not associated with survival in advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal cancers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in the treatment of gastric and oesophageal cancers (GEC). Despite their promising efficacy, ICIs have been associated with unique side effects known as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Several studies have shown improved treatment responses in patients with IRAEs compared to those without IRAEs in various cancer types such as melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. We performed a single-institution retrospective study to characterize IRAE incidence and association with treatment response in advanced GEC. We identified 70 patients with GEC who received ICI therapy; 20 (29%) developed an IRAE of any magnitude. The most common were colitis (35%) hypothyroidism (25%) and pneumonitis (20%). Median PFS and OS were not statistically different between IRAE and nonIRAE groups (10.4 vs. 11.3 months p = 0.6 and 11.0 vs. 12.9 months p = 1.0, respectively). This is in contrast to studies in other cancer types that have suggested association between IRAE and improved outcomes.

Integrative analyses of bulk and single-cell RNA-seq reveals the correlation between SPP1+ macrophages and resistance to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) has significant implications for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, its clinical efficacy varies considerably among patients, necessitating further investigation into the underlying mechanisms. The rapid advancement of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology facilitates the analysis of patient heterogeneity at the cellular level, particularly regarding treatment outcomes. In this study, we first analyzed scRNA-seq data of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following NACI, obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. After performing dimensionality reduction, clustering, and annotation on the scRNA-seq data, we employed CellChat to investigate differences in cell-cell communication among samples from distinct efficacy groups. The results indicated that macrophages in the non-responder exhibited stronger cell communication intensity compared to those in responders, with SPP1 and GALECTIN signals showing the most significant differences between the two groups. This finding underscores the crucial role of macrophages in the efficacy of NACI. Subsequently, reclustering of macrophages revealed that Mac-SPP1 may be primarily responsible for treatment resistance, while Mac-C1QC appears to promote T cell activation. Finally, we conducted transcriptome sequencing on ESCC tissues obtained from 32 patients who underwent surgery following NACI. Utilizing CIBERSORT, CIBERSORTx, and WGCNA, we analyzed the heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment among different efficacy groups and validated the correlation between SPP1+ macrophages and resistance to NACI in ESCC using publicly available transcriptome sequencing datasets. These findings suggest that SPP1+ macrophages may represent a key factor contributing to resistance against NACI in ESCC.

Who Should Receive Immunotherapy for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer?

OPINION STATEMENT

This paper shines a light on the exciting progress being made in using immunotherapy to treat advanced gastroesophageal cancers. The positive results from trials using drugs like Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab are certainly encouraging and open new possibilities for treating this challenging disease. However, it is clear that we still have a lot to learn about how to predict which patients will benefit most from these treatments. The exploration of combining therapies and using machine learning to guide treatment shows promise. Moving forward, it is crucial that researchers and healthcare professionals continue to work together, sharing knowledge and findings to continue the advancements in this important area.

Use of Real-World Evidence in a Virtual Bridging Analysis for a Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Gastric Cancer

This study bridged pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety clinical trial data from Japan to a Western population using real-world evidence (RWE) to investigate the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer. Using population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response (efficacy/safety) models, exposure-efficacy data from 117 patients and exposure-safety data from 158 patients in Japan who received T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg as second-line or later treatment were bridged to RWE including covariate information from 25 Western patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer who received second-line or later T-DXd treatment. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated that intact T-DXd and released drug (DXd) steady-state exposures were comparable between Western patients and patients from Japan; the Western/Japan ratio of exposure medians ranged from 0.82 (T-DXd steady-state minimum concentration) to 1.18 (DXd steady-state maximum concentration). Exposure-efficacy simulations estimated a confirmed objective response rate of 28.6% (90% confidence interval, 20.8-38.4) in real-world Western patients versus 40.1% (90% confidence interval, 33.5-47.0) in patients from Japan, possibly because of checkpoint inhibitor use in 4% versus 30% of patients, respectively. Western patients had a higher estimated rate of serious adverse events than patients from Japan (42.2% vs 34.6%); however, the rate of interstitial lung disease was lower (less than 10%) in Western patients. Overall, T-DXd was predicted to have meaningful clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in Western patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. Using RWE, bridging analysis supported US approval of T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg in advanced gastric cancer before a clinical trial was completed in Western patients.

Editorial: Bio-Pathological Markers in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Cancer

Identifying novel biomarkers with diagnostic, prognostic and predictive value in terms of therapeutic response is a current topic in the clinical practice of oncologists, pathologists and medical researchers in general [...].

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in resectable gastroesophageal cancers - a review

Gastroesophageal cancers (GEC) have a poor survival rate of 20–30% at 5 years, often due to delayed presentations. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery are widely used as the standard of care for patients with resectable GEC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival in metastatic and recurrent GEC which led to their application in resectable GEC. Based on the pivotal CheckMate 577 study results, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved nivolumab for patients with completely resected high-risk esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). Several ongoing trials with many ICIs could potentially improve resectable GEC outcomes. This review explores the rationale for using ICIs in resectable GEC and discusses the significance of reported clinical trials. Finally, we will examine some ongoing clinical trials and the challenges as well as prospects of ICIs in resectable GEC.