Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics for the Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Deciphering the Prognostic Efficacy of MRI Radiomics in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis investigates the prognostic value of MRI-based radiomics in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment outcomes, specifically focusing on overall survival (OS) variability. The study protocol was registered with INPLASY (INPLASY202420101). Initially, a systematic review identified 15 relevant studies involving 6243 patients through a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), highlighting a low risk of bias in most domains. Our analysis revealed a significant average concordance index (c-index) of 72% across studies, indicating the potential of radiomics in clinical prognostication. However, moderate heterogeneity was observed, particularly in OS predictions. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression identified validation methods and radiomics software as significant heterogeneity moderators. Notably, the number of features in the prognosis model correlated positively with its performance. These findings suggest radiomics' promising role in enhancing cancer treatment strategies, though the observed heterogeneity and potential biases call for cautious interpretation and standardization in future research.

Prognostic Factors and Construction of Nomogram Prediction Model of Lung Cancer Patients Using Clinical and Blood Laboratory Parameters

Objective

This work aimed to explore the prognostic risk factors of lung cancer (LC) patients and establish a line chart prediction model.

Methods

A total of 322 LC patients were taken as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a training set (n = 202) and a validation set (n = 120). Basic information and laboratory indicators were collected, and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were followed up. Single-factor and cyclooxygenase (COX) multivariate analyses were performed on the training set to construct a Nomogram prediction model, which was validated with 120 patients in the validation set, and Harrell's consistency was analyzed.

Results

Single-factor analysis revealed significant differences in PFS (P<0.05) between genders, body mass index (BMI), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), treatment methods, treatment response evaluation, smoking status, presence of pericardial effusion, and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) at 0 and 1-50%. Significant differences in OS (P<0.05) were observed for age, tumor location, treatment methods, White blood cells (WBC), uric acid (UA), CA125, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), SCCA, cytokeratin fragment 21 (CYFRA21), and smoking status. COX analysis identified male gender, progressive disease (PD) as treatment response, and SCCA > 1.6 as risk factors for LC PFS. The consistency indices of the line chart models for predicting PFS and OS were 0.782 and 0.772, respectively.

Conclusion

Male gender, treatment response of PD, and SCCA > 1.6 are independent risk factors affecting the survival of LC patients. The PFS line chart model demonstrates good concordance.

Radiomics for predicting survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Radiomics has recently received considerable research attention for providing potential prognostic biomarkers for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the methodological quality and prognostic prediction value of radiomic studies for predicting survival outcomes in patients with LARC.

Methods

The Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched. The radiomics quality score (RQS), Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist, the Image Biomarkers Standardization Initiative (IBSI) guideline, and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were used to assess the quality of the selected studies. A further meta-analysis of hazard ratio (HR) regarding disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed.

Results

Among the 358 studies reported, 15 studies were selected for our review. The mean RQS score was 7.73±4.61 (21.5% of the ideal score of 36). The overall TRIPOD adherence rate was 64.4% (251/390). Most of the included studies (60%) were assessed as having a high risk of bias (ROB) overall. The pooled estimates of the HRs were 3.14 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.12-4.64, P<0.01] for DFS and 3.36 (95% CI: 1.74-6.49, P<0.01) for OS.

Conclusions

Radiomics has potential to noninvasively predict outcome in patients with LARC. However, the overall methodological quality of radiomics studies was low, and the adherence to the TRIPOD statement was moderate. Future radiomics research should put a greater focus on enhancing the methodological quality and considering the influence of higher-order features on reproducibility in radiomics.

An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level.

METHODS

A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of primary radiomics studies were included. Their reporting transparency, methodological quality, and risk of bias were assessed by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist, AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, version 2) tool, and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool, respectively. The evidence level supporting the radiomics for clinical use was rated.

RESULTS

We identified 44 systematic reviews with meta-analyses on radiomics research. The mean ± standard deviation of PRISMA adherence rate was 65 ± 9%. The AMSTAR-2 tool rated 5 and 39 systematic reviews as low and critically low confidence, respectively. The ROBIS assessment resulted low, unclear and high risk in 5, 11, and 28 systematic reviews, respectively. We reperformed 53 meta-analyses in 38 included systematic reviews. There were 3, 7, and 43 meta-analyses rated as convincing, highly suggestive, and weak levels of evidence, respectively. The convincing level of evidence was rated in (1) T2-FLAIR radiomics for IDH-mutant vs IDH-wide type differentiation in low-grade glioma, (2) CT radiomics for COVID-19 vs other viral pneumonia differentiation, and (3) MRI radiomics for high-grade glioma vs brain metastasis differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic reviews on radiomics were with suboptimal quality. A limited number of radiomics approaches were supported by convincing level of evidence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The evidence supporting the clinical application of radiomics are insufficient, calling for researches translating radiomics from an academic tool to a practicable adjunct towards clinical deployment.

Automatic tumor segmentation and metachronous single-organ metastasis prediction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Distant metastases is the main failure mode of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, early prediction of distant metastases in NPC is extremely challenging. Deep learning has made great progress in recent years. Relying on the rich data features of radiomics and the advantages of deep learning in image representation and intelligent learning, this study intends to explore and construct the metachronous single-organ metastases (MSOM) based on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.

Patients and methods

The magnetic resonance imaging data of 186 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma before treatment were collected, and the gross tumor volume (GTV) and metastatic lymph nodes (GTVln) prior to treatment were defined on T1WI, T2WI, and CE-T1WI. After image normalization, the deep learning platform Python (version 3.9.12) was used in Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS to construct automatic tumor detection and the MSOM prediction model.

Results

There were 85 of 186 patients who had MSOM (including 32 liver metastases, 25 lung metastases, and 28 bone metastases). The median time to MSOM was 13 months after treatment (7–36 months). The patients were randomly assigned to the training set (N = 140) and validation set (N = 46). By comparison, we found that the overall performance of the automatic tumor detection model based on CE-T1WI was the best (6). The performance of automatic detection for primary tumor (GTV) and lymph node gross tumor volume (GTVln) based on the CE-T1WI model was better than that of models based on T1WI and T2WI (AP@0.5 is 59.6 and 55.6). The prediction model based on CE-T1WI for MSOM prediction achieved the best overall performance, and it obtained the largest AUC value (AUC = 0.733) in the validation set. The precision, recall, precision, and AUC of the prediction model based on CE-T1WI are 0.727, 0.533, 0.730, and 0.733 (95% CI 0.557–0.909), respectively. When clinical data were added to the deep learning prediction model, a better performance of the model could be obtained; the AUC of the integrated model based on T2WI, T1WI, and CE-T1WI were 0.719, 0.738, and 0.775, respectively. By comparing the 3-year survival of high-risk and low-risk patients based on the fusion model, we found that the 3-year DMFS of low and high MSOM risk patients were 95% and 11.4%, respectively (p &lt; 0.001).

Conclusion

The intelligent prediction model based on magnetic resonance imaging alone or combined with clinical data achieves excellent performance in automatic tumor detection and MSOM prediction for NPC patients and is worthy of clinical application.

Survival rate prediction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on MRI and gene expression using a deep neural network

To achieve a better treatment regimen and follow-up assessment design for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-treated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, an accurate progression-free survival (PFS) time prediction algorithm is needed. We propose developing a PFS prediction model of NPC patients after IMRT treatment using a deep learning method and comparing that with the traditional texture analysis method. One hundred and fifty-one NPC patients were included in this retrospective study. T1-weighted, proton density and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired. The expression level of five genes (HIF-1α, EGFR, PTEN, Ki-67, and VEGF) and infection of Epstein-Barr (EB) virus were tested. A residual network was trained to predict PFS from MR images. The output as well as patient characteristics were combined using a linear regression model to provide a final PFS prediction. The prediction accuracy was compared with that of the traditional texture analysis method. A regression model combining the deep learning output with HIF-1α expression and Epstein-Barr infection provides the best PFS prediction accuracy (Spearman correlation R²  = 0.53; Harrell's C-index = 0.82; receiver operative curve [ROC] analysis area under the curve [AUC] = 0.88; log-rank test hazard ratio [HR] = 8.45), higher than a regression model combining texture analysis with HIF-1α expression (Spearman correlation R²  = 0.14; Harrell's C-index =0.68; ROC analysis AUC = 0.76; log-rank test HR = 2.85). The deep learning method does not require a manually drawn tumor region of interest. MR image processing using deep learning combined with patient characteristics can provide accurate PFS prediction for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and does not rely on specific kernels or tumor regions of interest, which is needed for the texture analysis method.

Radiomics in clinical trials: perspectives on standardization

The term biomarker is used to describe a biological measure of the disease behavior. The existing imaging biomarkers are associated with the known tissue biological characteristics and follow a well-established roadmap to be implemented in routine clinical practice. Recently, a new quantitative imaging analysis approach named radiomics has emerged. It refers to the extraction of a large number of advanced imaging features with high-throughput computing. Extensive research has demonstrated its value in predicting disease behavior, progression, and response to therapeutic options. However, there are numerous challenges to establishing it as a clinically viable solution, including lack of reproducibility and transparency. The data-driven nature also does not offer insights into the underpinning biology of the observed relationships. As such, additional effort is needed to establish it as a qualified biomarker to inform clinical decisions. Here we review the technical difficulties encountered in the clinical applications of radiomics and current effort in addressing some of these challenges in clinical trial designs. By addressing these challenges, the true potential of radiomics can be unleashed.

Frontiers and hotspots of 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics: A bibliometric analysis of the published literature

Objective

To illustrate the knowledge hotspots and cutting-edge research trends of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics, the knowledge structure of was systematically explored and the visualization map was analyzed.

Methods

Studies related to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics from 2013 to 2021 were identified and selected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) using retrieval formula based on an interview. Bibliometric methods are mainly performed by CiteSpace 5.8.R3, which we use to build knowledge structures including publications, collaborative and co-cited studies, burst analysis, and so on. The performance and relevance of countries, institutions, authors, and journals were measured by knowledge maps. The research foci were analyzed through research of keywords, as well as literature co-citation analysis. Predicting trends of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics in this field utilizes a citation burst detection method.

Results

Through a systematic literature search, 457 articles, which were mainly published in the United States (120 articles) and China (83 articles), were finally included in this study for analysis. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Southern Medical University are the most productive institutions, both with a frequency of 17. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics–related literature was frequently published with high citation in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (IF9.236, 2020), Frontiers in Oncology (IF6.244, 2020), and Cancers (IF6.639, 2020). Further cluster profile of keywords and literature revealed that the research hotspots were primarily concentrated in the fields of image, textural feature, and positron emission tomography, and the hot research disease is a malignant tumor. Document co-citation analysis suggested that many scholars have a co-citation relationship in studies related to imaging biomarkers, texture analysis, and immunotherapy simultaneously. Burst detection suggests that adenocarcinoma studies are frontiers in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics, and the landmark literature put emphasis on the reproducibility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics features.

Conclusion

First, this bibliometric study provides a new perspective on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics research, especially for clinicians and researchers providing scientific quantitative analysis to measure the performance and correlation of countries, institutions, authors, and journals. Above all, there will be a continuing growth in the number of publications and citations in the field of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Second, the international research frontiers lie in applying ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics to oncology research. Furthermore, new insights for researchers in future studies will be adenocarcinoma-related analyses. Moreover, our findings also offer suggestions for scholars to give attention to maintaining the reproducibility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics features.