The Impact of Surgical Practice on Oncological Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer, Spanish National Registry

Providing a standardised educational programme in robot-assisted gynaecological surgery

Standardisation of an educational programme in robotic gynaecological surgery requires careful reflection to ensure that the correct surgeons are selected, that they are trained to the best of their ability, and that they have continued education into their careers. The generally agreed pathways included a proficiency-based progression model for procedures with validated assessment tools used for both formative and summative assessment. For new surgeons, a basic and advanced curriculum is required, involving tools on how to use the instruments as well as educational lectures and simulation. For advanced learning, there is a need for proctorship. To maintain their skills, a surgeon should demonstrate a reflective practice and continued good outcomes while adhering to a process of credentialing. Trainers should be validated on their ability to teach based on recognised training-the-trainers courses.

Therapies in Cervical Cancer-Editorial

George Papanikolaou is famously quoted as saying "the first observation of cancer cells in the smear of the uterine cervix gave me one of the greatest thrills I ever experienced during my scientific career" [...].

SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy in centers with high compliance with ESGO quality indicators had a lower risk of recurrence and death.